1、 CIE 52 82 9006345 0002336 712 W COMMISSION IN TER NA TIONA L E DE L ECL AIRA GE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON IL LUMINATION INTERNA TIONA L E BEL EUCHTUNGSKOMMISSION CALC U LATI0 NS FOR INTERIOR LIGHTING APPLIED METHOD PUBLICATION CIE No 52 (TC-I .5) 1982 BUREAU CENTRAL DE LA CIE 52, BOULEVARD MALESH
2、ERBES 75008 PARIS - FRANCE COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Handling ServicesCIE 52 82 m 9006145 0002337 659 m This report has been prepared by CIE Technical Committee 4.1 Interior Lighting. It has been approved by the majority of the Technical Committee and
3、is recommended for study and application. This report is not an Officially Agreed CIE Recommendation approved by the National Committees of the Member Countries of the CIE. It should be noted that any recommendations in this report are advisory and not mandatory. The latest CIE Proceedings or CIE Bu
4、lletin should be consulted regarding the current status of this report and possible subsequent amendments. Ce rapport a t prpar par le Comit Technique 4.1 Eclairage Interieur de la CIE. I1 a t approuv par la majorit du Comit Technique et il est recommand pour tude et application. Ca rapport nest pas
5、 une Recommandation officielle de la CIE, approuve par les Comits Nationaux des Pays Membres de la CIE. I1 doit tre not que toute reconunandation y figurant est donne titre de conseil et non dobligation. En ce qui concerne la situation prsente de ce Rapport et dventuelles modifications, il faut cons
6、ulter le plus rcent Compte Rendu de Session ou Bulletin de la CIE. Dieser Bericht wurde vom Technischen Komitee 4.1 Innenbeleuchtung der CIE ausgearbeitet. Er wurde durch die Mehrheit des Technischen Komitees gebilligt und wird zum Studium und zur Anwendung empfohlen. Dieser Bericht ist keine offizi
7、ell anerkannte CIE-Empfehlung, der die Nationalen Komitees der Mitgliedslnder der CIE zugestimmt haben. Es sei darauf hingewiesen, dass jede Empfehlung in diesem Bericht als Anleitung dient und nicht verbindlich ist. Was den gegenwrtigen Status dieses Berichtes und mgliche Nachfolge-Ausgaben angeht,
8、 ziehe man die neuesten CIE-Tagungsberichte oder das CIE-Bulletin zu Rate. II Copyrigth : Cornniscion Internationale de 1Eclairage 1382 ISBN 92-9034-052-5 A COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Handling ServicesCIE 52 82 m 7006345 0002l13 595 Members of the Techn
9、ical Committee 1.5 at the time of preparation of this report were as follows: Chairman Secretary Members A.B. de Graaff (x) Mme. P. Chadvel (x) S. Harper K. Stolzenberg (x) R.O. Philips E. Wiesner P. Massart K. Bogatev t H.G. Bassett B.J. Jacobsen (XI S. Perez Cutillas R.E. Levin V. Ahponen J. Dourg
10、non A.R. Bean (XI T. LantOS J. Stroumsa C. Codegone R. Krossawa N. Utne Z. Cichocki R.P. Cardoso P. Militaru L. Starby S. Ondrejicka V.I. Petrov V. Planinsek Pays Bas France Afrique du sud Allemagne Australie Autriche Belgique Bulgarie Canada Danemark Espagne tats-Unis Finlande France Grande-Bretagn
11、e Hongrie Israel Italie Japon Norvge Pologne Portugal Roumanie Sulde Tchcoslovaquie U.R.S.S. Yougoslavie (x) denotes members who have actively taken part in the preparation of the present report. II I COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Handling ServicesCIE 52 8
12、2 m 9006145 0002337 421 m La mgthode prsente dans ce rapport est limite aux clairements moyens sur le plan utile,les murs et le plafond. I1 sagit dune mthode davant projet (choix de la rpartition lumineuse et de limplantation des luminaires capables de satisfaire les clairements exigs) aussi bien qu
13、e dune mthode de vrification (calcul des clairements dun projet ou dune installation ralise). La mthode se distingue de la plupart des mthode courantes par sa possibilit de tenir compte de linfluence de limplantation des luminaires. La mthode sappuksur la iulthode de Base (Publication CIE No. 40 (TC
14、-1.5) 1978) KURZFASCUNG Die vorliegende Methode beschrnkt sich auf mittleren Beleuchtungsstrken der Raumbegrenzungsflachen. Es ist sowohl eine Planungsmethode (Bestimmung von bentigterLichtverteilungund Anordnung der Leuchten erforderlich um spezifizierte Beleuchtungsstrken zu bekommen) wie eine Prf
15、ungsmethode (Berechnung der Beleuchtungsstrken fur einen Entwurf oder fr eine realisterte Anlage). Die Methode unterscheidet sich von den meisten Methoden dass sie die Mglichkeit bietet auch den Einflqss der Leuchtenanordnung Rechnung zu tragen. Die Methode basiert auf der Basis Methode (Publikation
16、 CIE No. 40 (TC-1.5) 1978) SUMMARY The method presented in this report deals with average illuminances at the working plane, walls and ceiling. It is a design method (determination of light distribution and arrangement of luminaires required for specified illuminances) as well as a verification meth
17、od (calculation of illuminances of a design ogof an existing installation). The method Is distinguished from most of the existing methods by its possibility to take into account the influence of the luminaire arrangement. The method is based on the Basic Method (Publication CIE No. 40 (TC- 1.5) 1978
18、). IV COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Handling Services CIE 52 82 I 900b145 0002L40 Lit3 I Table of contents part I - 1. Iptgouctio 1.1 the method 1.2 the presentation 2.- - - Ggngrgl-Cgnetogs- 2.1 maintenance factor 2.2 the use of suffixes 2.3 room surface
19、reflectances 2.4 the shape of the interior 2.5 interpolation 3.- - - Parpgtgrg affecting the illugipapces- 3.1 the installed luminous flux per square metre 3.2 the proportions of the interior 3.3 the zonal flux distribution of the luminaires 3.4 the geometry of the installation 3.5 the reflectances
20、of the surfaces 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 6.3 the photometric data of a luminaire the direct flux from a luminaire towards the working plane the direct flux from an installation towards the working plane the relations between direct fluxes and illuminances utilances classificat
21、ion of installations 4.6.1 classification procedure for one specific installation 4.6.2 classification procedure for one specific luminaire type in reference arrangements; the luminaire reference class set classification of luminaires 4.7.1 classification procedures optional photometric data of a lu
22、minaire - The-DSsAg-gn Method- determination of the required installation flux densities selection of the installation 5.2.1 specified luminaire arrangement, specified suspension ratio 5.2.2 luminaire arrangement not specified, specified suspension ratio 5.2.3 luminaire arrangement not specified, su
23、spension ratio not specified. - The-Vgrificgti-og Method- determination of the direct-ratio 6.1.1 calculation using the flux triplet 6.1.2 calculation using published reference direct-ratio values 6.1.3 calculation using published reference class set 6.1.4 calculation using published luminaire class
24、 determination of the reduced utilances 6.2.1 calculation using interreflection coefficients 6.2.2 calculation using utilance tables calculation of illuminances 9 9 9 9 9 10 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 20 21 22 22 23 24 1 COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Ha
25、ndling ServicesCIE 52 82 m OOb/Y5 0002LYL OBT m 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 2.- - 8.2 8.1 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 an installationwith luminaires in reference arrangement 7.1.1 general 7.1.2 design 7.1.3 verification an installation with luminaires not in reference arrangement 7.2.1 general 7.2.2 design
26、7.2.3 verification an installation with no specification of luminaire arrangement 7.3.1 general 7.3.2 design 7.3.3 verification an installation with no specification for its geometry 7.4.1 general 7.4.2 design 7.4.3 verification classification of an installation 7.5.1 luminaires in reference arrange
27、ment 7.5.2 luminaires not in reference arrangement classification of luminaires 7.6.1 the luminaire reference class set 7.6.2 the luminaire class determination of the correction factor for the direct-ratio 7.7.1 calculation using tabulated values 7.7.2 calculation using the basic method - ExigtinS M
28、erhodg utilization factor tables tables of reduced utilization factors the British method the French method the German method the U.S.A. Method comparison of results Page 25 25 27 29 31 37 38 40 43 43 43 44 45 45 46 47 2 50 COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Ha
29、ndling ServicesCIE 52 2 H 7006345 0002142 TL6 H Part II 20, - - - TegmAng lsy- az d-Sy for other arrangements of luminaires (on condition that they are regular and rectangular) a correction factor is applied to the direct flux of the reference arrangement. When using the Basic Method the direct flux
30、 of the installation must be calculated for each of its luminaires separately, which is a much more time consuming procedure. However, for irregular or non rectangular luminaire arrangements use of the Basic Method is the only approach open; for this reason, the geometric multipliers given in the Ba
31、sic Method are reproduced in this report. The combined effect of direct and reflected fluxes on the illuminances at the room surfaces i.e. ceiling, walls and working plane can, with the Applied Method, be rapidly calculated using utilances. These utilances are given in tables for ranges of values of
32、 the direct ratio. The procedure followed in the Basic Method for the calculation of these illuminances is necessarily protracted since it involves using a set of linear equations relating the direct fluxes per square meter tq the total illiuninance, and the applications of nine tabulated interrefle
33、ction coefficients. However, the Basic Method, which unlike the Applied Method does not rely onapproximated direct ratios, is the more accurate of the two methods. For this reason the interreflection coefficients from the Basic Method are reproduced in this report. In practice, the illuminances requ
34、ired at the room surfaces are given and the design of the installation will involve calculating the lumen output per luminaire and the flux distribution of the luminaire as a function of the luminaire arrangement needed to produce these specified illuminances. In general there will not be one unique
35、 solution, but different luminaires in different arrangements may lead to the same illuminances. Furthermore, since it is unlikely that a luminaire will be found that will give exactly the required lumen output and exactly the required flux distribution, a certain approximation to the specified illu
36、minance values is to be expected. For this reason, an inverse or(verification) calculation method is required in order to see which of the alternative solutions best meets the illuminance requirements specified. Both methods, the design method and the verification method, are given in this report. M
37、ost of the existing calculation methods deal only with the calculation of the illuminance at the working plane. With such methods the need to distinguish between a design method and a verification method is less apparent because only one relationship is involved, and this is used directly or inverse
38、ly as the occasion demands. For the calculation of the average illuminance at the working plane the use of utilization factor tables or of utilance tables is the most widely spread method. Similar procedures can be followed for the calculation of the illuminances at the walls and ceiling, although d
39、ue to the definitions of utilization factor and utilance new concepts had to be introduced (reduced utilization factor and reduced utilance) to permit of rapid calculations. Whereas (reduced) utilization factor tables are valid for one specific luminaire in one arrangement only, (reduced) utilance t
40、ables can be applied for a group of installations having approximately the same direct ratio values 4 COPYRIGHT International Commission on IlluminationLicensed by Information Handling ServicesCIE 52 82 9006145 0002L44 899 .For this reason (reduced) utilance tables are given in this report. Grouping
41、 installations for which the same utilance table is applicable is frequently referred to as classification. Instead of classification of installations some methods use a classification of luminaires in which luminaires with similar luminous flux distributions are grouped. In this report examples of
42、both a system of classification of installations and a system of classification of luminaires have been introduced. mutually compatible. They are not dissimilar to some of the The only data required on a luminaire for application of the values of its flux distribution - which are contained in its of
43、 its lamps. These systems are existing methods. Applied Method are five flux code - and the flux The Applied Method is meant to retain and combine all the good features of the existing procedures and methods. As illustrated in Chanter 8, within their domain of validity the various existing methods d
44、o not differ from each other and from the Applied Method in the results obtained. The Applied Method as presented does not pretend to be more accurate than existing methods but is primarily intended to extend the domain of validity and to stimulate international standardization. Parts of the Applied
45、 Method can be used in combination with existing methods. As explained above, two steps can be distinguished in the calculation procedure: firstly the determination of the direct flux to the working plane and secondly the combined effect of direct and reflected fluxes.If, for example, the direct flu
46、x has been determined by means o an existing method that deals with the calculation of the illuminance at the working plane, the data provided in this report can be used for the calculation of the illuminances at the other room surfaces, thus supplementing the existing method. The same principle can
47、 also be used to deal with installations having an obviously asymmetrical light distribution), one of the various existing methods having been used to calculate the direct flux. It is also possible to make the first step with an existing method, switch over to the Applied Method in order to calculat
48、e, for example, the effect of changing the luminaire arrangement, and then continue with the second step according to the existing method. This is possible because for the determination of the flux radiated towards the working plane use is made of the important feature of the Basic Method which is t
49、hat the data required to account for the effects of the light distribution and the geometry are given separately. For each of the room index values a reference arrangement has been defined(l0.3.6)l for which the average geometric multipliers havebeen tabulated. The effect of the geometry of an arbitrary regular, rectangular arrangement is accounted for by means of tabulated correction factors. The restrictions to the application of the Basic Method should be respected for the Applied Method as wel
