ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:3 ,大小:14.83KB ,
资源ID:1018080      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1018080.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(REG NASA-LLIS-0433-1996 Lessons Learned Voyager - Power Subsystem Power Distribution Flight Relay Procurement (~1975).pdf)为本站会员(progressking105)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

REG NASA-LLIS-0433-1996 Lessons Learned Voyager - Power Subsystem Power Distribution Flight Relay Procurement (~1975).pdf

1、Lessons Learned Entry: 0433Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 0433a71 Lesson Date: 1996-07-17a71 Submitting Organization: JPLa71 Submitted by: J.A. RobertsSubject: Voyager - Power Subsystem Power Distribution Flight Relay Procurement (1975) Abstract: Voyagers discovery of defective component lots in wel

2、ded module assemblies led to a re-procurement of the flight relays. For procurement of parts with a prior history of problem/failures, evaluate the design and workmanship of the current production and determine the need for JPL inspections and special screening tests.Description of Driving Event: (R

3、elevant Historical Lesson(s) Learned)During flight welded module fabrication (2) 3SBM relay failures occurred. One relay failed due to a shorted coil, the other failure was due to a broken weld. Subsequent JPL failure analysis on (14) additional flight relays showed failed conditions in one or more

4、of the armature positioning welds.An investigative team visited the vendor to review the failures and the relay manufacturing process/Quality Assurance (QA) controls. The welding process suffered from a component “fit“ problem, worn welding fixtures and an absence of weld schedules. The coil lead op

5、eration had no instructions that precluded the possibility of coil shorts. The QA coverage lacked a systematic method of keeping records and employing corrective action.Based on the deficiencies found in the manufacturing process and the inability to cull defective relays in a non-destructing manner

6、 from the existing flight lots, a re-procurement of flight relays was initiated. The modifications to the fabrication process include: (a) component part inspection prior to kitting, (b) development of weld schedules and weld inspection criteria, and (c) JPL inspection points established at critical

7、 stages of relay fabrication.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-NOTE: This component was selected from the JPL Preferred Parts List.Additional Keyword(s): Wire WeldingReference(s):PARs 36074, 36841, 36861; Part Failure analysis Reports 2

8、494, 2496, 2603, 2622; IOM #342-76-B-028, Johnson, H. L., “Disposition and Status of MJS77 Power Subsystem 3SBM Relay Problems,“ 5 February 1976.Lesson(s) Learned: The discovery of defective component lots in welded module assemblies or at any point subsequent to completion of flight hardware fabric

9、ation results in major program impacts. There are unavoidable schedule slips due to the re-procurement and replacement of parts and welded modules. Flight hardware quality is jeopardized by the resulting rework and retest effort.The pre-cap visual inspection alone on a densely packed relay provides

10、little insight into the quality of its individual subassemblies. Screening tests are not 100% effective in elimination of defective units.Recommendation(s): Procurement of parts with a prior history of problem/failures should be specifically re-evaluated prior to re-use on a subsequent flight progra

11、m. Both design and workmanship of the current production output should be evaluated to establish the quality of the product and the critical points in the manufacturing process where JPL inspections should be negotiated into the purchase order. Special screening tests and/or additional special burn-

12、in tests may also be warranted.Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: N/ADocuments Related to Lesson: N/AMission Directorate(s): N/AAdditional Key Phrase(s): Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-a71 Parts Materials & Processesa71 Test & VerificationAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 1996-03-07a71 Approval Name: Carol Dumaina71 Approval Organization: 125-204a71 Approval Phone Number: 818-354-8242Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1