ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:10 ,大小:31.33KB ,
资源ID:1018336      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1018336.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(REG NASA-LLIS-0689--2000 Lessons Learned Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Material Selection.pdf)为本站会员(proposalcash356)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

REG NASA-LLIS-0689--2000 Lessons Learned Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Material Selection.pdf

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-03-09a71 Center Point of Contact: GSFCa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Material Selection Practice: Material selection is an important aspect of design. Often the success of the design

2、is critically dependent on a material or materials performing as desired. This is especially true in the case of advanced composite materials with polymer matrices reinforced with carbon or aramid (Kevlar) fibers. The important considerations necessary for a proper selection of a fiber-reinforced po

3、lymer composite material in NASA spacecraft and satellite structures include fiber material, fiber reinforcement form, fiber volume, matrix material, ply lamination, processing, cost, database, health and safety factors and end-item properties.Programs that Certify Usage: N/ACenter to Contact for In

4、formation: GSFCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Reliability Guideline Number GD-ED-2210 from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:Proper selection of the fiber, fiber-reinforcement form, and polymer matrix will produc

5、e a material system that 1) satisfies design property requirements thermal/physical/mechanical), 2) facilitates Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-fabrication processes (lay-up and cure) and 3) minimizes program risks (cost, schedule, an

6、d technical).Implementation Method:OverviewUnlike a monolithic, homogenous material or an alloy, a composite is composed of two or more materials that retain their identity on the macroscopic level. Materials composing a composite can be classified as a reinforcement or strengthening phase and a mat

7、rix or binder phase. Reinforcement materials can be ceramics, polymers, or wires. Reinforcement forms can be continuous fibers, discontinuous or chopped fibers, whiskers, particles, platelets, etc. Matrix materials can be polymers, metals, or ceramics.The primary consideration of this guideline is f

8、iber reinforcements and thermoset polymer matrices in the most common product form, a prepreg (pre-impregnated and partially cured) sheet or ply. This is done out of practical considerations, since these composites possess the highest structural efficiency (specific properties) and are the most high

9、ly developed in terms of processing methods and material characterization (data base). Much of the information in the guideline is, however, relevant to other manufacturing forms and methods, such as Resin Transfer Molding, Filament Winding, Fiber Placement, Pultrusions, and Injection Molding.The co

10、ntent by volume of fibers in the composite is a critical parameter from which the composite derives thermo/physical/mechanical properties. A body of science called micromechanics references 1-4 exists to predict the properties of composites as a function of fiber volume given the material properties

11、 of the reinforcement and matrix. Micromechanics will not be discussed in this article.Fiber reinforcement in a ply can be unidirectional or multidirectional. The latter applies to woven and non-woven fabrics. Choice of reinforcement form is a degree of freedom that can result in better processing a

12、nd labor savings in part fabrication.Plies with either or both reinforcement scheme are stacked and cured to make a laminate. The ply fiber angles in the laminate are oriented to satisfy application design requirements (stiffness, strength, thermal expansion, etc.). Laminate design/analysis methods

13、will not be covered in this article. Information on this subject can be found in many publications references 5-8.The matrix phase is typically the material that most affects the processing, and most directly the curing of the composite. Choices for polymer matrices include a variety of epoxies, pol

14、yimides, and others. The choice of polymer matrix determines to a great degree the operational temperature limits for the composite. The matrix phase also affects other physical properties, such as outgassing and moisture diffusion.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted

15、 without license from IHS-,-,-Lastly, there are additional considerations that include economic, experience (flight history), and safety considerations that factor into the selection of a composite material. Table 1 summarizes relevant selection considerations for a fiber-reinforced composite with a

16、 polymer matrix. A more detailed discussion of the selection considerations follows.Table 1. Composite Selection Considerations 1. Fiber Considerations a. Thermo/physical/mechanical properties and relevance to end applicationb. Ply thickness and tow size availabilityc. Ply flexibility and part curva

17、tured. Sizing and surface treatments for matrix bonding and wettinge. Cost, availability, lead time, and stable supply source2. 3. Reinforcement Considerations a. Part curvatureb. Ply thicknessc. Laminate ply orientationsd. Machininge. Weaving styles (drape) and weaving vendorsf. Cost, availability,

18、 lead time, and stable supply source4. 5. Resin Considerations a. Fiber sizing compatibility and wettingb. Cure temperature and related items: laminate residual stresses, tooling expansion, upper use temperature, composite glass transition temperature (Tg), and microcrackingc. Prepeg handling charac

19、teristics: tack, drape, outlifed. Flow characteristics and processing methode. Mechanical properties: shear and tensile strength, modulus and strain compatibility with the reinforcing phasef. Physical properties: outgassing, moisture absorption/diffusivity/swelling, othersg. Toxicity and health conc

20、ernsh. Cost, availability, lead time, and stable supply source6. 7. Other Considerations (Composite Level) a. Material characterization data baseb. Flight historyc. Cost, availability, lead time, and stable sourceProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license fr

21、om IHS-,-,-Fiber SelectionThe designer or material specialist has a wide range of fibers from which to make a selection. Often a fiber is selected because of physical properties. For example, graphite or carbon fibers are electrically and thermally conductive, while aramid (Kevlar) and glass fibers

22、are non-conductive. In certain applications, such as an antenna reflector, electrical conduction is required. Hence, graphite (carbon) fibers are generally chosen for reflector-type applications. In other applications, for example a radome, radar transmissibility is desired. Here, Kevlarand glass fi

23、bers are the materials of choice.Fiber selection should also consider mechanical and thermal properties. The salient mechanical properties are modulus and strength. Those for thermal properties include coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) and thermal conductivity. Table 2 presents typical properti

24、es of some commercially available fibers presently utilized for space and spacecraft structures.Table 2. Typical Fiber Properties (Axial Direction) Trade Name/ TypeYoungs Modulus (Msi)Tensile Strength (Ksi)CTE (PPM/F)Thermal Conduct. (BTU/hr- ft-F)Density (Lb/in3)T300 33.5 530 -0.3 5 0.064 AS4 33.5

25、530 0.065 IM7 41.1 710 -0.5 9 0.065 T50 56.4 350 -0.55 40 0.0654 UHMS 64 550 0.067 P75S 75 300 -0.72 107 0.072 P100S 105 325 -0.8 300 0.078 Kevlar49 18 525 -2.2 5.3 0.052 E-glass 10.5 500 2.8 0.56 0.094 S2-glass 12.6 665 3.1 0.090 Quartz 10 500 0.3 0.0795 K1100 130-145 350-550 -0.9 550-676 .0777-.08

26、13 M46J 63.3 611 -0.5 0.0665 Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-M50J 69 569 -0.55 57 0.0672 M55J 78.2 583 -0.61 90 0.690 M60J 85.3 569 -0.61 88 0.0694 XN-50 75 530 -0.8 100 0.0773 XN-70 105 530 -0.9 180 0.0780 XN-80 114 530 -0.9 235 0.07

27、80 Often figures of merit (FOMs) are used in fiber selection. FOMs are ratios of composite material properties references 5,6, for which the fibers may be unidirectional or cross plied depending on the application. Some typical FOMs are E/r, F/r, E/r/a, and Ek/r, where E, F, r, a, and k denote Young

28、s modulus, strength, density, coefficient of thermal expansion, and thermal conductivity, respectively.Broadly speaking, most structural applications fall into two categories: strength critical and stiffness critical. The choice of fiber must be attuned to the driving design requirement of the appli

29、cation. For example, in primary structure, strength is usually the dominant factor influencing fiber selection. Therefore, F/r is the appropriate FOM for fiber selection. Whereas in secondary structure having vibration frequency and/or deflection requirements, stiffness may be the dominant selection

30、 factor. In this case E/r is the pertinent FOM. For dimensionally stable applications, E/r/a is the meaningful FOM. For thermal applications, Ek/r is a relevant FOM.Tensile strength and modulus are controlled principally by the fibers in the composite. Compressive and shear properties, however are d

31、erived from both the fiber and matrix and the interface (bond) between them.The thickness of a ply or layer is also determined by the fibers, more specifically the fiber diameter and the number of fibers in bundle or tow. Thin plies (2.5 mils or less) require low tow counts (500 to 1000 filaments),

32、which are not available for some fibers.Ply flexibility, which is a function of fiber modulus and ply thickness, should be considered with respect to part curvature. For example, the brittleness and thickness of a ply with ultra-high modulus carbon fiber may preclude its use in fabricating a deeply

33、curved part.The choice of fiber also can impact the type of reinforcement form possible. For example, ultra-high modulus graphite fibers may present weaving difficulties, which can preclude the availability of certain fabric styles with tight weaves. The availability of fabric woven with high-modulu

34、s fibers has improved greatly in the recent past.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Lastly, fiber selection must consider wetting, bonding, and material compatibility of the matrix resin. A coating or sizing on the fibers is applied for

35、these purposes. In material selection, one should be aware of the importance of a proper coupling agent between the fibers and resin. This is particularly important for carbon fibers. Coupling agents for carbon fibers are usually proprietary formulations of the fiber producer or the prepreg vendor.R

36、einforcement FormChoices of fiber reinforcement forms include unidirectional and multidirectional. Selection aspects of each form are discussed below.The most commonly used product containing unidirectional fiber reinforcement is prepreg tape. Unidirectional tape has collimated bundles of fibers cal

37、led tows, which run in the length or long direction of the tape. Unidirectional tape gives the ability to tailor the fiber orientations from layer to layer in a laminate. This results in design flexibility. Also, the widest choice of fibers are available in unidirectional tape.Unidirectional tape is

38、 available in a range of widths. The choice of tape width can facilitate lay-up and can promote efficient material usage. An example of the latter is less wasted material from cutting ply pattern details. When laying up unidirectional tape, the continuity of the fibers should be maintained. End-to-e

39、nd butt splices that result in fiber discontinuity should be avoided. On the other hand, butting the sides of adjacent layers with parallel fibers is permissible.Use of unidirectional tape to produce parts with deep, double curvature can prove difficult. Lay up may be facilitated by cutting the tape

40、 into narrow strips. However, labor increases in doing so.The most common multidirectional reinforcement form is woven fabric. Fabric weave styles can have drastically different draping characteristics, which is an important characteristic in making doubly-curved parts and those with integral flange

41、s and bends. Harness-satin weaves are more drapable than plain weaves. Other desirable characteristics of fabrics include bidirectional properties at a minimum gage, resistance to microcracking (matrix splitting between fibers), and good machining characteristics.In a woven fabric, the fibers will b

42、e curved to some degree or another depending on the weave style. Fiber curvature results in decreased composite moduli and strengths, especially in compression. Weaving also reduces the volume available for fibers in the composite. As a result, laminates made from woven fabric composites are less st

43、ructurally efficient than those made from unidirectional tapes.Recent manufacturing advancements have made possible ultra-thin unidirectional and fabric reinforced composites. These materials have been manufactured in a thickness of one mil or less for unidirectional prepreg and about two mils for f

44、abric prepreg. Such ultra-thin composites are Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-especially attractive for lightly-loaded, minimum gage structures. Here, the weight of the structure and, importantly, the weight savings potential of the c

45、omposite are directly proportional to layer thinness. Other benefits of ultra-thin composites include less micro cracking under thermal cycling and the potential for more homogeneous laminate stacking sequences for a given laminate thickness. The latter usually results in improved strength due to a

46、more thorough interspection of ply-angle orientations in the laminate stacking. The disadvantages of ultra-thin composites are increased handling difficulty, cost, and lead time.Fabric prepregs may offer labor efficiency in lay ups. For example, a 0/90 (Fiber angles are 0 degrees and 90 degrees) lam

47、inate needs 50% fewer plies to be laid up using an orthogonally woven fabric, since fibers in two directions are obtained with every ply applied. Some fabric prepregs are available with hybrid fibers, such as carbon warp-yarns and Kevlarfill-yarns, which may provide more potential design solutions.T

48、heoretically, the possibilities of fiber type and weave style are unlimited. Practically, off-the-shelf choices are limited. Certain non-standard fabrics made from high- and ultra high-modulus fibers can be obtained from specialty weavers. The design use of such fabrics should be tempered by cost an

49、d lead-time considerations.Matrix SelectionThe choice of prepreg matrix resin is of critical importance in fabrication. The composite part quality is extremely dependent on the resin matrix and its handling and cure processing characteristics. The matrix vendor is usually the vendor that makes the prepreg, i.e., incorporates the fibers in the matrix.Handling characteristics are most importa

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1