REG NASA-LLIS-0730--2000 Lessons Learned Sine-Burst Load Test.pdf

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-03-31a71 Center Point of Contact: GSFCa71 Submitted by: Wilson HarkinsSubject: Sine-Burst Load Test Practice: The sine-burst test is used to apply a quasi-static load to a test item in order to strength qualify the item and i

2、ts design for flight.Programs that Certify Usage: This practice has been used on Sampex Spacecraft, COBE instruments and electronic boxes, and ISTP instruments.Center to Contact for Information: GSFCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Reliability Practice Number PT-TE-1420 from NA

3、SA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.The sine-burst test is a simple method to apply a quasi-static load using a vibration shaker and shock testing software. Depending on the complexity of the test item, it often can be used in lieu of , and is more

4、 economical than, acceleration (centrifuge) or static tests. For components and subsystems, the fixture used for vibration testing often can also be used for sine-burst strength testing. For this reason, strength qualification and random vibration qualification can often be performed during the same

5、 test session which saves time and money.Implementation Method:Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-The process involves subjecting each orthogonal axis of the test item to five-to ten cycles of a sine wave whose peak is equivalent to the

6、qualification load level. The qualification load root-sum-squaring (RSSing) the limit loads that cause the most significant stress to the critical elements in the test item and multiplying this value by a qualification margin of 1.25 (Reference 1) . If the item can be placed in a combined axis fixtu

7、re that orientates the test item in a manner that allows application of the correct combined qualification load vector, only one test has to be conducted. This option often prevents any overtesting of elements in the test item.Since the test is intended to impart a quasi-static load to the test item

8、 the test frequency must be below the fundamental resonant frequency of the test item. As a general guideline, the test frequency should be less than one-third the test item resonant frequency to avoid dynamic amplification during the test. This is a strongly recommended guideline. In some cases, i

9、t is allowable to use a sinal-burst closer to the test items fundamental frequency if it solves a test procedure problem. Such a case would be where the qualification load input can not be theoretically applied due to constraints of the equipment such as exceeding shaker stroke. Using a sine-burst w

10、hose frequency is closer to the first primary resonant frequency, thus taking advantage of the first modes dynamic amplification factor, will result in achieving the correct loading. If test item/fixture weight rather than stroke is the limiting constraint, it is possible to achieve the desired leve

11、l by overdriving the shaker current. The short duration of the test will allow this overdrive of shaker current.After the test level and fixturing method is determined, a sine-burst open loop program must be built to drive the vibration table. The practice at GSFC has been to synthesize the waveform

12、 using a short program, written in Time Series Language, a general purpose application program from GenRad. The resulting waveform is then transferred to the shaker control program, “Transient Waveform Control“, which runs on a GenRad 2514 Vibration Control System.The actual test is conducted in a s

13、tepwise manner applying a number of lower level sine-bursts that are fractions of the full load. For example 1/8,1/4, and then 1/2 of full level. This assures the test conductor that the test item/fixture/shaker table is reacting in a linear manner. If it is not the waveform can be modified by outpu

14、tting only a percentage of the programmed level, i.e., 90%. After these preliminary runs with corrections are made then the full load is applied to the item under test.The figure shown below is a typical sine-burst waveform. The waveform is sinusoidal with a ramp up to maximum level, several cycles

15、at maximum level, and then ramp down to zero. The number of cycles at maximum level is usually 5 to 10 cycles. The sine-burst test is performed with the same fixturing used for sine and random vibration.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,

16、refer to D descriptionD Technical Rationale:The sine-burst test was developed at GSFC to satisfy requirements for strength qualifying structures to quasi-static load specifications. The primary objective of the sine-burst test is to apply the specified acceleration to the test item in a uniform man

17、ner. A secondary objective is to minimize potential fatigue damage to the test item. At GSFC the test item can be a flight unit undergoing Protoflight qualification . Protoflight hardware is flight hardware that is flown after qualification testing. Since the applied loads in this test are significa

18、nt, it is important that the total number of cycles of peak strain be minimized. The test frequency must be sufficiently below any resonant frequencies of the test item. This requirement will preclude sine-burst testing of large structures, which usually have lower resonant frequencies. The sine-bur

19、st test has been shown to be a cost effective alternative to either static loads or to centrifuge testing.References1. General Environmental Verification Specification for STS and ELV Payloads, Subsystems, and Components, GEVS-SE, January 1990, GSFCImpact of Non-Practice: Provided by IHSNot for Resa

20、leNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-If sine-burst testing is not performed, structural load requirements should be satisfied by a static, sine sweep/dwell, or centrifuge load test or by conservative analysis.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-03-31a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-