ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:8 ,大小:24.28KB ,
资源ID:1018468      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1018468.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(REG NASA-LLIS-0822-2000 Lessons Learned Design of a Small Apparatus for Improved Vibration Thermal Testing.pdf)为本站会员(explodesoak291)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

REG NASA-LLIS-0822-2000 Lessons Learned Design of a Small Apparatus for Improved Vibration Thermal Testing.pdf

1、Best Practices Entry: Best Practice Info:a71 Committee Approval Date: 2000-04-18a71 Center Point of Contact: JSCa71 Submitted by: Wil HarkinsSubject: Design of a Small Apparatus for Improved Vibration/Thermal Testing Practice: A small test fixture has been specifically designed for conducting vibrat

2、ion/thermal tests on small test specimens such as ignitors and detonators. This test fixture creates much smaller loads and less hostile thermal environments for the vibrator table armature thus creating a more reliable test set up. In addition, this small test fixture provides much more rapid and a

3、ccurate thermal transfer to a test specimen which results in more data points for the same test times and more accuracy and reliability in the test data.Programs that Certify Usage: This practice has been used on Vibration/Thermal Testing of the NASA Standard Initiator (NSI) and the NASA Standard De

4、tonator (NSD). NOTE: Testing of armed NASA Standard Initiators or NASA Standard Detonators is a highly dangerous undertaking and proper safety precautions should always be observed. For more safety information on testing these devices, please contact the Johnson Space Center (JSC).Center to Contact

5、for Information: JSCImplementation Method: This Lesson Learned is based on Reliability Practice number PT-TE-1442 from NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test.Benefit:Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without licens

6、e from IHS-,-,-This new environmental fixture is much smaller than other larger, bulky environmental fixtures that require long soaking times for even temperature stability over the entire fixture and sample. The smaller fixture has less weight and requires little temperature soaking time for obtain

7、ing fixture and specimen temperature stability. This improves the reliability of the test set up as low, long term soaking temperatures can cause armature brittleness and subsequent failure while long term heat soaking of the armature can cause vibrator shaker shutdown. In addition, more data points

8、 can be obtained in a shorter period of time with better thermal resolution.Implementation Method:Two small thermal control and conditioning test apparatus have been developed and utilized in vibration/thermal testing at JSC for NASA Standard Initiator (NSI) and NASA Standard Detonator (NSD) explosi

9、ve components. These devices are applicable to all fixturing designs which utilize a flow through manifold for the thermal medium. Although these fixtures were designed specifically for vibrating explosive components under extreme conditions the application could be altered by fabricating fixture(s)

10、 to incorporate any type device to be thermally conditioned and/or vibrated.Photographs of these apparatus are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Each are fabricated out of aluminum and differ in several ways. Each is fabricated for its appropriate thread type, mounting hole pattern and thermal medium flow m

11、anifold. In addition, the NSI fixture has a cover plate where the NSD fixture does not. The reason for this is to minimize the amount of mass the armature has to move during the NSD vibration profile. One main difference between the two fixtures is the transition of the explosive components from one

12、 axis to another.Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 1. Fixture for NSI Thermal/Vibration Testing Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D

13、descriptionD Figure 2. Fixture for NSD Thermal/Vibration TestingIn each apparatus, liquid nitrogen is used for cold conditioning the explosive component during vibration testing and is controlled as shown in a block diagram in Figure 3. The system is capable of establishing thermal fixture temperatu

14、res as low as -310 degrees F with a temperature gradient across the fixture not exceeding 5 degrees F. A glycol/water solution is used for hot temperature conditioning. The solution is circulated through the fixture(s) with a Neslab high temperature bath and control circuit with system capabilities

15、of up to 400 degrees F and thermal gradients not exceeding 3 degrees F. Both apparatus utilize a phenolic insulator plate to minimize thermal soaking to the armature and an armaflex cap to minimize thermal losses. This prevents soak-out and shutdown problems associated with the armature.Provided by

16、IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 3. Block Diagram of Thermal Control of Cooling and Heating Medium Because of the dynamics of the NSI vibration profile a secondary fixture was used to transition from one axis to anot

17、her. This fixture allows the transition of the thermal fixture from a horizontal plane to a vertical one. This secondary transition fixture is pictured in Figures 4 and 5 with the NSI thermal/vibration fixture attached in the X and Y vibration planes, respectively. Because of the dynamics of Provide

18、d by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-the NSD vibration profile on the other hand, the amount of mass resting on top of the armature is critical, since the profile is demanding close to full power output of the vibration amplifier system. Thus the

19、 fixture was designed to have a transition from one axis to another of the explosive components without any extra fixturing. This is done by utilizing both the top and side of the fixture to accomplish the X and Y axes. A 0.018 inch thick shim is used to offset the explosive devices 90 degrees to ac

20、complish the Z axis.refer to D descriptionD Figure 4. Secondary Transition Fixture with NSI Thermal/Vibration Fixture Attached in X Vibration Plane Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-refer to D descriptionD Figure 5. Secondary Transition

21、 Fixture with NSI Thermal/Vibration Fixture Attached in Y Vibration PlaneTechnical Rationale:A thermal environmental chamber has been previously used at JSC to thermally condition explosive components that could be mounted to a shaker head and vibrated in three axes (X, Y, & Z). These prior set-ups

22、had utilized a bulky and heavy environmental chamber which required structural supports and bracing to hold it over the shaker head. Liquid nitrogen was used as a cold temperature conditioning media and electric heaters were used for hot temperature conditioning. The environmental chamber had a larg

23、e air space which created temperature gradients throughout the chamber. Therefore, obtaining a stable thermal condition for the test subject required a great deal of thermal “soaking“ time.The time requirement for conditioning the test subject was also increased at cold temperatures because of the n

24、eed for more thermal accuracy and stability in this test range. This thermal “soaking“ acted as a detriment to the shaker armature components which also “soaked out“ to the required temperature causing them to become brittle and more susceptible to damage and/or breakage during the vibration process

25、 Also, when conditioning the test component to a hot condition, the armature ran hotter. If the cooling capacity of the shaker system couldnt keep up with Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-the influx of heat to the armature during the

26、hot“ test, then the system over-temperature protect circuit shut the vibration test down.All these limitations and inconveniences of the larger environmental chamber led to the development of the smaller, controllable, environmental fixture for vibration/thermal testing which is the subject of this

27、 practice.References:1. Reliability Preferred Practice PT-TE-1402, Thermal Cycling2. Reliability Preferred Practice PT-TE-1405, Powered-On Vibration3. Reliability Preferred Practice PT-TE-1406, Sinusoidal Vibration4. Reliability Preferred Practice PT-TE-1413, Random Vibration TestingImpact of Non-Pr

28、actice: The impact of non-practice is that the larger environmental chamber could be used which would increase costs and time to perform vibration/thermal testing. This would expose the shaker armature to more weight and cold soak temperature extremes. The additional weight can cause armature failur

29、e while the lower temperatures can cause armature brittleness and subsequent failure and the higher temperatures can cause vibration shaker shutdown.Related Practices: N/AAdditional Info: Approval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2000-04-18a71 Approval Name: Eric Raynora71 Approval Organization: QSa71 Approval Phone Number: 202-358-4738Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1