ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:3 ,大小:15.19KB ,
资源ID:1019315      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1019315.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(REG NASA-LLIS-1841--2008 Lessons Learned - Discovery Main Landing Gear Dynamic Seal Installed Incorrectly.pdf)为本站会员(eastlab115)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

REG NASA-LLIS-1841--2008 Lessons Learned - Discovery Main Landing Gear Dynamic Seal Installed Incorrectly.pdf

1、Lessons Learned Entry: 1841Lesson Info:a71 Lesson Number: 1841a71 Submitting Organization: KSCa71 Submitted by: Gregory RawlSubject: Discovery Main Landing Gear Dynamic Seal Installed Incorrectly Abstract: Lack of adequate detail on the landing gear installation drawings contributed to the incorrect

2、 installation of the Orbiter right Main Landing Gear (MLG) hydraulic seal. The installation drawing that showed the detail for the dynamic seal was owned by the seal manufacturer, not the landing gear manufacturer. To reduce human errors during parts installation, parts should be marked to show inst

3、allation order and proper orientation. Update engineering drawings to show sufficient detail of piece part installations.Description of Driving Event: During final OPF preparations for STS-120 flight, technicians discovered the right Main Landing Gear (MLG) of Orbiter Discovery (OV-103) had a hydrau

4、lic leak rate which exceeded specifications. As a result, the MLG strut was removed and engineers determined that hydraulic seals needed to be replaced. Representatives from the landing gear original equipment manufacturer (OEM) were contacted to help assist KSC technicians with the seal replacement

5、. The seals were replaced and a successful retest of the MLG strut showed no signs of leakage. Normal OPF processing progressed with the MLG being raised for flight configuration and Discovery was cleared for mate with external tank. One week after the seal replacements, the landing gear OEM was rev

6、iewing their paperwork and realized the installation of the dynamic seal was incorrect. They contacted KSC representatives and stated the dynamic seal had been installed improperly, according to new information from the seal manufacturer. The OEM stated their technicians had installed the replacemen

7、t seal in the same configuration as the discrepant seal, assuming the old seal was installed in the proper location and orientation. Unfortunately the discrepant seal had been installed incorrectly during a previous seal replacement 20+ years earlier. Later investigations revealed that the left MLG

8、seal had also been installed incorrectly. Based on the low risk that an out of tolerance leak would develop in orbit, Discovery was cleared for one flight with the seals in the incorrect configuration. Once the STS-120 mission had ended, the seals on both landing gears were replaced and restored to

9、the correct configuration.Lesson(s) Learned: One of the contributing factors that led to the incorrect installation of the dynamic seal was a lack of adequate detail on the landing gear installation drawings. The installation drawing that showed the detail for the dynamic seal was owned by the seal

10、manufacturer, not the landing gear manufacturer. The landing gear manufacturer did not show this detail on their drawings, therefore any recorded knowledge of this design was effectively lost over the course of the shuttle program. This caused vendor technicians to rely on the previous seal installa

11、tion to guide them in the new installation, instead of an approved design. Another factor leading to the mistake was a lack of training. The vendor technicians that performed the seal change-out had little or no experience with space shuttle landing gear. The landing gear designs are specific to the

12、 shuttle program, and the hardware is rarely rebuilt, offering little opportunity for hands-on training. Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-Recommendation(s): Update engineering drawings to show sufficient detail of piece part installati

13、ons. Update old, hand-drawn, electronically scanned drawings with modern CAD drawings. To reduce human errors during parts installation, design piece parts such that the installations are fool proof and intuitive. Parts can be marked to show installation order and proper orientation. Also, provide t

14、raining in complex installations that are rarely performed.Evidence of Recurrence Control Effectiveness: N/ADocuments Related to Lesson: Orbiter Project Office Technical Tag-Up (OPOTT) Presentation: MLG_Seal_Plan_OPOTT_11_16_07A Located in the Orbiter Project Office Technical Tag-Up Archive: https:/

15、sspweb.jsc.nasa.gov/meeting/OPOTT/presentation.cfm?date=11162007&special=Y&Archive=2007Mission Directorate(s): a71 Space OperationsAdditional Key Phrase(s): Provided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-a71 Manufacturing and Assemblya71 Mission Ope

16、rations and Ground Support Systems.Ground processing and manifestinga71 Safety and Mission Assurance.MaintenanceAdditional Info: a71 Project: Space Shuttle ProgramApproval Info: a71 Approval Date: 2008-06-13a71 Approval Name: mbella71 Approval Organization: HQProvided by IHSNot for ResaleNo reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS-,-,-

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1