ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:15 ,大小:300.10KB ,
资源ID:1023042      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1023042.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(SAE ARP 5146-2005 Assessment of Aircraft Wheel Sealing Systems《飞行器轮子密封系统的评定》.pdf)为本站会员(visitstep340)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

SAE ARP 5146-2005 Assessment of Aircraft Wheel Sealing Systems《飞行器轮子密封系统的评定》.pdf

1、_SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising theref

2、rom, is the sole responsibility of the user.”SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be revised, reaffirmed, stabilized, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions.Copyright 2015 SAE InternationalAll rights reserved. No part of this publi

3、cation may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE.TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada)Tel: +1 724-776-4970 (out

4、side USA)Fax: 724-776-0790Email: CustomerServicesae.orgSAE WEB ADDRESS: http:/www.sae.orgSAE values your input. To provide feedbackon this Technical Report, please visithttp:/www.sae.org/technical/standards/ARP5146AEROSPACERECOMMENDED PRACTICEARP5146Issued 2005-07Reaffirmed 2015-08Assessment of Airc

5、raft Wheel Sealing SystemsRATIONALEARP5146 has been reaffirmed to comply with the SAE five-year review policy.1. SCOPE: 1.1 Scope: This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is intended to provide guidance on verifying the integrity of inflation pressure sealing systems of aircraft wheel/tire ass

6、emblies. 1.2 Purpose: Aircraft wheel/tire assemblies can maintain inflation integrity only if the entire sealing system, consisting of the tire, wheel, inflation valve, over pressure relief devices, pressure monitoring systems , valve caps, gauges, fuse plugs, O-rings, seal glands and interfaces/bou

7、ndaries between these components, successfully contains the tire inflation gas. This document is to be used as a guide for sealing system validation when new design concepts not proven in service are being employed. It may also be used for evaluating alternate design approaches, material changes and

8、 trouble shooting service problems. The design of the sealing system and the need for verification testing are left to the discretion of the wheel manufacturer, and the cognizant wheel design and configuration controller. This document is not intended to be a new qualification/certification standard

9、. 1.3 Background: When an aircraft wheel/tire assembly loses inflation pressure, the tire is generally suspect. However, any component within the wheel/tire assembly may be a leakage path. The creation of this document was originally requested by aircraft tire OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers)

10、 to provide a recommended practice for evaluating the entire sealing system for both new designs and when evaluating service performance of existing designs. Current commercial and military specification requirements such as TSO-C135, TSO-C26d, and ARP1493 provide a good indication of sealing integr

11、ity if inflation pressure is monitored during the performance of the qualification tests defined in these specifications. A critical evaluation of the system is verified during the aircraft certification tests (flight testing). Depending on the aircraft type and landing gear configuration, numerous

12、tire/wheel assemblies, up to 200 or more, can be involved in these flight tests, giving significant opportunity for assessing sealing system integrity. Approved seals, maintenance and trouble-shooting procedures for commercial wheels are typically defined in the wheel manufacturers Component Mainten

13、ance Manual (CMM). Use of any other than approved seal and maintenance or non-approved hardware interfacing with the seals invalidates the airworthiness of the wheel as established by the TSO approval. Similarly, for military wheels, the Technical Order (TO) is utilized and it relates to the qualifi

14、cation status of the wheel. Although a separate procedure for assessing the seal integrity of aircraft wheel/tire assemblies is not currently accepted industry practice, at least one regional jet wheel required the inflated wheel and tire to be exposed to three cycles of temperature extremes from -6

15、5 F (-54 C) to 225 F (107 C) in a 24-hour period with no greater than 5% pressure loss. 2. REFERENCES: 2.1 Applicable Documents: The following publications may be applicable or are provided as references. SAE INTERNATIONAL ARP5146 2 OF 152.1.1 SAE Publications: Available from SAE, 400 Commonwealth D

16、rive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001. ARP1493 Wheel and Brake Design and Test Requirements for Military Aircraft ARP5265 Minimum Operational and Maintenance Responsibilities for Aircraft Tire Usage AMS-P-83461 Packing, Preformed, Petroleum Hydraulic Fluid Resistant, Improved Performance at 275 F (135 C)

17、2.1.2 Federal Specifications: Available from Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591. TSO-C135 Transport Airplane Wheels and Wheel and Brake Assemblies TSO-C26d Aircraft Wheels, Brakes, and Wheel / Brake Assemblies for Part 23, 27, and 29 Aircraft 2.1.3 AIA

18、/NAS Publications: Available from Aerospace Industries Association of America Inc., 1250 Eye Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. NAS 1613 Seal Element, Packing, Preformed, Ethylene Propylene Rubber 3. SEALING SYSTEM DESIGN: 3.1 General: The aircraft wheel tubewell design, combined with the stiffness o

19、f tubeless aircraft tires, does not permit the tire bead to be mounted over the wheel flange. Aircraft wheels are designed to accommodate the tire on the tubewell, between wheel flanges, prior to final wheel assembly and tire inflation. This requires that one of the wheel flanges is removable or tha

20、t the wheel be split into two halves. For the wheel to provide an airtight structure for a mating tubeless tire, a primary wheel seal is required at the mating sealing surfaces of the removable wheel flange or wheel halves. Normally this is an O-ring type seal. Smaller seals are used to prevent leak

21、age at the inflation valve, over-pressurization release device, thermal fuse plugs, as well as at other ports to accommodate components such as a pressure gauge or a sensor for a tire pressure indicating system. Again, these ports generally utilize O-ring type seals. SAE INTERNATIONAL ARP5146 3 OF 1

22、53.2 O-ring and Gland Geometry: The size and contour of the primary wheel seal gland is based on many considerations including stress, wheel deflection, interface considerations, O-ring cross-section diameter, O-ring squeeze, and O-ring circumferential stretch. Since the main seal of the wheel is a

23、static and relatively low-pressure application where pressure fluctuations are small, back-up rings are generally not required. Extrusion of the seal at the gland interface is controlled by the built-in clearance of the mating wheel components. Proper configuration and location of the gland is neces

24、sary to eliminate pinching, minimize abrasion, and to maintain proper positioning of the seal during assembly and operation of the wheel. The configuration of the gland is designed to develop sealing ability by the mechanical squeeze on (compression of) the O-ring when assembled in the wheel. The O-

25、ring is typically stretched during installation to retain it in position during wheel assembly. This stretch reduces the cross section of the seal and should be considered when determining that adequate sealing squeeze is provided. Other factors contributing to the required seal squeeze are seal mat

26、erial, cross-sectional tolerance of the seal, gland dimension tolerances and surface finishes, diametric clearance, thermal expansion and/or contraction, concentricity of component dimensions, and compression set. 3.3 O-ring Material: Material selection is based on design considerations such as oper

27、ating and storage temperature requirements, durometer value, compression set resistance, abrasion resistance, sealing surfaces, shelf life, and compatibility with bearing grease and hydraulic fluid. O-ring lubricants are selected to ensure compatibility with the seal compound. The two most popular r

28、ubber compound families for commercial airplane wheel application are EPDM/EPR (ethylene propylene) and nitrile. The choice depends on the application, operating environment and service experience. 3.4 System Temperature Environments: Seal systems are designed to be capable of maintaining inflation

29、pressure over the temperature extremes experienced during wheel operation. System performance includes low and high temperature exposure in the wheel wells. Some wheel wells do not have full doors, and the wheel is directly exposed to ambient airstream conditions of the flight profile. This results

30、in exposure to extreme low temperature conditions during flight. Fixed landing gear systems have obvious exposure to ambient and airstream conditions. SAE INTERNATIONAL ARP5146 4 OF 154. RECOMMENDED TESTS FOR SEAL SYSTEM VERIFICATION: The wheel manufacturer, and cognizant wheel design and configurat

31、ion controller (airframe manufacturer and/or military procurement office) establish the scope of the verification testing based on similarity to proven designs operating in similar environments. The standard diffusion and leakage tests, which form a part of the wheel and tire qualification, have exi

32、sted for many years, are still relevant, and continue unchanged. Reference TSO-C26d, TSO-C135, and TSO-C62d. Monitoring pressure retention during wheel and wheel/brake qualification laboratory tests and during flight tests provide other avenues for verifying the sealing system integrity. Low tempera

33、ture operating environments are of particular concern relative to wheel sealing system performance. The test wheel/tire assembly configuration must be documented to provide a basis for airworthiness compliance. 4.1 Wheel Seal Assessment Tests: The following tests are recommended as one way to evalua

34、te pressure retention capability. Effort is directed to minimize or neutralize the impact of external factors such as tire growth, ambient temperature changes, and gas diffusion through the tire itself. The purpose of 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 is to condition the wheel/tire assembly so that any degradation in

35、 performance resulting from the temperature soak tests can be quantified. Test 4.1.1 requires the use of a brake in the test and can be run independently, as can 4.1.2. The tests of 4.1.3 and 4.1.4 must be performed in sequence. 4.1.1 Seal Temperature Conditioning for Braked Wheels Using a Brake Tes

36、t Dynamometer: The purpose of this test is to demonstrate the seal robustness to the thermal operating environment of the wheel. The seal performance should not be compromised under operating conditions that would not cause thermal fuse plug release. In developing a thermal profile for the test, con

37、sideration should be given to the wear state of the brake, new or worn, depending on the thermal behavior of the wheel-tire and brake assembly, and the residual heat in the wheel-tire and brake assembly from previous energy events, taxi sequence and/or landing activity. The Design Landing condition

38、may provide a foundation for this test, however, depending on the category of aircraft, another condition other than the Design Landing might be desirable, such as the Service Cycle or Fuse Plug No-melt cycle for commercial transports. Temperature and pressure instrumentation recommendations are con

39、tained in Appendix A. Dangerous combinations of pressure and temperature can be achieved during this test. Personnel must be protected from either tire or wheel explosive failures. It is recommended that new tires be used to conduct this test. Tire pressure and temperatures must be checked remotely

40、for the duration of this test. SAE INTERNATIONAL ARP5146 5 OF 154.1.1.1 Inflate wheel/tire assembly with dry nitrogen to wheel rated inflation pressure and let tire growth stabilize for a minimum of 12 hours. 4.1.1.2 Install the wheel/tire assembly onto the brake assembly. Re-inflate if needed to wh

41、eel rated inflation pressure, and then perform five dynamic stops at Design Landing energy. Reference the Design Landing Test in the wheel and brake TSO-C135 or TSO -C26d. The brake and wheel/tire assembly may be cooled to near ambient temperature between stops using cooling fans only after all temp

42、eratures have peaked. It is recommended that paint stripes be added to the wheel/tire assembly to allow assessment of potential movement of the tire bead on the wheel rim. 4.1.1.3 Test Assessment of Pressure Retention Capability: Allow the wheel/tire assembly to cool to ambient before re-inflating t

43、o wheel rated inflation pressure, and then perform two 24-hour pressure retention tests. Record any pressure change. Any loss of pressure over a 24-hour period should be less than 5% of the wheel rated inflation pressure. Conduct a bubble test to determine the location of any leakage regardless of r

44、ate of pressure loss. Bubble checks at low temperatures can be accomplished by using Ethylene Glycol (Automotive Coolant). A 70/30 Ethylene Glycol/water mixture is listed as having the capability of being used down to -84 F (-64 C). If the pressure loss is greater than 5%, stop the test and determin

45、e the cause. 4.1.2 High Temperature Soak Test for Unbraked Wheels: The purpose of this test is to “age” the seals at elevated temperatures representative of the service environment. There is no intent to simulate the actual temperature distributions or wheel load effects that also occur in service.

46、The wheel is unlanded during this test. The tire manufacturer and the wheel manufacturer must approve the test procedure to insure that the structural capability of the wheel/tire assembly is not exceeded. Inflate the wheel/tire assembly with dry nitrogen to the wheel rated inflation pressure. Then

47、subject the assembly to a continuous 48 hours at temperatures based on the wheel well environment specified by the airframe manufacturer or 200 F 5 F (93.3 C 2.9 C), whichever is higher, with the inflation gas locked in. The default temperature is approximately the highest temperature that can be ex

48、perienced by the wheel without degradation in properties, and is therefore considered an upper limit. Dangerous combinations of pressure and temperature can be achieved during this test. Personnel must be protected from either tire or wheel explosive failures. It is recommended that new tires should

49、 be used to conduct this test. Tire pressures must be checked remotely for the duration of this test. The availability of facilities for conducting this test may necessitate modifications to these procedures. SAE INTERNATIONAL ARP5146 6 OF 154.1.2.1 Assess the pressure retention capability as in 4.1.1.3. 4.1.3 Low Temperature Seal Integrity Test, Braked and Unbraked Wheel/Tire Assemblies: 4.1.3.1 Following the successful

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1