ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:8 ,大小:151.67KB ,
资源ID:1026227      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1026227.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(SAE J 1270-2006 Measurement of Passenger Car Light Truck and Highway Truck and Bus Tire Rolling Resistance《客车 轻型卡车和公路卡车及公共汽车轮胎滚动阻力的测量》.pdf)为本站会员(刘芸)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

SAE J 1270-2006 Measurement of Passenger Car Light Truck and Highway Truck and Bus Tire Rolling Resistance《客车 轻型卡车和公路卡车及公共汽车轮胎滚动阻力的测量》.pdf

1、_ SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising there

2、from, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be revised, reaffirmed, stabilized, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright 2017 SAE International All rights reserved. No part of this p

3、ublication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) Tel: +1 724-776-497

4、0 (outside USA) Fax: 724-776-0790 Email: CustomerServicesae.org SAE WEB ADDRESS: http:/www.sae.org SAE values your input. To provide feedback on this Technical Report, please visit http:/standards.sae.org/J1270_201710 SURFACE VEHICLE INFORMATION REPORT J1270 OCT2017 Issued 1979-10 Revised 2006-09 Re

5、affirmed 2017-10 Superseding J1270 SEP2006 Measurement of Passenger Car, Light Truck, and Highway Truck and Bus Tire Rolling Resistance RATIONALE J1270 has been reaffirmed to comply with the SAE Five-Year Review policy. FOREWORD This information report is a companion document to SAE Recommended Prac

6、tice, J1269, Rolling Resistance Measurement Procedure for Passenger Car, Light Truck and Highway Truck and Bus Tires. It provides background information and explanations related to the use of the Measurement Procedure and follows the same format as SAE J1269. 1. SCOPE1.1 Basic Methods The force, tor

7、que, and power methods of measurement are all in common use and should yield the same test results. Effects of steering, traction, surface texture, and non-steady-state tire operations are excluded from the recommended practice because they are still in the research stage. 1.1.1 Force Method The chi

8、ef advantage of the force method is that the only parasitic losses in the measurement are tire spindle bearing losses and aerodynamic losses associated with rotation of the tire and its wheel. The main disadvantage of this method is that the spindle force measured can contain a severe error caused b

9、y load misalignment and load-spindle force interaction (“crosstalk”). Elimination or compensation of these effects is necessary. A minor disadvantage is that the loaded radius of the tire must be measured in order to convert spindle force to rolling resistance. 1.1.2 Torque Method The torque method

10、has the advantage that the measurement is direct: rolling resistance is the net torque divided by the test wheel radius. The main disadvantage of the torque method is that parasitic losses contained in the measurement include rotational test wheel losses as well as tire spindle losses. Hence, the pa

11、rasitic losses are larger than those of the force method and can be of the same order of magnitude as the rolling resistance itself. In addition, speed-hunting oscillations in the drive motor can introduce errors. 1.1.3 Power Method The advantage of the power method is that no force or torque transd

12、ucer is necessary; a voltmeter and an ammeter to measure the electrical energy input to the drive system are sufficient. The chief disadvantage of the power method is that electrical losses are included in the measurement in addition to all the other parasitic losses of the system. Thus, the parasit

13、ic losses are even larger than those of the torque method. In some laboratories, special control may be needed to prevent line voltage fluctuations from creating power surges which can distort the readings. 2. REFERENCES 2.1 Applicable Publications The following publications form a part of the speci

14、fication to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise indicated, the latest revision of SAE publications shall apply. 2.1.1 SAE Publication Available from SAE, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA), www.sae.org.

15、 SAE J1269 Rolling Resistance Measurement Procedure for Passenger Car, Light Truck, and Highway Truck and Bus Tires 2.1.2 Other Publications 1. D. J. Schuring and G. L. Hall, “Ambient Temperature Effects on Tire Rolling Loss,” Rubber Chemistry and Technology, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 11131123 (1981). 2.

16、R. Masaki, Y. Tanida, C. Ikeya, and I. Harada, “Research on Rolling Resistance of Tires,” J. Mech. Lab., Japan, Vol. 4, No. 1, p. 43 (1958). 3. S. K. Clark, “Rolling Resistance Forces In Pneumatic Tires,” DOT/TSC, Report No. DOT-TSC-76-1 (January 1976). 4. J. R. Luchini, “Test Surface Curvature Redu

17、ction Factor For Truck Tire Rolling Resistance,” SAE Paper No. 821264 (1982). 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1 Rolling Resistance The definition given in the recommended practice applies only to the free-rolling mode. The universal rolling resistance definition from which it is derived is defined as the energy ex

18、pended by the tire per unit distance traveled. 3.2 Rolling Resistance Coefficient No further background information is required in this section. 3.3 Loaded Radius No further background information is required in this section. 3.4 Maximum Load The maximum tire load is expressed in kilograms (kg) or p

19、ounds (lb), which are units of mass. For use in the recommended practice, these units must be converted to units of force, either to the newton (N) or the pound-force (lbf). SAE INTERNATIONAL J1270 OCT2017 Page 2 of 8_ 3.5 Base Inflation Pressure Base inflation pressure is the inflation pressure cor

20、responding to the maximum load listed in the tire load tables of the current TRA Yearbook or in corresponding tables published by similar organizations concerned with standardization. 3.6 Capped Inflation Pressure As the tire with inflation pressure capped is run under load, the rising tire temperat

21、ure will cause the inflation pressure to increase. Thus, capped inflation pressure reflects actual road service conditions. 3.7 Regulated Inflation Pressure Pressure is most commonly regulated by a constant pressure source attached to the tire through a rotating union. 3.8 Ambient Temperature An ove

22、rall ambient room temperature representing air temperatures throughout the test room is difficult to define and measure. Therefore, a location close to the cooler part of the tire/wheel assembly was selected for ambient temperature measurements. 3.9 Ambient Reference Temperature Variations in rollin

23、g resistance occur with changes in ambient temperature. Because precise control of room temperature is difficult, rolling resistance data must be referred to 24 C (75 F) according to paragraph 7.4 of SAE J1269. 4. TEST EQUIPMENT An objective of the recommended practice is to provide a test procedure

24、 that nearly all test organizations can adopt as standard. Since the most common equipment is the laboratory test wheel, it serves as a standard for the procedure. However, most of the provisions of this recommended practice do apply to flat-surface laboratory test apparatus. Note that rolling resis

25、tance results from a laboratory test wheel are usually slightly higher than corresponding results from a flat surface test machine because of the greater tire deflection on the curve test wheel surface (see 8.3). 4.1 Test Surface 4.1.1 Test Wheel Diameter Most standard laboratory test wheels have a

26、diameter of 1.708 m (67.23 in) derived from a circumferential length of 1/300 mile. 4.1.2 Width Most laboratory test wheels have a surface width of at least 0.30 m (12 in). 4.1.3 Texture Rolling resistance is affected by road texture in a manner still under study. The selection of medium-coarseness

27、abrasive-type surface for this test procedure is designed to simulate results on a dry, well-maintained public roadway. Periodic renewal of the surface is necessary because contamination or wear adds variability to the test results. 4.2 Test Rims The test rim selected should represent a rim used as

28、original equipment and conform to specifications of the TRA or similar organizations. Because of the wide variety of rims available for some tire sizes, and because the rim may affect rolling resistance, it is important to report test rim width and contour along with the test results. Since rim runo

29、ut may affect rolling resistance, good quality rims must be used. SAE INTERNATIONAL J1270 OCT2017 Page 3 of 8_ 4.3 Alignment and Control Accuracies The limits given are selected to minimize the error of rolling resistance data and thus to aid accurate comparisons of different rolling resistance faci

30、lities. The limits reflect standard deviations from the true value; they do not cover systematic errors, which must be eliminated by careful calibration and proper data processing. 4.3.1 Force Method Misalignment of the tire load may result in a significant spindle force component that could be misi

31、nterpreted as rolling resistance. To eliminate this effect, very low limits for tire load offsets would be required (on the order of 0.005 degree for angular offset and 0.02 mm for fore-aft offset). To avoid maintaining impractically low load offsets, a correction technique for load misalignment mus

32、t be developed for facilities employing the force method. The load misalignment correction technique is frequently combined with the correction technique for load-spindle force crosstalk (see 7.2). 4.3.2 Torque Method The large polar moment of inertia of the test wheel gives rise to substantial torq

33、ue variations even if speed variations are very small. Since these torque variations can be misread as rolling resistance, they must be filtered out either statistically or electronically. 4.3.3 Power Method If surface speed cannot be controlled to 0.3 km/h (0.2 mph) for passenger car and light truc

34、k tires, or controlled to 0.8 km/h (0.5 mph) for highway truck and bus tires, the input electrical power should be averaged over several speed cycles and the average speed used in the rolling resistance calculation. 4.4 Instrumentation Accuracy The values selected reflect common accuracies of modern

35、 equipment. In laboratories where more accurate instruments are available, better measurement resolution is encouraged. The specific values recommended are adequate for the following: TABLE 1 INSTRUMENTATION ACCURACY Typical Normal Load Typical Rolling Resistance Produced Passenger Car Tire 5 kn (11

36、00 lbf) 35 N ( 8 lbf) Light Truck Tire 10 kn (2200 lbf) 100 N (22 lbf) Highway Truck and Bus Tires 22 kn (5000 lbf) 220 N (50 lbf) 4.4.1 Force Method This method requires measurement of spindle force and loaded radius. The force measurement must be very precise; it requires careful selection or spec

37、ification of current-technology equipment. 4.4.2 Torque Method This method requires precise measurement of input torque. Modern torque cells may require separate over-torque protection to ensure the needed resolution. 4.4.3 Power Method This method requires precise measurement of electrical power an

38、d speed. The speed resolution required for this method is higher than for the other methods because the average speed during the measurement interval is used in the calculation of rolling resistance. SAE INTERNATIONAL J1270 OCT2017 Page 4 of 8_ 5. TEST CONDITIONS 5.1 Load and Inflation PressureStand

39、ard Test The capped inflation pressure test condition (Test Point 1) in combination with the regulated inflation pressure test conditions constitute the basis for predicting rolling resistance over a wide range of operating conditions. 5.2 Load and Inflation PressureAlternate Test The accuracy of th

40、e predicted values at various loads and inflation pressures is not compromised if the first test point is run at regulated inflation pressure, indicated as Test Point 1A. The final capped inflation pressure at temperature equilibrium of Test Point 1 will usually be close to the regulated inflation p

41、ressure at Test Point 1A so that both points will yield very similar rolling resistance values. Regulated pressure is believed to enhance testing efficiency and to improve the predictive accuracy of the regression model (see 8.2). Note, however, that the alternate test does not deliver information a

42、bout the pressure rise that would occur under normal road service conditions. 5.3 Test Sequence Experiments have suggested that steady-state conditions are achieved more quickly for steps of decreasing rolling resistance. Thus, in order to shorten the total test and at the same time ensure steady-st

43、ate values at all test conditions, testing in the order of decreasing values of rolling resistance is recommended. 5.4 Standard Reference Condition (SRC) for PC and LT Tires The SRC is intended to serve as a simple, single-point measurement that can be used for comparison of the coefficient of rolli

44、ng resistance between tires of different sizes, under their typical use conditions, and for high volume rolling resistance evaluations. 5.5 Test Speed A single speed is recommended, because rolling resistance at equilibrium (steady-state) is relatively insensitive to speed over the range from 60 to

45、100 km/h (40 to 60 mph). 5.6 Ambient Temperature The recommended procedure is a compromise of sufficient accuracy for temperature compensations (see 7.4) within the range between 20 C (68 F) and 28 C (82 F). A representative temperature average is required for each test point. The control of ambient

46、 temperature varies between different laboratories, and various methods may be used to obtain an average temperature for each point. A method for obtaining an average would be to measure the ambient temperature at the beginning, middle, and end of a test point and average the three values. Other ave

47、raging techniques may provide similar results. The intent here is to measure an average temperature and not to take an instantaneous temperature reading. An instantaneous reading may not accurately reflect ambient conditions because the ambient temperature may change during a test. 6. TEST PROCEDURE

48、 6.1 Break-In The cool-down period of at least 2 h for passenger car and light truck tires, or at least 6 h for highway truck and bus tires is recommended to assure that the tire has reached a uniform temperature equal to the ambient temperature. If the tire has undergone other tests prior to the rolling resistance test, break-in may not be necessary. SAE INTERNATIONAL J1270 OCT2017 Page 5 of 8_

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1