ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:18 ,大小:130.43KB ,
资源ID:1027564      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1027564.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(SAE J 2746-2009 Software Assessment Repository《软件评估知识库》.pdf)为本站会员(figureissue185)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

SAE J 2746-2009 Software Assessment Repository《软件评估知识库》.pdf

1、_ SAE Technical Standards Board Rules provide that: “This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising there

2、from, is the sole responsibility of the user.” SAE reviews each technical report at least every five years at which time it may be reaffirmed, revised, or cancelled. SAE invites your written comments and suggestions. Copyright 2009 SAE International All rights reserved. No part of this publication m

3、ay be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of SAE. TO PLACE A DOCUMENT ORDER: Tel: 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) Tel: 724-776-4970 (outside USA)

4、 Fax: 724-776-0790 Email: CustomerServicesae.org SAE WEB ADDRESS: http:/www.sae.org SURFACE VEHICLE STANDARD J2746 APR2009 Issued 2009-04 Software Assessment Repository RATIONALE Not Applicable. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SCOPE 2 1.1 Purpose . 3 2. REFERENCES 3 3. DEFINITIONS . 3 3.1 Terms 3 4. TECHNICAL

5、REQUIREMENTS 3 4.1 Software Assessment Repository Vision 4 4.2 Goals of SAE J2746 Software Assessment Repository . 4 4.3 Role Descriptions of Various Users of the Software Assessment Repository . 5 4.4 Use Case: Enter Assessment Results 6 4.5 Use Case: Grant/Revoke Access . 7 4.6 Use Case: View Asse

6、ssment Results . 10 4.7 Use Case: Request User ID 10 4.8 Use Case: Log into SAE Software Assessment Repository . 11 4.9 SAE Assessment Criteria 11 5. PARTICIPATING IN SAE J2746 SOFTWARE ASSESSMENT REPOSITORY . 18 6. NOTES 18 6.1 Marginal Indicia . 18 FIGURE 1 AUTOSAR FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS . 2 FIGURE 2

7、CMMI ASSESSMENT RESULTS GRID . 16 FIGURE 3 15504-BASED ASSESSMENT RESULTS GRID . 17 TABLE 1 SAE REQUIRED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA . 12 SAE J2746 Issued APR2009 Page 2 of 18 1. SCOPE This standard is intended to provide corporations that develop embedded software for the automotive industry direction on h

8、ow to effectively publish and promote their organizations development capabilities. The organizations maturity may be measured through several capability assessment methods; this document addresses how the results of those assessments are shared within the SAE J2746 Software Assessment Repository. T

9、he repository is the online database system utilized by the SAE to facilitate accurate and secure sharing of corporations software development capabilities. The SAE Software Assessment Repository is a web-based repository that allows organizations that develop embedded software to post and share the

10、ir assessments in a uniform, disciplined manner. The repository does not mandate the use of one assessment method over another; rather, it reports the salient results from industry accepted assessment methods. It is important to recognize that both OEMs and suppliers developing software which goes i

11、nto vehicles should participate in the SAE J2746 Repository and follow improved practices of software engineering. Since car manufacturers OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturer) also develop embedded software, they should participate in the Software Assessment Repository in addition to the supply ba

12、se. In order to better focus software improvements in the industry, the intent of Software Process Improvement (SPI) and related assessments must be focused upon industry specific technologies. When a customer is interested in the capabilities of a supplier, the relevance of those capabilities to th

13、e customers need is critical. SAE J2746 proposes to utilize the Functional Domains of the automotive electronics systems as defined by AutoSAR to partition suppliers capabilities. The six functional domains as defined by AutoSAR are Chassis, Powertrain, Safety, Multimedia/Telematics, Body/Comfort an

14、d Human Machine Interface. FIGURE 1 - AUTOSAR FUNCTIONAL DOMAINS These functional domains provide the repository the ability to better define the capabilities of OEMs and Suppliers for creating specific types of product software. Furthermore, by also understanding the geographic locations of OEMs an

15、d Suppliers engineering facilities, it is possible to understand the capability of a specific team, in a specific location to create a product of a specific Functional Domain. Instead of a blanket statement that Company Y is Level 3, a more precise statement of; “Company Ys engineering team located

16、in Facility X and engineering products of Functional Domain Z is Level 3” would be found within the SAE J2746 Software Assessment Repository (SAR), and offer a higher fidelity of insight into a companys capabilities. SAE J2746 Issued APR2009 Page 3 of 18 1.1 Purpose The impact of software developmen

17、t on pre-production engineering costs has escalated in the last five years to unprecedented levels. Much of this cost is impacted by the quality and reliability of the software deliveries to vehicle builds. Rapid growth of feature content in electronics products has opened the field for new supplier

18、s whose qualifications for software development are often not clear. Organizational level assessments from CMMI, SPICE or other methods do not offer enough granularity or relevance to the OEMs to ensure quality, on-time delivery. The question should not be, “Is this supplier capable?” But rather, “I

19、s the team this supplier intends to use on this product capable of engineering software for products of this Functional Domain?” The significant difference between the answers to these two questions acts as the motivation for the SAE J2746 Software Assessment Repository. The intent of the repository

20、 is to promote finer resolution of software capability in an effort to dramatically improve the quality and reliability of automotive embedded software. This support will promote better software development in the industry reducing pre-production engineering re-work, as well as costly warranty issue

21、s which result from poor software quality. 2. REFERENCES There are no referenced publications specified herein. 3. DEFINITIONS 3.1 Terms Term Definition Assessed To determine the value, significance or extent of http:/ In context of this document, refers to the organization which was the subject of

22、a capability assessment Automotive Embedded Software Software typically written to interact with hardware to perform a function generally utilized in electronics that are on-board production automobiles AutoSAR AUTOSAR (AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture) is an open and standardized automotive soft

23、ware architecture, jointly developed by automobile manufacturers, suppliers and tool developers. (http:/www.autosar.org) CMMI Capability Mature Model Integration, Registered mark of Carnegie Mellon University is a process improvement approach that provides organizations with the essential elements o

24、f effective processes. It can be used to guide process improvement across a project, a division, or an entire organization. CMMI helps integrate traditionally separate organizational functions, set process improvement goals and priorities, provide guidance for quality processes, and provide a point

25、of reference for appraising current processes. (http:/www.sei.cmu.edu) ISO/IEC 15504 (SPICE) ISO/IEC 15504 is published as a full international standard under the general title Information Technology Process Assessment. SAR Software Assessment Repository, the on-line database of software assessments

26、 created by organizations participating in SAE J2746. 4. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS In the fall of 2005, the Automotive Industry established the SAE J2746 Software Assessment Repository (SAR) Task Force with the purpose of achieving significant improvements in software quality and reductions in cost thr

27、oughout the automotive supply chain. The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) and International Standards Organization (ISO) have developed specific guidelines for software development processes that have been embraced throughout the supply chain in the manufacture of products for automotive applica

28、tions, as well as other industries. These requirements are published internationally as ISO 15504-series (aka SPICE and AutoSPICE), and CMMI v1.2 Dev by SEI. In this document these standards will be collectively referred to as CMMI/SPICE. SAE J2746 Issued APR2009 Page 4 of 18 An initiative of the SA

29、E J2746 Task Force was the development of a global scheme for the use of assessment results performed by assessors, based on the CMMI/SPICE standards. This system will house assessment data which will be available to the SAE J2746 SAR members by the establishment and maintenance of a common global S

30、AE J2746 Software Assessment Repository (SAR). 4.1 Software Assessment Repository Vision Foster the improvement of automotive software development capabilities by promoting more effective software process improvement activities and assessments Repository Motivations Is Automotive Software Quality Im

31、proving? Is it better or cheaper? Is “Our Company is Capability Level X” useful? Does the declaration have enough resolution? Is it marketed and interpreted appropriately? What group(s) was(were) assessed and when? Do Assessment Results Distinguish Suppliers? Are the OEMs doing Assessments internall

32、y? Do the OEMs want to write more software? What is the Automotive Industry capability/maturity as a whole? How does our organization compare to the collective whole? How can improvement initiatives costs be contained? Can accurate results of assessments be easily available to my customers? Can I re

33、duce the number of assessments? Potential Repository Impacts Reduce Redundant OEM Assessments Reduce OEM Assessment Expense Saves supplier burden Provide Consistent Results Improve Assessment Meaning & Interpretation Provide details of the maturity level Prevent surprise issues due to loose interpre

34、tations Improvement in Industry Software Quality By promoting effective process improvement Visibility to organizations and their improvement initiatives Benchmarking and tracking the overall maturity of the Industry 4.2 Goals of SAE J2746 Software Assessment Repository The Software Assessment Repos

35、itory has five main goals designed to assist in achieving the stated Vision. These five goals are as follows: 1. Develop criteria to annotate results of assessments providing information which will assist the SAE in measuring automotive industry software development capabilities. a. Develop a detail

36、ed set of evaluation criteria. b. Annotate the assessment results provided by users of the repository. c. Assist the SAE in measuring automotive industry software development capabilities. 2. Provide guidelines for understanding annotated assessment data and its use in evaluation of potential softwa

37、re suppliers. a. Help a user determine the capability of a software supplier in a specific area. b. Explain the SAE annotation criteria defined in Goal #1, to interpret a suppliers results. SAE J2746 Issued APR2009 Page 5 of 18 3. Create a data repository for automotive organizations to selectively

38、share capability assessment results between customer and supplier. a. Actual assessment results plus SAE annotations i. In the basic form/method in which the supplier was assessed ii. If the supplier was assessed using CMMI, then CMMI results will be reported. b. Additional SAE annotations will be p

39、rovided i. Added to help refine the fidelity of the information from assessments (Goal #1) ii. A simple interpretation guide will be provided to explain these SAE annotations, and their definition (Goal #2) c. Allow detailed sharing between repository members i. Access granted by supplier to custome

40、r ii. Details are restricted only to potential customers d. Provide global secure access 4. Analyze repository data and publish industry “state of practice” reports. a. Generate relevant Auto Industry Analysis i. Specific results not publicly tied to supplier ii. Comparison of ECM software suppliers

41、 by Functional Domain b. Mean, Min and Max on different Process Areas i. To compare your possible suppliers against c. Compilation of best practices 5. Establish industry software development capability targets. a. Prescribe the use of SAE standards to close gaps and achieve industry targets 4.3 Rol

42、e Descriptions of Various Users of the Software Assessment Repository 4.3.1 Assessor The individual responsible for performing the capability assessment and compilation of the analysis data being placed into the repository could be any person from the assessed organization or neutral 3rdparty qualif

43、ied individual. May also enter the data into the repository if they have Organizational Administrative rights for the company that they assessed. 4.3.2 Assessed The Assessed is the SAE J2746 SAR participating organization that has stored their assessment results in the on-line SAR. 4.3.3 Administrat

44、or The Administrator is a person who has the authority to update and remove assessment results. There are three types of administrators. 4.3.3.1 SAE Administrator The SAE Administrator is a person who grants User IDs, and has access to all areas of the SAE J2746 SAR, including archived data. 4.3.3.2

45、 Regional Administrator (Asia, Europe, Americas) The Regional Administrator is a person who is allowed to make modifications to data once it has been entered into the SAE Assessment Repository. SAE J2746 Issued APR2009 Page 6 of 18 4.3.3.3 Organizational Administrator The Organizational Administrato

46、r is one or more people at the Assessed organization that has “Organizational Admin” privileges to the repository for their organization. The Organizational Administrator will have the authority to perform the following actions: Enter assessment results. Grant any user access to view the companys as

47、sessment results. Grant access to other people within their organization to have Organizational Admin privilege. 4.3.4 User The User is any person who has an ID in the SAE Software Assessment Repository. They may be employees of Assessed organizations that are members of SAE J2746 SAR. Users are ass

48、igned access privileges which allow, or prevent access to assessment results stored in the database. 4.4 Use Case: Enter Assessment Results 4.4.1 Brief Description This use case is designed to describe the events that occur when the assessed organization has received their assessment results, and ar

49、e ready to publish this information into the SAE software assessment repository. The Actor for this use case will be referred to as “The Assessor”. The Assessor could be any person from the assessed organization or the certified assessor. This use case will cover the steps for the Assessor to enter the assessment results into the SAE softwa

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1