ANSI IEEE C37 10 1-2000 Guide for the Selection of Monitoring for Circuit Breakers《断路器监控选用指南》.pdf

1、Recognized as anAmerican National Standard (ANSI)The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997, USACopyright 2001 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.All rights reserved. Published 18 April 2001. Printed in the United Stat

2、es of America.Print: ISBN 0-7381-2730-2 SH94905PDF: ISBN 0-7381-2731-0 SS94905No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.IEEE Std C37.10.1-2000(R2006)IEEE Guide for the Selection of

3、Monitoring for Circuit BreakersSponsorSwitchgear Committeeof theIEEE Power Engineering SocietyReaffirmed 30 March 2006Approved 7 December 2000IEEE-SA Standards BoardApproved 3 May 2001American National Standards InstituteAbstract: Direction is provided for the selection of monitoring and for diagnos

4、tic parameters to beused with high-voltage circuit breakers (i.e., above 100 V). Guidance on appropriate parameters tobe considered for monitoring applied to various circuit breaker technologies is also provided.Keywords: failure characteristics; failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA); failure mo

5、des, effects,and criticality analysis (FMECA); failure rate; high-voltage circuit breakers; monitoring; online conditionmonitoring; risk assessment IEEE Standards documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinating Committees of theIEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) St

6、andards Board. The IEEE develops its standards through a consensus develop-ment process, approved by the American National Standards Institute, which brings together volunteers representing variedviewpoints and interests to achieve the final product. Volunteers are not necessarily members of the Ins

7、titute and serve with-out compensation. While the IEEE administers the process and establishes rules to promote fairness in the consensus devel-opment process, the IEEE does not independently evaluate, test, or verify the accuracy of any of the information containedin its standards.Use of an IEEE St

8、andard is wholly voluntary. The IEEE disclaims liability for any personal injury, property or other dam-age, of any nature whatsoever, whether special, indirect, consequential, or compensatory, directly or indirectly resultingfrom the publication, use of, or reliance upon this, or any other IEEE Sta

9、ndard document.The IEEE does not warrant or represent the accuracy or content of the material contained herein, and expressly disclaimsany express or implied warranty, including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a specific purpose, or thatthe use of the material contained herein

10、 is free from patent infringement. IEEE Standards documents are supplied AS IS.The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market,or provide other goods and services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the vie

11、wpoint expressed at thetime a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in the state of the art andcomments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is subjected to review at least every five years for revi-sion or reaffirmation. When a d

12、ocument is more than five years old and has not been reaffirmed, it is reasonable to concludethat its contents, although still of some value, do not wholly reflect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to checkto determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.In publish

13、ing and making this document available, the IEEE is not suggesting or rendering professional or other servicesfor, or on behalf of, any person or entity. Nor is the IEEE undertaking to perform any duty owed by any other person orentity to another. Any person utilizing this, and any other IEEE Standa

14、rds document, should rely upon the advice of a com-petent professional in determining the exercise of reasonable care in any given circumstances.Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meaning of portions of standards as they relate to specificapplications. When the need for

15、interpretations is brought to the attention of IEEE, the Institute will initiate action to prepareappropriate responses. Since IEEE Standards represent a consensus of concerned interests, it is important to ensure that anyinterpretation has also received the concurrence of a balance of interests. Fo

16、r this reason, IEEE and the members of its soci-eties and Standards Coordinating Committees are not able to provide an instant response to interpretation requests except inthose cases where the matter has previously received formal consideration. Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome f

17、rom any interested party, regardless of membership affiliation withIEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a proposed change of text, together with appropriatesupporting comments. Comments on standards and requests for interpretations should be addressed to:Secretary, IEE

18、E-SA Standards Board445 Hoes LaneP.O. Box 1331Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331USAIEEE is the sole entity that may authorize the use of certification marks, trademarks, or other designations to indicate com-pliance with the materials set forth herein.Authorization to photocopy portions of any individual sta

19、ndard for internal or personal use is granted by the Institute ofElectrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., provided that the appropriate fee is paid to Copyright Clearance Center. Toarrange for payment of licensing fee, please contact Copyright Clearance Center, Customer Service, 222 Rosewood Driv

20、e,Danvers, MA 01923 USA; (978) 750-8400. Permission to photocopy portions of any individual standard for educationalclassroom use can also be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center.Note: Attention is called to the possibility that implementation of this standard may require use of subject m

21、at-ter covered by patent rights. By publication of this standard, no position is taken with respect to the existence orvalidity of any patent rights in connection therewith. The IEEE shall not be responsible for identifying patentsfor which a license may be required by an IEEE standard or for conduc

22、ting inquiries into the legal validity orscope of those patents that are brought to its attention.Copyright 2001 IEEE. All rights reserved. iiiIntroduction(This introduction is not part of IEEE Std C37.10.1-2000, IEEE Guide for the Selection of Monitoring for CircuitBreakers.)This first issue of thi

23、s guide, IEEE Std C37.10.1-2000, provides guidance in the selection of monitoring forhigh-voltage circuit breakers. Monitoring for a particular circuit breaker is very dependent on the circuitbreaker technology, age of the circuit breaker, details of the specific application, and the risks associate

24、dwith the various failures possible with the circuit breaker and its many associated power or protection andcontrol and other support components. This guide is not intended to provide guidance on the monitoring of protection and control circuits anddevices used with circuit breakers, even though suc

25、h circuits and devices can have a significant effect on theoverall performance of circuit breaker functions.NOTEThis guide makes no attempt to address the many possible protection and control failure modes. These failuremodes are dependent on the technology of the protective devices as well as on th

26、e manner in which they are applied onthe power system. IEEE Std C37.10.1-2000 does not address the subject of software used in protective, control, or mon-itoring devices and systems.Several methodologies are introduced. A methodology termed failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) ispresented to a

27、ssist identification of significant failure modes and their causes. The concepts of risk assess-ment are introduced. The subsequently derived priority and economic analysis determines when and wheremonitoring is warranted.The selection of monitoring for circuit breakers should be based on logical en

28、gineering and economic princi-ples. Appropriate monitoring can be selected by considering failure modes and their effects on the circuitbreaker and on the power system, the degree of risk or criticality associated with the failure, and the economicsassociated with each type of failure. Monitoring ca

29、n be used to reduce or replace some inspections, optimizemaintenance, enhance availability of the circuit breaker, improve safety to human and environment, and deriveinformation on the condition of a specific circuit breaker (or information from several circuit breakers can beextrapolated to a large

30、r population of identical circuit breakers).Considerably more information can be gained by combining various signals than from an individual signal. More advanced monitoring systems may include diagnostic analysis using tools such as artificial intelligence.These may relate recent monitoring data to

31、 historic monitoring data and provide engineering conclusions oractions required. Systems may be further enhanced by remote access through supervisory control and dataacquisition (SCADA) or use of telephone dial-up systems. Eventually, it is presumed that systems will becomeintegral to substation au

32、tomation development.Readers of this guide are advised of ongoing standards development work now underway that will provideuseful supplementary guidance.The IEEE Substations Committee is the draft stages of developing Draft Standard for Substation IntegratedProtection, Control, and Data Acquisition

33、Communications. The communication requirement for devicesused to monitor substation equipment is a rapidly changing area. The IEC is in the draft stages of producing IEC 60300, Dependability ManagementPart 3-13: ApplicationguideProject risk management.The IEEE Transformer Committee is developing sim

34、ilar guidance for selecting monitoring for transformers. iv Copyright 2001 IEEE. All rights reserved.Monitoring of predominant failure causes and remedying them may also significantly reduce minor failurecauses from occurring.NOTEMany of the techniques discussed in this guide could have application

35、with many other types of components.At the time this standard was completed, the Working Group on the Selection of Monitoring for CircuitBreakers had the following membership:W. J. (Bill) Bergman, ChairThe following members of the balloting committee voted on this standard:Roy W. AlexanderMike Allen

36、William BradleyPatrick DiLilloRandall L. DotsonPete DwyerDavid GaliciaCharles G. GarnerRick J. GavazzaMietek T. GlinkowskiVictor GorCarlos IsaacRichard P. JacksonRobert JeanjeanR. William LongNeil McCordGeorges F. MontilletAnne F. MorganRaja MunayirjiYasin I. MusaJeffrey H. NelsonEdward J. ODonnellM

37、iklos J. OroszJon RennieGary SchaufflerDon SeayDevki N. SharmaH. Melvin SmithR. Kirkland SmithAlan D. StormsJohn S. TanneryJohn WebbAlan WilsonRoy W. AlexanderEdwin AverillStan BillingsAnne BosmaTed BurseCarlos L. Cabrera-RuedaJames F. ChristensenAlexander DixonRandall L. DotsonJ. J. DravisDenis Duf

38、ournetDouglas J. EdwardsMarcel FortinCharles G. GarnerRuben D. GarzonMietek T. GlinkowskiKeith GrayCharles R. HeisingHarold L. HessRichard P. JacksonAftab H. KhanJoseph L. KoepfingerP. L. Kola rikDavid G. KumberaStephen R. LambertW. E. LaubachJohn G. LeachGeorge N. LesterAlbert LivshitzR. William Lo

39、ngJeffrey D. LordNeil McCordNigel P. McQuinPeter MeyerDaleep C. MohlaGeorges F. MontilletAnne F. MorganPatrick MurphyYasin I. MusaJeffrey H. NelsonPaul J. NotarianMiklos J. OroszGordon O. PerkinsRobert J. PuckettDavid N. ReynoldsHugh C. RossGerald SakatsGary SchaufflerLarry H. SchmidtCurt A. Schwalb

40、eDevki N. SharmaH. Melvin SmithR. Kirkland SmithGuy St. JeanDavid StoneAlan D. StormsDavid SwindlerChand Z. TailorStan H. TelanderMalcolm V. ThadenCharles L. WagnerLarry E. YonceCopyright 2001 IEEE. All rights reserved. vWhen the IEEE-SA Standards Board approved this standard on 7 December 2000, it

41、had the followingmembership:Donald N. Heirman, ChairJames T. Carlo, Vice ChairJudith Gorman, Secretary*Member EmeritusAlso included is the following nonvoting IEEE-SA Standards Board liaison:Alan Cookson, NIST RepresentativeDonald R. Volzka, TAB RepresentativeYvette Ho SangIEEE Standards Project Edi

42、torSatish K. AggarwalMark D. BowmanGary R. EngmannHarold E. EpsteinH. Landis FloydJay Forster*Howard M. FrazierRuben D. GarzonJames H. GurneyRichard J. HollemanLowell G. JohnsonRobert J. KennellyJoseph L. Koepfinger*Peter H. LipsL. Bruce McClungDaleep C. MohlaJames W. MooreRobert F. MunznerRonald C.

43、 PetersenGerald H. PetersonJohn B. PoseyGary S. RobinsonAkio TojoDonald W. Zipsevi Copyright 2001 IEEE. All rights reserved.Contents1. Scope 12. References 23. Definitions . 24. Purpose of monitoring . 35. Methodology 45.1 Decision-making sequence 45.2 Failure modes and effects analysis 45.3 Circuit

44、 breaker failure modes, failure characteristics/patterns, and monitoring parameters . 75.4 Risk assessment . 265.5 Cost-benefit (economic) analysis. 29Annex A (informative) Examples of circuit breaker monitoring analysis 37Annex B (informative) Examples of maintenance programs with and without monit

45、oring. 48Annex C (informative) Bibliography 49Copyright 2001 IEEE. All rights reserved. 1IEEE Guide for the Selection of Monitoring for Circuit Breakers1. ScopeThis guide provides direction for the selection of monitoring and for diagnostic parameters to be used withhigh-voltage circuit breakers (i.

46、e., above 1000 V). It provides guidance on appropriate parameters to be con-sidered for monitoring applied to various circuit breaker technologies.This guide will lead a user through an analysis of circuit breaker performance and application expectations.The analysis includes a failure modes and eff

47、ects analysis (FMEA) of the circuit breaker and associatedcomponents, an analysis of the risks associated with failure of the specific application, and a discussion ofthe items to be considered in a cost-benefit study to justify application of monitoring in its many forms.Monitoring is dependent on

48、the technology of the circuit breaker and monitoring available at the time ofapplication. FMEA as well as failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) are methods of reli-ability analysis intended to identify failures that have significant consequences affecting the systemperformance in

49、the considered application.NOTEThe examples shown are for illustrative purposes only. Numeric and financial values shown are solely for thepurpose of showing that values can be assigned if so chosen. Actual circumstances will dictate values, costs, andexpenses to be used in the quantifying of risk, economic evaluation and justification, and the ultimate selection of moni-toring. The specific circuit breaker technology employed will also either restrict or broaden opportunities for monitoring.This guide provides advice on what parameters can be monitored to derive informatio