ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:145 ,大小:31.94MB ,
资源ID:1247043      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1247043.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(GBC LEED ND RATING SYSTEM-2009 LEED Neighborhood Development Rating System (Updated April 2012)《》.pdf)为本站会员(bonesoil321)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

GBC LEED ND RATING SYSTEM-2009 LEED Neighborhood Development Rating System (Updated April 2012)《》.pdf

1、For Public Use and Display LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development Rating System Created by the Congress for the New Urbanism, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the U.S. Green Building Council (Updated October 2010) For Public Use and Display LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development Rating System

2、Created by the Congress for the New Urbanism, Natural Resources Defense Council, and the U.S. Green Building Council (Updated April 2012)LEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt i The built environment has a profound impact on our natural environment, economy, health, and productivity. Through its Lea

3、dership in Environmental and Energy Design (LEED ) certification programs, the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) is transforming the built environment. The green building movement offers an unprecedented opportunity to respond to the most important challenges of our time, including global climate

4、change, dependence on nonsustainable and expensive sources of energy, and threats to human health. The work of innovative building planning professionals is a fundamental driving force in the green development movement. Such leadership is a critical component to achieving USGBCs mission of a sustain

5、able built environment for all within a generation. USGBC MeMBerShip USGBCs greatest strength is the diversity of our membership. USGBC is a balanced, consensus-based nonprofit with more than 20,000 member companies and organizations representing the entire building industry. Since its inception in

6、1993, USGBC has played a vital role in providing a leadership forum and a unique, integrating force for the building industry. USGBCs programs have three distinguishing characteristics: Committee-based The heart of this effective coalition is our committee structure, in which volunteer members desig

7、n strategies that are implemented by staff and expert consultants. Our committees provide a forum for members to resolve differences, build alliances, and forge cooperative solutions for influencing change in all sectors of the building industry. Member-driven Membership is open and balanced and pro

8、vides a comprehensive platform for carrying out important programs and activities. We target the issues identified by our members as the highest priority. We conduct an annual review of achievements that allows us to set policy, revise strategies, and devise work plans based on members needs. Consen

9、sus-focused We work together to promote green buildings and neighborhoods, and in doing so, we help foster greater economic vitality and environmental health at lower costs. We work to bridge ideological gaps between industry segments and develop balanced policies that benefit the entire industry. C

10、ontact the U.S. Green Building Council: 2101 L Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20037 (800) 795-1747 Office (202) 828-5110 Fax www.usgbc.org partnerShip The Congress for the New Urbanism and the Natural Resources Defense Council collaborated with the U.S. Green Building Council in creating the LE

11、ED for Neighborhood Development Rating System. USGBCs consensus-focused approach to rating system development was furthered by these organizations expertise in New Urbanism and smart growth strategies. LEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt ii CopyriGht Copyright 2009 by the U.S. Green Building Coun

12、cil, Inc. All rights reserved. The U.S. Green Building Council, Inc. (USGBC ) devoted significant time and resources to create this LEED Rating System. USGBC authorizes individual use of the LEED Rating System. In exchange for this authorization, the user agrees: 1. to retain all copyright and other

13、 proprietary notices contained in the LEED Rating System, 2. not to sell or modify the LEED Rating System, and 3. not to reproduce, display, or distribute the LEED Rating System in any way for any public or commercial purpose. Unauthorized use of the LEED Rating System violates copyright, trademark,

14、 and other laws and is prohibited. DiSClaiMer None of the parties involved in the funding or creation of the LEED Rating System, including USGBC, its members, volunteers, or contractors, assume any liability or responsibility to the user or any third parties for the accuracy, completeness, or use of

15、 or reliance on any information contained in the LEED Rating System, or for any injuries, losses, or damages (including, without limitation, equitable relief ) arising from such use or reliance. Although the information contained in the LEED Rating System is believed to be reliable and accurate, all

16、 materials set forth within are provided without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of the accuracy or completeness of information or the suitability of the information for any particular purpose. As a condition of use, the user covenants not t

17、o sue and agrees to waive and release the U.S. Green Building Council, its members, volunteers, and contractors from any and all claims, demands, and causes of action for any injuries, losses, or damages (including, without limitation, equitable relief ) that the user may now or hereafter have a rig

18、ht to assert against such parties as a result of the use of, or reliance on, the LEED Rating System. U.S. Green Building Council 2101 L Street, NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20037 traDeMarkS USGBC , U.S. Green Building Council , and LEED are registered trademarks of the U.S. Green Building Council, In

19、c.LEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt iii aCknowleDGMentS The LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development Rating System has been made possible only through the efforts of many dedicated volunteers, staff members from USGBC and the two partner organizations, consultants, and others in the USGBC communi

20、ty. The rating system development work was managed and implemented by USGBC staff and the LEED for Neighborhood Development Core Committee and included review and input by many Technical Advisory Group (TAG) members with oversight by the LEED Steering Committee. We extend our deepest gratitude to al

21、l of our LEED committee members who participated in the development of this rating system, and especially the LEED for Neighborhood Development Core Committee, for their tireless volunteer efforts and support of USGBCs mission: leeD Steering Committee Scot Horst, Former Chair U.S. Green Building Cou

22、ncil Joel Ann Todd, Vice-Chair Joel Ann Todd Neal Billetdeaux JJR Bryna Dunn Moseley Architects Stu Carron JohnsonDiversey, Inc. Holley Henderson H2 Ecodesign, LLC Greg Kats Good Energies Malcolm Lewis CTG Energetics, Inc. Christine Magar Greenform Muscoe Martin M2 Architecture Jessica Millman Agora

23、 DC Sara OMara Choate Construction Company Kristin Shewfelt Architectural Energy Corporation Lynn Simon Simon and Associates, Inc. Bob Thompson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Indoor Environments Management Branch Mark Webster Simpson Gumpertz & Heger energy and atmosphere ta G Marcus Sheffer,

24、 Chair Energy Opportunities/7Group Chris Schaffner The Green Engineer, LLP John Adams U.S. General Services Administration Lane Burt Natural Resources Defense Council Allan Daly Taylor Engineering Charles Dorgan University of WisconsinMadison Jay Enck Commissioning & Green Building Solutions Ellen F

25、ranconi Architectural Energy Corporation Scott Frank Jaros Baum & Bolles Nathan Gauthier Harvard Office for Sustainability Gail Hampsmire CTG Energetics, Inc. John Hogan City of Seattle Bion Howard Building Environmental Science and Technology Rusty Hodapp Dallas/Fort Worth Airport Board Greg Kats G

26、ood Energies Dan Katzenberger Engineering, Energy, and the EnvironmentLEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt iv Richard Lord Carrier Corporation Bob Maddox Sterling Planet Brenda Morawa BVM Engineering, Inc. Erik Ring LPA, Inc. Michael Rosenberg U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest National

27、Laboratory Greg San Martin PG&E Gordon Shymko G.F. Shymko & Associates Mick Schwedler The Trane Company Jorge Torres Coto mbo, Inc. Tate Walker Energy Center of Wisconsin Michael Zimmer Thompson Hine LLP location and planning ta G Ted Bardacke, Chair Global Green USA Justin Horner, Vice-Chair Natura

28、l Resources Defense Council Laurence (LJ) Aurbach Office of Laurence Aurbach Uwe Brandes Urban Land Institute Fred Dock City of Pasadena Bruce Donnelly Auricity Reid Ewing University of Utah Lois Fisher Fisher Town Design, Inc. Tim Frank Sierra Club Norman Garrick University of Connecticut Ron Kilco

29、yne Greater Bridgeport Transit Dana Little Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Steve Mouzon New Urban Guild Lucy Rowland Athens-Clarke Co. Planning Commission Harrison Rue ICF International Tony Sease Civitech, Inc Laurie Volk Zimmerman/Volk Associates Materials and resources ta G Steven Baer,

30、Chair Five Winds International Lee Gros, Vice-Chair Lee Gros Architect and Artisan, Inc. Paul Bertram Kingspan Paul Bierman-Lytle Renomics Corporation Steve Brauneis Rocky Mountain Institute Amy Costello Armstrong World Industries Chris Dixon NBBJ Ann Edminster Design AVEnues Chris Geiger San Franci

31、sco Department of the Environment Avi Golen Construction Waste Management Brad Guy Building Materials Reuse Association Rick Levin Kahler Slater, Inc. Nadav Malin BuildingGreen, LLC Nancy Malone Siegel & Strain Architects Joep Meijer The Right Environment Ltd. Co. Kriten Ritchie Gensler Raymond Smit

32、h U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyLEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt v Wayne Trusty Athena Sustainable Materials Institute Denise Van Valkenburg MASCO Retail Cabinet Group Mark Webster Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Gabe Wing Herman Miller, Inc Sustainable Sites ta G Steven Benz, Chair Sasaki Asso

33、ciates Alfred Vick, Vice-Chair University of Georgia Michele Adams Meliora Environmental Design Neal Billetdeaux JJR Gina Bocra Burt Hill Mark Brumbaugh Brumbaugh & Associates Joby Carlson Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University Jenny Carney YRG Sustainability Laura Case BMV-Eng

34、ineering, Inc. Stewart Comstock Maryland Department of the Environment Stephen Cook Brickman Bryna Dunn Moseley Architects Jay Enck Commissioning & Green Building Solutions Ron Hand E/FECT. Sustainable Design Solutions Richard Heinisch Acuity Lighting Group Heather Holdridge Lake Flato Architects Ja

35、son King Greenworks, PC Michael Lane Lighting Design Lab Marita Roos HNTB Corporation Katrina Rosa EcoLogic Studio Zolna Russell Hord Coplan Macht, Inc. Kyle Thomas Natural Systems Engineering water efficiency ta G Neal Billetdeaux, Chair JJR John Koeller, Vice-Chair Koeller and Company Damann Ander

36、son Hazen & Sawyer, P .C. Gunnar Baldwin TOTO USA, INC Robert Benazzi Jaros Baum & Bolles Doug Bennett Southern Nevada Water Authority David Bracciano Tampa Bay Water David Carlson Columbia University Ron Hand E/FECT. Sustainable Design Solutions Bill Hoffman H.W. Hoffman and Associates Winston Huff

37、 SSR Engineers Joanna Kind Eastern Research Group, inc. Heather Kinkade ARCADIS Don Mills Clivus Multrum, Inc. Geoff Nara Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc Karen Poff Austin Energy Shabbir Rawalpindiwala Kohler Co.LEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt vi Neil Rosen North Shore LIJ Health Syste

38、m Robert Rubin McKim and Creed Stephanie Tanner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Bill Wall Clivus New England, Inc. Daniel Yeh University of South Florida leeD for neighborhood Development Core Committee The LEED 2009 for Neighborhood Development Rating System is the work of members of the LEED

39、for Neighborhood Development Core Committee, both those who have worked on this version and those who helped create previous versions. In addition, staff would like to thank Criterion Planners, Urban Advantage, and AECOM for the graphics. Current Members Jessica Millman, Chair Agora DC Bert Gregory,

40、 Vice-Chair Mithun Susan Mudd, Vice-Chair The Congress for the New Urbanism Ted Bardacke Global Green USA Constance Beaumont Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development Kaid Benfield Natural Resources Defense Council John Dalzell Boston Redevelopment Authority Victor Dover Dover, Kohl & P

41、artners Lee Epstein Chesapeake Bay Foundation Douglas Farr Farr Associates Tim Frank Sierra Club Daniel Hernandez Jonathan Rose Companies Bruce Knight City of Champaign, IL John Norquist The Congress for the New Urbanism Ken Potts McGough Companies Former Members Eliot Allen Criterion Planners Dana

42、Beach Coastal Conservation League Bill Browning Terrapin Bright Green Sharon Feigon I-Go Car Sharing Rebecca Flora U.S. Green Building Council Justin Horner Natural Resources Defense Council Melissa Knott Forest City Enterprises Megan Lewis JF New Michael Pawlukiewicz Urban Land Institute Shelley Po

43、ticha U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Tom Richman Office of Tom Richman Elizabeth Schilling Smart Growth Leadership Institute Laura Watchman Watchman Consulting Sandy Wiggins Conscilience, LLCLEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt vii leeD 2009 For neiGhBorhooD DeVelopMent projeCt C

44、heCkliSt Smart location and linkage 27 possible points prerequisite 1 Smart Location required prerequisite 2 imperiled Species and Ecological Communities required prerequisite 3 Wetland and Water body Conservation required prerequisite 4 Agricultural Land Conservation required prerequisite 5 floodpl

45、ain Avoidance required Credit 1 preferred Locations 10 Credit 2 brownfield redevelopment 2 Credit 3 Locations with reduced Automobile Dependence 7 Credit 4 bicycle Network and Storage 1 Credit 5 housing and Jobs proximity 3 Credit 6 Steep Slope protection 1 Credit 7 Site Design for habitat or Wetlan

46、d and Water body Conservation 1 Credit 8 restoration of habitat or Wetlands and Water bodies 1 Credit 9 Long-term Conservation management of habitat or Wetlands and Water bodies 1 neighborhood pattern and Design 44 possible points prerequisite 1 Walkable Streets required prerequisite 2 Compact Devel

47、opment required prerequisite 3 Connected and open Community required Credit 1 Walkable Streets 12 Credit 2 Compact Development 6 Credit 3 mixed-Use Neighborhood Centers 4 Credit 4 mixed-income Diverse Communities 7 Credit 5 reduced parking footprint 1 Credit 6 Street Network 2 Credit 7 transit facil

48、ities 1 Credit 8 transportation Demand management 2 Credit 9 Access to Civic and public Spaces 1 Credit 10 Access to recreation facilities 1 Credit 11 visitability and Universal Design 1 Credit 12 Community outreach and involvement 2 Credit 13 Local food production 1 Credit 14 tree-Lined and Shaded

49、Streets 2 Credit 15 Neighborhood Schools 1 Green infrastructure and Buildings 29 possible points prerequisite 1 Certified green building required prerequisite 2 minimum building Energy Efficiency required prerequisite 3 minimum building Water Efficiency required prerequisite 4 Construction Activity pollution prevention requiredLEED 2009 for NEighborhooD DEvELopmENt viii Credit 1 Certified green buildings 5 Credit 2 building Energy Efficiency 2 Credit 3 building Water Efficiency 1 Credit 4 Water

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1