ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:3 ,大小:11.33KB ,
资源ID:1247978      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1247978.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(IEEE 1003 5 INT 1-2006 en Information Technology - POSIX Ada Language Interfaces - Part 1 Binding for System Application Program Interface (API) - Amendment 2 P.pdf)为本站会员(赵齐羽)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

IEEE 1003 5 INT 1-2006 en Information Technology - POSIX Ada Language Interfaces - Part 1 Binding for System Application Program Interface (API) - Amendment 2 P.pdf

1、IEEE-SA - IEEE Std 1003.5-1992 interpretationsIEEE Standards Interpretations for IEEE Std 1003.5 (1999 Edition) - IEEE Standard for Information Technology-POSIX Ada Language Interfaces-PART 1: Binding for System Application Program Interface Copyright 2006 by the Institute of Electrical and Electron

2、ics Engineers, Inc. All Rights Reserved.This is an interpretation of IEEE Std 1003.5 (1999 Edition). Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and are not intended to constitute an alteration to the original standard or to supply consulting information. Permission is

3、 hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standard Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this do

4、cument is at your own risk.IEEE Standards Department Copyrights and Permissions 445 Hoes Lane, P. O. Box 1331 Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USADecember 2006 Interpretation Number: #1 Topic: Open_And_Map_Shared_Memory and Open_Or_Create_And_Map_Shared_Memory functions. Relevant Clauses: 12.5.1.2

5、Interpretation request #1 This standard states that these functions are equivalent to a sequence of calls. This includes a call to Open_Shared_Memory, with the Mode parameter set as follows: “If the value of Protection is set to Allow_Write, Mode is Read_Write; otherwise Mode is Read_Only.“However,

6、Protection is a /set/ of options and may be set to “Allow_Write + Allow_Read“. By following the standard literally, this would lead to a Mode of Read_Only, which was clearly not what was intended.This interpretation would make these functions unusable for opening or creating a shared memory mapping

7、with both read and write access, which this user supposes is the most commonly desired mode of operation.However, this user sees two possible interpretations that would make the functions usable:1. The quoted sentence above should be interpreted as “If the value of Protection /includes/ Allow_Write,

8、 Mode is Read_Write; otherwise Mode is Read_Only.“2. As it is not specified exactly how the Protection parameter should be used in the subsequent call to Map_Memory, a possible interpretation would be that one should always add the Allow_Read option in the call to Map_Memory.http:/standards.ieee.org

9、/findstds/interps/1003.5-1999.html (1 of 3)11/4/2011 10:16:17 PMIEEE-SA - IEEE Std 1003.5-1992 interpretationsIn this users opinion, number #2 (above) is counterintuitive, as one would expect the protection parameters passed on to Map_Memory being the same as those initially submitted. And besides t

10、hat, this would decrease the flexibility by not allowing the user to create a write-only mapping.To illustrate the problematics, a simple example will follow. The example consists of two Ada functions which communicate via a shared memory area. With a common implementation of the IEEE 1003.5 (Floris

11、t), the problem arises in the form of a Storage_Error when trying to access the shared area:-shmserv.adb- with POSIX_Generic_Shared_Memory, POSIX_IO, POSIX_Memory_Mapping, POSIX.Permissions; with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Shmserv is type Data is record I : Integer; J : Integer; end record; package GSM i

12、s new Posix_Generic_Shared_Memory(Data); Descriptor : POSIX_IO.File_Descriptor; Data_Access : GSM.Shared_Access; begin Descriptor := GSM.Open_Or_Create_And_Map_Shared_Memory (“/foo“, POSIX_Memory_Mapping.Allow_Write, POSIX.Permissions.Access_Permission_Set); Data_Access := GSM.Access_Shared_Memory(D

13、escriptor); Data_Access.I := 1; loop Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line(IntegerImage(Data_Access.I); delay(0.5); end loop; end Shmserv; -end shmserv.adb-shmcli.adb- with POSIX_Generic_Shared_Memory, POSIX_IO, POSIX_Memory_Mapping; procedure Shmcli is type Data is record I : Integer; J : Integer; end record; packa

14、ge GSM is new Posix_Generic_Shared_Memory(Data); Descriptor : POSIX_IO.File_Descriptor; Data_Access : GSM.Shared_Access; begin Descriptor := GSM.Open_And_Map_Shared_Memory (“/foo“, POSIX_Memory_Mapping.Allow_Write); Data_Access := GSM.Access_Shared_Memory(Descriptor); loop Data_Access.I := Data_Acce

15、ss.I + 1; delay(1.0); end loop; end Shmcli; -end shmcli.adb-The current Florist implementation of Open_And_Map_Shared_Memory is defined as follows:- function Open_And_Map_Shared_Memory (Name : POSIX.POSIX_String; Protection : POSIX.Memory_Mapping.Protection_Options; Masked_Signals : POSIX.Signal_Mas

16、king := POSIX.RTS_Signals) return POSIX.IO.File_Descriptor is FD : POSIX.IO.File_Descriptor; Mode : POSIX.IO.File_Mode; begin if Protection = POSIX.Memory_Mapping.Allow_Write then Mode := POSIX.IO.Read_Write; else Mode := POSIX.IO.Read_Only; end if; Begin_Critical_Section; begin FD := POSIX.Shared_M

17、emory_Objects.Open_Shared_Memory (Name, Mode, POSIX.IO.Empty_Set, Masked_Signals); POSIX.IO.Truncate_File (FD, Length); Insert_Node (FD, POSIX.Memory_Mapping.Map_Memory (System.Storage_Elements.Storage_Offset (Length), Protection, POSIX.Memory_Mapping.Map_Shared, FD, 0); End_Critical_Section; except

18、ion when others = End_Critical_Section; raise; end; return FD; end Open_And_Map_Shared_Memory; -Interpretation Response #1 There is a problem with the wording of 12.5.1.2, and that your suggested intepretation (item 1 above) is correct. That is where the standard says http:/standards.ieee.org/findst

19、ds/interps/1003.5-1999.html (2 of 3)11/4/2011 10:16:17 PMIEEE-SA - IEEE Std 1003.5-1992 interpretations“If the value of Protection is set to Allow_Write, Mode is Read_Write; otherwise Mode is Read_Only to convey the intended meaning it should instead say“If the value of Protection *includes* Allow_W

20、rite, Mode is Read_Write; otherwise Mode is Read_Only“.Accordingly, it seems the “=“ test in the Florist implementation code below should be changed to “=“.if Protection = POSIX.Memory_Mapping.Allow_Write then Mode := POSIX.IO.Read_Write; else Mode := POSIX.IO.Read_Only; end if;http:/standards.ieee.org/findstds/interps/1003.5-1999.html (3 of 3)11/4/2011 10:16:17 PM

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1