ISO 16100-3-2005 Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 3 Interface services pr.pdf

1、 Reference number ISO 16100-3:2005(E) ISO 2005INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16100-3 First edition 2005-12-15 Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates Systmes dautomatisat

2、ion industrielle et intgration Profil daptitude du logiciel de fabrication pour interoprabilit Partie 3: Services dinterface, protocoles et gabarits daptitude ISO 16100-3:2005(E) PDF disclaimer This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobes licensing policy, this file may be

3、 printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobes licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts

4、no liability in this area. Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the fi

5、le is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below. ISO 2005 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form

6、 or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISOs member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright office Case postale 56 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 749 09 4

7、7 E-mail copyrightiso.org Web www.iso.org Published in Switzerland ii ISO 2005 All rights reserved iii ISO 2005 All rights reserved Contents 1 Scope 1 2 Normative references 1 3 Terms and definitions . 2 3.1 ISO 16100-3 definitions. 2 3.2 Applicable definitions from ISO 16100-1. 3 3.3 Applicable def

8、initions from ISO 16100-2. 4 4 Abbreviated terms . 5 5 Manufacturing software information model and profile 5 5.1 Manufacturing activity and information exchange model. 5 5.2 Manufacturing software unit 6 5.3 Matching capability profiles . 7 5.3.1 General . 7 5.3.2 Type 1 Matcher. 9 5.3.3 Type 2 Mat

9、cher. 9 5.4 Interface service definition. 10 6 Capability profile interface, service, and protocol. 10 6.1 Capability profile service usage. 10 6.1.1 Capability profile access 10 6.1.2 Matching of two capability profiles 10 6.1.3 Service set Type 1 primitives . 12 6.1.4 Common management services fo

10、r the capability profiling and analysis process . 14 6.1.5 Validation of capability profiles . 16 6.2 Protocol specifications . 16 6.2.1 Service URL syntax . 16 6.2.2 Type 1 service protocol 17 6.2.3 Common management service protocol. 18 6.2.4 Type 2 and Type 3 service protocols 19 7 Templates. 20

11、7.1 Overall structure 20 7.1.1 General . 20 7.1.2 Formal structure 20 7.2 Common part . 20 7.2.1 General . 20 7.2.2 Formal structure 21 7.3 Specific part . 23 7.4 Usage of Templates. 23 8 Conformance 23 A.1 General capability profile template 24 A.1.1 Filled template 24 A.1.2 Common part sample 24 A

12、.2 Manufacturing capability class structure . 25 A.2.1 Sample of a reference class structure using XML syntax. 25 A.2.2 Example of a requirement capability profile.26 A.2.3 Example of a capability profile of a MSU 27 A.2.4 Matching a required capability profile with one of a MSU 29 ISO 16100-3:2005(

13、E) iv ISO 2005 All rights reserved A.3 Capability class structure for a test unit .29 A.3.1 Sample of a reference class structure using XML syntax.29 A.3.2 Example of a requirement capability profile .34 A.3.3 Example of a capability profile of a MSU.35 B.1 Capability class diagram and object model3

14、7 B.2 Capability collaboration diagram.43 C.1 Software unit for Data Analysis and Visualization (DAV)51 C.2 Services Offering common functions .52 C.3 Items The communicated objects .52 C.4 Software components The functional modules of a software unit 53 C.5 Setting up a software unit.54 C.6 Example

15、 of communicated objects58 ISO 16100-3:2005(E) v ISO 2005 All rights reserved ISO 16100-3:2005(E) Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally ca

16、rried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work

17、. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. The main task of technical committees is to prepare Intern

18、ational Standards. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the

19、 elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. ISO 16100-3 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 184, Industrial automation systems and integration, Subcommittee SC 5, Architecture, communications

20、and integration frameworks. ISO 16100 consists of the following parts, under the general title Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability: Part 1: Framework Part 2: Profiling methodology Part 3: Interface services, protocols and cap

21、ability templates In addition, the following part is envisaged: Part 4: Conformance test methods, criteria and reports vi ISO 2005 All rights reserved Introduction The motivation for ISO 16100 stems from the industrial and economic environment, in particular: a) a growing base of vendor-specific sof

22、tware intensive solutions; b) increasing user difficulty in applying independently-developed standards; c) a need to move to modular and interoperable sets of system integration tools; d) a recognition that application software and the expertise to apply that software are assets of the enterprise. T

23、his part of ISO 16100 is an International Standard for the computer-interpretable and human readable representation of a capability profile. Its goal is to provide a method to represent the capability of manufacturing application software relative to its role throughout the life cycle of a manufactu

24、ring application, independent of a particular system architecture or implementation platform. Certain diagrams in this part of ISO 16100 are constructed following UML conventions. Because not all concepts embodied in these diagrams are explained in the text, some familiarity with UML on the part of

25、the reader is assumed. In this part of the ISO 16100, references to classes (objects) and services use a specific naming convention as shown in the following examples: ServiceAccessPoint a service access point object registerProfile a service primitive for profile registration ISO 16100-3:2005(E) 1

26、1 Scope This part of ISO 16100 specifies requirements for interface services and protocols used to access and edit capability profiles and associated templates used in the capability profiling method defined in Clause 5 of ISO 16100-2. The detailed services for accessing capability profiles and perf

27、orming the matching process on these profiles are defined in this part of ISO 16100. This part of ISO 16100 is applicable only for the interoperability of software units used in the manufacturing domain. Concerns regarding interchangeability of manufacturing software units are outside the scope of t

28、his standard. 2 Normative references The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. ISO 16100-1:

29、2002 Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 1: Framework ISO 16100-2:2003 Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 2: Profiling methodology IEEE 132

30、0.1-1998 Standard for Functional Modeling Language Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0 OMG ad/2003-04-01 Unified Modeling Language; Superstructure v2.0 REC-xml-19980210 Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 W3C Recommendation REC-soap12-20021219 SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework REC-xmlschema-1

31、-20010502 XML Schema Part 1: Structures Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates ISO 2005 All rights reserved INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16100-3:2005(E)3 Terms and def

32、initions For the purposes of this part of ISO 16100, the following terms and definitions apply. 3.1 ISO 16100-3 definitions 3.1.1 capability profile interface functional (implementation-independent) service access point that provides a set of services described in 5.4 of this part of ISO 16100 to ha

33、ndle capability profiles NOTE In some implementations as noted in ISO 16100-2 the CPI can be implemented by a database server. 3.1.2 capability profile service provider software that implements the capability profile interface 3.1.3 cluster set of manufacturing resource units 3.1.4 component part of

34、 a manufacturing software unit, including manufacturing software components. 3.1.5 consumer user of profile or Matching Level result 3.1.6 matcher mechanism to compare an offered capability profile with a required capability profile. 3.1.7 matching level qualitative measure of how closely a capabili

35、ty profile of a MSU meets the software functional requirements of a manufacturing activity 3.1.8 MSU interoperability capability of a MSU to support a particular usage of an interface specification in exchanging a set of application information with another MSU 3.1.9 MSU interchangeability capabilit

36、y of a MSU to replace another MSU in performing a required function within a particular manufacturing activity 3.1.10 producer generator of profile or Matching Level result for consumption 3.1.11 reference capability class structure schema representing a hierarchy of capability classes to be used fo

37、r capability profiling. 2 ISO 2005 All rights reserved ISO 16100-3:2005(E) 3.1.12 reference dictionary list of capability classes used in the reference capability class structure 3.1.13 schema XML meta-data definition 3.1.14 template schema for a manufacturing software capability profile 3.1.15 type

38、 I matcher matcher that can process profiles derived from the same capability class structure 3.1.16 type II matcher matcher that can process profiles whether they are derived from the same or from different capability class structures 3.2 Applicable definitions from ISO 16100-1 For the purposes of

39、this document, the following terms and definitions from ISO 16100-1 apply. The reference to the specific subclause in ISO 16100-1 appears in brackets after the definition. Following clause C.1.4 of ISO / IEC directives, part 2 some definitions are repeated here with notes added as required. 3.2.1 ca

40、pability set of functions and services with a set of criteria for evaluating the performance of a capability provider 3.3 3.2.2 capability profiling selection of a set of offered services defined by a particular interface within a software interoperability framework 3.4 3.2.3 manufacturing software

41、type of software resource within an automation system that provides value to a manufacturing application (e.g. CAD/PDM) by enabling the flow of control and information among the automation system components involved in the manufacturing processes, between these components and other enterprise resour

42、ces, and between enterprises in a supply chain or demand chain 3.10 3.2.4 manufacturing software capability set of manufacturing software functions and services against a set of criteria for evaluating performance under a given set of manufacturing conditions 3.14 ISO 2005 All rights reserved 3ISO 1

43、6100-3:2005(E) 3.2.5 manufacturing software capability profile concise representation of a manufacturing software capability to meet a requirement of a manufacturing application 3.15 3.2.6 manufacturing software component class of manufacturing software resource intended to support the execution of

44、a particular manufacturing task 3.11 3.2.7 manufacturing software unit class of software resource, consisting of one or more manufacturing software components, performing a definite function or role within a manufacturing activity while supporting a common information exchange mechanism with other u

45、nits 3.12 3.3 Applicable definitions from ISO 16100-2 For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions from ISO 16100-2 apply. The reference to the specific subclause in ISO 16100-2 appears in brackets after the definition. 3.3.1 capability class element within the capability p

46、rofiling method that represents software unit functionality and behaviour with regard to the software units role in a manufacturing activity 3.3 3.3.2 capability profile integration process in which two or more software units interoperate using equivalent interfaces that are configured in a compatib

47、le manner as indicated by their capability profiles 3.4 3.3.3 interface abstraction of the behaviour of an object that consists of a subset of the interactions of that object together with a set of constraints on when they may occur 3.8 3.3.4 profile set of one or more base specifications or sub-pro

48、files or both, and, where applicable, the identification of chosen classes, conforming subsets, options and parameters of those base specifications, or sub-profiles necessary to accomplish a particular function, activity, or relationship 3.10 4 ISO 2005 All rights reserved ISO 16100-3:2005(E) 4 Abbr

49、eviated terms CPI Capability Profile Interface DTD Document Type Definition ML Matching Level MSU Manufacturing Software Unit UML Unified Modeling Language XML eXtensible Markup Language 5 Manufacturing software information model and profile 5.1 Manufacturing activity and information exchange model A manufacturing application shall be modeled as a set of manufacturing processes that are enabled, controlled and automated by a set of manufacturing resources through a series of infor