ISO 16100-5-2009 Industrial automation systems and integration - Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability - Part 5 Methodology for profi.pdf

1、 Reference number ISO 16100-5:2009(E) ISO 2009INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16100-5 First edition 2009-03-01 Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class structures

2、 Systmes dautomatisation industrielle et intgration Profil daptitude du logiciel de fabrication pour interoprabilit Partie 5: Mthodologie pour la correspondance de profil utilisant des structures de classe de capacit multiple ISO 16100-5:2009(E) PDF disclaimer This PDF file may contain embedded type

3、faces. In accordance with Adobes licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infri

4、nging Adobes licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this area. Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were opti

5、mized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below. COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT ISO 2009 All rights reserved. U

6、nless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISOs member body in the country of the requester. IS

7、O copyright office Case postale 56 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11 Fax + 41 22 749 09 47 E-mail copyrightiso.org Web www.iso.org Published in Switzerland ii ISO 2009 All rights reservedISO 16100-5:2009(E) ISO 2009 All rights reserved iii Contents Page Foreword .iv Introductionv 1 Scope .1 2

8、 Normative references .1 3 Terms and definitions.1 4 Abbreviated terms.2 5 Multiple CCSs referenced in manufacturing applications and in MSUs .3 5.1 Profile matching concept .3 5.2 Reuse of MSUs4 5.3 Registration of MSUs4 5.4 Applying reusable MSUs to meet requirements of a new manufacturing applica

9、tion.4 5.5 Manufacturing Domain Data.6 5.6 Mapping capability classes to MDDs.8 6 Methods and rules for capability profiling 9 6.1 Templates for MSU capability profiling .9 6.2 CCS template.9 6.3 Capability profile template .11 6.4 MDM Template.17 6.5 MDD templates 19 7 Profile matching based on mul

10、tiple capability class structures .21 7.1 Capability profile matching procedure21 7.2 Matching report.25 8 Conformance.26 Annex A (informative) Process for Generating a MDM and MDDs 35 Annex B (informative) Example of profile matching using multiple capability classes.36 Bibliography . 50 ISO 16100-

11、5:2009(E) iv ISO 2009 All rights reservedForeword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member b

12、ody interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electro

13、technical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards adopted

14、by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent r

15、ights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. ISO 16100-5 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 184, Automation systems and integration, Subcommittee SC 5, Architecture, communications and integration frameworks. ISO 16100 consists of the following part

16、s, under the general title Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability: Part 1: Framework Part 2: Profiling methodology Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates Part 4: Conformance test methods, criteria and rep

17、orts Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class structures The following part is planned: Part 6: Interface services and protocols for matching profiles using multiple capability class structures ISO 16100-5:2009(E) ISO 2009 All rights reserved v Introduction The motiva

18、tion for this part of ISO 16100 stems from the industrial and economic environment noted by TC 184/SC 5 in its strategic planning discussions, in particular: a growing base of vendor-specific solutions; user difficulties in applying standards; the need to move to modular sets of system integration t

19、ools; the recognition that application software and the expertise to apply that software are assets of the enterprise. ISO 16100 is an International Standard for the computer-interpretable and human-readable representation of a software capability profile. Its goal is to provide a method to represen

20、t the capability of manufacturing software relative to its role throughout the life cycle of a manufacturing application, independent of a particular system architecture or implementation platform. This can lead to reduced production and information management costs to users and vendors/suppliers of

21、 manufacturing applications. Certain diagrams in this part of ISO 16100 are constructed following unified modeling language (UML) conventions. Because not all concepts embodied in these diagrams are explained in the text, some familiarity with UML on the part of the reader is assumed. Annex A descri

22、bes the process for generating a manufacturing domain model (MDM) and manufacturing domain data (MDD). Annex B gives an example of profile matching using multiple capability classes. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16100-5:2009(E) ISO 2009 All rights reserved 1 Industrial automation systems and integrati

23、on Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class structures 1 Scope This part of ISO 16100 specifies the methods and rules for matching existing manufacturing software unit (MSU) capability profiles and requi

24、red capability profiles derived from multiple capability class structures. The methods and rules allow MSUs in manufacturing applications to be evaluated for interoperability and, in some cases, for interchangeability. The following are outside the scope of this part of ISO 16100: services for creat

25、ing, registering and accessing the various templates for the reference manufacturing domain models, the manufacturing domain data and the capability class structures; the conformance tables that reference Type 1 services defined and specified in ISO 16100-3; additional services needed for managing t

26、hese templates in a database or equivalent object repository. 2 Normative references The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document

27、(including any amendments) applies. ISO 16100-1, Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 1: Framework ISO 16100-2:2003, Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interopera

28、bility Part 2: Profiling methodology ISO 16100-3:2005, Industrial automation systems and integration Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates ISO 16100-4:2006, Industrial automation systems and integration Manufac

29、turing software capability profiling for interoperability Part 4: Conformance test methods, criteria and reports 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 16100-1, ISO 16100-2, ISO 16100-3, ISO 16100-4 and the following apply. ISO 16100-5:2009(

30、E) 2 ISO 2009 All rights reserved3.1 capability class element within the capability profiling method that represents software unit functionality and behaviour with regard to the software units role in a manufacturing activity, as denoted in a capability inheritance structure and as deployed in a cap

31、ability aggregation structure NOTE 1 The role of an MSU changes when used in different manufacturing activities; however, the MSUs corresponding capability class is positioned uniquely in an inheritance structure, but can assume different positions in an aggregation structure. NOTE 2 In this part of

32、 ISO 16100, a capability class template is identical to a capability template (see ISO 16100- 2:2003, 6.3, for requirements for capability templates). NOTE 3 Adapted from ISO 16100-2:2003, 3.3. 3.2 capability class structure template extensible markup language (XML) schema representing a hierarchy o

33、f capability classes 3.3 manufacturing domain data unified modeling language (UML) class representing information about manufacturing resources, manufacturing activities, or items exchanged among manufacturing resources within a particular manufacturing domain 3.4 manufacturing domain data template

34、eXtensible markup language (XML) schema representing a manufacturing domain data 3.5 manufacturing domain model particular view of a manufacturing domain, consisting of manufacturing domain data and relationships among them, corresponding to the domains applications 3.6 manufacturing domain model te

35、mplate eXtensible markup language (XML) schema representing a manufacturing domain model 4 Abbreviated terms CCS Capability Class Structure CSI Conformance Statement for the Implementation MDD Manufacturing Domain Data MDM Manufacturing Domain Model MES Manufacturing Operations Management MSU Manufa

36、cturing Software Unit UML Unified Modeling Language XML eXtensible Markup Language ISO 16100-5:2009(E) ISO 2009 All rights reserved 35 Multiple CCSs referenced in manufacturing applications and in MSUs 5.1 Profile matching concept Figure 1 shows the concept of the profile matching using multiple cap

37、ability class structures. NOTE 1 The capability class structures of the provided MSUs (left side of figure) are assumed to be based on the existence of a common capability class inheritance tree. NOTE 2 The actual process for matching profiles uses the same algorithms that exist for matching XML sch

38、emas. Capability Profile Matcher Usable MSUs output input input Template template profile MSU Provider register refer Profiling Modeling (apply ISO 16100) integrate MSUs Manufacturing Application #N register or register Capability Class Structure #X Register or Search the capability class structure

39、Capability Class #A Capability Class #B Capability Class #D Capability Class #B1 Capability Class #B2 Capability Class #B2 Database MDM #a MDD #aa Activity Tree #N Activity #E Activity #F Activity #E1 Activity #E2 Activity #E3 analyzing Requirements of Manufacturing Application #N Manufacturing Appl

40、ication Developer (MSU User) refer register or Capability Class Structure #1 Capability Class Structure #2 register Capability Class Capability Class Structure #N Capability Class #E Capability Class #F Capability Class #E1 Capability Class #E2 Capability Class #E3 refer Capability Template #A Capab

41、ility Template #B Make templates Capability Template #B Capability Template #B Capability Profile #A Capability Profile #B Capability Profile #D Capability Profile #B1 Capability Profile #B2 Capability Template #D Capability Template #A Capability Template #E refer Capability Template #E3 Profile Ca

42、pability Template #E3 Capability Profile #D Capability Profile #B Capability Profile #G Figure 1 Concept of profile matching using multiple capability class structures ISO 16100-5:2009(E) 4 ISO 2009 All rights reserved5.2 Reuse of MSUs To increase the efficiency of manufacturing application developm

43、ent, MSUs previously deployed in a similar manufacturing application should be reused. The MSU user shall only consider as candidates for reuse those MSUs whose capability profiles (see left side of Figure 1) meet his defined matching criteria for its capability profile (see right side of Figure 1).

44、 This part of ISO 16100 specifies a profile matching process wherein the capability class structures of the profiles being matched can be different, thus resulting in a larger number of candidate MSUs for reuse. 5.3 Registration of MSUs A MSU provider registers an MSU so that it is widely available

45、to many potential users of the MSU. The MSU provider shall perform the following procedures to prepare and register an MSU. a) Analyze the set of activities that the MSU enables. The MSU can enable one or more activities. b) Identify the capability class corresponding to each activity and search for

46、 the associated CCS to which the capability class belongs. If an MSU provides capabilities for two or more activities, those activities can belong to the same CCS or the different CCS. c) Select the capability template for each capability class identified. d) If there is no suitable CCS, construct t

47、he appropriate CCS and register it using appropriate database management methods. Then, generate the corresponding template and register that similarly. e) Create the MSU capability profile by filling in the template(s) selected in procedure (c) or the new template(s) created in procedure (d), and r

48、egister the template(s) using appropriate database management methods. 5.4 Applying reusable MSUs to meet requirements of a new manufacturing application When a new manufacturing application is developed, the MSU user shall perform the following procedures. a) Analyze the functional capability requi

49、rements of the manufacturing application and create an activity tree. b) Create a CCS using existing or new capability classes to match the activity tree created in procedure (a), or select an existing CCS by using the methodology of ISO 16100-2. c) For each capability class in the created or selected CCS, fill in the corresponding capability class template to create the set of required capability profiles. d) Using a Type 2 capability profile matcher as described in ISO 16100-3, compa