ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:22 ,大小:118KB ,
资源ID:1343368      下载积分:5000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1343368.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(2017年12月ACCA考试P5高级业绩管理真题及答案解析.doc)为本站会员(sofeeling205)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

2017年12月ACCA考试P5高级业绩管理真题及答案解析.doc

1、2017 年 12 月 ACCA 考试 P5 高级业绩管理真题及答案解析(总分:125.00,做题时间:195 分钟)案例分析题(总题数:4,分数:125.00)Section A This ONE question is compulsory and MUST be attemptedThyme Engine Products (Thyme) manufactures jet aircraft engines for the commercial aircraft market. This is a worldwide business although Thymes production

2、and development are all based in the country of Beeland. Thyme is a listed company and its stated overall objective is to be a world-class jet engine manufacturer trusted by our customers to deliver excellent products. Its promise to its shareholders is that it will maximise their returns. The strat

3、egy to achieve this is to use world-class engineering to design engines and high quality production and customer service in order to drive profitable growth.Thymes share price has recently suffered as a result of the failure of a new engine design which led to large cash losses and a difficulty in o

4、btaining new financing. There has also been a bribery scandal involving a senior manager and one of its key customers. As a result, a new chief executive officer (CEO) has been employed and she has begun a major review of systems at Thyme.The first area which the CEO wants to examine is the informat

5、ion given to the board for strategic decision-making in both the planning and controlling of the business. The government of Beeland has been encouraging information sharing between businesses and has recently sponsored awards for management accounting. The winner of the engineering sector has produ

6、ced a sample dashboard template (with dummy figures) for an annual review and this is given in Appendix 1. The CEO realised that the winner had a very similar overall objective and strategies to Thyme and wants to know what it is about this dashboard that helped it win the award. She does not want a

7、 new dashboard for Thyme at this stage but there may be some useful, specific comments to make about the contents of the dashboard given Thymes recent problems.The CEO has also recently been reading about integrated reporting and in the light of this review of the dashboard, the CEO has also asked f

8、or your views on how integrated reporting might impact on the type of information prepared by the companys management accountants.As high quality engineering products lie at the heart of Thymes competitive advantage, there has been a total quality management (TQM) approach to the management of all r

9、esources and relationships throughout the business. Thyme currently has a project under consideration to develop a new simple jet engine which would compete in the crowded market for small corporate jets. In order to compete in this market, it is believed that a target costing approach to this new e

10、ngine would be beneficial. The CEO wants you to calculate the target cost gap for the new engine using the data in Appendix 2. Next, she wants to know how the use of target costing would fit within the existing TQM approach for this new engine.The new engine project has further raised the profile of

11、 quality as a broad issue at Thyme and the CEO wants your advice on the costs associated with quality. She needs to know the cost of each of the four categories of quality costs. She has gathered data in Appendix 3 for this exercise. She is happy that she has identified that prevention costs are com

12、plete but is worried that some of the possible costs for the other three categories are missing and needs suggestions of cost areas to be examined to identify these missing items. Finally, she needs advice on the relative importance to Thyme of each of the four categories.Required:(分数:50.00)Write a

13、report to the CEO of Thyme to:(i) Evaluate why the dashboard in Appendix 1 was award winning, as requested by the CEO. (15 marks)(ii) Explain broadly the role of the management accountant in providing information for integrated reporting. (6 marks)(iii) Calculate the target cost gap for the new engi

14、ne (using the data in Appendix 2) and assess how the use of this target cost will fit within the TQM approach. (12 marks)(iv) Categorise and calculate the costs of quality at Thyme (given in Appendix 3). Suggest cost areas to be examined as required by the CEO, and evaluate the relative importance o

15、f each category to Thyme. (13 marks)Professional marks will be awarded for the format, style and structure of the discussion of your answer. (4 marks) (分数:50.00)_Section B TWO questions ONLY to be attemptedChicory operates a chain of depots in Deeland, supplying and fitting tyres and other vehicle p

16、arts to lorries, buses and agricultural vehicles. Chicorys objective is to maximise shareholder wealth. Due to a slowdown in the Deeland economy, Chicorys recent performance has been weak. An unsuccessful acquisition has also caused cash flow problems and a write-off of goodwill of $247m in the year

17、 to 30 June 2017.The board has commissioned a benchmarking exercise to help improve Chicorys performance. This exercise will involve comparison of a range of financial and other operational performance indicators against Fennel, a similar business in Veeland. Fennel has agreed to share some recently

18、 available performance data with Chicory as they operate in different countries. The reason Fennel was chosen as a benchmark is that as well as supplying and fitting tyres and parts to heavy vehicles, a large part of Fennels business involves supplying electricity to charging points to recharge elec

19、tric cars. Fennel installs and operates the charging points in public places, and users pay Fennel for the electricity they use. The board of Chicory intends to follow a similar business model as the use of electric cars is increasing in Deeland.The Veeland economy is growing strongly. Electric car

20、use there has increased rapidly in the last two years, encouraged by tax incentives for businesses, like Fennel, to install and operate charging points. The Veeland government has also underwritten loans taken out by businesses to finance this technology, which has enabled Fennel to borrow funds for

21、 the significant capital investment required. The cost of components used in the charging points is falling rapidly. Capitalisation of development costs related to this technology is permitted in Veeland, but not in Deeland. In 2015, Fennel invested heavily in IT systems which significantly improved

22、 performance by increasing the availability of parts in its depots, and reducing inventories.Chicory uses return on average capital employed (ROCE) as its main financial performance indicator, and this is to be benchmarked against Fennel. One board member suggested that, though it may have some disa

23、dvantages, EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) could have advantages as a performance measure over the existing measure, and should also be included in the benchmarking exercise.You have been given the most recently available financial data for both businesses in Ap

24、pendix 1, with the data for Fennel being converted into $ from its home currency.Notes1 $6m of new capital was introduced into Fennel on 31 March 2015. Normally, new net investment is spread evenly over the year.2 Operating profit is after charging depreciation of non-current assets of $18m in Chico

25、ry, and $25m in Fennel.Required:(分数:25)(1).Evaluate the relative financial performance of Chicory against Fennel using the two financial performance measures identified in the benchmarking exercise and evaluate their use as performance measures in this situation.(i) ROCE. (6 marks)(ii) EBITDA. (10 m

26、arks)(分数:16)_(2).Advise Chicory on the problems of using the benchmarking exercise with Fennel as a way to improve performance.(分数:9)_Tosemary and Rhyme Hospital (TRH) is a small hospital for the treatment of patients with only minor injuries. Patients arriving at TRH with more serious injuries are

27、referred to a larger hospital nearby. Those with minor injuries are admitted into TRH and wait to be seen by a doctor. After treatment, most patients leave the hospital and need not return. If their treatment has failed, however, they are re-admitted for additional treatment.Patients do not have to

28、pay for treatment at TRH, which is a not-for-profit, public sector hospital. It is funded entirely by the government from taxation and a fixed level of funding is received from the government each year. It is up to TRH to allocate its funding to different areas, such as doctors salaries, medicines a

29、nd all other costs required to run a hospital.TRHs objectives are: to give prompt access to high quality medical treatment for patients to provide value for money for the taxpayer, as measured by the 3Es framework of economy, efficiency and effectiveness to contribute to medical science by developin

30、g innovative ways to deliver treatment to patients.It has been suggested to TRH that the hospital has inadequate performance measurement systems in place to assess whether it is achieving its objectives, and that insufficient attention is given to the importance of non-financial performance indicato

31、rs. You have been asked for your advice, and have met with some of the doctors to get their opinions.One senior doctor has told you, I think TRH always delivers value for money. Weve always achieved our total financial budgets. Doctors here work much longer hours than colleagues in other hospitals,

32、often without being paid for working overtime. There is not enough government funding to recruit more doctors. At busy times, weve started referring more patients arriving at TRH to the larger hospital nearby. This has helped reduce average waiting times. Patients arriving at TRH are now seen by a d

33、octor within 3 hours 50 minutes rather than 4 hours as was previously the case. So, were already doing all we can. I dont know how much time we spend developing innovative ways to deliver treatment to patients though, as most of the performance data we doctors receive relates to financial targets.Re

34、cent performance data for TRH and national average information has been provided in Appendix 1. This is indicative of the data which the doctors at TRH receive.Notes1 National average for other public sector minor injuries hospitals.2 Staff satisfaction rating was obtained by conducting a survey of

35、all 25 doctors. A survey score of 100% represents totally satisfied, and a score of 0% represents totally unsatisfied.Required:(分数:25)(1).Explain why non-financial performance indicators are particularly important to measure the performance of not-for-profit organisations such as TRH.(分数:5)_(2).Just

36、ify one performance measure for each of the components of the value for money framework used at TRH and, using that measure evaluate whether TRH is delivering value for money.(分数:10)_(3).Evaluate the extent to which the management style at TRH can be said to be budget constrained and advise on the i

37、mplications of this approach for managing TRHs performance.(分数:10)_Sweet Cicely (SC) manufactures sweets and confectionery and has delivered stable but modest increases to the shareholder wealth for many years. Following a change in ownership, the new shareholders are keen to increase the long-term

38、performance of the business and are prepared to accept a high level of risk to achieve this.SC is considering setting up a factory to manufacture chocolate bars. There are three options (1, 2 and 3) for the size and output capacity of the new chocolate factory. SC must choose a size most suited to t

39、he expected demand for its products. As well as the impact of the quality, branding and pricing of its products, demand for SC chocolate bars will be influenced by external factors such as consumer tastes for chocolate over other sweets, and even the suggested health benefits of certain types of cho

40、colate.A high-cost ingredient in chocolate bars is cocoa, a commodity traded on international markets. The market price of cocoa fluctuates with worldwide demand. Due to economic growth, chocolate consumption is rising in many countries, where it was once considered a luxury. In some countries, howe

41、ver, governments are considering introducing additional taxes on products containing sugar in order to reduce the consumption of chocolate and confectionery products. Being derived from an agricultural crop, the availability and price of cocoa is also influenced by climatic conditions, soil erosion,

42、 and disease. Conflicts and political instability in cocoa growing regions can also restrict its availability. Recent technological advances in the production of cocoa, such as the use of genetically modified crops, promise higher yields from cocoa plants in the near future.You have been asked to he

43、lp SC choose one of the three options for the new chocolate factory. One board member told you: The board proposed expanding into cake manufacturing several years ago. With hindsight, our planning on that proposal was poor. We sold only slightly fewer cakes than expected, but hadnt realised how sens

44、itive our operating profit would be to a small change in demand. The previous shareholders thought problems in the cake business would put their dividends at risk, so SC stopped manufacturing cakes, barely a year after it started. The board does not want to repeat these mistakes. We want to minimise

45、 the opportunity cost of making the wrong decision about the size of the new chocolate factory.Appendix 1 shows the net present values for the three options discounted at SCs current cost of capital. Appendix 2 shows the expected operating profit generated by the three options in the first year of t

46、he project, according to the market price of cocoa, and assuming an annual demand of 70 million chocolate bars.Required:(分数:25)(1).Advise SC why decisions, such as what size of chocolate factory to build, must include consideration of risk and uncertainty, and evaluate the use of PEST analysis in ma

47、naging the risk and uncertainty surrounding the project.(分数:14)_(2).Using the data in Appendix 1, explain which of the three options for the new chocolate factory would be preferred by the board and the new shareholders according to their respective risk appetites.(分数:6)_(3).Using the data in Appendix 2, recommend which of the three options for the new chocolate factory a risk neutral investor would choose, and explain any problems with the approach

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1