ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:8 ,大小:59.50KB ,
资源ID:1381031      下载积分:5000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1381031.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(【考研类试卷】2012年上海外国语大学英语翻译基础真题试卷及答案解析.doc)为本站会员(syndromehi216)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

【考研类试卷】2012年上海外国语大学英语翻译基础真题试卷及答案解析.doc

1、2012年上海外国语大学英语翻译基础真题试卷及答案解析(总分:44.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、词语翻译(总题数:22,分数:40.00)1.英译汉_2.Austerity measures(分数:2.00)_3.UNESCO(分数:2.00)_4.The US Senate(分数:2.00)_5.APEC(分数:2.00)_6.The Washington Post(分数:2.00)_7.NATO(分数:2.00)_8.Arab Spring(分数:2.00)_9.Gary Locke(分数:2.00)_10.Reuters(分数:2.00)_11.The Wall Street Jou

2、rnal(分数:2.00)_12.汉译英_13.十二五规划(分数:2.00)_14.十七届三中全会(分数:2.00)_15.全国人大(分数:2.00)_16.新华社(分数:2.00)_17.软实力(分数:2.00)_18.中美战略经济对话(分数:2.00)_19.上海合作组织(分数:2.00)_20.珠江三角洲(分数:2.00)_21.西气东输(分数:2.00)_22.北京共识(分数:2.00)_二、英汉互译(总题数:4,分数:4.00)23.英译汉_24.Reforming Education The great schools revolution Education remains th

3、e trickiest part of attempts to reform the public sector. But as ever more countries embark on it, some vital lessons are beginning to be learned Sep 17th 2011|DRESDEN, NEW YORK AND WROCLAW| from the print edition From Toronto to Wroclaw, London to Rome, pupils and teachers have been returning to th

4、e classroom after their summer break. But this September schools themselves are caught up in a global battle of ideas. In many countries education is at the forefront of political debate, and reformers desperate to improve their national performance are drawing examples of good practice from all ove

5、r the world. Why now? One answer is the sheer amount of data available on performance, not just within countries but between them. In 2000 the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) at the OECD, a rich-country club, began tracking academic attainment by the age of 15 in 32 countries.

6、Many were shocked by where they came in the rankings. (PISAs latest figures appear in table 1.) Other outfits, too, have been measuring how good or bad schools are. McKinsey, a consultancy, has monitored which education systems have improved most in recent years. Technology has also made a differenc

7、e. After a number of false starts, many people now believe that the internet can make a real difference to educating children. Hence the success of institution like Americas Kahn Academy (see article). Experimentation is also infectious; the more governments try things, the more others examine, and

8、copy, the results. Above all, though, there has been a change in the quality of the debate. In particular, what might be called “the three great excuses“ for bad schools have receded in importance? Teachers union have long maintained that failures in Western education could be blamed on skimpy gover

9、nment spending, social class and cultures that did not value education. All these make a difference, but they do not determine outcomes by themselves. The idea that good schooling is about spending money is the one that has been beaten back hardest. Many of the 20 leading economic performers in the

10、OECD doubled or tripled their education spending in real terms between 1970 and 1994, yet outcomes in many countries stagnatedor went backwards. Educational performance varies widely even among countries that spend similar amounts per pupil. Such spending is highest in the United Statesyet America l

11、ags behind other developed countries on overall outcomes in secondary education. Andreas Schleicher, head of analysis at PISA, thinks that only about 10% of the variation in pupil performance has anything to do with money. Many still insist, though, that social class makes a difference. Martin Johns

12、on, an education trade unionist, points to Britains “inequality between classes, which is among the largest in the wealthiest nations“ as the main reason why its pupils under perform. A review of reforms over the past decade by researchers at Oxford University supports him. “Despite rising attainmen

13、t levels,“ it concludes, “there has been little narrowing of long standing and sizeable attainment gaps. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds remain at higher risks of poor outcomes.“ American studies confirm the point; Dan Goldhaber of the University of Washington claims that “non-school factors“,

14、such as family income, account for as much as 60% of a childs performance in school.Yet the link is much more variable than education egalitarians suggest. Australia, for instance, has wide discrepancies of income, but came a creditable ninth in the most recent PISA study. China, rapidly developing

15、into one of the worlds least equal societies, finished first. Culture is certainly a factor. Many Asian parents pay much more attention to their childrens test results than Western ones do, and push their schools to succeed. Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea sit comfortably at the top of McKinsey

16、s rankings (see table 2). But not only do some Western countries do fairly well; there are also huge differences within them. Even if you put to one side the unusual Asians, as this briefing will now do, many Western systems could jump forward merely by bringing their worst schools up to the standar

17、d of their best. So what are the secrets of success? Though there is no one template, four important themes emerge: decentralisation (handing power back to schools); a focus on underachieving pupils; a choice of different sorts of schools; and high standards for teachers. These themes can all betrac

18、ed in three places that did well in McKinseys league: Ontario, Poland and Saxony.(分数:2.00)_25.汉译英_26.国务院新闻办发表中国特色社会主义法律体系白皮书,这是 2011年 10月 27号发布的。以下是其中的一些内容。 社会实践是法律的基础,法律是实践经验的总结、提炼。社会实践永无止境,法律体系也要与时俱进。建设中国特色社会主义是一项长期的历史任务,完善中国特色社会主义法律体系同样是一项长期而又艰巨的任务,必须随着中国特色社会主义实践的发展不断向前推进。 法律的生命力在于实施。中国特色社会主义法律体系

19、的形成,总体上解决了有法可依的问题,对有法必依、执法必严、违法必究提出了更为突出、更加紧迫的要求。中国将积极采取有效措施,切实保障宪法和法律的有效实施,加快推进依法治国、建设社会主义法治国家的进程。(分数:2.00)_2012年上海外国语大学英语翻译基础真题试卷答案解析(总分:44.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、词语翻译(总题数:22,分数:40.00)1.英译汉_解析:2.Austerity measures(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:财政紧缩措施)解析:3.UNESCO(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(United Nations Educational Scie

20、nce and Cultural Organization)联合国教科文组织)解析:4.The US Senate(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(美国)参议院)解析:5.APEC(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation)亚太经济合作组织亚太经合组织)解析:6.The Washington Post(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(美国)华盛顿邮报)解析:7.NATO(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(North Atlantic Treaty Organization)北大西洋公约组织)解析:8

21、.Arab Spring(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:阿拉伯之春)解析:9.Gary Locke(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:骆家辉(原美国驻华大使)解析:10.Reuters(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(美国)路透社)解析:11.The Wall Street Journal(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:(美国)华尔街日报)解析:12.汉译英_解析:13.十二五规划(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:Twelfth Five-Year Plan)解析:14.十七届三中全会(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:the Third Pl

22、enary Session of the seventeenth Central Committee)解析:15.全国人大(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:NPC(National Peoples Congress)解析:16.新华社(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:the Xinhua News Agency)解析:17.软实力(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:Soft Power)解析:18.中美战略经济对话(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogue)解析:19.上海合作组织(分数:2.

23、00)_正确答案:(正确答案:SCO(Shanghai Cooperation Organization)解析:20.珠江三角洲(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:Pearl River Delta)解析:21.西气东输(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:project of natural gas transmission from West to East China; West-East Gas Pipeline)解析:22.北京共识(分数:2.00)_正确答案:(正确答案:Beijing Consensus)解析:二、英汉互译(总题数:4,分数:4.00)23.英译汉_解析

24、:24.Reforming Education The great schools revolution Education remains the trickiest part of attempts to reform the public sector. But as ever more countries embark on it, some vital lessons are beginning to be learned Sep 17th 2011|DRESDEN, NEW YORK AND WROCLAW| from the print edition From Toronto

25、to Wroclaw, London to Rome, pupils and teachers have been returning to the classroom after their summer break. But this September schools themselves are caught up in a global battle of ideas. In many countries education is at the forefront of political debate, and reformers desperate to improve thei

26、r national performance are drawing examples of good practice from all over the world. Why now? One answer is the sheer amount of data available on performance, not just within countries but between them. In 2000 the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) at the OECD, a rich-country cl

27、ub, began tracking academic attainment by the age of 15 in 32 countries. Many were shocked by where they came in the rankings. (PISAs latest figures appear in table 1.) Other outfits, too, have been measuring how good or bad schools are. McKinsey, a consultancy, has monitored which education systems

28、 have improved most in recent years. Technology has also made a difference. After a number of false starts, many people now believe that the internet can make a real difference to educating children. Hence the success of institution like Americas Kahn Academy (see article). Experimentation is also i

29、nfectious; the more governments try things, the more others examine, and copy, the results. Above all, though, there has been a change in the quality of the debate. In particular, what might be called “the three great excuses“ for bad schools have receded in importance? Teachers union have long main

30、tained that failures in Western education could be blamed on skimpy government spending, social class and cultures that did not value education. All these make a difference, but they do not determine outcomes by themselves. The idea that good schooling is about spending money is the one that has bee

31、n beaten back hardest. Many of the 20 leading economic performers in the OECD doubled or tripled their education spending in real terms between 1970 and 1994, yet outcomes in many countries stagnatedor went backwards. Educational performance varies widely even among countries that spend similar amou

32、nts per pupil. Such spending is highest in the United Statesyet America lags behind other developed countries on overall outcomes in secondary education. Andreas Schleicher, head of analysis at PISA, thinks that only about 10% of the variation in pupil performance has anything to do with money. Many

33、 still insist, though, that social class makes a difference. Martin Johnson, an education trade unionist, points to Britains “inequality between classes, which is among the largest in the wealthiest nations“ as the main reason why its pupils under perform. A review of reforms over the past decade by

34、 researchers at Oxford University supports him. “Despite rising attainment levels,“ it concludes, “there has been little narrowing of long standing and sizeable attainment gaps. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds remain at higher risks of poor outcomes.“ American studies confirm the point; Dan Gol

35、dhaber of the University of Washington claims that “non-school factors“, such as family income, account for as much as 60% of a childs performance in school.Yet the link is much more variable than education egalitarians suggest. Australia, for instance, has wide discrepancies of income, but came a creditable ninth in the most recent PISA study. China, rapidly developing into one of the worlds least equal

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1