ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:DOC , 页数:27 ,大小:146KB ,
资源ID:1381538      下载积分:5000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-1381538.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(【考研类试卷】2016年中国海洋大学翻译硕士英语真题试卷及答案解析.doc)为本站会员(orderah291)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

【考研类试卷】2016年中国海洋大学翻译硕士英语真题试卷及答案解析.doc

1、2016 年中国海洋大学翻译硕士英语真题试卷及答案解析(总分:122.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、Vocabulary(总题数:20,分数:40.00)1.The great ballplayer and civil rights leader Jackie Robinson was the_of both physical and moral strength.(分数:2.00)A.epitomeB.episodeC.animosityD.apotheosis2.Those vicious Hollywood reporters often_movie stars, forever da

2、maging their public images.(分数:2.00)A.absolveB.applaudC.impairD.malign3.In_disregard of his parents stated wishes, Steven wore a T-shirt and jeans to their dinner party.(分数:2.00)A.conventionalB.flagrantC.fluorescentD.comprehensive4.Most prisons make little effort to_inmates so that they can lead pro

3、ductive, wholesome lives after their release.(分数:2.00)A.fluctuateB.persevereC.rehabilitateD.recapture5.Professor Rubin never_during a lecture. Even his jokes related to the days topic.(分数:2.00)A.succumbedB.curtailedC.distractedD.digressed6.Dr. Segura has a _ sign on his office door: “Id like to help

4、 you out. Which way did you come in?“(分数:2.00)A.facetiousB.infamousC.grislyD.hypocritical7.Melissa is so_that she wants to be with other people even when shes studying.(分数:2.00)A.ostentatiousB.gregariousC.scrupulousD.dexterous8.If you cant afford to travel, reading guidebooks can give you a (n) _exp

5、erience of traveling in foreign countries.(分数:2.00)A.optimumB.sensoryC.vibrantD.vicarious9.Bob cant get his boss to say whether or not he intends to give him a raise. When Bob asks him, he _, saying, “Youve been doing good work, Bob.“(分数:2.00)A.blursB.equivocatesC.inundatesD.disavows10.When she audi

6、tioned for the play, Julie gave a (n) _performance. She read the lines perfectly.(分数:2.00)A.reprehensibleB.fortuitousC.impeccableD.solicitous11.When she handed in her term paper late, Diane _ a story that her computer had crashed. The truth is that she doesnt even use a computer.(分数:2.00)A.insinuate

7、dB.fabricatedC.misconstruedD.derided12.The writer Thoreau had no liking for_. He wrote in his journal, “That man is richest whose pleasures are the cheapest.“(分数:2.00)A.opulenceB.proximityC.affinityD.sagacity13.The building_the earthquake but then_by a fire.(分数:2.00)A.was survived; destroyedB.surviv

8、ed; was destroyedC.survived; destroyedD.was survived; was destroyed14.Ill be with you in_.(分数:2.00)A.one quarter of an hourB.a quarter of one hourC.a quarter of an hourD.a quarter of hour15.John was the first person I saw_hospital.(分数:2.00)A.on leavingB.by leavingC.in leavingD.on to leave16.She was_

9、as anyone could have had.(分数:2.00)A.as patient teacherB.a patient a teacherC.as patient as teacherD.as patient a teacher17._Derek nowadays; hes so busy at the office.(分数:2.00)A.We see hardly everB.We hardly see everC.We hardly ever seeD.Hardly we ever see18.If the North Sea_in winter, you could walk

10、 from London to Oslo.(分数:2.00)A.happened to freezeB.frozeC.should freezeD.should happen to freeze19.Whats the chance_five heads when you toss a coin five times?(分数:2.00)A.of throwingB.to throwC.of throwD.throw20.I_you can swim so well and I cant.(分数:2.00)A.hateB.hate thatC.hate itD.hate it that二、Rea

11、ding Comprehensio(总题数:5,分数:40.00)The Asian tiger mom that Amy Chua portrays in her new book may seem like just one more species in the genus Extreme Parent the counterpart to the hovering American Parents helicopters or the Scandinavian Curling Parents, who frantically rush ahead of their children,

12、sweeping their paths clear of the tiniest obstacles. The common characteristics include an obsession with a childs success, a reflex to treat kids as extensions or reflections of oneself and patterns of conduct that impartial observers might class as insane if not criminal, if not both. In Chuas cas

13、e, this famously includes prohibiting grades lower than an A, TV, playdates and sleepovers, and warning her pianist child that “if the next times not PERFECT, Im going to TAKE ALL YOUR STUFFED ANIMALS AND BURN THEM.“ In the case of the classic Western helicopter parent, it starts with Baby Einstein

14、and reward charts for toilet training, and it never really ends, which is why colleges have to devote so many resources to teaching parents how to leave their kids alone. But it is the differences between the Tigers and the Choppers that help explain the furor Chua has caused, at least in the U. S.

15、Tigers fixate on success, defined as achievement in precision-oriented fields like music and math; Choppers are obsessed with failure and preventing it at all costs. Tigers operate in a culture of discipline; Choppers, in a culture of fear. Tigers view children as tough, able to take the abuse; Chop

16、pers view them as precious, to be raised under glass. Their fury at a bad grade is more likely to land on the teacher than on the child. And if Chua appears to sentence her children to slave labor, Western parents enshrine their children and crave their friendship. “The thing that impresses me most

17、about America,“ observed Edward, Duke of Windsor, who knew something about indulgence, “is the way parents obey their children.“ There is something bracing about Chuas apparent indifference to her daughters hostility, especially for parents who have learned that even if you let your teenagers spend

18、50 hours a week on Facebook, theyll still find reasons to hate you. The reactions to Chuas book, Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, have ranged from praise for her honesty to scorn for her “extreme, rigid and authoritarian approach,“ as one critic put it. But in less hysterical precincts, she elicits

19、a more conflicted response. First reaction: My God, shes crazy. Second reaction: Maybe shes right. I suspect one reason the book has touched such a nerve is a suspicion among the Choppers that an excessive fear of failure guarantees it that if you dont let your kids get clobbered now and then by a t

20、ough teacher, theyll never have the resilience to thrive as adults in a competitive economy. Twenty-first century parenting already seemed like a gladiatorial contest, its battles fought in playgrounds , at book clubs and especially online, with the rise of parenting websites where parents O. K. , m

21、ainly moms claw and bite. You let your toddler have Froot Loops? You quit karate lessons? Western parents may exalt freedom and self-expression, but in many ZIP codes, parenting is a highly conformist activity, with protocols every bit as strict as Chuas. Commenters spank the moms who appear insuffi

22、ciently committed to breast feeding. Some of Chuas critics sound just as smug when they declare that the Tigers “ inside-the-box thinking is why Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Michael Dell and/or a cure for cancer will never come from China. “ Too much discipline, they argue, makes for submissiveness and l

23、ack of imagination, because imagination by its nature is subversive; it colors outside the lines. Likewise, invention, the creation of something utterly new, violates the authority of the present and the tyranny of tradition.But this much derision, I suspect, reflects some doubts. Western families h

24、ave no monopoly on happiness, and those of the helicopter variety at least do not exactly encourage wild individuality in their children. Trust your instincts, Dr. Spock advised back in 1946; but that involves a leap of faith that many modern parents find terrifying. Helicopter parents are great bel

25、ievers in expertise: read enough books, consult enough professionals, and you can crack the parenting code. Chuas daughters are, by all accounts, girls any parent would be proud of. But maybe the real appeal is her tone of certainty in discussing something so confounding as child rearing as if its a

26、 puzzle to be solved rather than a picture to be painted, and theres no way to know what it will look like until its done.(分数:10.00)(1).Tiger mothers and Chopper mothers mainly differ in_.(分数:2.00)A.degree of concernB.method of parentingC.requisite disciplineD.idea of success(2).According to Paragra

27、ph 5, which word can best describe parents reaction to Chuas book?(分数:2.00)A.Radical.B.Normal.C.Polarized.D.Complimentary.(3).The phrase “in many ZIP codes“ in Paragraph 6 can be paraphrased as_.(分数:2.00)A.in terms of ZIP codesB.to some extentC.in many fieldsD.in many regions(4).The major problem wi

28、th Chuas parenting (Chinese parenting) is that children lack_.(分数:2.00)A.disciplineB.imaginationC.individualityD.happiness(5).In the authors opinion, the real charm of Chuas way of parenting is her_.(分数:2.00)A.monopolyB.faithC.certaintyD.confidencePeople say money doesnt buy happiness. Except, accor

29、ding to a new study from Princeton Universitys Woodrow Wilson School, it sort of does up to about $ 75, 000 a year. The lower a persons annual income falls below that benchmark, the unhappier he or she feels. But no matter how much more than $ 75, 000 people make, they dont report any greater degree

30、 of happiness. Before employers rush to hold or raise everyones salary to $ 75, 000, the study points out that there are actually two types of happiness. Theres your changeable, day-to-day mood: whether youre stressed or blue or feeling emotionally sound. Then theres the deeper satisfaction you feel

31、 about the way your life is going. While having an income above the magic $ 75,000 cutoff doesnt seem to have an impact on the former (emotional well-being), it definitely improves peoples life satisfaction. In other words, the more people make above $ 75, 000, the more they feel their life is worki

32、ng out on the whole. But it doesnt make them any more jovial in the mornings. The study, by economist Angus Deaton and psychologist Daniel Kahneman, who has won a Nobel Prize for Economics, analyzed the responses of 450, 000 Americans polled by Gallup and Healthways in 2008 and 2009. Participants we

33、re asked how they had felt the previous day and whether they were living the best possible life for them. They were also asked about their income. The authors found that most Americans 85% regardless of their annual income, felt happy each day. Almost 40% of respondents also reported feeling stresse

34、d (which is not mutually exclusive with happiness) and 24% had feelings of sadness. Most people were also satisfied with the way their life was going. So, where does the $ 75, 000 come into play? Researchers found that lower income did not cause sadness itself but made people feel more ground down b

35、y the problems they already had. The study found, for example, that among divorced people, about 51% who made less than $ 1,000 a month reported feeling sad or stressed the previous day, while only 24% of those earning more than $ 3, 000 a month reported similar feelings. Among people with asthma, 4

36、1% of low earners reported feeling unhappy, compared with about 22% of the wealthier group. Having money clearly takes the sting out of adversities. At $ 75, 000, that effect disappears. For people who earn that much or more, individual temperament and life circumstances have much more sway over the

37、ir lightness of heart than money. The study doesnt say why $ 75, 000 is the benchmark, but “ it does seem to me a plausible number at which people would think money is not an issue,“ says Deaton. At that level, people probably have enough expendable cash to do things that make them feel good, like g

38、oing out with friends. But in the bigger view of their lives, peoples evaluations were much more tied to their income. The more they made, the more they felt their life was going well. The survey asked respondents to place themselves on a life-satisfaction ladder, with the first rung meaning their l

39、ives were not going well and the 10th rung meaning it was as good as it could be. The higher their income, the higher the rung people chose. “ Importantly, the same percentage increase in income has the same effect on evaluation for everyone, rich or poor alike, even though the absolute dollar amoun

40、ts differ,“ the authors write. So every 10% rise in annual income moves people up the satisfaction ladder the same amount, whether theyre making $25, 000 or $ 100, 000. “High incomes dont bring you happiness, but they do bring you a life you think is better,“ conclude the authors. Might it be time f

41、or Oprah to give these guys their own show? Past research on money and happiness has also found that its not absolute wealth thats linked with happiness , but relative wealth or status that is, how much more money you have than your neighbors. Its no surprise, then, that when the same polls are done

42、 in different countries, Americans come out as a bit of a mixed lot; theyre fifth in terms of happiness, 33rd in terms of smiling and 10th in terms of enjoyment. At the same time, theyre the 89 th biggest worriers, the 69 th saddest and fifth most stressed people out of the 151 nations studied. Even

43、 so, perhaps because of the countrys general wealth, they are in the top 10 citizenries where people feel their lives are going well, beaten out by such eternal optimists as the Canadians, New Zealanders and Scandinavians. Right. Now that Princeton researchers have untangled that life mystery, maybe

44、 someone at MIT can look into the optimal amount of money required to buy us love.(分数:10.00)(1).Whats the finding of the study from Princeton University?(分数:2.00)A.Its very important to earn $ 75, 000 a year.B.The more money you have, the happier you are.C.People who earn less than $ 75, 000 a year

45、are unhappy.D.There is a relationship between happiness and money.(2).Why its not the case that the more people make above $ 75, 000, the happier they feel?(分数:2.00)A.People who earn more than $ 75, 000 a year are likely to feel stressed.B.There is no need for people to earn more than $ 75, 000 a ye

46、ar.C.An income more than $ 75, 000 a year only increases ones life satisfaction.D.People who earn more than $ 75, 000 a year have little leisure time.(3).The word “sting“ at the end of the fourth paragraph means_.(分数:2.00)A.painB.woundC.excitementD.happiness(4).The increase in income is proportional

47、 to the growth of_.(分数:2.00)A.happinessB.stressC.satisfactionD.power(5).Whats the tone of the end of the passage?(分数:2.00)A.Ironic.B.Serious.C.Critical.D.Humorous.How fast is your personal computer? When people ask this question, they are typically referring to the frequency of a minuscule clock ins

48、ide the computer, a crystal oscillator that sets the basic rhythm used throughout the machine. In a computer with a speed of one gigahertz, for example, the crystal “ticks“ a billion times a second. Every action of the computer takes place in tiny steps, each a billionth of a second long. A simple t

49、ransfer of data may take only one step; complex calculations may take many steps. All operations, however, must begin and end according to the clocks timing signals. Because most modern computers use a single rhythm, we call them synchronous. Inside the computers microprocessor chip, a clock distribution system delivers the timing signals from the crystal oscillator to the var

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1