1、(A)英语翻译高级口译英译中政治外交及答案解析(总分:100.00,做题时间:90 分钟)一、试题 1(总题数:1,分数:20.00)Consider the following statements, made by the same man eight years apart. “Eventually, being poor wont be as much a matter of living in a poor country as it will be a matter of having poor skills.“ That was Bill Gates talking in 199
2、2. Way back then, the Microsoft chairmans image was that of a rather harsh, libertarian-leaning fellow who proudly declared his products alone would “change the world.“ When asked what he would do with his billions, the boy wonder of Silicon Valley used to shrug off the question, saying his long wor
3、kdays didnt leave time for charity. But now listen to the same Gates-or perhaps not quite the same Gages-talking in the fall of 2000: Whenever the computer industry has a panel about the digital divide and Im on the panel, I always think, “OK, you want to send computers to Africa, what about food an
4、d electricity-those computers arent going to be that valuable“. The mothers are going to walk right up to that computer and say: “My children are dying, what can you do?“Yes, even Bill Gates, the iconic capitalist of our day, seems to have come around. The self-assured Gates of 1992 was obviously a
5、man of his times, confident of his industrys ability to change the world, certain that the power of markets and new technology, once unleashed, would address most of the worlds ills. But the more skeptical Gates of the new millennium is someone who evinces a passion for giving and government aid. He
6、 shares a growing realization, even in the multibillionaire set, that something is amiss with the ideology that has prevailed since the end of the cold war: global-capitalism-as-panacea.(分数:19.98)(1).Consider the following statements, made by the same man eight years apart. “Eventually, being poor w
7、ont be as much a matter of living in a poor country as it will be a matter of having poor skills.“ That was Bill Gates talking in 1992.(分数:3.33)_(2).Way back then, the Microsoft chairmans image was that of a rather harsh, libertarian-leaning fellow who proudly declared his products alone would “chan
8、ge the world.”(分数:3.33)_(3).Yes, even Bill Gates, the iconic capitalist of our day, seems to have come around.(分数:3.33)_(4).The self-assured Gates of 1992 was obviously a man of his times, confident of his industrys ability to change the world, certain that the power of markets and new technology, o
9、nce unleashed, would address most of the worlds ills.(分数:3.33)_(5).But the more skeptical Gates of the new millennium is someone who evinces a passion for giving and government aid.(分数:3.33)_(6).He shares a growing realization, even in the multibillionaire set, that something is amiss with the ideol
10、ogy that has prevailed since the end of the cold war: global-capitalism-as-panacea.(分数:3.33)_二、试题 2(总题数:1,分数:20.00)The most important fact in Washingtons failure on Thursday to be re-elected for the first time since 1947 to the U.N. Human Rights Commission is that it was Americas friends, not its en
11、emies, that engineered the defeat. After all, China and Cuba and other targets of U.S.-led criticism in the committee were always going to vote and lobby against Washington; the shock came in the fact that the European and other Western nations that traditionally ensured U.S. reelection turned their
12、 backs on Washington.Many traditional U.S. supporters clearly withdrew their votes to signal displeasure over U.S. unilateralism. They have been increasingly chagrined by Washingtons tendency to ignore the international consensus on issues ranging from the use of land mines to the Kyoto climate chan
13、ge treaty. They are also critical of what they see as Washingtons tendency to publicise the issue of human rights, using annual resolutions at the committee to denounce China or Cuba when that conforms to U.S. foreign policy objectives but for the same reason voting alone in defence of Israel when t
14、hat country is in the dock over its conduct.(分数:19.98)(1).The most important fact in Washingtons failure on Thursday to be re-elected for the first time since 1947 to the U.N. Human Rights Commission is that it was Americas friends, not its enemies, that engineered the defeat.(分数:3.33)_(2).After all
15、, China and Cuba and other targets of U.S.-led criticism in the committee were always going to vote and lobby against Washington;(分数:3.33)_(3).The shock came in the fact that the European and other Western nations that traditionally ensured U.S. reelection turned their backs on Washington.(分数:3.33)_
16、(4).Many traditional U.S. supporters clearly withdrew their votes to signal displeasure over U.S. unilateralism.(分数:3.33)_(5).They have been increasingly chagrined by Washingtons tendency to ignore the international consensus on issues ranging from the use of land mines to the Kyoto climate change t
17、reaty.(分数:3.33)_(6).They are also critical of what they see as Washingtons tendency to publicise the issue of human rights, using annual resolutions at the committee to denounce China or Cuba when that conforms to U.S. foreign policy objectives but for the same reason voting alone in defence of Isra
18、el when that country is in the dock over its conduct.(分数:3.33)_三、试题 3(总题数:1,分数:20.00)France today is no superpower, but French influence in some spheres significant. Nothing has cemented French influence in the world like the decision made by the victorious World War powers in 1945 to include France
19、 as one of the five permanent, veto-wielding members of the Security Council. Until the end of the Cold War, France rarely found itself in disagreement with or the U.S. on major issues. But the U.N. veto today takes on larger significance as France struggles to decide whether it wants to lead the Eu
20、ropean Union in defiance of American power or in partnership with it.As Americas great media outlets have begun preparing for coverage of the D-Day celebrations, the question of a “grand gesture“ by the French toward the American war in Iraq has been raised. Administration officials hint that, perha
21、ps, just perhaps, the French President will use the occasion of Frances rescue as an opportunity to square the accounts-to issue a blanket endorsement of Americas plan for Iraqs future and throw its support behind the transfer of power looming at the end of the month. France certainly wants the Unit
22、ed States to be successful in Iraq at this point. But France seems unlikely to see D-Day as an opportunity to make good on a 60-year-old debt. Beyond nice speeches and some truly fine cuisine, dont expect France to liberate America from Iraq.(分数:20.02)(1).France today is no superpower, but French in
23、fluence in some spheres significant.(分数:2.86)_(2).Nothing has cemented French influence in the world like the decision made by the victorious World War powers in 1945 to include France as one of the five permanent, veto-wielding members of the Security Council.(分数:2.86)_(3).Until the end of the Cold
24、 War, France rarely found itself in disagreement with or the U.S. on major issues.(分数:2.86)_(4).But the U.N. veto today takes on larger significance as France struggles to decide whether it wants to lead the European Union in defiance of American power or in partnership with it.(分数:2.86)_(5).As Amer
25、icas great media outlets have begun preparing for coverage of the D-Day celebrations, the question of a “grand gesture“ by the French toward the American war in Iraq has been raised.(分数:2.86)_(6).Administration officials hint that, perhaps, just perhaps, the French President will use the occasion of
26、 Frances rescue as an opportunity to square the accounts-to issue a blanket endorsement of Americas plan for Iraqs future and throw its support behind the transfer of power looming at the end of the month.(分数:2.86)_(7).France certainly wants the United States to be successful in Iraq at this point.
27、But France seems unlikely to see D-Day as an opportunity to make good on a 60-year-old debt. Beyond nice speeches and some truly fine cuisine, dont expect France to liberate America from Iraq.(分数:2.86)_四、试题 4(总题数:1,分数:20.00)A proposal to change long-standing federal policy and deny citizenship to ba
28、bies born to illegal immigrants on U.S. soil ran aground this month in Congress, but it is sure to resurface-kindling bitter debate even if it fails to become law.At issue is “birthright citizenship“ provided for since the Constitutions 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868. Section 1 of that amendmen
29、t, drafted with freed slaves in mind, says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.“Some conservatives in Congress, as well as advocacy groups seeking to crack down on illegal immigration, say the amendment ha
30、s been misapplied over the years, that it was never intended to grant citizenship automatically to babies of illegal immigrants. Thus they contend that federal legislation, rather than a difficult-to-achieve constitutional amendment, would be sufficient to end birthright citizenship.“Most Americans
31、feel it doesnt make any sense for people to come into the country illegally, give birth and have a new U.S. citizen,“ said the spokesman of the federation of American immigration reform. “But the advocates for illegal immigrants will make a fuss; theyll claim youre punishing the children, and I susp
32、ect the leadership doesnt want to deal with that./(分数:20.00)(1).A proposal to change long-standing federal policy and deny citizenship to babies born to illegal immigrants on U.S. soil ran aground this month in Congress, but it is sure to resurfacekindling bitter debate even if it fails to become la
33、w.(分数:5.00)_(2).At issue is “birthright citizenship“provided for since the Constitutions 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868. Section 1 of that amendment, drafted with freed slaves in mind, says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citi
34、zens of the United States./(分数:5.00)_(3).Some conservatives in Congress, as well as advocacy groups seeking to crack down on illegal immigration, say the amendment has been misapplied over the years, that it was never intended to grant citizenship automatically to babies of illegal immigrants. Thus
35、they contend that federal legislation, rather than a difficult-to-achieve constitutional amendment, would be sufficient to end birthright citizenship.(分数:5.00)_(4).Most Americans feel it doesnt make any sense for people to come into the country illegally, give birth and have a new U.S. citizen, said
36、 the spokesman of the federation of American immigration reform. “But the advocates for illegal immigrants will make a fuss; theyll claim youre punishing the children, and I suspect the leadership doesnt want to deal with that./(分数:5.00)_五、试题 5(总题数:1,分数:10.00)When President Obama took the stage here
37、 Wednesday to address a communityand a nationtraumatized by Saturdays shooting rampage in Tucson, Arizona, it invited comparisons to President George W. Bushs speech to the nation after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and the memorial service President Bill Clinton led after the bombing of a federal
38、office building killed 168 people in Oklahoma City in 1995. But Mr. Obamas appearance presented a deeper challenge, reflecting the tenor of his times. Unlike those tragedies-which, at least initially, united a mournful country and quieted partisan divisionsthis one has, in the days since the killing
39、s, had the opposite effect, inflaming the divide.It was a political reality Mr. Obama seemed to recognize the moment he took the stage. He directly confronted the political debate that erupted after the rampage, asking people of all beliefs not to use the tragedy to turn on one another. He called fo
40、r an end to partisan recriminations, and for a unity that has seemed increasingly elusive as each day has brought more harsh condemnations from the left and the right. It was one of the more powerful addresses that Mr. Obama has delivered as president, harnessing the emotion generated by the shock a
41、nd loss from Saturdays shootings to urge Americans “to remind ourselves of all the ways that our hopes and dreams are bound together./(分数:10.00)(1).When President Obama took the stage here Wednesday to address a communityand a nationtraumatized by Saturdays shooting rampage in Tucson, Arizona, it in
42、vited comparisons to President George W. Bushs speech to the nation after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and the memorial service President Bill Clinton led after the bombing of a federal office building killed 168 people in Oklahoma City in 1995.(分数:2.00)_(2).But Mr. Obamas appearance presented a deeper challenge, reflecting the tenor of his times. Unlike those tragedieswhich, at least initially, united a mournful country and quieted partisan divisionsthis one has, in the days since the killing
copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1