专业八级分类模拟440及答案解析.doc

1、专业八级分类模拟440及答案解析 (总分：35.00，做题时间：90分钟)一、PART LANGUAGE USAG(总题数：1，分数：25.00)Ingma Bergmans latest work as a screenwriter is Sundays Children. Set in rural Sweden during the late 1920s, the story centers on a young boy named Pu, clearly molded with Bergman 1 himself. Pus father is a country clergyman wh

2、o duties include 2 traveling to the capital and ministering to the royal family. While this is an enviable position, it does not assuage with problems in the 3 clergymans marriage. Pu is young enough to be fairly unaware of such difficulties, but his awareness grows with the pass of time. So 4 do th

3、e subtle tensions that damage Pus own relationship with his father, whose desire to show affection and compassion hampered by 5 a certain stiffness in his demeanor and chilliness in his emotions. The films most resonant passage take place when Pu learns to 6 see his father with new clarity while acc

4、ompanied him on a cross- 7 country trip to another parish. In a remarkable change of tone, this portion of the story is punctuated for flash-forwards to a time 40 8 years in the future, showing the relationship between parent and children to be dramatically changed. The father is now cared for by th

5、e son, and desires for forgiveness for past shortcomings what the 9 younger man resolutely refuse to grant. Brief and abrupt although they are, these scenes make a sharp 10 contrast with the sunny landscapes and comic interludes in the early part of the movie. Sundays Children is a film of many leve

6、ls, and all are skillfully handled by Danniel Bergman in his directional debut. Gentle scenes of domestic contentment are sensitively interwoven with intimations of underlying malaise.（分数：25.00）二、PART TRANSLATION(总题数：1，分数：10.00)1.我尝见许多年青的朋友，聪明用功，成绩优异，而语文程度不足以达意，甚至写一封信亦难得通顺，问其故则曰其兴趣不在语文方面。又有一些位，执笔为文，

7、斐然可诵，而视数理科目如仇讐，勉强才能及格，问其故则亦曰其兴趣不在数理方面。如果他们觉得某些科目没有趣味，便撇在一旁视如敝屣，怡然自得，振振有词，略无愧色，好像这就是发扬趣味主义。殊不知天下没有没有趣味的学问，端视吾人如何发掘其趣味，如果在良师指导之下按部就班地循序而进，一步一步地发现新天地，当然乐在其中，如果浅尝辄止，甚至躐等躁进，当然味同嚼蜡，自讨没趣。一个有中上天资的人，对于普通的基本的文理科目，都同样地有学习的能力，绝不会本能地长于此而拙于彼。只有懒惰与任性，才能使一个人自甘暴弃地在“趣味”的掩护之下败退。 （分数：10.00）_专业八级分类模拟440答案解析 (总分：35.00，做题

8、时间：90分钟)一、PART LANGUAGE USAG(总题数：1，分数：25.00)Ingma Bergmans latest work as a screenwriter is Sundays Children. Set in rural Sweden during the late 1920s, the story centers on a young boy named Pu, clearly molded with Bergman 1 himself. Pus father is a country clergyman who duties include 2 traveling

9、to the capital and ministering to the royal family. While this is an enviable position, it does not assuage with problems in the 3 clergymans marriage. Pu is young enough to be fairly unaware of such difficulties, but his awareness grows with the pass of time. So 4 do the subtle tensions that damage

10、 Pus own relationship with his father, whose desire to show affection and compassion hampered by 5 a certain stiffness in his demeanor and chilliness in his emotions. The films most resonant passage take place when Pu learns to 6 see his father with new clarity while accompanied him on a cross- 7 co

11、untry trip to another parish. In a remarkable change of tone, this portion of the story is punctuated for flash-forwards to a time 40 8 years in the future, showing the relationship between parent and children to be dramatically changed. The father is now cared for by the son, and desires for forgiv

12、eness for past shortcomings what the 9 younger man resolutely refuse to grant. Brief and abrupt although they are, these scenes make a sharp 10 contrast with the sunny landscapes and comic interludes in the early part of the movie. Sundays Children is a film of many levels, and all are skillfully ha

13、ndled by Danniel Bergman in his directional debut. Gentle scenes of domestic contentment are sensitively interwoven with intimations of underlying malaise.（分数：25.00）解析：withon解析 介词误用。model on sb.是固定搭配，表示“仿造某人”或者“以某人为原型”。解析：whowhose解析 关系代词误用。定语从句的主语是duties，是指clergymanS duties，因此应该使用表示物主代词的关系代词whose。解析

14、with with 解析 介词冗余。assuage是及物动词，意为“缓和，减轻”，无需加介词with。解析：passpassage解析 词义混淆。pass作名词用时表示“关口”，而passage of time可以表示“时间的流逝”。解析：hamperedis解析 语态错误。此处句子的主语是whose desire to show affection and compassion，谓语是hampered，可见应该使用被动语态，意思是“父亲想对儿子表达爱的想法总是被他举止上的僵硬和情感上的冷酷所阻断”。解析：taketakes解析 主谓不一致。主语是passage，是单数，谓语动词应该使用ta

15、kes。解析：accompaniedaccompanying解析 非谓语动词误用。此处accompany应该使用现在分词，表示伴随动作。而且accompany修饰的是Pu，二者是主谓关系，因此用现在分词形式。解析：forwith解析 介词误用。punctuated with表示“用不时打断，交织”，此处的意思是“故事的这一部分总是穿插40年后的一些场景”。解析：whatthat/which解析 关系代词误用。此处是定语从句，关系代词在定语从句中作宾语，因此应该使用that或者which，而不能使用what。解析：althoughthough/as解析 近义词混淆。作连词时，although和t

16、hough通常可以互换使用，如：Although(Though)she smiled，she was angry.但二者也有区别：although常放在从句的开头，而though可以出现在其他位置，当用来连接词语或短语时更为常用，如：Fond though I am of opera, Id rather not sit through the ring cycle this weekend. 此时就不能使用although。由于as和though可以使用同样的结构，因此此处改为as也可以。二、PART TRANSLATION(总题数：1，分数：10.00)1.我尝见许多年青的朋友，聪明用功，

17、成绩优异，而语文程度不足以达意，甚至写一封信亦难得通顺，问其故则曰其兴趣不在语文方面。又有一些位，执笔为文，斐然可诵，而视数理科目如仇讐，勉强才能及格，问其故则亦曰其兴趣不在数理方面。如果他们觉得某些科目没有趣味，便撇在一旁视如敝屣，怡然自得，振振有词，略无愧色，好像这就是发扬趣味主义。殊不知天下没有没有趣味的学问，端视吾人如何发掘其趣味，如果在良师指导之下按部就班地循序而进，一步一步地发现新天地，当然乐在其中，如果浅尝辄止，甚至躐等躁进，当然味同嚼蜡，自讨没趣。一个有中上天资的人，对于普通的基本的文理科目，都同样地有学习的能力，绝不会本能地长于此而拙于彼。只有懒惰与任性，才能使一个人自甘暴弃

18、地在“趣味”的掩护之下败退。 （分数：10.00）_正确答案：()解析：They cast away whatever subjects they dislike like something utterly worthless. They are so smug and thick-skinned that they speak volubly in defense of their own attitude like champions of interestism. They hardly realize that there is no learning but is capable

19、of engendering interest and that all depends on how to search for it. You will develop a liking for learning if, under the guidance of a good teacher, you study to discover new horizons opening up before you one after another by following the proper order and advancing step by step. On the other han

20、d, you will find learning as dry as sawdust and feel frustrated if you refuse to go into a subject in depth or even make impetuous advances without following the proper order. People with an average natural endowment are equally capable of mastering the basics of liberal arts and natural science. They are never predetermined by nature to be good at one subject and poor in another. It is laziness and waywardness, however, that causes one to give himself up as hopeless and back down on the pretext of no interest.