The Right to Food in India.ppt

1、The Right to Food in India,The Food Security Scenario in South Asia,Some Indicators for Child Wellbeing and malnutrition in South Asia,Indias Annual Growth Rate,Year GDP Per capita income1951-79 3.6 1.31980-91 5.6 3.51992-06 6.5 4.7,Worrying issues,News of starvation deaths & farmers suicides from m

2、any states Stagnant agricultural production, and falling food availability Unemployment has increased from 4 to 8% in ten years Regional disparities are increasing IMR stagnating around 60 per 1000, it is 46 in Bangladesh Immunisation coverage fell from 60 to 40% in 5 yrs More than 50% women are ane

3、mic 46% children are malnourished Declining child sex ratio during 1991-2001 There is no will to improve administration in poor states,Index number of Agricultural Production,Index annual rate of growth 1981-82 1004.4% 1990-91 1482.8% 1996-97 1760.2% 2004-05 179,% of Work Force dependent on Agricult

4、ure,Percentage below poverty line1973 5639 1994 35 1999 26? 2004 28,Poverty,There should be no food insecurity in India,Both GDP and foodgrain production have risen faster than the growth in population over the last 50 yearsAnd yet chronic hunger and starvation persist in large sections of the popul

5、ation. There has been a declining calorie consumption especially in the bottom 30% of the population.,Source: Report of Committee on Long Term Grain Policy, 2002,India has the largest food schemes in the World,Entitlement Feeding Programmes ICDS (All Children under six, Pregnant and lactating mother

6、) MDMS (All Primary School children)Food Subsidy Programmes Targeted Public Distribution System (35 kgs/ month of subsidised food grains Annapurna (10 kgs of free food grain for destitute poor)Employment Programmes National Rural Employment Scheme (100 days of employment at minimum wages)Social Safe

7、ty Net Programmes National Old Age Pension Scheme (Monthly pension to BPL) National Family Benefit Scheme (Compensation in case of death of bread winner to BPL families),The Right to Food Case,PUCL petition on hunger in Rajasthan in the Supreme Court in 2001 Emergence of the Right to Food Campaign K

8、ey Issues: Making the Right to Food a Fundamental Right Converting all existing schemes into entitlements Tackling large scale malnutrition and chronic hunger Securing employment as a fundamental right linked to the Right to Food Longest continuing mandamus on the Right to Food in the World 51 Inter

9、im Orders so far; more than 500 affidavits; nearly 70 Interim Applications,Highlights of Supreme Court Orders on the Right to Food,Converted all food and employment schemes into legal entitlements Universalised food entitlement programmes for children (ICDS for children under six and Mid Day Meal Sc

10、heme for all primary school children) Instituted the independent mechanism of Commissioners to the Supreme Court to monitor all food and employment programmes Prevented the reduction of the “poverty line” from 36% to 26% Hauled up Government periodically by serving notice of contempt of court on sen

11、ior most Government functionaries (Chief Secretaries),Office of the Commissioners to the Supreme Court (Writ 196/ 2001),Appointed by the Supreme Court to monitor all food schemes in the Country Mandate extends to: Entitlement Feeding Programmes MDMS, ICDS Employment Programmes NREGS, SGRY I & II, NF

12、FWP, RSVY Food Subsidy Programme TPDS, Antodaya Anna Yojana (AAY), Annapurna Yojana Social Security Programmes Pensions (NOAPS, NMBS, NFBS),How does the Office of the Commissioners function?,Honorary positions; work supported by funds mandated by the Supreme Court Works through a secretariat (Delhi)

13、 and a network of Advisers across India Make policy recommendations through: Rigorous participatory research Articulating alternative demands of State policy Participating in policy bodies such as Planning Commission Steering Groups,How does the Office of the Commissioners function? (contd.),Monitor

14、s programmes Through analysis of macro-data Addressing complaints at the micro-level Holds the State accountable by: Regular engagement with the GoI and State Governments Joint Commission of Enquiries Regular reports on non-compliance to the Supreme Court,Impact so far,Universalisation of MDMS (120

15、million children get school meals) and ICDS (Government would need to double the ICDS centres to 1.4 million centres covering 60 million children under the age of six) Managed to restrict the lowering of BPL quotas by GoI from 36% to 26% Increase in off-take of subsidised food-grains through the tar

16、geted public distribution system Increased budgetary allocation for ICDS, Old Age Pensions (3 times the amount) Passage of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act which guarantees 100 days of employment a year (at minimum wages),Impact so far (contd.),Provided Civil Society an anchor to engage/

17、confront the State and created spaces for civil society to engage in food/ employment programmes Brought the discourse on food rights to the centre-stage of governance in the States and GoI Has been largely effective in provision of gratuitous relief (Tea Garden Workers in West Bengal). Created the

18、environment for the passage of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act,Off-take of BPL/ AAY Food Grains,Figure 3.1: Percentage off-take of BPL/AAY food grains from 2001-02 to 2004-05,Source: Various issues of Monthly food grain bulletin, Department of food and public distribution, GoI,Some Chall

19、enges that we face,Attempting reforms in an era of overall weakening governance and state commitment to social sectors Has powers (including filing contempt charges against Chief Secretaries) which are best used by not being exercised Operates in the domain of judicial activism Challenge of individual redressal versus systemic policy engagement Has proved to be marginally effective in harder areas of governance reforms,