The World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome.ppt

1、The World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (www.wsacs.org) presents,Intra-abdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Updated Consensus Definitions and Clinical Practice Guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome,Consensus Definitions,Reta

2、ined Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,1) Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is the steady-state pressure concealed within the abdominal cavity.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Synd

3、rome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,2) The reference standard for intermittent IAP measurements is via the bladder with a maximal instillation volume of 25 mL of sterile saline.,1Malbrain ML et al., Resul

4、ts from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,3) IAP should be expressed in mmHg and measured at end-exp

5、iration in the complete supine position after ensuring that abdominal muscle contractions are absent and with the transducer zeroed at the level of the midaxillary line.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartmen

6、t Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,4) The IAP is approximately 5-7 mmHg in critically ill adults,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hyperte

7、nsion and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,5) IAH is defined by a sustained or repeated pathological elevation in IAP 12 mmHg,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the Internation

8、al Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,6) ACS is defined as a sustained IAP20mmHg (with or without an APP 60mmHg) that i

9、s associated with new organ dysfunction/failure,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consen

10、sus Statements1,7) IAH is graded as follows:Grade I, IAP 12-15 mmHgGrade II, IAP 16-20 mmHgGrade III, IAP 21-25 mmHgGrade IV, IAP 25 mmHg,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Int

11、ensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,8) Primary IAH or ACS is a condition associated with injury or disease in the abdominopelvic region that frequently requires early surgical or interventional radiological intervention,1Malbrain

12、ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,9) Secondary IAH or ACS refers to conditio

13、ns that do not originate from the abdominopelvic region.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 20

14、06 Consensus Statements1,10) Recurrent IAH or ACS refers to the condition in which ACS redevelops following previous surgical or medical treatment of primary or secondary ACS,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compa

15、rtment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,11) Abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) =Mean arterial pressure (MAP) IAP,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-A

16、bdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,2) The reference standard for intermittent IAP measurements is via the bladder with a maximal instillation volume of

17、 25 mL of sterile saline.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,New Definitions Accepted by the 2012 Consensus Panel,Retained Definition

18、s from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,12) A poly-compartment syndrome is a condition where two or more anatomical compartments have elevated compartmental pressures.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compa

19、rtment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,13) Abdominal compliance quantifies the ease of abdominal expansion, is determined by the elasticity of the abdominal wall and diaphragm, and is expressed as

20、 the change in intra-abdominal volume per change in intra-abdominal pressure.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions

21、 from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,14) An open abdomen is any abdomen requiring a temporary abdominal closure due to the skin and fascia not being closed after laparotomy. The technique of temporary abdominal closure should be explicitly described.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the In

22、ternational Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Retained Definitions from the Original 2006 Consensus Statements1,15) Lateralization of the abdominal wall refers to the phenomenon whereb

23、y the musculature and fascia of the abdominal wall, most well seen by the rectus abdominus muscles and their enveloping fascia, move lateraly away from the midine with time.,1Malbrain ML et al., Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-Abdominal hypertension and Abdominal Compar

24、tment Syndrome. I. Definitions , Intensive Care Medicine 2006;32:1722 -1732,Classification System for the Complexity of an Open abdomen,1Bjorck M, Bruhin A, Cheatham M, et al. Classification-important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 2009; 33(6):1154-7.,Conse

25、nsus Management Statements,Recommendations,Updated consensus definitions and management statements were then derived using a modified Delphi method and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Quality of evidence was graded from high (A) to very lo

26、w (D) and management statements from strong RECOMMENDATIONS (desirable effects clearly outweigh potential undesirable ones) to weaker SUGGESTIONS (potential risks and benefits of the intervention are less clear).,Consensus Management Statements - Recommendation,1) We RECOMMEND measuring intra-abdomi

27、nal pressure versus not when any known risk factor for IAH/ACS is present in critically ill or injured patients 1 (Unchanged Management Recommendation 1 GRADE 1C).,1Risk Factors are presented in the next slide,Risk Factors Continued,Risk Factors,References for Risk Factors,Consensus Management State

28、ments - Recommendation,2) We also RECOMMEND that studies of IAH or ACS adopt the trans-bladder technique as a standard IAP measurement technique1 (Unchanged Management Recommendation 2; not GRADED).,1Risk IAP should be expressed in mmHg and measured at end-expiration in the complete supine position

29、after ensuring that abdominal muscle contractions are absent and with the transducer zeroed at the level of the midaxillary line.,Consensus Management Statements - Recommendation,3) we RECOMMEND use of protocolized monitoring and management of IAP versus not (New Management Recommendation 3 GRADE 1C

30、).,Consensus Management Statements - Recommendation,4) Efforts and/or protocols should be utilized to avoid sustained IAH in critically ill patients,GRADE 1C,Consensus Management Statements - Recommendation,5) We recommend decompressive laparotomy to decrease IAP in cases of overt ACS compared to st

31、rategies that do not use decompressive laparotomy in critically ill adults with ACS GRADE 1D,Consensus Management Statements - Recommendation,6) We recommend that among ICU patients with open abdominal wounds, conscious and/or protocolized efforts be made to obtain an early or at least same hospital

32、 stay closure GRADE 1D,Consensus Management Statements - Recommendation,7) We recommend that among critically ill/injured patients with open abdominal wounds, strategies utilizing negative pressure wound therapy should be used versus not GRADE 1C,Suggestions,Updated consensus definitions and managem

33、ent statements were then derived using a modified Delphi method and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Quality of evidence was graded from high (A) to very low (D) and management statements from strong RECOMMENDATIONS (desirable effects clear

34、ly outweigh potential undesirable ones) to weaker SUGGESTIONS (potential risks and benefits of the intervention are less clear).,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,1) We suggest that critically ill or injured patients receive optimal pain and anxiety relief GRADE 2D,Consensus Management S

35、tatements - Suggestions,2) We suggest brief trials of neuromuscular blockade as temporizing measure in the treatment of IAH GRADE 2D,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,3) We suggest that the potential contribution of body position to elevated IAP be considered among patients with, or at r

36、isk of, IAH or ACS GRADE 2D,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,4) We suggest using a protocol to try and avoid a positive cumulative fluid balance in the critically ill or injured patient with, or at risk of, IAH, after the acute resuscitation has been completed and the inciting issues/so

37、urce control have been addressed GRADE 2C,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,5) We suggest use of an enhanced ratio of plasma/packed red blood cells for resuscitation of massive hemorrhage versus low or no attention to plasma/packed red blood cell ratios GRADE 2D,Consensus Management Stat

38、ements - Suggestions,We suggest use of PCD to remove fluid (in the setting of obvious intraperitoneal fluid) in those with IAH/ACS when this is technically possible compared to doing nothing GRADE 2C. We also suggest using PCD to remove fluid (in the setting of obvious intraperitoneal fluid) in thos

39、e with IAH/ACS when this is technically possible compared to immediate decompressive laparotomy as this may alleviate the need for decompressive laparotomy GRADE 2D,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,7) We suggest that patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma suffering from physiologic e

40、xhaustion be treated with the prophylactic use of the open abdomen versus closure and expectant IAP management GRADE 2D,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,8) We suggest not to routinely utilize the open abdomen for patients with severe intraperitoneal contamination undergoing emergency la

41、parotomy for intra-abdominal sepsis unless IAH is a specific concern GRADE 2B,Consensus Management Statements - Suggestions,9) We suggest that bioprosthetic meshes should not be routinely used in the early closure of the open abdomen compared to alternative strategies GRADE 2D,No Recommendations,Upd

42、ated consensus definitions and management statements were then derived using a modified Delphi method and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Quality of evidence was graded from high (A) to very low (D) and management statements from strong RE

43、COMMENDATIONS (desirable effects clearly outweigh potential undesirable ones) to weaker SUGGESTIONS (potential risks and benefits of the intervention are less clear).,Consensus Management Statements,1) We could make no recommendation regarding use of abdominal perfusion pressure in the resuscitation

44、/management of the critically ill/injured,Consensus Management Statements,2) We could make no recommendation regarding use of diuretics to mobilize fluids in hemodynamically stable patients with IAH after the acute resuscitation has been completed and the inciting issues/source control have been add

45、ressed,Consensus Management Statements,3) We could make no recommendation regarding the use of renal replacement therapies to mobilize fluid in hemodynamically stable patients with IAH after the acute resuscitation has been completed and the inciting issues/source control have been addressed,Consens

46、us Management Statements,4) We could make n o recommendation regarding the administration of albumin versus not, to mobilize fluid in hemodynamically stable patients with IAH after the acute resuscitation has been completed and the inciting issues/source control have been addressed,Consensus Managem

47、ent Statements,5) We could make no recommendation regarding the prophylactic use of the open abdomen in non-trauma acute care surgery patients with physiologic exhaustion versus closing and expectant IAP management,Consensus Management Statements,6) We could make no recommendation regarding use of the component separation technique to facilitate early fascial closure versus not,