ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:23 ,大小:1.08MB ,
资源ID:376738      下载积分:2000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-376738.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(Introduction to Transition Economics.ppt)为本站会员(livefirmly316)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

Introduction to Transition Economics.ppt

1、Introduction to Transition Economics,I. Economics of Transition The demise of communism in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) ushered in a new phenomenon in economics, transition. The break up of the Soviet Union in 1991 was, in a sense a twofold event. The country that was the USSR broke into success

2、or states, such us the Russian federation and Ukraine. The Soviet Union lost its political control over many neighboring countries across CEE and the Baltic states. The econ transition brought increased political freedom but also econ and social depression. The degree of econ and political freedom i

3、n the Soviet successor states was quite low in the late 1980s. By the mid 1990s, these states enjoyed perhaps two-thirds of the political freedom of the developed, democratic nations of the world. The nations of the former SU and CEE entered a deep depression in the early 1990s. Econ growth started

4、again in EE by 1994 and in Russia around 1998 and has increased rapidly since. This is an unprecedented process as no economy has ever moved from a comprehensively controlled economy to a market economy,The Economist (March 24-30, 1990: 22) “Hundreds of books have been written on the transition from

5、 capitalism to communism but not the other way. There is no known recipe for unmaking an omelet.” The key problem is the difficult environment in which the new institutions must take root.In transition we are analyzing how one system transforms into another we need to understand what institutions ar

6、e needed to become market economies.Transition has brought significant changes in the lives of the citizens Rise in the standards of living Demographic changesTransition is not the simple process,II. Why Study Transition? Transition and development Transition is very different from development. Deve

7、lopment is the process of turning a less complex organism into a more complex one. Transition can be likened to changing the organism from one type to another. Transition thus involves the study of the creation of markets; hence, it should be of interest to all economists. Institutions are precisely

8、 what transition economies lack.Politics and Transition The end of communism is a political, as well as econ transformation. The collapse of communism led to political transformations as democracies replaced totalitarian political systems. developing democracy is thus as important in many countries

9、as the creation of markets.,III. The Nature of Transition Transition is the replacement of one ES with another ES. The Evolutionary View A central feature of transition is to build market-institutionslegal system, private property, financial system, etc. 2) The Importance of the Historical Legacy We

10、 are studying the transition from a particular system. The historical legacy is crucial. The most important of these legacies is: An industrial structure designed for a command economy; one that is dominated by large industrial enterprises that are destructive of value (i.e., produce negative value

11、added); The absence of property rights, dictatorship.Although transition economies share a common legacy, there are important differences.,3) Main explanatory forces in modeling transition are: Initial conditions, prevailing at the onset of transition Policy measures, chosen during transition (degre

12、e of liberalization) Environmental factors-resource base, level of developmentInitial Conditions: Two waves of transition Countries differ in the length of socialist period (Former Soviet republics, some 70 years). CEE were generally much smaller and homogeneous in many dimensions, Hungary and Polan

13、d more open economies) Different resource bases Degree of distortion in command economy:,Deviations from market patterns of resource allocation The plan was used to allocate resources. priority allocation based on ideology Biases in favor of industry Soviet industrial enterprises were large, capital

14、-intensive Industry as a source of GDP is higher than in mkt economies Emphasis on investment at the expense of consumption Allocation of labor distorted by rules against dismissal and state budgeting Regional preferences for resource allocation (e.g. Soviet preference for developing Siberia) Foreig

15、n trade distorted by state trading organizations Existence of large “shadow“ economy Evidence suggests larger in Russia and FSU Artificially high levels of employment Countries had been largely isolated from world competitive forces. Distortions growing out of economic isolation were: distorted trad

16、e patterns lack of foreign technological advances isolation from democratic ideas isolation from Western democratic institutions.,Why the initial conditions matter? As markets are introduced, we expect allocation patterns to revert to more “normal” patterns that resemble long-term market outcomes. T

17、he more serious the distortions are, the greater the distance that an economy must travel to reach market dimensions, therefore the more difficult the transition process will be.Can the effects of initial conditions and thus distortions be measured? To measure a countrys “initial condition” an “init

18、ial condition” index developed by European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is used the index is “derived from factor analysis and represents a weighted average of measures of the level of development, trade dependence on CMEA (Council for Mutual econ Assistance), macroeconomic disequil

19、ibria, distance to the EU, natural resource endowments, market memory and state capacity.”,Common Features of transition economies at the beginning of transition Dominated by state ownership prior to transition; small private sector shareFSU 10%, CEE 20%. Foreign trade was controlled by the state Hi

20、gh level of secondary school enrollment; unlike developing countries, transition econ invested rather highly in education. A critical feature of transition is the decline in outputsince 1990 typical pattern is the J curve, the pattern of severe economic collapse followed by recovery; The significant

21、 increase in inflation accompanied liberalization in transition economies.,4. Transition Policies a) Important question about transition is the speed of transition should the economy be transformed rapidly, or should there be a more gradual adjustment to the new system. Big bang (shock therapy) stra

22、tegy that involves moving quickly to eliminate the old order and to replace it with new organizational and policy arrangements, i.e. markets; transition policies could be implemented rapidly. all at once and painful causes immediate, sharp economic collapse get it over with before it can be undone T

23、he window of opportunity for reform must be exploited It was often thought that markets would naturally emerge from decentralization as the state exited from its former dominant role. Poland, other Central European countries (Hungary, Czech, Slovenia, Slovakia) chose the big band strategy,slow and s

24、teady (gradual or evolutionary approach)- emphasizes complexity of organizations; process of learning and adaptation required. This approach drew on the analogy of how mkts and related organizational arrangements and policies emerged in Western industrialized economies, typically over extended perio

25、ds of time. spread out and less painful avoids collapse, in principle takes longer The gradual approach believe that institutional change is path-dependent. Organizations are viewed as complex hierarchies within which participants pursue objectives while guided by incentives but subject to bounded r

26、ationality. “Bounded rationality” refers to the limits of information; the limits faced by decision makers and personal limitations (inadequate education). Hierarchy is an architecture in which there are superiors and subordinates. To an economist the hierarchical structure of an organization implie

27、s the principal-agent problem. Organizational change is sequential, path-dependent and evolutionary through a process of organizational learning and adaptation.,b) Important question in transition is also the sequencing of specific reforms the order in which reforms should be introduced. where to be

28、gin (in what sectors?); where to privatize; liberalization of prices (when?, some or all?); safety net Importance of sequencing and complementarities, e.g. financial markets must be developed as firms are privatized and required to raise capital. The notion of gradual reform implies that there is a

29、proper sequence in which reforms must be implemented. Some reforms must be first, whereas the notion of big bang is that all, or at least several, components, must be implemented at once. Major steps necessary for the transition to a market economy: Privatization Creation of property rights Price li

30、beralization External liberalization Hardening budget constraint Creation of financial markets Some of the steps in transition are mutually dependant, e.g. privatization and price liberalization. Some aspects of transition are most dependant on successful implementation of other steps, e.g. external

31、 liberalization and price liberalization.,c) Transition stages: To decide on a particular transition strategy, it was necessary to stabilize the economy and try to limit the decline of econ activity. The legislative base of transition began to evolve early 1990s. Implementing of new policies toward

32、market institutions, arrangements and outcomes.,5. The framework of transitiontraditionally the econ literature on transition is translated into 4 major dimensions: a) Microeconomics of transition, which includes the process of creation of markets and associated price signals product markets Mkts in

33、 which firms sell products and services to hhlds factor markets Mkts in which resources( capital, land, labor) are sold to firms Prices must be allowed to fluctuate in response to changes in dd and ss. The rewards and penalties of the price system must be allowed to encourage and motivate decision-m

34、akers Privatization Countries have used different schemes in order to privatize SOE The establishment of property rights The process of privatization and development of factor and product marketsinvolves changing the nature of property rights. A major difficulty in the privatization of enterprises i

35、n the transition economies has been: the existence of large state subsidies in many instances the problem of valuing enterprise assets the absence of well-developed capital markets Restructuring is frequently defined as changes which take place in an enterprise after formal privatization has been co

36、mpleted to achieve efficiency objective.,b) The development of the macro economy (both institutions and policies). creation of monetary-financial system financial markets (regulatory agencies) central bank/monetary authority (monetary policy) The macroeconomics of transition focuses on the state bud

37、getary process revenues and expenditures tax structure budgetary process The process through which govt expenditures are determined and allocated Most economists have argued that stabilization is important, especially during the initial stages of the transition, ending the decline of the economies.

38、Rather that focusing on longer term issues such as econ growth, in this context stabilization can refer to monetary health of the economy, e.g. inflationary pressures. Normalization refers to the development of financial markets for financial intermediaries and the budgetary process and the banking

39、system. These issues in transition are especially important b/c financial institutions had limited influence on resource allocation before.,c) International trade and finance policies elimination of state trade monopoly Introduction of convertibility of currency and the implementation of an exchange

40、 regime capable of sustaining a reasonable foreign & domestic balance.d) Safety-net issuesthe concept of a safety net refers to changes in pensions, medical benefits, benefits for the elderly, unemployed etc,6. The Legal System must be broadly obeyed and generate a climate of trust. The legal system

41、 creates private property and defines the rules of econ transactions. a) Property law must be developedset of rights rights to income from the use of property rights of transferability (sell, rent) rights of control (exercise of decision making) b) Contract lawframework within which parties can lega

42、lly enter into contractual relationships protection of vulnerable parties (consumers, tenants) c) Bankruptcy law controls how businesses can close down and distribute their assets and pay their liabilities d) Anti-monopoly lawsprevent anti-competitive practices e) Securities lawregulates sale of sto

43、cks and bonds to public regulatory body to prevent fraud and ensure full disclosure f) Intellectual property lawpatents, trademarks, copyrights g) Labor lawsdefines rights and obligations of employers and employees,7. Assessing transition patterns-growth index models To understand how we might asses

44、s the patterns of performance exhibited by different transition econ, we will use two illustrative approaches for transition economies. a) Simple model of transition economy Lets assume that the performance of transition economies is determined by just one variable: liberalization (Lib) (typical ind

45、ex to capture systematic change) Gri=f(Libi)Grian index of growth, 1989-1999, 1989=100Libian index of liberalization is compounded from consideration of price liberalization (ending price controls) and trade and foreign exchange liberalization (current account convertibility, end of export control a

46、nd taxes) Rather than estimating, Scatter diagram Greater liberalizationhigher positive number,b) More complex model of transition economy Gri=f(ICi, Libi, Envi) ICian index measuring initial conditions Envia measure of environmental factors Econometrically estimate this relation: Expect better IC (

47、less distortions) would make the transition easier (positive relation) Expect positive relation with Liberalization Less clearTherefore, transition experiences differ according to: the level of economic development environmental factors distortions left behind,8. Problems of specification and estima

48、tion specification endogenity time lags selecting the dependent variables9. Empirical evidence debate about what dependent variable or measure of the outcome of performance is appropriate (growth, unemployment rate, inflation) attempt to capture the impacts of systematic change-the typical index to capture systematic change has been liberalization serious econometric issues data in transition measurement problems different data series from west changes in basic indicators qualitative differences “non standardized” componentsshadow economy,

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1