ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:44 ,大小:224.50KB ,
资源ID:378150      下载积分:2000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-378150.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(AIDS LawPast and Future.ppt)为本站会员(hopesteam270)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

AIDS LawPast and Future.ppt

1、AIDS Law Past and Future,Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS - 21 June 05 Edward P. Richards, JD, MPH Director, Program in Law, Science, and Public Health Professor, Louisiana State University Law Center http:/biotech.law.lsu.edu/cphl/slides/AIDS-com.htm,2,“Secret Sex, Drug Use Fuel Rise in AI

2、DS“,Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 16 June 2005 Researchers said yesterday at CDCs 2005 National HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta that, given a record 1.1 million people infected with HIV in the United States, the fight against the epidemic is becoming more complicated. “The HIV epidemic is not o

3、ver in the United States, like many people think it is,“ Dr. Ron Valdiserri of CDCs HIV division said at the conclusion of the biennial conference. “Its an increasingly complex epidemic in the US, with multiple populations affected.“,3,Objectives,Put public health in a historical context Explain the

4、 breakdown in public support for public health in the 1970s Show how that breakdown led to AIDS exceptionalism Explain why ending AIDS exceptionalism is the first step to controlling AIDS in the US,4,Public Health Law,Traditionally, public health dealt with external threats to the individual Communi

5、cable diseases Environmental hazards Many of these put the individual or business in conflict with the good of society Law was core to all public health Discussing public health meant discussing law,5,The Roots of Public Health Law,Leviticus Roman water and sewer works Early renaissance Venice Quadr

6、aginta Blackstone Death for breaking quarantine,6,Public Health in the Colonies,Most of the population lived in poorly drained coastal areas Cholera Yellow Fever Urban Diseases Smallpox Tuberculosis Average life expectancy was short,7,Public Health Law Actions in Colonial America,Quarantines, areas

7、of non-intercourse Inspection of ships and sailors Nuisance abatement Colonial governments had and used Draconian public health powers The Police Powers,8,Public Health in the Constitution,Federal Powers Interstate commerce International trade and travel War State Powers Powers not given to the fede

8、ral government Police Powers All public health except that related to foreign shipping and commerce,9,Public Health as National Security,Epidemic disease destabilized society The Black Death broke the feudal system Yellow fever almost destroyed Philadelphia The Courts and the Constitution gave the s

9、tates as much power over public health as they gave the President and Congress over foreign military threats Bioterrorism reminds us of this nexus,10,Public Health: 1850 - 1970,Sanitation Drinking water Waste water Environmental Health Food inspection Housing codes Working conditions Communicable Di

10、seases Vaccinations Investigation and control,11,Communicable Disease Investigation and Control,Mandatory reporting of cases By name No anonymous testing Disease investigation Contact tracing Screening (tuberculosis, syphilis) Disease interventions Contact (“Partner“) notification Education Treatmen

11、t Isolation and quarantine,12,Public Health Law: 1850 - 1970,Best public health practices shaped public health law The courts uniformly supported public health laws (Richards 1989) Laws were rejected if they were subterfuges for restricting interstate trade or racial discrimination Public health law

12、s and public health departments had broad public support,13,The Results: 1850 - 1970,Urban life expectancy almost tripled between 1850 and 1970 Tuberculosis and polio are under control Food and water borne diseases are rare Yellow fever, malaria, and smallpox are eradicated in the US Vaccinations an

13、d disease control are routine and not controversial,14,Leading up to AIDS: 1970 - 1980,In 1969 U.S. Surgeon General William H. Stewart testified before Congress that it was time to close the book on infectious disease. People no longer feared communicable diseases,15,The Role of Fear in Public Healt

14、h,“Reasonable fear saves many lives and prevents much sickness. It is one of the greatest forces for good in preventive medicine . and at times it is the most useful instrument in the hands of the sanitarian.“ (Rosenau 1910) Fear drives public support for disease control,16,Public Health becomes Per

15、sonal Health,Medicaid and the Great Society - 1964 Created a huge fund for indigent medical care Important focus on prenatal and pediatric care Transformed many health departments into medical care providers Personal medical care expertise displaced public health expertise Medical care values displa

16、ced public health values,17,Vaccine Liability Cases,Restatement of Torts 2nd - 1965 Created strict liability Exception for drugs only covers risks the doctor/patient was warned of Allows liability for unforeseeable risks Allows alternative design claims Fueled anti-vaccine campaigns by plaintiffs la

17、wyers,18,Stonewall Riots - 1969,Focused public attention on police harassment of gay men and women Showed the political power of gay voters and supporters in big cities Made the newly emerging bathhouse culture off limits to public health enforcement,19,Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment,This experiment b

18、egan in the 1930s to study the natural history of untreated syphilis in black men. It was continued until the late 1960s, long after penicillin became available (1945), making syphilis treatment safe and effective. This study did great harm to the participants, and to their wives and partners and ch

19、ildren, who were also infected during the duration of the experiment. It undermined the credibility of the public health establishment in minority communities and created suspicion of all public health programs targeting minorities. (Tuskegee 1973),20,Swine Flu - 1976,Driven by the real fear of a gl

20、obal flu pandemic Vaccine was rushed into production A national compensation program was set up Massive push to vaccinate the public No cases of Swine Flu,21,Swine Flu - The Epilog,Fear of Guillain-Barre syndrome and the lack of a good lab test lead to over diagnosis Lawyers helped patients find sym

21、pathetic docs Huge liability for the government, (Unthank) despite limited scientific support (Freedman) Federal and local public health loses credibility and becomes more politically sensitive,22,Hepatitis B in Bathhouses - 1976,Data published in 1976 and 1977 showed a huge hepatitis B epidemic in

22、the bathhouses Almost everyone who was active became infected Hepatitis B is sometimes fatal, with long term complications Nothing was done to close the bathhouses Why? Distracted by Swine Flu? Politically unwilling to take unpopular action?,23,Bathhouses and HIV: 1976-1980,HIV was rare initially Ba

23、thhouses allow a huge number of different contacts Bathhouses allow mixing of social classes and nationalities HIV is hard to catch Bathhouses allow high frequency sex Bathhouses allow high risk sex Bathhouses encourage other STIs, which increase HIV transmission Bathhouse clientele also included IV

24、 drug users,24,What if the Bathhouses had been Closed in the 1970s?,Without bathhouses, HIV would be a small problem in the US Mathematical models show that bathhouses amplified the HIV epidemic in gay men Models show that bathhouses are still critical to the spread of HIV in the US (Thompson) Bathh

25、ouses were the start of AIDS exceptionalism, before AIDS was discovered,25,1981 - Ground Zero in the US,GRID and the first cases (5 years late) HIV was originally concentrated in several metropolitan areas on the coasts: San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, and in the East Coast Metroplex fro

26、m Baltimore through Washington DC, New Jersey, New York City to Boston. Working out the epidemiology We did traditional investigation for the first cases Exactly the same epidemiology as the hepatitis B in the bathhouses in the 1970s Exactly the same people,26,Initial Fears,When it was known that AI

27、DS was a disease of gay men and IV users, questions were raised about whether it could be spread to others Pressure to fire gay waiters and hair dressers Claims of housing discrimination against persons with AIDS These claims were difficult to substantiate Civil libertarians pushed to keep informati

28、on about AIDS secret,27,The Bathhouses Redux,Bathhouses in NY were left open until 1985, when death weakened the opposition to closing (St. Marks Baths) Public health experts who pushed to close bathhouses lost their jobs (Joseph 1993) Gay activists, bathhouse owners, and even health department empl

29、oyees claimed that bathhouses were good places to do sex education Some never closed and many others have reopened,28,The HIV Test,In 1985 a blood test for HIV became available The debate shifted to the identification of HIV carriers who had not yet developed AIDS Some states required reporting posi

30、tive HIV tests by name, as with other diseases such as syphilis Colorado passed the first HIV reporting law None of the states with high numbers of AIDS cases required named HIV reporting It was argued that the only reason to report was to get people treated. Most now report names, but allow anonymo

31、us testing,29,Anonymous Testing,Only for HIV Health departments had always had a few people give fake names in sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics, but the clinic policies did not encourage this There is no evidence that anonymous testing has a significant effect on HIV testing (Judson 1988)

32、Anonymous testing prevents reporting and investigation Congress was lobbied to require anonymous testing sites as a condition of federal funding States with named reporting were forced to allow anonymous testing Anonymous testing is still offered in most states,30,Reporting,All communicable disease

33、reporting is local, with data sent from the state to the federal government. There are no national standards or laws for disease reporting HIV data is very weak because of anonymous testing, lack of named reporting, and no contact investigation HIV rates and spread are based on models, not real data

34、 Models tend to lag epidemics Models are biased to show that prevention is working,31,Contact Tracing,Contact tracing is the best way to find hidden cases Many states do not do contact tracing because they see it as an invasion of privacy It also requires named reporting and no anonymous testing to

35、get good input data. It does not require perfect reporting - overlapping contacts help fill in missing data (Hethcote),32,Partner Notification,Warning people who have been exposed to a communicable disease This has been opposed on privacy grounds. It would interfere with the right to avoid knowing t

36、hat one was exposed to HIV. If the contact is monogamous, it is impossible to hide the identity of the person who exposed them What about the person being exposed?,33,Benefits of Contact Tracing and Partner Notification,HIV is hard to catch Many persons who are exposed can be warned before they are

37、infected Persons who need help in avoiding exposure, such as poor women, can be given social service support Poor minority women have been hit hard by HIV They do not know they are exposed They need help to deal with infected partners Remember that headline from the CDC last week?,34,Does Disease Co

38、ntrol Cost too Much?,Contact tracing and partner notification is expensive because HIV is now so common The benefit of preventing cases of HIV is very high The human and financial costs of the continued spread of HIV is higher Minority communities are the hardest hit,35,HIV in Medical Care,AIDS exce

39、ptionalism extends to HIV in routine medical care HIV is not treated the same as other diseases This delays diagnosis and reporting This interferes with effective treatment HIPAA Whatever the original concerns about privacy of HIV information, HIPAA has now imposed a rigorous national medical inform

40、ation privacy standard. HIPAA standards are adequate to protect HIV information.,36,Consent to HIV testing,HIV testing should be a routine part of medical care Many states have special laws for consent to HIV testing These require onerous extra paperwork and counseling to order HIV tests They often

41、require the patient to be told non-medical information intended to discourage testing These requirements are unique to HIV and interfere with screening pregnant women and others There are also special medical record keeping requirements for HIV data in some states,37,AIDS and Other Public Health Law

42、s,Since AIDS was the hottest public health law issue in the 1980s and 1990s, all public health law was seen as AIDS law AIDS activists and civil libertarians lobbied state legislatures to weaken other public health laws to limit the states ability to use traditional public health measures in all are

43、as Quarantine and isolation laws were the main target, but other disease control laws also suffered Ironically, the Supreme Court is more likely to uphold public health laws now than it was 30 years ago,Where Do We Go From Here?,End AIDS Exceptionalism,39,The Federal Governments Role,Since the feder

44、al government shapes state disease control through its funding, it must change its priorities to encourage proper disease control for HIV Most goals can be reached with funding incentives and do not require national public health laws It will require changing state laws and rules,40,Proposed Require

45、ments for Federal AIDS Funding,End anonymous testing. Named reporting of all positive HIV tests Screen pregnant women End all special requirements for HIV testing HIV testing should be no different than any other medical test Post test counseling should not be allowed to stand in the way of testing,

46、41,Federal Government Funding,Contact tracing Partner notification and assistance Uniform disease reporting A national clearinghouse for HIV reports A national system for assuring that infected persons receive up to date information on HIV treatment and available social services. Public health law p

47、rojects designed to protect existing powers and expand traditional disease control laws,42,Why HIV Control Matters to National Security,The US must have a working national reporting and communicable disease investigation system This cannot be a shadow plan, used only for emergencies It must be part

48、of working disease investigation system It must be used every day to maintain staffing and readiness. HIV costs more than other communicable diseases, yet little of this money supports disease control. HIV funding could support the public health infrastructure necessary to respond to public health e

49、mergencies,43,References,ASTHO: Association of State and Territorial Health Officers, Guide to Public Health Practice: AIDS Confidentiality and Anti-Discrimination Principles (March 1988) Freedman, D.A. & Stark, PB.The Swine Flu Vaccine and Guillain- Barr Syndrome: A Case Study in Relative Risk and

50、Specific Causation, 23 Evaluation Review 619 (1999) Hethcote, HW and Yorke, JA.Gonorrhea Transmission Dynamics and Control, Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 56 (1984) http:/biotech.law.lsu.edu/cphl/Models/gon/index.htm Joseph, Stephen, Dragon Within the Gates: The Once and Future AID

51、S Epidemic (1993) Judson F. and Vernon T., The Impact of AIDS and HIV on State and Local Health Department, 78 Am. J. Pub. Health 387 (1988). Richards, EP. “Communicable Disease Control in Colorado: A Rational Approach to AIDS,“ 65 U. Dev. L. R. 127-179 (1988) http:/biotech.law.lsu.edu/cphl/articles/CO_HIV.pdf Richards, EP The Jurisprudence Of Prevention: The Right Of Societal Self-Defense Against Dangerous Persons, 16 Hast Const L Q 320 (1989) http:/biotech.law.lsu.edu/cphl/articles/hastings/hastings-Contents.htm,

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1