Anne S. TsuiArizona State UniversityPeking UniversityXi'an .ppt

1、1,Anne S. TsuiArizona State University Peking University Xian Jiaotung University International Association for Chinese Management Research Management and Organization Review,Scientific Process and Research Design,2,The scientific process Types of empirical studies Purposes of research design Contri

2、bution to global management knowledge Research ethics and IACMR values,Topics of this Session,3,Readings for this session,Required readings: Wallace, Walter. 1971. The Logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 11-25. IACMR Statement of “Commitment to Excellent” Tsui, A.S. 2006. Contextuali

3、zation in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1-13. Supplemental readings: Tsui, A.S., Jone L. Pearce, Lyman W. Porter, and Angela M. Tripoli. 1997. “Alternative Approaches to the Employee-Organization Relationship: Does Investment in Employees Pay Off?” Academy of

4、 Management Journal, 40(5): 1089-1121. Xiao, Z.X. & Tsui, A. S. 2007. “Where brokers may not work: The culture contingency of social capital”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 1-31. Yan, A. & Gray. B. 1994. Bargaining power, management control, and performance in the United States-China joint v

5、entures: A comparative case study. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1478-1517.,4,Four sources of knowledge or truth,MythicalAuthoritativeLogicalScientific,5,Goal of Science: Seek truth or create knowledge,Science is the pursuit of truth, of explanation, prediction, and control a phenomenon. Truth

6、obtained from the scientific method contains both logic and evidence that are consistent with each other. Science is about the creation of knowledge, not the application of knowledge Science cannot settle debate about values (good or bad, right or wrong, e.g. stem cell research) - objectivity Ultima

7、te goal of science is to better the human condition,6,Methodology The conduct of scientific inquiry,Methodology is the science of finding out knowledge (truth). The standards for determining truth is rigor in logic and methods The scientific community determines the standards of rigor and profession

8、al competence. Each scientist is accountable to the scientific community for adhering to standards of professional competence and norms. The visible part of our scientific conduct and results is “reconstructed logic” The ethics of science is in the conduct of the scientist.,7,Reality (Epistemology)

9、Three views in social sciences,Premodern: Only one reality, no individual experience matters or allowed. Modern: There is an objective reality (e.g., the temperature) but we have different subjective experience of it (e.g., warm, cold). Agreement in subjective experiences could indicate objective re

10、ality. Postmodern: No objective reality, only images of reality or subjective experiences, and all are true. Agreement is neither necessary or desirable to define reality.,8,Normal Science based on the modern view of reality,Normal science is empirical science data, evidences or observations are nec

11、essary to support theory. Determination of significant fact, matching of facts with theory, and articulation of theory basic paradigm of normal science that we accept.Research based on shared paradigm is committed to the same rules and standards for scientific practice. That commitment and the appar

12、ent consensus it produces are both the genesis and the continuation of a research tradition. Paradigms involve different assumptions of truth or reality normal science is based on a modern view of reality.,9,The Domain of Organization and Management Research,Inter-firm level: firm to firm, firm to e

13、nvironment Firm level: Strategy, structure, culture, process Group level: process, structure, dynamics Individual level: attitudes, behavior, decision, perceptionCross-level: firm group individualfirm individualindividual group firm,10,Commonly Used Research Methods in Management,Survey Research （调查

14、研究） Laboratory experiments (实验室研究） Quasi experiments （准实验） Secondary data design (二手数据分析） Qualitative and case methods (定性和个案研究）,11,Scientific Research,Scientific research is a systematic, controlled, empirical, and critical investigation of natural or social phenomena (using commonly accepted metho

15、dology) that either (a) is guided by theory and hypotheses about the presumed (true) relations among such phenomena, or b) results in theory and propositions about the possible (true) relationships among such phenomena.,12,Two Types of Empirical Research,Theory testing empirical research Surveys (in

16、terview, mail, internet, phone) Experiments (university setting) Quasi experiments (university or company) Secondary data (financial, operational, personnel)Theory building empirical research Qualitative research (interview, observation, text) Case methods (interviews, text, secondary data),13,Deduc

17、tive research 演绎研究,Inductive research 归纳研究,Theoretical research 理论研究,A Simplified Scientific Research Process and Types of Research,Descriptive research,1. Research Question 研究问题,3. Theory and Hypotheses 理论和假设,4. The empirical study实证研究,2. Literature review文献回顾,14,Elements of the Scientific Process,

18、Theories,Hypotheses 假设,Observations,Empirical Generalization 实证概括,Accept or reject Hs,Logical Deduction 演绎逻辑,Research Design, instrumentation, scaling, sampling,Measurement, sample summarization, parameter estimation,Concept formation Propositions Induction 形成概念、假设, 归纳,Logical Inference 逻辑推理,Tests o

19、f hypotheses,From W.L. Wallace, The Logic of Science in Sociology, Figure 1,15,The Scientific Process - Review,Curiosity or puzzle,Research Question,Literature review,Theory?,Yes,No,Deductive Design,Inductive Design,Observation,16,The Truth #,Research is “messy”. The “reconstructed story” does not r

20、eveal the “messiness” in the “construction process”. Research is “perseverance” through iterations of induction and deduction Thomas Edison 2000 times before he succeeded 2000 step journey,17,Research design: Purpose 1 - variance control,Systematic variance系统变异 Extraneous variance外生变异 Error variance

21、误差变异A good research design should: maximize systematic variance, control extraneous variance, and minimize error variance,18,Approaches to variance control,Maximize systematic variance Through good experimental control Through a strong theory Through systematic sampling Control extraneous variance T

22、hrough randomization or matching of subjects Through including meaningful control variables Minimize error variance Through controlled conditions Through valid measurement,19,Variance Control in EOR study (Tsui, et al 1997, AMJ),Systematic: Independent variable (EOR) Sample selection multiple indust

23、ries (5), multiple firms (10) 85 jobs Measurement of I.V. 4 types at the job level QSC 31%, UI 18%, OI 18%, MI 33% Extraneous: Control variables individual, job, company 8 total Error: Precision in measurement (EFA and CFA),20,Variance Control in IJV control study (Yan & Gray, 1994, AMJ),Systematic:

24、 Independent variable (Management Control) Sample selection theoretical sampling using criteria of IJV age, size, industries, ownership (4). Measurement or data interviews and archives Extraneous: Through sampling match of age, foreign country, etc. Error: Triangulation of data from multiple sources

25、,21,Variance control in social capital study (Xiao & Tsui, 2007, ASQ),Systematic variance in the IV industry experts nominate firms that vary on commitmentExtraneous variance through 9 control variablesError variance through valid measurement,22,Research Design: Purpose 2 - Enhance Validity,Validity

26、 is the probable truth or falsity of an assertion or inference. Four types of validity: Construct validity（构想效度） Present when measure produces results consistent with alternative (valid) measures of same construct Internal validity（内部效度） Absence of alternative explanations External validity（外部效度） Pr

27、esent when control variables do not interact with causal variables, i.e., results would hold at other times, in other settings, and for other individuals Statistical conclusion validity（统计推论效度） Significant presence of co-variation between variables,23,Construct Validity - Does the variable measure w

28、hat it purports to measure?,Content validity（内容效度） When the measure is absent of deficiency or contamination Criterion-related validity（效标关联效度） When the measure relates to other constructs as expected Convergent validity（会聚效度） When the measure relates to other measures of the same construct Discrimi

29、nant validity（区分效度） When the measure does not relate to other constructs as expected.,24,Construct validity in EOR study (Tsui et al., 1997, AMJ),1 independent and 7 dependent variables Assess internal consistency of multiple items for the same construct (alpha = .76 to .96) Factor analysis to ensur

30、e that items load on the intended factor (CFA discriminant validity) Agreement between multiple assessment of EOR dimensions in the same job (ANOVA F, R-2 = .33 and .50 for the two dimensions),25,Construct validity in IJV study (Yan & Gray, 1994, AMJ),Triangulation of data from multiple sourcesRepli

31、cation of discovered constructs across casesCase examples to illustrate constructs,26,Construct validity in the social capital study (Xiao & Tsui, 1997, ASQ),3 main constructs: structural holes, high commitment organization, career success2 of the 3 are based on current measuresHigh commitment firm

32、level construct measured at the individual level (n=88, 117, 102, 128 employees in four firms)EFA, Rwg=.83 to .84 (4 firms), ICC1=.14, ICC2=.95,27,Internal Validity: Confidence in inference, absence of alternative explanations,Strong statistical validity Strong theory (internal validity) Strong cont

33、rols (extraneous variance) Valid measurement (construct validity) Appropriate sample (external validity) Strong inference of causation (internal validity) No artificial covariance due to design or attribution,28,Internal validity of EOR study (Tsui et al., 1997, AMJ),Strong theoretical foundation No

34、 serious common method variance problemInclusion of 8 control variablesConstruct validity of EOR measure only 7 items (3 for contribution and 4 for inducement) - content deficiency?,29,Internal validity in IJV study (Yan & Gray, 1994, AMJ),Replication of relationships in different casesConsistency o

35、f patterns across casesCoders should be unaware of the initial model or hypothesesCompeting explanations (e.g., IJV changes) are incorporated into the revised model,30,Controlling for reverse causality Career data (DV) collected 6 months after IV Networks ties within performance period excludedUsing

36、 9 control variables that may also influence the dependent variable3 ways to test the moderating hypothesis Subgroup analysis Interaction of firm level commitment score Interaction of individual level commitment score,Internal validity in the social capital study (Xiao & Tsui, 1997, ASQ),31,Contribu

37、ting to Global Management Knowledge (how to publish in international journals),Address an interesting and important “puzzle” Contribute to a “current conversation” Connect to current theories and constructs Use current normal science method Select a type of international management research Engage i

38、n appropriate “contextualization”,32,The “Puzzle” Asking interesting questions,“Uninteresting” questions in any study: Obvious questions Irrelevant questions Absurd questions Definitional questions Affirmation questions“Uninteresting” Chinese studies: Replicating a published study Uncritical applica

39、tion of an existing theory Affirmation of similarities to Western samples Outside-in and literature-driven approach in selecting problems or research questions,(Davis, 1971),“What to study in Chinese Management research” Tsui, Zhao, and Abrahamson, MOR3.2,33,The “Conversation” (Huff, 1999),What are

40、the old and new topics in the conversation? What are the current debates? How familiar are current conversationalists about your topic and context (sample)? How to make the connection to the unfamiliar? Why should “they” listen to you?,34,Connect to Current Theories,Apply current theories Extend or

41、modify Create and connectMaking the novel appear familiar Making the familiar appear novel Borrow and return something better Vision limited by borrowed lens,Whetten, 2002; 2008,35,Contextualization and type of global management knowledge (Tsui, 2004),36,Use of Current Methods,Meet criteria of valid

42、ity construct, internal, external Contextualization of measurement and data collection procedure Develop new methods of data collection, measurement, or analyses to supplement current methods,37,Contextualization (Tsui, 2006),The Phenomena from “outside in” to “inside out” The Theory from “applicati

43、on” to “creation” The Measurement from “translation” to “indigenization” The Methodology from “sharpening old tools” to “developing new instruments”,38,Pure international studies of management in a multinational context Comparative or cross-cultural management studies of the behavior or decisions of

44、 firms or of individuals within firms across different cultural/national contexts Country specific or indigenous management studies of firm or individual behavior within a nation/culture,Types of international management research,Tsui, Nifadker Werner, 2002, JOM,39,IACMR Commitment to Excellence,Res

45、earch Code of Ethics Research integrity Journal submission policy Respect for research participants Reviewer and editor responsibilities Professional interaction and exchange Conference participation IACMR member responsibility,40,IACMR,Source of Inspiration 灵感之源 Spirit of Service 奉献精神 Commitment to

46、 Excellence 追求卓越,41,References,Academy of Management Journal award winning papers (book) Administrative Science Quarterly award winning papers (book) IACMR Statement of “Commitment to Excellent” on www.iacmr.orgBabbie, Earl R. 2004, 10th edition. The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadswro

47、th/Thomson Learning. Davis, Murray S. 1971. That is interesting! Phil. Soc. Sci., 309-344. Huff, Anne. 1999. Writing for scholarly publications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler. Kuhn, Thomas. 1996. The structure of scientific revolution

48、, 3rd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Popper, Karl R. 1968, 2nd edition. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Harper. Tsui, A.S. 2004 . Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21: 491-513. Ts

49、ui, A.S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1-13. Tsui, A.S., Nifadkar, S. & Ou, Y. 2007. Cross-national cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426-478. Tsui, A.S., Zhao, SM & Abrahamson, 2007. “What to study in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 3(2): 1:171-181. Wallace, Walter. 1971. The Logic of science in sociology. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 11-25.,