ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:21 ,大小:747.50KB ,
资源ID:379473      下载积分:2000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-379473.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(Chandrakant Patel, Ratnesh Sharma, Cullen Bash, Sven .ppt)为本站会员(explodesoak291)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

Chandrakant Patel, Ratnesh Sharma, Cullen Bash, Sven .ppt

1、Chandrakant Patel, Ratnesh Sharma, Cullen Bash, Sven GraupnerHP Laboratories Palo Alto,Energy Aware Grid: Global Workload Placement based on Energy Efficiency,Grid Computing,New paradigm in distributed and pervasive computing for scientific as well as commercial applications.Based on coordinated res

2、ource sharing and problem solving in dynamic, multi institutional virtual organizations.,Energy Aware Grid,Objective: Build an energy aware grid. Problem: Thermal and energy management issues due to aggregation of computing, networking and storage hardware. Solution: Data center energy efficiency co

3、efficients: Workload placement decisions will be made across the Grid, based on these coefficients. Provide a global utility infrastructure explicitly incorporating energy efficiency and thermal management among data centers.,Cooling Issues,Example : A data center, with 1000 racks, approximately 25,

4、000 square feet. Requires 10 MW of power for the computing infrastructure.An additional 5 MW would be required to remove the dissipated heat. At $100/MWh, cooling would cost $4 million per annum.,Data Center thermo-mechanical architecture,Rows of racks with multiple air-cooled hardware.Presence of m

5、ultiple air-conditioning units.Higher airflow rates required due to “slim servers” and “blade servers”.,Problems in Data Center Cooling: Cooling at Chip Level 10% of total power Cooling at Data Center Level 50% of the total powerAdditional thermodynamic work for cooling. Non-uniform temperature and

6、airflow patterns. The data center has no well defined boundaries.No control mechanism to dissipate high heat loads.,Contributions of the paper,Propose an energy-aware co-allocator that redistributes computing within the global network of data centers. Examine the methods for evaluating energy effici

7、ency and thermal management parameters applicable to any data center cooling infrastructure.,Globus resource management architecture Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman :The Grid , Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, 1999.,RSL (Resource Specification Language) Application specifies resource needs.B

8、roker Infrastructure Resolving higher-ordered RSL specifications into elementary, ground resource specifications.Ground RSL specification List of physical resources (machines, storage units, devices) needed to perform a computation.GRAMs (Globus Resource Allocation Managers) Allocates RSL ground res

9、ources from its resource pool for a scheduled time period. Assigns them to a specific computation.GIS information about resources and their availability.,Energy Aware Co-Allocator,Has information about a data center Resource Types machines, OS etc. Capacity of the resources. Schedules of allocations

10、 and reservations. The energy efficiency coefficient of the data center. Represents the energy cost when placing a workload in a particular data center.Data Center selection process Co-allocator will choose one or more GRAMs Necessary Conditions - Functional: Appropriate types of resources available

11、. Quantitative: Sufficient amounts of resources available. Schedule: Sufficient amounts of resource instances. Constraints: Restrictions, if provided by the application.,Energy Efficiency Coefficient ( ),A composite indicator of energy efficiency and thermal management of a data center.Factors which

12、 affect the coefficient Low condenser temperature. Relative humidity (RH). Cooling load. Using ground as a heat sink. Local Thermal Management.The efficiency coefficient of ith data center is given by i = i COPi is a factor of the Local Thermal Management. COP is the Coefficient of Performance, base

13、d on the condenser temperature.,Vapor Condensation Mechanism,Heat extraction system in a data center is based on a variation of reverse power cycle (also known as vapor compression cycle).Efficiency ()Pressure (P)- enthalpy (h) diagram for a vapor compression cycle Heat addition in the evaporator (C

14、-D) Work input at the compressor (D-A) Heat rejection at the condenser (A-B),Coefficient of Performance,COP Coefficient of Performance the ratio of desired output (i.e. heat extracted from the data center, Qevap) over the work input (i.e. Wc).Lower condenser temperature improves coefficient of perfo

15、rmance of cooling system.Heat can only be rejected to the ambient surroundings over a negative temperature gradient.Workload placement in data centers located in regions with higher ambient temperatures can increase the energy consumption per unit workload.,Example,Comparison of temperatures of New

16、Delhi and Phoenix.Calculate the COP Delhi 3.32 Phoenix 7.61Workload placement in New Delhi will be 56% more energy intensive than that in Phoenix.Energy-Aware Grid: Workload placement should be carried out based on lowest available heat rejection temperature.,Relative Humidity,Cooling of data center

17、 supply air also depends on the humidity.Energy-Aware Grid: Workload placement should avoid the potential disadvantages associated with high ambient humidity conditions.Regions with low seasonal humidity and ambient temperature can directly utilize outside air to provide cooling.,Cooling Load,COP of

18、 cooling systems varies with load.COP can deteriorate by 20%, if the load drops to 50% of rated capacity.Energy-Aware Grid : Workload placements across data centers should strive to maintain optimum load levels for highest possible coefficient of performance.,Using ground as a heat sink,Higher COP a

19、t a slightly higher initial cost.Temperature variation is barely observable below a depth of 1 m.Heat from the condenser is rejected to the ground Underground piping with water/glycol.Energy- Aware Grid: Aware of efficiency of these systems for prospective workload placement during adverse ambient c

20、onditions.,Local Thermal Management,Prevent local hot-spots by proper arrangement of rack and unit layouts. Depends on the data center infrastructure. Propose a data center-level thermal multiplier Account for the ability of the data center infrastructure to cope with new workload placement.Tref : a

21、ir supply temperature to the data center. SHI: denotes effect of hot air infiltration at the inlet to server or rack. Higher indicates a greater potential for vulnerability.,Energy-Aware Workload Distribution in a Grid,The co-allocator can choose those data center with the highest performance index

22、at the time of the placement.Need to consider migration costs across long distances, time zones etc.Calculate a Workload IndexUse the WPI to efficiently allocate workloads.,Workload Example,Co-allocator follows a 3 step process Search for data centers which can match the workload Determine for those

23、 locations. Eliminate centers ( 4) Use WPI to determine the final placement. Calculations for Phoenix compared to New Delhi Reduction in cooling resource power consumption of 56%. Reduction in total energy consumption of 13%.,Conclusion,Energy-Aware policy for distributing computational workload in the Grid resource management architecture.Data center energy coefficient.,

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1