ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PPT , 页数:21 ,大小:114KB ,
资源ID:389695      下载积分:2000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。 如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-389695.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(Technical Writingfor Computer SciencePart 1- Content and .ppt)为本站会员(bonesoil321)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

Technical Writingfor Computer SciencePart 1- Content and .ppt

1、Technical Writing for Computer Science Part 1: Content and Organization Research Careers Lecture Series July 13, 2009,Michael J. Lewis, Director Department of Computer Science Binghamton University (SUNY),NSF REU Technical Writing,CS Research Papers,Every paper is different, but most should be organ

2、ized like this: Abstract Introduction Related Work Design Implementation Performance Summary and Future Work References,NSF REU Technical Writing,CS Research Paper (cont.),Abstract 150 300 words Identify the problem Some background OK, but get to the point Identify the key contribution explicitly do

3、nt let others decide Dont keep secrets report the main results Many more people will read your abstract than your paper,NSF REU Technical Writing,Introduction,Do not start with a quote! Provide some background (1-2 paragraphs) Get to the point Identify the problem (yes, again) Identify your contribu

4、tion (yes, again) Preview most important results (yes, again),NSF REU Technical Writing,Related Work,Report the background research Categorize other papers Briefly summarize them (1-2 sentences each is often all you have room for) Draw the most important distinctions with your work About to 1 page,N

5、SF REU Technical Writing,Related Work: How?,People (your advisor, graduate students, other professors, etc.) Manuals, websites, specifications, etc. If its not officially “published,” be careful Use Wikipedia for trivia about Saturday Night Fever Do not use Wikipedia for CS background research Publi

6、shed research papers,NSF REU Technical Writing,Why?,Research must be new Otherwise its a waste of time Especially important if its an “old problem” Others have good ideas you can build on Reading other work can spark ideas (it can also inject biases, be overwhelming, etc. no magic answer to this pro

7、blem) Others may identify problems for you They may also show which problems are “too hard” E.g. NP-Complete problems need heuristics,NSF REU Technical Writing,CS Publications,(from the “Publishing Game” talk.) Publication Venues Journals Conferences Workshops Technical ReportsYou have to find every

8、thing,NSF REU Technical Writing,How do you find “everything”,Build a list of venues that are likely to report research on this topic Talk to your advisor and other group members Browse conference lists, look at “Calls for Papers“ Browse by key words to find some recent papers Google, Google Scholar,

9、 INSPEC, ACM Digital Library, IEEE digital library Check the last several years of proceedings in these venues Online or printed copy in the library,NSF REU Technical Writing,Find some papers,Now get your hands on some papers Read them - are they relevant? If so, theyve probably cited relevant work

10、Go find those papers, tooUse the Related Work and Reference list of relevant papers, to find others Use title, author, conference, etc.,NSF REU Technical Writing,Browse by Author or Group,Make sure you get the latest work from the group or author of relevant papers Statements in a paper are only nec

11、essarily true at the time it is published “open problems” may be solved Performance numbers may be irrelevant “new” approaches may be old Find the author or research groups Web page Dont count on it being up to date! Browse databases/libraries by author,NSF REU Technical Writing,Shortcuts,You will n

12、ot be able to read everything thoroughly You dont have to! (notice before I said you have to find everything) Read abstract, intro, related work, summary Then decide whether to read the whole paper Gold nuggets in your background research “Taxonomies”, or “Surveys” (not always called that) E.g. ACM

13、Computing Surveys,NSF REU Technical Writing,Use Citation Counts and Info,Some papers will pop up over and over Make sure you read and cite these If only for practical reasons for reviewers to see Google scholar and Citeseer Reports citation counts Read and cite the heavily cited papers (see above) A

14、llows you to browse by “Cited by” If others are citing the same work you are, they might be working on similar problems,NSF REU Technical Writing,Writing a Related Work Section,Group and categorize other approaches Distinguish your work succinctly Be diplomatic and nice Start with the most “importan

15、t” work If something is very closely related Describe it in more detail Be more specific about differences Make it clear why (you think) your paper is novel,NSF REU Technical Writing,Brief aside,Make it easy for others to find your work Pick good titles for your papers Post your papers on a web page

16、 Post full citations on your page So others can simply cut and paste into their papers Its easier to stay “current” than to get current Track top conferences, related groups, and authors Seek them out at conferences and talk to them Potential for collaboration Staying current is like eating healthy

17、and exercising,NSF REU Technical Writing,Design and Implementation,Depend heavily on content of the paperBest to separate Design from Implementation But not always and sometimes impossibleNot every implementation detail is important Focus on those that are novel and important to the contribution of

18、the paper,NSF REU Technical Writing,Performance,Clearly describe your experimental setup Ideally others should be able to reproduce your results Computer scientists seldom achieve this goal Then describe your results Capitalize “Figure 1” but not “this figure” ALL figures and tables should be called

19、 out in the text Interpret the results and “lesson” of every graph, figure, table, etc. Dont require the reader to do this for himself or herself,NSF REU Technical Writing,Summary and Future Work,Say what youre going to say (Intro) Say it (Body) Say what you said (Summary)Summaries are not Conclusio

20、ns Draw conclusions throughout the paperFuture Work Show that theres more to do dont reveal too much,NSF REU Technical Writing,The Process,You do not need to set aside a whole day! Write in small blocks of time Reread often, later, on paper Get a first draft done, somehow, fast This is the “clay” to

21、 sculpt from But be willing to throw away most of it eventually,NSF REU Technical Writing,Miscellaneous ideas,Be clear “Hold the readers hand” Assume your reader is lazy Make it easy to find the information Focus on contributions, not the journey Name new things acronyms, capital letters, descriptiv

22、e names, bold face or italics (the first time), etc.,NSF REU Technical Writing,Other Sources,How (and How Not to) Write a Good Systems Paper A classic still relevant http:/www.sigops.org/advice.htmlWriting a Technical Paper, by Michael Ernsthttp:/pag.csail.mit.edu/mernst/advice/write-technical-paper.html,

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1