Tectonic Thinkingafter theIndustrial Revolution.ppt

1、Tectonic Thinking after the Industrial Revolution,Robert Pirsig, Zen & the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance Kenneth Frampton, Studies in Tectonic Culture Lars Spuybroek, The Architecture of Continuity Richard Sennett, The Craftsman Ed Ford, The Details of Modern Architecture, Vol. 1 Geoffrey Scott, The

2、 Architecture of Humanism,“. Eduard Sekler defined the tectonic as a certain expressivity,Expression (ik-SPRESHuhn) n. Definition -n. 1. The act of expressing, conveying, or representing in words, art, music, or movement. Express (ik-SPRES) tr.v. Definition -tr.v. -pressed, -pressing, -presses. 4. T

3、o make a representation of; depict. 5. To represent by a sign or symbol; symbolize. American Heritage Dictionary Online,“. Eduard Sekler defined the tectonic as a certain expressivity arising from the statical resistance of constructional form in such a way that the resultant form could not be accou

4、nted for in terms of structure and construction alone.”,Aesthetics,From Websters Online Dictionary 1.a branch of philosophy dealing with the nature of beauty, art, and taste and with the creation and appreciation of beauty 2.a particular theory or conception of beauty or art Beauty derived from the

5、Greek Word for “sensory perception” “skin deep” “in the eye of the beholder” classical beauty expresses order and clarity,Dualities,Art Nature Art Science Art Fine Arts Art as expressing Artist-centered, receivers attitude is irrelevant Art as pleasing Viewer-centered, receivers attitude is some for

6、m of sensory pleasure Art as moving In the lives of the receivers hearts and minds Art as revealing Discloses something about reality, enlightening,Pirsig, Robert M; Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance,Reality,Pirsig, Robert M; Zen And The Art Of Motorcycle Maintenance,Quality,Zen 2: Peace of

7、Mind,“Assembly of Japanese bicycle require great peace of mind. Technology presumes theres just one right way to do things and there never is. And when you presume theres just one right way to do things, of course the instructions begin and end exclusively with the rotisserie. But if you have to cho

8、ose among an infinite number of ways to put it together then the relation of the machine to you, and the relation of the machine and you to the rest of the world, has to be considered, because the selection from among many choices, the art of the work is just as dependent upon your own mind and spir

9、it as it is upon the material of the machine. Thats why you need the peace of mind.”,Zen 3: Harmony,“Sometime look at a novice workman or a bad workman and compare his expression with that of a craftsman whose work you know is excellent and youll see the difference. The craftsman isnt ever following

10、 a single line of instruction. Hes making decisions as he goes along. For that reason hell be absorbed and attentive to what hes doing even though he doesnt deliberately contrive this. His motions and the machine are in a kind of harmony. He isnt following any set of written instructions because the

11、 nature of the material at hand determines his thoughts and motions, which simultaneously change the nature of the material at hand. The material and his thoughts are changing together in a progression of changes until his minds at rest at the same time the materials right.”,Zen 4: Transcendance,“Al

12、l that talk about technology and art is part of a pattern that seems to have emerged from my own life. It represents transcendence from something I think a lot of others may be trying to transcend. Well, it isnt just art and technology. Its a kind of non-coalescence between reason and feeling. Whats

13、 wrong with technology, is that its not connected in any real way with matters of the spirit and of the heart. And so it does blind, ugly things quite by accident and gets hated for that. the ugliness is being noticed more and more and people are asking if we must always suffer spiritually and esthe

14、tically in order to satisfy material needs. It cant be solved by rational means because the rationality itself is the source of the problem.”,Zen 5: Technology,“The ugliness the Sutherlands were fleeing is not inherent in technology. It only seemed that way to them because its so hard to isolate wha

15、t it is with technology thats so ugly. But technology is simply the making of things and the making of things cant by its own nature be ugly or there would be no possibility for beauty in the arts, which also include the making of things. Actually a root word of technology, technikos, originally mea

16、nt “art.“ The ancient Greeks never separated art from manufacture in their minds, and so never developed separate words for them. Neither is the ugliness inherent in the materials of modern technology - a statement you sometimes hear. Mass-produced plastics and synthetics arent in themselves bad. Th

17、eyve just acquired bad associations.”,Zen 6: Technology,“But, the real ugliness of modern technology isnt found in any material or shape or act or product. These are just the objects in which the low Quality appears to reside. Its our habit of assigning Quality to subjects or objects that gives this

18、 impression. The real ugliness is not the result of any objects of technology. Nor is it, if one follows Phaedrus metaphysics, the result of any subjects of technology, the people who produce it or the people who use it. Quality, or its absence, doesnt reside in either the subject or the object. The

19、 real ugliness lies in the relationship between the people who produce the technology and the things they produce, which results in a similar relationship between the people who use the technology and the things they use.”,Zen 7: Fusion,“It is this identity that is the basis of craftsmanship in all

20、the technical arts. And it is this identity that modern, dualistically conceived technology lacks. The creator of it feels no particular sense of identity with it. The owner of it feels no particular sense of identity with it. The user of it feels no particular sense of identity with it. The way to

21、solve the conflict between human values and technological needs is not to run away from technology. Thats impossible. The way to resolve the conflict is to break down the barriers of dualistic thought that prevent a real understanding of what technology is-not an exploitation of nature, but a fusion

22、 of nature and the human spirit into a new kind of creation that transcends both.”,Vitruvius: Firmness, Commodity & Delight Pugin: “no features of a building which are not there for convenience, construction or proprietyall ornament should consist in the essential construction” Ruskins Architectural

23、 Deceits: 1) suggestion of a mode of structure other than the true one, 2) painting of surfaces to represent some other material and 3) use of cast or machine made ornaments of any kind. Nervi: “. marvelous possibilities cannot be fully developed if the three fundamental factors of any construction

24、the architectural concept, the structural analysis and the correct solution to the problems of execution.” Konstantinidis: “Good architecture starts always with efficient construction.” Pjer Feld: The use of a given material should never happen by choice or calculation but only through intuition and

25、 desire. Billington: Efficiency, Economy & Elegance,Historical Tectonic Attitudes,“ The tectonic suggests itself today as a critical strategy largely because of the current tendency to commodify architectural form. It has to be conceded that this concern largely arises out of a reaction to Robert Ve

26、nturis concept of the “decorated shed.“ In this regard, it may be seen as a response to the fashion for reducing architecture to a spectacular expendable mise en scene. This amortizable scenographic approach has accompanied the general dissolution of references in the late modern world. With the pos

27、sible exception of applied science, the precepts governing many discourses today have become rather both incommunicative and unstable.”,A4229 Studies in Tectonic Culture, Kenneth Frampton,Cecil Balmond, 2002,“To my mind the answers lie deep in configuration. As we are made of patterns, both random a

28、nd regular, both physical and emotional, probing the archetypes of pattern is important - in its recognition and resonance we may find an element of beauty. In the past , beauty was conditioned by aspects of purity, fixed symmetries and pared minimal structure being accepted as norms. . Now that the

29、 world is being accepted as not simple, the complex and oblique and the intertwining of logic gain favor. Reason itself is finally being understood as nascent structure, non-linear and dependent on feedback procedures. Beauty may lie in the actual processes of engagement and be more abstract that th

30、e aesthetic of objecthood. Ultimately it may really be a constructive process.”,Richard Sennett, 2008,The architect Renzo Piano explains his own working procedure thus: “You start by sketching, then you do a drawing, then you make a model, and then you go to reality-you go to the site-and then you g

31、o back to drawing. You build up a kind of circularity between drawing and making and then back again.” About repetition and practice Piano observes, “This is very typical of the craftsmans approach. You think and you do at the same time. You draw and you make. Drawing . Is revisited. You do it, you

32、redo it, and you redo it again.”,Lars Spuybroek, 2008,Similarly for Spuybroek, the inherently empathetic nature of materiality is the basis for a politics of the object, enacted through the material logics of architecture, which are understood as continuous with those of the world. It is the “burnin

33、g surfaces“ of space, he concludes, that “make us catch fire. That is true continuity.from the foreword by Detlef Mertens,A Final Thought,“In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.”Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut, 19531994,Zen 8,“When this transcendence occ

34、urs in such events as the first airplane flight across the ocean or the first footstep on the moon, a kind of public recognition of the transcendent nature of technology occurs. But this transcendence should also occur at the individual level, on a personal basis, in ones own life, in a less dramati

35、c way.”,Zen 9,“Such personal transcendence of conflicts with technology doesnt have to involve motorcycles, of course. It can be at a level as simple as sharpening a kitchen knife or sewing a dress or mending a broken chair.”,A.W. Pugin,76 page book entitled “Principles of Pointed or Christian Archi

36、tecture” Two great rules of design: “there should be no features of a building which are not there for convenience, construction or propriety” “.all ornament should consist in the essential construction of the building. In pure architecture, the smallest detail should have meaning or purpose.” Ratio

37、nal Building = Monolithic Construction,John Ruskin: The Seven Lamps of Architecture,The Lamp of Truth: Architectural Deceits 1st: The suggestion of a mode of structure or support, other than the true one 2nd: The painting of surfaces to represent some other material than that of which they actually

38、consist. 3rd: The use of cast or machine made ornaments of any kind.,Pier Luigi Nervi, 1961,“ the unlimited possibilities of design offered by scientific theories of construction, the executions made possible by new building materials and current techniques, and the architectural themes growing ever

39、 greater and more complex as dictated by our social and economic developments, open horizons of unprecedented possibilities of construction as compared to what humanity has achieved from prehistoric times to the present. Nevertheless these marvelous possibilities cannot be fully developed if the thr

40、ee fundamental factors of any construction the architectural concept, the structural analysis and the correct solution to the problems of execution do not proceed in close collaboration having as its aim the sole and unique goal of arriving at a proposed result combining functionality, solidity and

41、beauty.”,Aris Konstantinidis, Architecture, 1964,“Good architecture starts always with efficient construction. Without construction there is no architecture. Construction embodies material and its use according to its properties, that is to say, stone imposes a different method of construction from

42、iron or concrete.”,Sigurd Lewerentz: St. Peters,The column itself is not what it at first appears to be: split in two from top to bottom, its twin cross-trees which are not symmetrical carry at their extremities yet further beams which are also split into pairs. Upon these beams stand steel struts t

43、o support the metal ribs that support the brick vaults at both springing and ridgelines alternately. Then again, these ribs to the vaults are neither horizontal nor do they run parallel but expand and contract as they run from wall to wall. Lewerentz speaks of the vaults as a recall of the ancient s

44、ymbol of the heavens, but here his treatment of them is strangely moving and insinuates into the mind a closer analogy to the rhythm of breathing the rise and fall, the interlocking of expansion and contraction.,Pjer Feld, 1983,“The use of a given material should never happen by choice or calculatio

45、n, but only through intuition and desire.” “The calculated column expresses nothing more than a particular number . . . In a world that is determined by calculation, material loses all capacity for the expression of constructive thought.” “For the young architect each material is a measurement of strength. To apply the material to its ultimate capacity is natural for youth. The expression of this inherent force complements a natural vitality. The materials sensation carries its conviction and the energy of youth attains a structural perfection.”,