ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:16 ,大小:2MB ,
资源ID:397400      下载积分:5000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-397400.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(BS PD CEN TR 16894-2015 Postal services Quality of delivery Reforwarding《邮政业务 交付质量 续运》.pdf)为本站会员(medalangle361)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

BS PD CEN TR 16894-2015 Postal services Quality of delivery Reforwarding《邮政业务 交付质量 续运》.pdf

1、BSI Standards Publication Postal services Quality of delivery: Reforwarding PD CEN/TR 16894:2015National foreword This Published Document is the UK implementation of CEN/TR 16894:2015. The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical Committee SVS/4, Postal services. A list of orga

2、nizations represented on this committee can be obtained on request to its secretary. This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application. The British Standards Institution 2015. Published by BSI Standards Limited

3、2015 ISBN 978 0 580 90476 9 ICS 03.240 Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from legal obligations. This Published Document was published under the authority of the Standards Policy and Strategy Committee on 30 September 2015. Amendments/corrigenda issued since publication Date

4、Text affected PUBLISHED DOCUMENT PD CEN/TR 16894:2015 TECHNICAL REPORT RAPPORT TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHER BERICHT CEN/TR 16894 September 2015 ICS 03.240 English Version Postal services - Quality of delivery: Reforwarding Services postaux - Qualit de la distribution: rexpdition Qualitt von Lieferungen: Na

5、chsendeantrag This Technical Report was approved by CEN on 8 September 2015. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 331. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic o

6、f Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMIT EUROPEN DE NORMALISATI

7、ON EUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNG CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2015 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. CEN/TR 16894:2015 E PD CEN/TR 16894:2015CEN/TR 16894:2015 (E) 2 Contents Page Euro

8、pean foreword . 3 Introduction 4 1 Scope 5 2 Symbols and abbreviations . 5 3 Service characteristics 5 4 Test items . 5 5 Test customers . 6 6 Performance indicator 7 7 Sample design . 8 8 Report 9 9 Scalability . 9 Bibliography . 11 PD CEN/TR 16894:2015CEN/TR 16894:2015 (E) 3 European foreword This

9、 document (CEN/TR 16894:2015) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 331 “Postal services”, the secretariat of which is held by NEN. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN and/or CENELEC shall not be held res

10、ponsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. PD CEN/TR 16894:2015CEN/TR 16894:2015 (E) 4 Introduction The European Commission emphasises the need to have common rules for the development of community postal services and the improvement of Quality of Service (QoS). The purpose of re-forwar

11、ding of postal items standardization is to supply all POs with a useful set of rules how to measure the QoSin re-forwarding. A survey among operators showed that all contributing countries provide this type of service, although with varying offers on type of mail, duration of contract, and modes of

12、processing. The technical recommendations on re-forwarding measurement take the varying service levels into account and should be flexible towards any POs service offer. It is essential to set the re-forwarding monitor up as an independent measurement, performed by an independent network of senders

13、and receivers managed by an independent supplier. Beyond this, this document describes a best practice approach of measuring re-forwarding with a basic design and sample. The design can be extended and refined to meet more advanced criteria of representative sampling, e.g. in mail characteristics, g

14、eographical spread, customer type, and differentiation of performance indicator. It is recommended to focus on the type of contract that covers the majority of contracts, e.g. on the domestic measurement (although re-forwarding contracts are offered as cross-border service as well), and / or on thos

15、e of private households or permanent relocation. The measurement should be based on a defined methodology which shall be objective and be auditable even if no audit is foreseen. The methodology and the sample design should be defined before the start of the measurement. PD CEN/TR 16894:2015CEN/TR 16

16、894:2015 (E) 5 1 Scope This Technical Report specifies methods for measuring the quality of a re-forwarding service of domestic addressed mail that is collected, processed and delivered by postal service operators. As a European Standard or technical specification it relates to the measurement of se

17、rvices given to household and business customers who receive mail at their homes, their post office boxes, or at their office premises and have contracted their national Postal Operator (PO) to re-forward their mail for a defined stretch of time to an address that deviates from the one presented on

18、the postal items that are to be delivered to them. It is not the purpose of this standard to measure the POs performance in a way that provides direct comparison of postal service providers. 2 Symbols and abbreviations PO Postal Operator QoS Quality of Service 3 Service characteristics The re-forwar

19、ding service is characterized by the fact that a person or company asks the PO to deliver their mail to a different address from the one that is written on the label of the postal item. This service is used when private households, businesses or other type of organizations leave their premises tempo

20、rarily or permanently and the alternative address is not (yet) commonly known to their correspondents. Holidays or travels / stays away from home for health, educational or job purposes are typical examples of temporary absence which has a predetermined end. Alternatively, re-forwarding contracts ar

21、e set up if a person, family, or business relocates permanently, i.e. move to another place of living. This type of re-forwarding service typically runs for several months. To measure this type of service, real re-forwarding contracts shall be used. The method to monitor the quality of the re-forwar

22、ding service is to send the test items to a person having a re-forwarding contract under this address. The test letters are being sent to the old/not valid address, and are considered correctly re-forwarded if they arrive at the new / now valid address. Without the real registration of the re-forwar

23、ding request the usual process of re-forwarding cannot be carried out by the PO. PO employees shall be able to refer to their usual database or source of information to identify a test item as a letter that should not be delivered to the address written on it but to someplace else. Both addresses, t

24、he one that is written on the envelope and the one where the item is re-forwarded to, shall be real addresses, postally correct and verified, and available in the POs information system as a re-forwarding case. Only then a sorting process or postal employees are able to correctly re-direct the item

25、and the postman is able to deliver the item to its addressee. 4 Test items The need for real re-forwarding contracts renders the finding of participants in the measurement rather demanding. A sample of test customers with the comparatively rare feature of a re-forwarding contract needs to be picked

26、and their mail monitored for test purposes (test mail) for a certain period. The test period should begin with the contract start date and last until the end of the contract. A defined number of test letters is sent to this test customer and monitored during this period. The start and end date of th

27、e contract should be considered carefully in the posting plan because a letter posted on the last day before a contract starts might slip through the sorting, before the contract PD CEN/TR 16894:2015CEN/TR 16894:2015 (E) 6 becomes active and the re-forwarding information is available. If a letter wa

28、s posted the day before the contract terminates, it will not reach the postman until the day after the contract becomes invalid and the re-forwarding information might get unavailable. These critical days shall be proportionately included in the measurement. The QoS(QoS) result Fulfilment of the re-

29、forwarding service shall be measured by the percentage of mail that is properly redirected and arrives at the new / temporary address (fulfilment of re-forwarding service). The percentage of successful delivery can be calculated if one knows the total number of items that should have been re-forward

30、ed, and thereby find out whether any one is missing. Therefore one has to control the number of items that are sent to the test receiver and have to be taken into account for the monitoring result calculation, which is achieved by the use of test items. Other (real) mail items that arrive during tha

31、t period of observation are not measured. NOTE 1 The simple approach of just reporting the real mail that was successfully re-forwarded does not give more than an indicator whether the re-forwarding works at all. Even if it was possible to determine the number of items gone to the wrong address (e.g

32、. finding them at home after the end of holidays or collected by persons with access to the old/not valid letterbox), it does not produce the number of items that might have been lost in transit, if one is not aware they were on their way. The test letters shall have an outward appearance that shows

33、 no obvious difference from typical regular mail in format, weight, colour, print, and franking. The address on the envelope shall be in conformity with typical addressing. The address shall be written correctly and legibly. Therefore it might be useful to fabricate all items and provide them to the

34、 sender(s) to prevent individual errors in addressing. It should be verified that the addressing was correct and enabled the PO to deliver the letter. The test letters address shall match exactly the one given in the re-forwarding contract which is verified by most postal operators. Verifying the ne

35、w address as well avoids delays in the re-forwarded delivery. NOTE 2 It might be possible to set up a test design that makes use of real mail between the test person with a re-forwarding contract and one or some of his regular correspondents. As the letters under observation are selected for the tes

36、t period they are also referred to as “test items”. 5 Test customers For setting up the test customer network, the monitoring agency needs to recruit customers that have the intention to use a re-forwarding contract, in time to measure its start date. NOTE Some PO might dispose of a database that al

37、lows for monitoring the QoS of re-forwarded real mail by data-analysis, e.g. counting all items that should be re-forwarded and calculating the share of those that were successfully delivered vs. those who were not. If this can be reliably identified by the data, a special test monitor may not be re

38、quired. Although monitoring companies may use various sources to get hold of participants who plan a move or absence with the use of re-forwarding (e.g. as a by-result of the domestic J+1 monitor), the most effective source usually is the POs own database of re-forwarding contracts. This may contain

39、 customers who are just signing the contract, or regular re-forwarding customers (e.g. because they have a summer house). While participants with the intention to get a re-forwarding contract may be found well in advance, the re-forwarding contract is typically signed only a few days before the star

40、t date with respect to the minimum delay required by the operator to implement the information. This leaves little time to approach the customer and recruit him for the test. Therefore a smooth procedure between the PO and the monitoring agency of providing the contact information is required that c

41、omplies with the respective data privacy regulation. PD CEN/TR 16894:2015CEN/TR 16894:2015 (E) 7 The test customers who join the measurement shall not be known to the staff of the POs. If a PO unit provides contact data of persons who have a re-forwarding contract for recruitment purposes this unit

42、shall not make the selection and shall not know which persons have been selected. This requirement shall ensure that a PO cannot influence either the behaviour or reporting of the panellists, or the QoS provided specifically to them, thus introducing bias. If their identity is kept secret, there can

43、 be no opportunity for influencing behaviour. These test customers function as receivers of the test items. The same or other persons (independent from a re-forwarding contract) are selected as senders who post the test items on prescribed days and confirm the (date of) sending. The test receivers r

44、egister the delivery, e.g. by date, or non-delivery. If the geographical spread of the induction is relevant (a discriminant mail characteristic) a network of senders should be established similar to an end-to-end measurement. If geography has no importance, e.g. because all mail is sorted and check

45、ed for re-forwarding contracts in one country hub or because this mail is identified only at their destination address by the postman, the test mail may be inducted at only one point of origin by just one sender. It shall be ascertained that the integrity of the measurement is not compromised, e.g.

46、the name of the sender (in case a sender address appears on the envelope) may be changed several times to keep the test less discoverable. Recording the dates of sending and receiving is recommended although they are not really required when fulfilment of the re-forwarding service is measured. Howev

47、er, they are easily added by the participant and help verifying the information. Another support to identify the test item is by enumeration: the sending is done in numeric sequence (e.g. 1 to 20), the sender is able to determine whether all items have arrived or one of the sequence is missing. In c

48、ase of a missing item the receiver should actively confirm that it did not arrive and was not just overlooked, or received and discarded by another member of the household. Any method of data capturing can be applied, from paper-and-pencil lists to phone, online or mobile device formats. The sending

49、 shall be monitored in a timely manner: in case an item gets forgotten it has to be cancelled from the reception list and removed from the performance indicator calculation. The receiver may confirm each item on a list, or individually by phone. They also may collect and return all test items to the monitoring agency for verification, in case of a relatively short temporary absence at the end, or during longer test periods in intervals by prepaid return envelope. The participants shall be able to report the sending and receiving accurately and to be relied on to confes

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1