ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:602 ,大小:35.53MB ,
资源ID:399687      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-399687.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(API OSRC-2015 Proceedings of the 2014 Offshore Structural Reliability Conference .pdf)为本站会员(eventdump275)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

API OSRC-2015 Proceedings of the 2014 Offshore Structural Reliability Conference .pdf

1、Proceedings of the 2014 Offshore Structural Reliability ConferenceSeptember 16 18, 2014Houston, TexasSpecial Notes Standard is a broad term covering all API documents that have been developed in accordance with APIs “Procedures for Standards Development”. Users of this document should be aware that

2、this publication is not a consensus document developed in accordance with these procedures and therefore does not represent an industry consensus or standard. This publication is merely a compendium of presentations submitted to API for presentation at a technical conference. The materials represent

3、 the individual opinions of the individual authors, and neither API nor its standards committees have made any effort to judge the content for technical accuracy or completeness. API has included all relevant presentations from the conference and the inclusion of a presentation does not indicate tha

4、t practices or procedures contained therein are recognized or generally accepted good engineering practices. USERS OF THIS PUBLICATION SHOULD NOT RELY SOLELY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK. Neither API nor any of APIs employees, subcontractors, consultants,

5、 or other assigns make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or utility of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in

6、this publication, or represent that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Sound business, scientific, engineering, and safety judgment should be used in employing the information contained herein. API is not undertaking to meet the duties of employers, manufacturers, or suppliers t

7、o warn and properly train and equip their employees, and others exposed, concerning health and safety risks and precautions, nor undertaking their obligations to comply with authorities having jurisdiction. Information concerning safety and health risks and proper precautions with respect to particu

8、lar materials and conditions should be obtained from the employer, the manufacturer or supplier of that material, or the material safety data sheet. Neither API nor any of APIs employees, subcontractors, consultants, committees, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express

9、or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication. Neither API nor any of APIs employees, subcontrac

10、tors, consultants, or other assignees represent that use of this publication would not infringe upon privately owned rights. API publications may be used by anyone desiring to do so. Every effort has been made by the Institute to assure the accuracy and reliability of the data contained in them; how

11、ever, the Institute makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection with this publication and hereby expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from its use or for the violation of any authorities having jurisdiction with which this publication may

12、 conflict. API publications are published to facilitate the broad availability of proven, sound engineering and operating practices. These publications are not intended to obviate the need for applying sound engineering judgment regarding when and where these publications should be utilized. The for

13、mulation and publication of API publications is not intended in any way to inhibit anyone from using any other practices. Nothing contained in any API publication is to be construed as granting any right, by implication or otherwise, for the manufacture, sale, or use of any method, apparatus, or pro

14、duct covered by letters patent. Neither should anything contained in the publication be construed as insuring anyone against liability for infringement of letters patent. All rights reserved. No part this work may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means,

15、electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Contact the Publisher, API Publishing Services, 1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 Copyright 2015 American Petroleum Institute Introduction The 2014 Offshore Structural Reliability conferenc

16、e was hosted by API for the same purposes as similar past events such as DIRT (DesignInspectRedundancyTriangle) conference in 1983, the series of Civil Engineering in the Oceans conferences by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and the Reliability of offshore structures workshop by the

17、Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP) in 2012 now the International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (IOGP). Practitioners and end-users of structural reliability methods were brought together for the purpose of sharing the collective knowledge of applying reliability theories and operating exp

18、eriences in order to address the offshore design and operational challenges facing the industry. These proceedings contain the material presented at this conference that included alternating sessions of instruction and topical papers starting with the history of offshore reliability studies, progres

19、sed to current activities, and then finally outlined issues for future resolution. This event was of interest for operators, engineers, regulators, academics, and anyone else involved in the design and operations of offshore structures. ContentsKeynote 1 History Behind the Development of Limit State

20、 (LRFD) Offshore Structures Design StandardsSession 1 Basic Principles of Structural ReliabilitySession 2 History & Background2.1 Historical Perspective on the Reliability Design of Offshore Platforms for Earthquakes 2.2 Reliability of Fixed Offshore Structures: A Historical Perspective2.3 How Relia

21、ble are Reliability CalculationsSession 3 Environmental Criteria3.1 Approaches for the Probabilistic Modeling for Hurricane-induced Wind and Waves 3.2 Wave Loads on Platform Sub-structures and Decks of Fixed Steel Platforms 3.3 Evolution and Development of Offshore Seismic Criteria3.4 Uncertainty in

22、 Ice Actions on Offshore StructuresKeynote 2 Safety Assessment of Offshore StructuresSession 4 Calibration MethodologiesSession 5 Experience with Structural Reliability5.1 Lessons Learned about Performance Realiability of Jacket Foundations Systems in Gulf of Mexico Hurricanes 5.2 Comparison of Glob

23、al Design Requirements and Failure Rates for Industry Long-term Mooring Systems5.3 Updating the Foundation Strength of the Jacket Structures in a Benign Tropical EnvironmentSession 6 Reliability Methods6.1 Development of API RP 2A-LRFD 2nd Edition6.2 Earthquake Reliability of Onshore Structures and

24、Comparison to Offshore Structures6.3 Reliability Application in Arctic Codes and StandardsKeynote 3A Forward Looking Vision for Offshore Structural ReliabilitySession 7 Industry Trends7.1 Methodology for Developing Acceptance Criteria for Storm Hazards for Offshore Structures - Adopting Current Seis

25、mic Methodologies7.2 Methodology for Developing Acceptance Criteria for Storm Hazards for Offshore Structures - Using Storm Hazard Curves7.3 Examination of FPSO Safety Factors using Storm Hazard CurvesSession 8 Response-based Statistics1Proceedings of the Offshore Structural Reliability Conference 2

26、014 OSRC September 16-18, 2014, Houston, Texas, USA Keynote Paper 1 History behind the development of Limit State (LRFD) Offshore Structures Design Standards Richard Snell Oxford University England, UK ABSTRACT The manner in which reliability is applied to structural engineering is different from mo

27、st other forms of engineering. Other engineering disciplines tend to consider reliability in the context of the performance of many thousands of identical precision made components where physical and performance tests can be used to quantify product reliability. Structures, which may involve many th

28、ousands of tonnes of material and site assembly, are not identical and cannot normally be physically tested on completion. Reliability is therefore addressed in the design and fabrication standards. This paper addresses the early development of structural reliability as a concept, initial applicatio

29、ns to standards development and how it has been incorporated in the International Standards Orgainisation (ISO) Offshore Structures Standard. Offshore Structures designed and fabricated to current standards have in general a satisfactory reliability. An overview of where the industry is in terms of

30、reliability is provided. INTRODUCTION The oil industry has built platforms offshore since 1947. Initially they were in very shallow water using dock piling technology. As they extended out into deeper water tubular jacket structures evolved. The oil first industry specific offshore structures design

31、 recommended practice API RP 2A was developed in the early 1970s by the American Petroleum Institute (API) focusing on the US Gulf of Mexico. This RP has been actively developed with 20 further editions published up to the mid 1990s. Although written primarily for application to US waters it has bee

32、n applied extensively to offshore structures design worldwide. With the discovery of oil and gas in the harsh waters of NW Europe other national practices and standards in the UK and Norway were developed reflecting the specific needs of this region. Initially the objective of the oil industry stand

33、ards was to address the key design issues such as marine loading, tubular joint design, fatigue, materials selection and fabrication tolerances with a conceptually very simple single WSD load factor. This resulted in an inconsistency in reliability depending on the accuracy with which the extreme ma

34、rine load can be predicted and the ratio of the live load to the self-weight of the platform. The industry is now in the process of migrating to the slightly less simple but more consistent limit state (also LRFD) method for specifying load factors. The oil industry has been behind other structural

35、sectors in applying reliability based design. It is fast catching up. This paper outlines some of the history of the development of reliability based structural design standards and the adoption of them by the oil industry. HISTORY OF STRUCTURAL STANDARDISATION The development of standards in struct

36、ural design has been a very long term process. Early examples of standardisation tended to be in the sphere of military engineering. The Romans had a systemised process operated by a corps of military Keynote 1 - Paper2 engineers for building forts, roads and bridges with variations in standardised

37、design according to the duration of use. An early application of the reliability concept. The Persian King Xerses had sufficient confidence in his military engineering organisation to have ordered it to build a temporary bridge across the Hellespont (Dardanelles) which comprised some 676 identical l

38、inked hulls. Chinese military engineers built the Great Wall to a standardised approach to provide long term protection for their civilisation from the Mongols. Individual ancient civilisations built religious and civic structures in stone in many places around the world. Some such as the Egyptian a

39、nd Mayan pyramids had a degree of standardisation. Others were unique. The durability of these ancient stone structures is a source of wonder to many archaeologists and historians but is not to an engineer. Stone material that had been chemically stable and subject to high compressive forces for mil

40、lions of years was quarried and re-shaped to function in a largely compressive mode. The structures subsequently survived with minimal maintenance for a further few thousand years. Failures have primarily arisen from weathering, removal of material for use in later buildings, conflict and in specifi

41、c regions seismic action rather than classical overload. Much of the ancient civic and domestic built environment used materials that are not generally highly durable, mud, brick and wood. Failures arose from poor construction, inadequate foundation, fire, earthquake and conflict as well as classica

42、l overload. The design attention tended to focus on the decorative rather than structural capability. Over centuries an improved understanding of materials allowed a reduction in conservatism without a reduction in safety. Perhaps the first time that the capability of materials was deliberately stre

43、tched was in the construction of cathedrals in Europe. The great cathedrals were intended to be awe inspiring and were built, often over a period of 100+ years, by masons who observed how the structure performed as it was being built and, if necessary, applied corrections as the building progressed.

44、 They deliberately pushed the bounds of materials and knowledge and sometimes exceeded it. Local structural failures were not uncommon during the construction process. Fortunately most were built in zones of very low seismicity. They produced drawings of their structural details which were available

45、 as guidance to others building later structures. Bridges were the other area where early engineers were forced to extrapolate knowledge and precedent to achieve longer spans. Masonry arch bridges are inherently tolerant of high loads and foundation settlement. The reliability of arch bridges was fi

46、rst documented in a paper written in 1801 (ref 1). Failures arising from scour undermining the foundations were more prevalent than structural overload. The industrial age introducing iron as a construction material accelerated the process of consideration of factors of safety for appropriate reliab

47、ility. The application of cast iron in beams and columns in factories and warehouses and wrought iron chain in suspension bridges was accompanied by early scientific papers providing guidance on aspects of reliability. (refs 2, 3, 4) DEVELOPMENT OF RELIABILITY BASED DESIGN PRINCIPLES The principles

48、of structural reliability as we understand them today were first evolved in the late 1930s. A M Freundenthal at Columbia University was working in this field for civil engineering structures in 1936. A G Pugsley at Bristol University applied the principles of structural reliability to aircraft struc

49、tures in 1942. These two published the first papers that outline the concept as it is currently understood. Freundenthal in 1947 published “The safety of structures” (ref 5). Pugsley in 1951 published “Concepts of safety in Structural Engineering” (ref 6). Both of these authors were strongly of the opinion that structural engineers knowledge of the reliability of structures lags far behind their ability to undertake complex analysis. Both viewed the key need to be improved statistical understanding of the loads to which structures are subject. In a 1956 American Society of C

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1