ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:55 ,大小:1.38MB ,
资源ID:401320      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-401320.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ACI 445R-1999 Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete《结构混凝土剪切力设计的最新方法》.pdf)为本站会员(吴艺期)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ACI 445R-1999 Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete《结构混凝土剪切力设计的最新方法》.pdf

1、ACI 445R-99 became effective November 22, 1999.Copyright 2000, American Concrete Institute.All rights reserved including rights of reproduction and use in any form or by anymeans, including the making of copies by any photo process, or by electronic ormechanical device, printed, written, or oral, or

2、 recording for sound or visual reproduc-tion or for use in any knowledge or retrieval system or device, unless permission inwriting is obtained from the copyright proprietors.445R-1ACI Committee Reports, Guides, Manuals, and Commentariesare intended for guidance in planning, designing, executing,and

3、 inspecting construction. This document is intended for theuse of individuals who are competent to evaluate thesignificance and limitations of its content and recommendationsand who will accept responsibility for the application of thematerial it contains. The American Concrete Institute disclaimsan

4、y and all responsibility for the stated principles. The Instituteshall not be liable for any loss or damage arising therefrom.Reference to this document shall not be made in contractdocuments. If items found in this document are desired by theArchitect/Engineer to be a part of the contract documents

5、, theyshall be restated in mandatory language for incorporation bythe Architect/Engineer.Truss model approaches and related theories for the design of reinforcedconcrete members to resist shear are presented. Realistic models for thedesign of deep beams, corbels, and other nonstandard structural mem

6、bersare illustrated. The background theories and the complementary nature ofa number of different approaches for the shear design of structural con-crete are discussed. These relatively new procedures provide a unified,intelligible, and safe design framework for proportioning structural con-crete un

7、der combined load effects.Keywords: beams (supports); concrete; design; detailing; failure; models;shear strength; structural concrete; strut and tie.CONTENTSChapter 1Introduction, p. 445R-21.1Scope and objectives1.2Historical development of shear design provisions1.3Overview of current ACI design p

8、rocedures1.4SummaryChapter 2Compression field approaches, p. 445R-52.1Introduction2.2Compression field theoryRecent Approaches to Shear Designof Structural ConcreteReported by Joint ACI-ASCE Committee 445ACI 445R-99(Reapproved 2009)2.3Stress-strain relationships for diagonally crackedconcrete2.4Modi

9、fied compression field theory2.5Rotating-angle softened-truss model2.6Design procedure based on modified compressionfield theoryChapter 3Truss approaches with concrete contribution, p. 445R-173.1Introduction3.2Overview of recent European codes3.3Modified sectional-truss model approach3.4Truss models

10、 with crack friction3.5Fixed-angle softened-truss models3.6SummaryChapter 4Members without transverse reinforcement, p. 445R-254.1Introduction4.2Empirical methods4.3Mechanisms of shear transfer4.4Models for members without transverse reinforcement4.5Important parameters influencing shear capacity4.6

11、ConclusionsChapter 5Shear friction, p. 445R-355.1Introduction5.2Shear-friction hypothesis5.3Empirical developmentsP. E. Adebar*N. M. Hawkins D. Mitchell*D. M. Rogowsky*J. F. Bonacci T. T. C. Hsu R. G. Oesterle G. M. SabnisM. P. Collins G. J. Klein M. A. Polak D. H. SandersD. Darwin T. Krauthammer K.

12、 S. Rajagopalan J. K. WightW. H. Dilger J. G. MacGregor K. H. Reineck*P. ZiaA. B. Gogate*Members of Subcommittee 445-1 who prepared this report.J. A. Ramirez*ChairC. W. FrenchSecretary445R-2 MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE5.4Analytical developments5.5Code developmentsChapter 6Design with strut-and-tie m

13、odels,p. 445R-376.1Introduction6.2Design of B regions6.3Design of D regionsChapter 7Summary, p. 445R-467.1Introduction7.2Truss models7.3Members without transverse reinforcement7.4Additional workAppendix AACI 318M-95 shear design approach for beams, p. 445R-49Appendix BReferences, p. 445R-50CHAPTER 1

14、INTRODUCTION1.1Scope and objectivesDesign procedures proposed for regulatory standardsshould be safe, correct in concept, simple to understand, andshould not necessarily add to either design or constructioncosts. These procedures are most effective if they are basedon relatively simple conceptual mo

15、dels rather than oncomplex empirical equations. This report introduces designengineers to some approaches for the shear design of one-way structural concrete members. Although the approachesexplained in the subsequent chapters of this report are rela-tively new, some of them have reached a sufficien

16、tly maturestate that they have been implemented in codes of practice.This report builds upon the landmark state-of-the-art reportby the ASCE-ACI Committee 426 (1973), The ShearStrength of Reinforced Concrete Members, which reviewedthe large body of experimental work on shear and gave thebackground t

17、o many of the current American Concrete Insti-tute (ACI) shear design provisions. After reviewing themany different empirical equations for shear design,Committee 426 expressed in 1973 the hope that “the designregulations for shear strength can be integrated, simplified,and given a physical signific

18、ance so that designers canapproach unusual design problems in a rational manner.”The purpose of this report is to answer that challenge andreview some of the new design approaches that have evolvedsince 1973 (CEB 1978, 1982; Walraven 1987; IABSE1991a,b; Regan 1993). Truss model approaches and relate

19、dtheories are discussed and the common basis for these newapproaches are highlighted. These new procedures provide aunified, rational, and safe design framework for structuralconcrete under combined actions, including the effects ofaxial load, bending, torsion, and prestressing.Chapter 1 presents a

20、brief historical background of thedevelopment of the shear design provisions and a summaryof the current ACI design equations for beams. Chapter 2discusses a sectional design procedure for structural-concrete one-way members using a compression fieldapproach. Chapter 3 addresses several approaches i

21、ncorpo-rating the “concrete contribution.” It includes brief reviewsof European Code EC2, Part 1 and the Comit Euro-Interna-tional du BtonFdration International de la Prcontrainte(CEB-FIP) Model Code, both based on strut-and-tie models.The behavior of members without or with low amounts ofshear rein

22、forcement is discussed in Chapter 4. An explanationof the concept of shear friction is presented in Chapter 5.Chapter 6 presents a design procedure using strut-and-tiemodels (STM), which can be used to design regions havinga complex flow of stresses and may also be used to designentire members. Chap

23、ter 7 contains a summary of the reportand suggestions for future work.1.2Historical development of shear design provisionsMost codes of practice use sectional methods for design ofconventional beams under bending and shear. ACI BuildingCode 318M-95 assumes that flexure and shear can behandled separa

24、tely for the worst combination of flexure andshear at a given section. The interaction between flexure andshear is addressed indirectly by detailing rules for flexuralreinforcement cutoff points. In addition, specific checks onthe level of concrete stresses in the member are introduced toensure suff

25、iciently ductile behavior and control of diagonalcrack widths at service load levels.In the early 1900s, truss models were used as conceptualtools in the analysis and design of reinforced concrete beams.Ritter (1899) postulated that after a reinforced concrete beamcracks due to diagonal tension stre

26、sses, it can be idealized asa parallel chord truss with compression diagonals inclined at457 with respect to the longitudinal axis of the beam. Mrsch(1920, 1922) later introduced the use of truss models fortorsion. These truss models neglected the contribution of theconcrete in tension. Withey (1907

27、, 1908) introduced Ritterstruss model into the American literature and pointed out thatthis approach gave conservative results when compared withtest evidence. Talbot (1909) confirmed this finding.Historically, shear design in the United States has includeda concrete contribution Vcto supplement the

28、 45 degreesectional truss model to reflect test results in beams and slabswith little or no shear reinforcement and ensure economy inthe practical design of such members. ACI Standard Specifi-cation No. 23 (1920) permitted an allowable shear stress of0.025 fc, but not more than 0.41 MPa, for beams w

29、ithout webreinforcement, and with longitudinal reinforcement that didnot have mechanical anchorage. If the longitudinal reinforce-ment was anchored with 180 degree hooks or with platesrigidly connected to the bars, the allowable shear stress wasincreased to 0.03fc or a maximum of 0.62 MPa (Fig. 1.1)

30、.Web reinforcement was designed by the equationAvFv= Vs sin /jd (1-1)whereAv= area of shear reinforcement within distance s;fv= allowable tensile stress in the shear reinforcement;jd = flexural lever arm;RECENT APPROACHES TO SHEAR DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL CONCRETE 445R-3V = total shear minus 0.02 fcbjd

31、(or 0.03 fcbjd withspecial anchorage);b = width of the web;s = spacing of shear steel measured perpendicular to itsdirection; and = angle of inclination of the web reinforcement withrespect to the horizontal axis of the beam.The limiting value for the allowable shear stresses atservice loads was 0.0

32、6fc or a maximum of 1.24 MPa, or withanchorage of longitudinal steel 0.12fc or a maximum of2.48 MPa. This shear stress was intended to prevent diagonalcrushing failures of the web concrete before yielding of thestirrups. These specifications of the code calculated thenominal shear stress as v = V/bj

33、d.This procedure, which formed the basis for future ACIcodes, lasted from 1921 to 1951 with each edition providingsomewhat less-conservative design procedures. In 1951 thedistinction between members with and without mechanicalanchorage was omitted and replaced by the requirement thatall plain bars m

34、ust be hooked, and deformed bars must meetASTM A 305. Therefore, the maximum allowable shearstress on the concrete for beams without web reinforcement(ACI 318-51) was 0.03fc and the maximum allowable shearstress for beams with web reinforcement was 0.12fc.ACI 318-51, based on allowable stresses, spe

35、cified thatweb reinforcement must be provided for the excess shear ifthe shear stress at service loads exceeded 0.03fc.Calculationof the area of shear reinforcement continued to be based ona 45 degree truss analogy in which the web reinforcementmust be designed to carry the difference between the to

36、talshear and the shear assumed to be carried by the concrete.The August 1955 shear failure of beams in the warehouseat Wilkins Air Force Depot in Shelby, Ohio, brought intoquestion the traditional ACI shear design procedures. Theseshear failures, in conjunction with intensified research,clearly indi

37、cated that shear and diagonal tension was acomplex problem involving many variables and resulted in areturn to forgotten fundamentals.Talbot (1909) pointed out the fallacies of such proceduresas early as 1909 in talking about the failure of beamswithout web reinforcement. Based on 106 beam tests, he

38、concluded thatIt will be found that the value of v shear stress atfailure will vary with the amount of reinforcement,with the relative length of the beam, and with otherfactors which affect the stiffness of the beam. Inbeams without web reinforcement, web resistancedepends upon the quality and stren

39、gth of theconcrete. The stiffer the beam the larger thevertical stresses which may be developed. Short,deep beams give higher results than long slenderones, and beams with high percentage of reinforce-ment give higher results than beams with a smallamount of metal.Unfortunately, Talbots findings abo

40、ut the influence of thepercentage of longitudinal reinforcement and the length-to-depth ratio were not reflected in the design equations untilmuch later. The research triggered by the 1956 Wilkinswarehouse failures brought these important concepts back tothe forefront.More recently, several design p

41、rocedures were developedto economize on the design of the stirrup reinforcement. Oneapproach has been to add a concrete contribution term to theshear reinforcement capacity obtained, assuming a 45 degreetruss (for example, ACI 318-95). Another procedure hasbeen the use of a truss with a variable ang

42、le of inclination ofthe diagonals. The inclination of the truss diagonals is allowedto differ from 45 degree within certain limits suggested onthe basis of the theory of plasticity. This approach is oftenreferred to as the “standard truss model with no concretecontribution” and is explained by the e

43、xistence of aggregateinterlock and dowel forces in the cracks, which allow a lowerinclination of the compression diagonals and the furthermobilization of the stirrup reinforcement. A combination ofthe variable-angle truss and a concrete contribution has alsobeen proposed. This procedure has been ref

44、erred to as themodified truss model approach (CEB 1978; Ramirez andBreen 1991). In this approach, in addition to a variable angleof inclination of the diagonals, the concrete contribution fornonprestressed concrete members diminishes with the levelof shear stress. For prestressed concrete members, t

45、heconcrete contribution is not considered to vary with the levelof shear stress and is taken as a function of the level ofprestress and the stress in the extreme tension fiber.As mentioned previously, the truss model does not directlyaccount for the components of the shear failure mechanism,such as

46、aggregate interlock and friction, dowel action of thelongitudinal steel, and shear carried across uncrackedconcrete. For prestressed beams, the larger the amount ofprestressing, the lower the angle of inclination at first diagonalcracking. Therefore, depending on the level of compressivestress due t

47、o prestress, prestressed concrete beams typicallyhave much lower angles of inclined cracks at failure thannonprestressed beams and require smaller amounts of stirrups.Traditionally in North American practice, the additionalarea of longitudinal tension steel for shear has been providedby extending th

48、e bars a distance equal to d beyond the flexuralcutoff point. Although adequate for a truss model with 45 degreediagonals, this detailing rule is not adequate for trusses withdiagonals inclined at lower angles. The additional longitudinaltension force due to shear can be determined from equilibriumc

49、onditions of the truss model as V cot, with as the angle ofinclination of the truss diagonals. Because the shear stressesare assumed uniformly distributed over the depth of the web,the tension acts at the section middepth.The upper limit of shear strength is established by limitingthe stress in the compression diagonals fdto a fraction of theconcrete cylinder strength. The concrete in the cracked webFig. 1.1American Specification for shear design (1920-1951) based on ACI Standard No. 23, 1920.445R-4 MANUAL OF CONCR

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1