AASHTO T 355-2018 Standard Method of Test for In-Place Density of Asphalt Mixtures by Nuclear Methods.pdf

1、Standard Method of Test for In-Place Density of Asphalt Mixtures by Nuclear Methods AASHTO Designation: T 355-181Technical Section: 2c, AsphaltAggregate Mixtures Release: Group 3 (August) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 444 North Capitol Street N.W., Suite 249 Wash

2、ington, D.C. 20001 TS-2c T 355-1 AASHTO Standard Method of Test for In-Place Density of Asphalt Mixtures by Nuclear Methods AASHTO Designation: T 355-181Technical Section: 2c, AsphaltAggregate Mixtures Release: Group 3 (August) 1. SCOPE 1.1. This test method describes the procedure for determining t

3、he in-place density of asphalt mixtures by use of nuclear gauge. The density of the material is determined by the backscatter/air-gap ratio method. 1.2. DensityThe total density of asphalt mixtures is determined by the attenuation of gamma radiation where the source and detector(s) remain on the sur

4、face (backscatter method). 1.2.1. The density in mass per unit volume of the material under test is determined by comparing the detected rate of gamma radiation with previously established calibration data. 1.3. SI Unitsthe values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The inch-pound

5、 equivalents may be approximate. It is common practice in the engineering profession to concurrently use pounds to represent both a unit of mass (lbm) and of force (lbf). This implicitly combines two systems of units, that is, the absolute system and the gravitational system. 1.3.1. In the U.S. Cust

6、omary units system, the pound (lbf) represents a unit of force (weight). However, the use of balances or scales recording pounds of mass (lbm) or recording density (lbm/ft3) should not be regarded as nonconformance with this standard. 1.4. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety

7、concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. See Section 6, Hazards. 2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS 2.1. AASHTO Standards: T 166,

8、Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens T 191, Density of Soil In-Place by the Sand-Cone Method T 209, Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) T 331, Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) and Density of Compacted A

9、sphalt Mixtures Using Automatic Vacuum Sealing Method 2018 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-2c T 355-2 AASHTO 2.2. ASTM Standards: D2216, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination

10、of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass D2937, Standard Test Method for Density of Soil in Place by the Drive-Cylinder Method D7013/D7013M, Standard Guide for Calibration Facility Setup for Nuclear Surface Gauges 3. SIGNIFICANCE 3.1. This test method is useful as a rapid, nondestructive

11、 technique for the determination of the in-place density of asphalt mixtures. 3.2. This test method is used for quality control and acceptance testing of compacted asphalt mixtures for construction and for research and development. 3.3. DensityThe fundamental assumptions inherent in the methods are

12、that Compton scattering is the dominant interaction and that the material under test is homogeneous. 3.3.1. Test results may be affected by chemical composition, sample heterogeneity, and to a lesser degree, material density and the surface texture of the material being tested. 3.4. The test results

13、 can be used to establish the optimum rolling effort and evaluate the job mix formula for in-place properties. The nondestructive nature allows for repetitive measurements at a single test location and statistical analysis of the results. Note 1For in-place density results, correlation with cores is

14、 recommended (see Appendix X1). 4. INTERFERENCES 4.1. In-Place Density Interferences: 4.1.1. The chemical composition of the sample may affect the measurement, and adjustments may be necessary. 4.1.2. The gauge is more sensitive to the density of the material in close proximity to the surface. Note

15、2The nuclear gauge density measurements are somewhat biased to the surface layers of the material being tested. This method is more sensitive to the material within the first several inches from the surface. 4.1.3. Other radioactive sources must not be within 10 m (30 ft) of the gauge in operation.

16、4.1.4. Large objects must be at least 3 m (10 ft) away. 4.1.5. Use the gauge manufacturers correction procedure when the gauge will be closer than 600 mm (24 in.) to any vertical mass, or less than 300 mm (12 in.) from a vertical pavement edge. 5. APPARATUS 5.1. Nuclear Density Gauge (Either Density

17、/Moisture or Density Gauge)While exact details of construction of the gauge may vary, the system shall consist of: 5.1.1. Instruction ManualFor the specific make and model of gauge. 2018 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a

18、violation of applicable law.TS-2c T 355-3 AASHTO 5.1.2. Radiation SourceA sealed source of high-energy gamma radiation such as cesium or radium. 5.1.3. Gamma DetectorAny type of gamma detector such as a Geiger-Mueller tube(s). 5.2. Reference StandardA block of material used for checking gauge operat

19、ions, for correcting source decay, and to establish conditions for a reproducible reference count rate. 5.3. Site Preparation DeviceA plate, straightedge, or other suitable leveling tool. 5.4. Transport CaseFor properly shipping and housing the gauge and tools. 5.5. Filler MaterialFine-graded sand f

20、rom the source used to produce the asphalt pavement or other acceptable materials. 5.6. Radioactive materials information and calibration packet containing: 5.6.1. Daily standard count log; 5.6.2. Factory and laboratory calibration data sheet; 5.6.3. Leak test certificate; 5.6.4. Shippers declaratio

21、n for dangerous goods; 5.6.5. Procedure memo for storing, transporting, and handling nuclear testing equipment; and 5.6.6. Other radioactive materials documentation as required by local regulatory requirements. 6. HAZARDS 6.1. The gauge utilizes radioactive materials that may be hazardous to the hea

22、lth of the users unless proper precautions are taken. Users of the gauge must become familiar with applicable safety procedures and government regulations. 6.2. Effective user instructions together with routine safety procedures, such as source leak tests, recording and evaluation of film badge data

23、 etc., are a recommended part of the operation and storage of this gauge. 7. CALIBRATION 7.1. Calibration of the gauge will be in accordance with Annexes A and B (if applicable). (See also ASTM D7013/D7013M.) 8. STANDARDIZATION 8.1. All nuclear density gauges are subject to long-term aging of the r

24、adioactive sources, detectors, and electronic systems, which may change the relationship between count rates and the material density. To offset this aging, gauges are calibrated as a ratio of the measurement count rate to a count rate made on a reference standard or to an air-gap count (for the bac

25、kscatter/air-gap ratio method). The reference count rate should be in the same or higher order of magnitude than the range of measurement count rates over the useful range of the gauge. 2018 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication i

26、s a violation of applicable law.TS-2c T 355-4 AASHTO 8.2. Standardization of the gauge on the reference standard is required at the start of each days use and a permanent record of these data shall be retained. Standard counts should be taken in the same environmental conditions as the actual measur

27、ement counts. The standardization shall be performed with the gauge at least 10 m (30 ft) away from other radioactive sources and clear of large masses or other items which may affect the reference count rates. 8.2.1. Turn on the gauge and allow for stabilization according to the manufacturers recom

28、mendations. If the gauge is to be used either continuously or intermittently during the day, it is best to leave it in the “power on” condition to prevent having to repeat the stabilization (refer to manufacturer recommendations). This will provide more stable, consistent results. 8.2.2. Using the r

29、eference standard, take at least four repetitive readings at the normal measurement period and obtain the mean. If available on the gauge, one measurement of four or more times the normal period is acceptable. This constitutes one standardization check. Use the procedure recommended by the gauge man

30、ufacturer for determining compliance with the gauge calibration curves. Without specific recommendations from the gauge manufacturer, use the procedure in Section 8.2.3. 8.2.3. If the mean of the four repetitive readings is outside the limits set by Equation 1, repeat the standardization check. If t

31、he second standardization check satisfies Equation 1, the gauge is considered in satisfactory operating condition. If the second standardization check does not satisfy Equation 1, the gauge should be checked and verified according to Sections A1.8 and B1.5. If the verification shows that there is no

32、 significant change in the calibration curve, a new reference standard count, No, should be established. If the verification check shows that there is a significant difference in the calibration curve, repair and recalibrate the gauge. ( )1.96 /so oN N NF= (1) where: Ns= value of current standardiza

33、tion count, No= average of the past four values of Nstaken for prior usage, and F = factory pre-scale factor (contact gauge manufacturer for the factor). 9. PROCEDURE 9.1. Select a relatively smooth and flat test location where the gauge will be at least 3 m (10 ft) away from any large objects. Foll

34、ow the gauge manufacturers correction procedures when closer than 600 mm (24 in.) to a vertical mass or less than 300 mm (12 in.) from a vertical pavement edge. 9.2. Prepare the test site in the following manner: 9.2.1. Maintain maximum contact between the base of the gauge and the surface of the ma

35、terial under test. Use filler material to fill surface voids. Spread a small amount of filler material over the test site surface and distribute it evenly. Strike off the surface with a straightedge (such as a lathe or flat-bar steel) to remove excess material. 9.3. Thin Layer, Backscatter, or Backs

36、catter/Air-Gap Ratio Mode of In-Place Nuclear Density: 9.3.1. Alternate Method No. 190-Degree Rotation: 9.3.1.1. Place the gauge on the test site perpendicular to the direction of travel of the rollers. Using a crayon or chalk, mark the outline or footprint of the gauge. Then place the probe in the

37、backscatter position. 2018 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-2c T 355-5 AASHTO 9.3.1.2. Take a 1-min test, and record the (wet) density reading. 9.3.1.3. Rotate the gauge 90 degrees centered

38、 over the original footprint (see Figure 1). Mark the outline or footprint of the gauge. 9.3.1.4. Take another 1-min test and record the (wet) density reading. 9.3.1.5. If the difference between the two 1-min tests is greater than 40 kg/m3(2.5 lb/ft3), retest in both directions. If the difference of

39、 the retests is still greater than 40 kg/m3(2.5 lb/ft3), test at 180 and 270 degrees. 9.3.1.6. The density reported for each test site shall be the average of the two individual 1-min (wet) density readings. Figure 1Footprint of the Gauge Test Site (Gauge is Rotated 90 Degrees between Readings) 9.3.

40、2. Alternate Method No. 2180-Degree Rotation: 9.3.2.1. Place the gauge on the test site parallel to the direction of travel of the rollers. Using a crayon or chalk, mark the outline or footprint of the gauge. Then place the probe in the backscatter position. 9.3.2.2. Take a 1-min test and record the

41、 (wet) density reading. 9.3.2.3. Rotate the gauge 180 centered over the original footprint (see Figure 2). 9.3.2.4. Take another 1-min test and record the (wet) density reading. 9.3.2.5. If the difference between the two 1-min tests is greater than 40 kg/m3(2.5 lb/ft3), retest in both directions. Di

42、rectionofTravelofRollers 2018 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-2c T 355-6 AASHTO 9.3.2.6. The density reported for each test site shall be the average of the two individual 1-min (wet) dens

43、ity readings. Figure 2Footprint of the Gauge Test Site (Gauge is Rotated 180 Degrees between Readings) 9.3.3. Alternate Method No. 3: 9.3.3.1. Place the gauge on the test site parallel to the direction of travel of the rollers. Using a crayon or chalk, mark the outline or footprint of the gauge. The

44、n place the probe in the backscatter position. 9.3.3.2. Take a 4-min test and record the (wet) density reading. 10. CALCULATION OF RESULTS 10.1. Percent Compaction: 10.1.1. It may be desired to express the in-place density as a percentage of some other density, for example, the laboratory densities

45、determined in accordance with T 209. This relation can be determined by dividing the in-place density by the laboratory density and multiplying by 100. In-Place Density100 % CompactionMaximum Density=(2) DirectionofTravel of Rollers 2018 by the American Association of State Highway and Transportatio

46、n Officials. All rights reserved. Duplication is a violation of applicable law.TS-2c T 355-7 AASHTO 11. REPORT 11.1. The report shall include the following: 11.1.1. Standardization and adjustment data for the date of the tests; 11.1.2. Make, model, and serial number of the test gauge; 11.1.3. Name o

47、f the operator(s); 11.1.4. Date of last instrument calibration or calibration verification; 11.1.5. Test site identification; 11.1.6. Thickness of layer tested; 11.1.7. Density in kg/m3or unit weights in lb/ft3; 11.1.8. Percent compaction and percent compaction corrected with cores, when applicable;

48、 and 11.1.9. Any adjustments made in the reported values and reasons for the adjustment. 12. PRECISION AND BIAS 12.1. No precision or bias statements are available at this time. 13. KEYWORDS 13.1. Compaction test; construction control; density; moisture content; nuclear methods; quality control; wat

49、er content. ANNEX A (Mandatory Information) A1. (WET) DENSITY CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION A1.1. CalibrationNewly acquired gauges shall be calibrated initially. Existing gauges shall be calibrated after repairs that may affect the gauge geometry. Existing gauges shall be calibrated to reestablish calibration curves, tables, or equivalent coefficients if the gauge does not meet the specified tolerances in the verification process. If the owner does not establish a verification procedure, the gauge shall be calibrated at a minimum frequency of