AIAA S-080A-2018 Space Systems - Metallic Pressure Vessels Pressurized Structures and Pressure Components.pdf

1、 Standard ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 (Revision of AIAA S-080-1998) AIAA standards are copyrighted by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 12700 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20191-5807 USA. All rights reserved. AIAA grants you a license as follows: The right to download an el

2、ectronic file of this AIAA standard for temporary storage on one computer for purposes of viewing, and/or printing one copy of the AIAA standard for individual use. Neither the electronic file nor the hard copy print may be reproduced in any way. In addition, the electronic file may not be distribut

3、ed elsewhere over computer networks or otherwise. The hard copy print may only be distributed to other employees for their internal use within your organization. Space Systems Metallic Pressure Vessels, Pressurized Structures, and Pressure Components ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 (Revi

4、sion of AIAA S-080-1998) American National Standard Space SystemsMetallic Pressure Vessels, Pressurized Structures, and Pressure Components Sponsored by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Approved 12 March 2018 American National Standards Institute Approved 20 March 2018 Abstract Thi

5、s standard establishes baseline requirements for the design, analysis, fabrication, test, operation, and maintenance of metallic pressure vessels, pressurized structures, batteries, heat pipes, and cryostats, dewars, sealed containers, accumulators, and pressure components such as lines, fittings, h

6、oses, and bellows made of metals. These components are used for pressurized, hazardous, or nonhazardous liquid or gas storage in space systems including spacecraft and launch vehicles. ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 ii Approval of an American National Standard requires verification by ANSI that the requireme

7、nts for due process, consensus, and other criteria have been met by the standards developer. Consensus is established when, in the judgment of the ANSI Board of Standards Review, substantial agreement has been reached by directly and materially affected interests. Substantial agreement means much mo

8、re than a simple majority, but not necessarily unanimity. Consensus requires that all views and objections be considered, and that a concerted effort be made toward their resolution. The use of American National Standards is completely voluntary; their existence does not in any respect preclude anyo

9、ne, whether he has approved the standards or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing, or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standards. The American National Standards Institute does not develop standards and will in no circumstances give an interpretation of any Am

10、erican National Standard. Moreover, no person shall have the right or authority to issue an interpretation of an American National Standard in the name of the American National Standards Institute. Requests for interpretations should be addressed to the secretariat or sponsor whose name appears on t

11、he title page of this standard. CAUTION NOTICE: This American National Standard may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the American National Standards Institute require that action be taken to affirm, revise, or withdraw this standard no later than five years from the date of app

12、roval. Purchasers of American National Standards may receive current information on all standards by calling or writing the American National Standards Institute. Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 12700 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 200, Reston, VA 20191 Copyright 2018 Am

13、erican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-1-62410-541-8 ANSI/AIAA

14、S-080A-2018 Contents 1 Scope . 1 1.1 Purpose . 1 1.2 Applicability 1 1.3 Designation of Responsibilities 1 1.3.1 Owner 1 1.3.2 Procuring Authority . 2 1.3.3 Manufacturer 2 2 Tailoring 2 3 Applicable Documents . 2 4 Vocabulary 3 4.1 Acronyms and Abbreviated Terms . 3 4.2 Terms and Definitions . 5 5 G

15、eneral Design . 10 5.1 System Analysis 10 5.1.1 Service Classification . 11 5.1.2 Service Category 11 5.1.3 Maximum Expected Operating Pressure 11 5.1.4 Maximum External Pressure Differential 11 5.1.5 Load, Acoustic, Shock, and Vibration Environment 11 5.1.6 Service Life 12 5.1.7 Volume Capacity . 1

16、2 5.1.8 Pressurized Hardware Assessment . 12 5.1.9 Physical Envelope 12 5.1.10 Acceptable Leak Rate 13 5.1.11 Mass 13 5.1.12 Cleanliness Level . 13 5.1.13 Fluids . 13 5.1.14 Shipping Environment . 13 5.1.15 Reserved 13 5.1.16 Thermal Environment . 13 5.1.17 Unique Operating Environments 13 5.1.18 Re

17、liability . 13 5.2 Pressurized Hardware Design Parameters . 13 5.2.1 Burst Factor . 14 5.2.2 Design Burst Pressure . 15 5.2.3 Proof Pressure . 16 5.2.4 Design Safety Factor 16 5.2.5 Margin of Safety 16 5.2.6 Negative Pressure Differential Design 17 5.2.7 Volume Capacity Design 17 5.2.8 Physical Enve

18、lope Design 17 5.2.9 Mass Design 17 5.2.10 Stability Design 17 5.2.11 Fluid Compatibility Design. 17 ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 iv 5.2.12 Load, Acoustic, Shock, and Vibration Environment Design 17 5.2.13 Fracture Control Design 18 5.2.13.1 Damage Tolerance Life Design 18 5.2.13.2 Leak Before Burst Design

19、 19 5.2.14 Fatigue Life Design 19 5.2.15 Reserved 19 5.2.16 Unique Operating Environments Design . 19 5.2.17 Additional DesignBattery Containers 19 5.2.18 Additional DesignCryostats and Dewars . 19 5.2.19 Additional DesignSealed Containers . 19 5.2.20 Additional DesignLines and Fittings . 20 5.2.21

20、Additional DesignPressurized Components 20 5.3 Reserved . 20 5.4 Materials. 20 6 General Verification . 20 6.1 Stability Verification 20 6.2 Fracture Control Verification . 20 6.2.1 Damage Tolerance Life Verification 20 6.2.2 Leak Before Burst Verification 21 6.3 Unique Operating Environments Verifi

21、cation 21 7 Verification by Analysis . 21 7.1 Metallic Material Properties 21 7.2 Reserved . 22 7.3 Analysis Model 22 7.3.1 Analysis Model Strength 22 7.3.2 Analysis Model Loads . 23 7.3.3 Reserved 23 7.3.4 Reserved 23 7.3.5 Analysis Model Stiffness . 23 7.3.6 Analysis Model Thermal Effects . 23 7.4

22、 Pressurized Hardware Analysis 23 7.4.1 Proof Pressure Analysis . 23 7.4.2 Design Burst Pressure Analysis 23 7.4.3 Margin of Safety Analysis 23 7.4.4 Negative Pressure Differential Analysis 24 7.4.5 Stability Analysis 24 7.4.5.1 Linear Buckling Analysis 24 7.4.5.2 Nonlinear Buckling Analysis 25 7.4.

23、6 Volume Capacity Analysis 25 7.4.7 Physical Envelope Analysis 25 7.4.8 Mass Analysis 25 7.4.9 Load, Acoustic, Shock, and Vibration Environment Analysis 25 7.4.10 Unique Operating Environments Analysis 25 7.4.11 Fluid Compatibility Analysis 25 7.4.12 Fatigue Life Analysis 26 7.4.13 Reserved 26 7.4.1

24、4 Reserved 26 ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 7.4.15 Additional AnalysisBattery Containers 26 7.4.16 Additional AnalysisCryostats and Dewars . 26 7.4.17 Additional AnalysisSealed Containers . 26 7.4.18 Additional AnalysisLines and Fittings 27 7.4.19 Additional AnalysisPressurized Components 27 7.5 Fracture Co

25、ntrol Analysis 27 7.5.1 Damage Tolerance Life Analysis 27 7.5.2 LBB Analysis . 28 7.6 Reliability Engineering Analysis . 28 7.6.1 Reliability Analysis . 28 7.6.2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis . 28 8 Manufacturing . 29 8.1 Process Control . 29 8.2 Corrosion Control and Fluid Compatibility . 29 8

26、.3 Embrittlement Control 29 8.4 Fabrication and Process Control 29 8.5 Reserved . 29 9 Quality Assurance 29 9.1 QA Program Procedures 30 9.2 Quality Plan 30 9.3 Qualification Plan 30 9.4 Acceptance Plan 30 9.5 Inspection and Test Plan . 30 9.6 Reserved . 30 9.7 Quality Documentation . 30 10 Verifica

27、tion by Test 31 10.1 Damage Tolerance Life Test . 31 10.1.1 Damage Tolerance Life TestCoupon Specimens 31 10.1.2 Damage Tolerance Life TestPressurized Hardware Specimens . 32 10.2 LBB Test 33 10.2.1 LBB TestCoupon Specimens. 33 10.2.2 LBB TestPressurized Hardware Specimens 33 10.3 Reserved . 34 10.3

28、.1 Reserved 34 10.3.2 Reserved 34 10.3.3 Reserved 34 10.3.4 Reserved 34 10.4 Qualification Test 34 10.4.1 Qualification Test Instrumentation . 35 10.4.2 Nondestructive Testing . 35 10.4.3 Physical Envelope Test 35 10.4.4 Mass Test . 36 10.4.5 Volume Capacity Test 36 10.4.6 Proof Test 36 10.4.7 Leak

29、Test 36 10.4.8 Pressure Cycle Test 36 10.4.9 Load, Acoustic, Shock, Vibration, and External Loads Test . 36 ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 vi 10.4.10 Burst Test 37 10.4.11 Stability Test 37 10.4.12 Unique Operating Environments Test . 37 10.4.13 Stiffness Test . 37 10.5 Validation of Analysis Model With Qual

30、ification Test Data 38 10.6 Acceptance Tests . 38 11 Operations and Maintenance 39 11.1 Operating Procedures . 39 11.2 Safe Operating Limits 39 11.3 Special Requirements for Pressurized Hardware . 39 11.4 Embrittlement Control 39 11.5 Inspection and Maintenance . 39 11.6 Material Review Board 40 11.

31、7 Repair and Refurbishment 40 11.8 Storage . 40 11.9 Operations Documentation . 40 12 Documentation Retention 40 Annex (Informative) 42 List of Tables Table 1. Determination of Burst Factor, Proof Factor, Negative Pressure Factor, and Design Safety Factor 15 Table A. Design Requirements Verification

32、 Matrix . 42 vii Foreword This version of S-080 was developed as an industry consensus to represent accepted practices for the design, analysis, fabrication, test, inspection, operation, and maintenance of metallic pressure vessels, pressurized structures, batteries, heat pipes, cryostats, dewars, s

33、ealed containers, accumulators, and pressure components such as lines, fittings, hoses, and bellows in space systems. This version of S-080 was developed in collaboration with manufacturers, launch-site operators, range safety authorities, and individuals affiliated with universities and government

34、entities. The key elements in the revised version of this standard are as follows: Reformatted the requirements to align with ANSI/AIAA S-081B-2018, Space SystemsComposite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels Updated the requirements for design and verification including damage tolerance life (formerly refe

35、rred to as safe life) and leak before burst Articulated the responsibility of the owner, manufacturer, and procuring authority Organized the requirements into separate sections for design, analysis, and test Added a design requirements verification matrix Added sections to identify the manufacturing

36、, quality assurance , and operations and maintenance requirements Added requirements for maximum mass and required volume Expanded the requirements for stability and included a higher safety factor when verification is performed by analysis only Added requirements to address scenarios with significa

37、nt combined loads Added an alternate set of requirements for lines and/or fittings with 1.5 inches (38 mm) outside diameter or greater Added requirements for quantifiable reliability and a failure modes and effects analysis Identified requirements associated with reuse Aligned sections to better ide

38、ntify the separate requirements for metallic pressure vessels, pressurized structures, batteries, heat pipes, cryostats, dewars, sealed containers, and pressure components such as lines, fittings, and hose made of metal Removed the thermal vacuum testing requirement for batteries and battery cases b

39、ecause they will be included in ANSI/AIAA S-136-201x, Battery Safety Standard for Space Applications Articulated requirements for data documentation Incorporated loading spectra into the service life The AIAA Aerospace Pressure Vessels (APV) Committee on Standards (CoS) was initially formed in March

40、 1996 as a working group within the AIAA Structures Committee on Standards with an emphasis on inclusion of aerospace prime companies, pressure vessel suppliers, and all applicable government agencies. Deliberations focused on adapting the standard to address commercial procurement of aerospace comp

41、osite pressure vessels. The current members of the AIAA APV CoS appreciate the valuable input from several original members, and express their gratitude to past committee members and reviewers whose contributions over many years ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 viii have resulted in an improved standard. At th

42、e time of approval of this document, members of the APV CoS were: Michael Kezirian, Chair University of Southern California Nathanael Greene, Co-Chair NASA Johnson Space Center Alejandro Vega, Co-Chair U.S. Air Force Subcommittee Chairpersons: Manoj Bhatia* Keystone Engineering Kevin Case U.S. Depar

43、tment of Defense Harry Conomos Moog, Inc. Owen Greulich NASA Headquarters Lorie Grimes-Ledesma NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Joe Hamilton APT Research Peter Kinsman Aerojet Rocketdyne Kirk Sneddon Arde, Inc. Mark Stevens MEI Technologies John Thesken* NASA Glenn Research Center Members: Pravin Agga

44、rwal* NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Joachim Beek* NASA Johnson Space Center Harold Beeson* NASA White Sands Test Facility Robert Biggs Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Randy Brown* Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Matt Buchholz* MasterWorks Composite Solutions Jim Chang Analytical Mech

45、anics Associates Robert Conger Microcosm, Inc. John Duke, Jr. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Amy Engelbrecht-Wiggans Cornell University Paul Fabian Composite Technology Development, Inc. Scott Forth Spaceship Company Susan Gavin Independent Technical Advisor Engineering Contract

46、or Wes Geiman Vivace Corporation ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 Robert Geuther* U.S. Air Force, 45th Space Wing Vinay Goyal The Aerospace Corporation Jon Griffith Blue Origin Tim Gurshin* Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Jim Harris MasterWorks Composite Solutions Luis Hernandez GeoControls Systems Inc.

47、Mike Holt Virgin Galactic Kaiser Imtiaz The Boeing Company Sri Iyengar United Launch Alliance Michael Kelly FAA/AST Andre Lavoie Virgin Galactic Joseph Lewis* NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Edward Lira U.S. Department of Defense David McColskey National Institute of Standards and Technology Dan Muel

48、ler Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Cornelius Murray General Dynamics/OTS Norman Newhouse Hexagon Lincoln Yenyih Ni The Aerospace Corporation Jay Nightingale Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Michael Papadopoulos* The Aerospace Corporation James Patterson HyPerComp Engineering Kevin R

49、ichards Orbital ATK Michael Robinson* Boeing Markus Rufer Scorpius Space Launch Company Rick Russell* NASA Kennedy Space Center Regor Saulsberry* NASA White Sands Test Facility Joseph Seidler USAF, 45th Space Wing Kay Siegel H2Safe, LLC Gerben Sinnema European Space Agency Brian Spencer* Spencer Composites Michael Surratt* University of Southern California Jim Sutter* Independent Consultant ANSI/AIAA S-080A-2018 x Pete Taddie* NASA Kennedy Space Center Walter Tam* ATK Space Bruce Wallace Boeing Jess Waller HX5, Inc. Daniel Wentzel*