ANSI ASTM C769-2015 Standard Test Method for Sonic Velocity in Manufactured Carbon and Graphite Materials for Use in Obtaining an Approximate Value of Young s Modulus.pdf

1、Designation: C769 15 An American National StandardStandard Test Method forSonic Velocity in Manufactured Carbon and GraphiteMaterials for Use in Obtaining an Approximate Value ofYoungs Modulus1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C769; the number immediately following the designation

2、indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope*1.1 This test method covers a procedure f

3、or measuring thesonic velocity in manufactured carbon and graphite which canbe used to obtain an approximate value of Youngs modulus.1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded asstandard. No other units of measurement are included in thisstandard.1.3 This standard does not purport to addre

4、ss all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2C559 Test Metho

5、d for Bulk Density by Physical Measure-ments of Manufactured Carbon and Graphite ArticlesC747 Test Method for Moduli of Elasticity and FundamentalFrequencies of Carbon and Graphite Materials by SonicResonanceIEEE/ASTM SI 10 Standard for Use of the InternationalSystem of Units (SI) (the Modern Metric

6、 System)3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 elastic modulus, nthe ratio of stress to strain, in thestress range where Hookes law is valid.3.1.2 Youngs modulus or modulus of elasticity (E), ntheelastic modulus in tension or compression.3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:3.2.1 end corr

7、ection time (Te)the non-zero time of flight(correction factor), measured in seconds, that may arise byextrapolation of the pulse travel time, corrected for zero time,back to zero sample length.3.2.2 longitudinal sonic pulsea sonic pulse in which thedisplacements are in the direction of propagation o

8、f the pulse.3.2.3 pulse travel time, (Tt)the total time, measured inseconds, required for the sonic pulse to traverse the specimenbeing tested, and for the associated electronic signals totraverse the transducer coupling medium and electronic circuitsof the pulse-propagation system.3.2.4 zero time,

9、(T0)the travel time (correction factor),measured in seconds, associated with the transducer couplingmedium and electronic circuits in the pulse-propagation sys-tem.4. Summary of Test Method4.1 The velocity of longitudinal sound waves passingthrough the test specimen is determined by measuring thedis

10、tance through the specimen and dividing by the time lapse,between the transmitted pulse and the received pulse.3,4Pro-vided the wavelength of the transmitted pulse is a sufficientlysmall fraction of the sample lateral dimensions, a value ofYoungs modulus for isotropic graphite can then be obtainedus

11、ing Eq 1 and Eq 2:E 5 CvV2(1)where:E = Youngs modulus of elasticity, Pa, = density, kg/m3,V = longitudinal signal velocity, m/s, andCv= Poissons factor.The Poissons factor, C, is related to Poissons ratio, ,bythe equation:C511!1 2 2!1 2 (2)1This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committe

12、e D02 onPetroleum Products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricantsand is the direct responsibility ofSubcommittee D02.F0 on Manufactured Carbon and Graphite Products.Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2015. Published January 2016. Originallyapproved in 1980. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as C769 09. DO

13、I:10.1520/C0769-15.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.3Schreiber, Anderson, and Soga, Elastic Co

14、nstants and Their Measurement,McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1221Avenue of theAmericas, New York, NY 10020, 1973.4American Institute of Physics Handbook , 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co.,1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020, 1972, pp. 398ff.*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this st

15、andardCopyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States1If Poissons ratio is unknown, it can be assumed as anapproximation in the method. For nuclear graphites, a typicalPoissons ratio of 0.2 corresponds to a Poissons factor of 0.9.If t

16、he wavelength is not a small fraction of the sample lateraldimensions, and instead is much larger than the specimenlateral dimensions, then the Youngs modulus, E is given by Eq1 with Cset to one rather than being determined by Eq 2.5. Significance and Use5.1 Sonic velocity measurements are useful fo

17、r comparingmaterials with similar elastic properties, dimensions, andmicrostructure.5.2 Eq 1 provides an accurate value of Youngs modulusonly for isotropic, non-attenuative, and non-dispersive materi-als of infinite dimensions. For non-isotropic graphite, Eq 1 canbe modified to take into account the

18、 Poissons ratios in alldirections. As graphite is a strongly attenuative material, thevalue of Youngs modulus obtained with Eq 1 will be depen-dent on specimen length. If the specimen lateral dimensions arenot large compared to the wavelength of the propagated pulse,then the value of Youngs modulus

19、obtained with Eq 1 will bedependent on the specimen lateral dimensions. The accuracy ofthe Youngs modulus calculated from Eq 1 will also dependupon the uncertainty in Poissons ratio and its impact on theevaluation of the Poissons factor in Eq 2. However, a value forYoungs modulus can be obtained for

20、 many applications,which is often in good agreement with the value obtained byother more accurate methods, such as in Test Method C747.The technical issues and typical values of correspondinguncertainties are discussed in detail in STP 1578.55.3 If the grain size of the carbon or graphite is greater

21、 thanor about equal to the wavelength of the sonic pulse, the methodmay not be providing a value of Youngs modulus representa-tive of the bulk material. Therefore, it would be recommendedto test a lower frequency (longer wavelength) to demonstratethat the range of obtained velocity values are within

22、 anacceptable level of accuracy. Significant signal attenuationshould be expected when the grain size of the material isgreater than or about equal to the wavelength of the transmittedsonic pulse or the material is more porous than would beexpected for an as-manufactured graphite.NOTE 1Due to freque

23、ncy dependent attenuation in graphite, thewavelength of the sonic pulse through the test specimen is not necessarilythe same as the wavelength of the transmitting transducer.5.4 If the sample is only a few grains thick, the acceptabilityof the methods application should be demonstrated by initiallyp

24、erforming measurements on a series of tests covering a rangeof sample lengths between the proposed test length and a testlength incorporating sufficient grains to adequately representthe bulk material.6. Apparatus6.1 Driving Circuit, consisting of an ultrasonic pulse gen-erator.6.1.1 The user should

25、 select a pulse frequency to suit thematerial microstructure and specimen elastic properties anddimensions being tested. High frequencies are attenuated bycarbon and graphite materials and, while typical practicablefrequencies lie in the range 0.5 MHz to 2.6 MHz, the user mayshow that frequencies ou

26、tside this range are acceptable.6.2 Transducer, input, with suitable coupling medium (see8.5).6.3 Transducer, output, with suitable coupling medium (see8.5).6.3.1 The signal output will depend upon the characteristicsof the chosen transducers and pulser-receiver and the testmaterial. It is recommend

27、ed that the user analyses the input andoutput frequency spectra to determine optimum conditions.Band pass filters and narrow band transducers may be used tosimplify the signal output which could improve the measure-ment of the time of flight.6.4 Computer, with analogue to digital converter, oroscill

28、oscope, and external trigger from driving circuit.6.5 See Fig. 1 for a typical schematic setup.NOTE 2Some manufacturers combine items 6.1 and 6.4 into a singlepackage with direct time readout. Such apparatus can operatesatisfactorily, provided the frequency of the propagated pulse is alreadyknown, i

29、n order to check that wavelength requirements for the method aresatisfied.7. Test Specimen7.1 Selection and Preparation of SpecimensTake specialcare to assure obtaining representative specimens that arestraight, uniform in cross section, and free of extraneousliquids. The specimen end faces shall be

30、 perpendicular to thespecimen cylindrical surface to within 0.125 mm total indicatorreading.7.2 Measurement of Weight and DimensionsDeterminethe weight and the average specimen dimensions to within60.2 %.7.3 Limitations on DimensionsThese cannot be preciselyspecified as they will depend upon the pro

31、perties of thematerial being tested and the experimental setup (for example,transducer frequency). In order to satisfy the theory thatsupports Eq 1, as a guide, the specimen should have a diameterthat is at least a factor five, greater than the wavelength ofsound in the material under test. In pract

32、ice, the length of thespecimen will be determined taking account of the commentsin 5.3 and 5.4.7.4 Limitations on Ultrasonic Pulse FrequencyGenerallyspeaking, a better accuracy of time of flight will be obtained athigher frequencies. However, attenuation increases at higherfrequencies leading to wea

33、k and distorted signals.8. Procedure8.1 For any given apparatus and choice of couplingmedium, it is necessary to follow procedures to quantify thezero time, T0, and end correction time, Te, correction factors. T0will be dependent upon the type of transducers and theirperformance over time and should

34、 be regularly checked (see5ASTM Selected Technical Papers, STP 1578, Graphite Testing for NuclearApplications: The Significance of Test Specimen Volume and Geometry and theStatistical Significance of Test Specimen Population, 2014, edited by Tzelepi andCarroll.C769 1528.8). It must be quantified if

35、the test setup is changed. Teshouldbe small and reflects the interaction between the couplingmedium and the test material. Teshould be determined once fora specific measurement setup and test material.8.1.1 Determine whether an end correction time, Te,isevident in the time of flight by performing ti

36、me of flightmeasurements on various length samples taken from a singlebar. As modulus is likely to vary from sample to sample therecommended approach is to continually bisect a long rod,measuring each bi-section, until the required lower limit isreached. The end correction time, Te, is obtained from

37、 aregression fit to a graph of time of flight versus sample length.8.2 Measure and weigh the test specimen as in 7.2.8.3 Calculate the density of the test specimen in accordancewith Test Method C559.8.4 Connect the apparatus as shown in Fig. 1, and refer toequipment manufacturers instructions for se

38、tup precautions.Allow adequate time for equipment warm-up and stabilization.8.5 Place the transducers against the test specimen endfaces.8.5.1 A coupling medium may be necessary to improvetransmission of the sonic pulse. In this case, apply a lightcoating of the coupling medium to the faces of the t

39、estspecimens that will contact the transducers. Alternatively,rubber-tipped transducers can be effective if a fully noninva-sive measurement is needed.NOTE 3The following coupling media may be used: hydroxyethylcellulose, petroleum jelly, high vacuum greases and water-based ultra-sonic couplants. Ho

40、wever these may be difficult to remove subsequently.Distilled water can provide a very satisfactory coupling medium withoutsignificant end effects, and surface water may be removed subsequently bydrying. Manufacturers offer rubber-tipped transducers suitable for nonin-vasive measurements. With these

41、 transducers either good load control oraccurate determination of the rubber length is essential during measure-ment if good reproducibility is to be achieved.8.6 Bring transducer faces into intimate contact but do notexceed manufacturers recommended contact pressures.8.7 Follow the vendors instruct

42、ions to adjust the instrumen-tation to match the transducer frequency to give good visualamplitude resolution.8.8 Determine T0, the travel time (zero correction) measuredin seconds, associated with the electronic circuits in thepulse-propagation instrument and coupling (Fig. 2(a). Ensurethat the rep

43、eatability of the measurement is of sufficientprecision to meet the required accuracy in Youngs modulus.8.9 Adjust the gain of electronic components to give goodvisual amplitude resolution.8.10 Determine Tt, the total traverse time from the traces(Fig. 2(b). Ensure that the repeatability of the meas

44、urement isof sufficient precision to meet the required accuracy in Youngsmodulus.8.11 It is good practice to monitor the performance andreproducibility of the sonic velocity equipment by periodicallytesting a reference sample of similar material and geometry tothat typically used by the operator. Th

45、is will monitor driftarising from deterioration in transducer performance. Stan-dards need to be representative of the material being tested andhave a similar geometry.9. Calculation9.1 Velocity of Signal:V 5LTt2 T02 Te(3)where:V = velocity of signal, m/s,L = specimen length, m,Tt= traverse time, s,

46、T0= zero time, s, andTe= end correction time, s.9.2 Since graphites are not necessarily isotropic, the valueof Youngs modulus cannot be determined solely from aFIG. 1 Basic Experimental Arrangement for the Ultrasonic Pulsed-Wave Transit Time TechniqueC769 153velocity measurement in one direction. Ho

47、wever, an approxi-mate Youngs modulus for each direction may be obtainedusing Eq 4 (based upon an assumed Poissons ratio of 0.2).More accurate estimates of the Youngs moduli require thedetermination of the full compliance matrix from a set ofmeasurements of longitudinal and shear wave velocities alo

48、ngprincipal axes together with measurements of a sonic velocityat 45 to the principal axes.E 0.9 V2(4)where:E = Youngs modulus, Pa (approximate), = density, kg/m3, andV = velocity of sound, m/s.9.3 Conversion FactorsSee IEEE/ASTM SI 10.10. Report10.1 The report shall include the following:10.1.1 The

49、 wavelength or frequency of the transmitted pulseand sonic velocity equipment identification.NOTE 4Due to the strong frequency dependent attenuation of ultra-sound in graphite, the frequency of the transmitted pulse may becompletely different from the nominal ultrasonic transducer frequency.10.1.2 Specimen dimensions, weight, and test specimenorientation with respect to forming direction.10.1.3 Sonic velocity for each specimen, along with adescription of the method of time of flight determination.10.1.4 Density of ea