ANSI TIR19024-2016 Evaluation of CPB devices relative to their capabilities of reducing the transmission of gaseous microemboli (GME) to a patient during cardiopulmonary bypass.pdf

1、Technical Information ReportEvaluation of CPB devices relative to their capabilities of reducing the transmission of gaseous microemboli (GME) to a patient during cardiopulmonary bypassANSI/AAMI/ ISO TIR19024: 2016A Technical Report prepared by AAMI and registered with ANSI ANSI/AAMI/ISO TIR19024:20

2、16 Evaluation of CPB devices relative to their capabilities of reducing the transmission of gaseous microemboli (GME) to a patient during cardiopulmonary bypassApproved 2 September 2016 by AAMI Registered 9 October 2016 by American National Standards Institute, Inc. Abstract: Recommends acceptable m

3、ethodology for conducting gaseous microemboli (GME) testingand discusses limitations of current test methods. Tests described in this document are limited to those conducted using an in vitro circulatory system. Keywords: biocompatibility, components, non-pyrogenicity, sterilityPublished by AAMI 430

4、1 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 301 Arlington, VA 22203-1633 www.aami.org 2017 by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation All Rights Reserved This publication is subject to copyright claims of ISO and AAMI. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form, in

5、cluding an electronic retrieval system, without the prior written permission of AAMI. All requests pertaining to this document should be submitted to AAMI. It is illegal under federal law (17 U.S.C. 101, et seq.) to make copies of all or any part of this document (whether internally or externally) w

6、ithout the prior written permission of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Violators risk legal action, including civil and criminal penalties, and damages of $100,000 per offense. For permission regarding the use of all or any part of this document, complete the reprint

7、request form at www.aami.org or contact AAMI, 4301 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 301, Arlington, VA 22203-1633. Phone: +1-703-525-4890; Fax: +1-703-276-0793. Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-1-57020-633-7AAMI Technical Information Report A technical information report (TIR) is a publicatio

8、n of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) Standards Board that addresses a particular aspect of medical technology. Although the material presented in a TIR may need further evaluation by experts, releasing the information is valuable because the industry and the pro

9、fessions have an immediate need for it. A TIR differs markedly from a standard or recommended practice, and readers should understand the differences between these documents. Standards and recommended practices are subject to a formal process of committee approval, public review, and resolution of a

10、ll comments. This process of consensus is supervised by the AAMI Standards Board and, in the case of American National Standards, by the American National Standards Institute. A TIR is not subject to the same formal approval process as a standard. However, a TIR is approved for distribution by a tec

11、hnical committee and the AAMI Standards Board. Another difference is that, although both standards and TIRs are periodically reviewed, a standard must be acted onreaffirmed, revised, or withdrawnand the action formally approved usually every five years but at least every 10 years. For a TIR, AAMI co

12、nsults with a technical committee about five years after the publication date (and periodically thereafter) for guidance on whether the document is still usefulthat is, to check that the information is relevant or of historical value. If the information is not useful, the TIR is removed from circula

13、tion. A TIR may be developed because it is more responsive to underlying safety or performance issues than a standard or recommended practice, or because achieving consensus is extremely difficult or unlikely. Unlike a standard, a TIR permits the inclusion of differing viewpoints on technical issues

14、. CAUTION NOTICE: This AAMI TIR may be revised or withdrawn at any time. Because it addresses a rapidly evolving field or technology, readers are cautioned to ensure that they have also considered information that may be more recent than this document. All standards, recommended practices, technical

15、 information reports, and other types of technical documents developed by AAMI are voluntary, and their application is solely within the discretion and professional judgment of the user of the document. Occasionally, voluntary technical documents are adopted by government regulatory agencies or proc

16、urement authorities, in which case the adopting agency is responsible for enforcement of its rules and regulations. Comments on this technical information report are invited and should be sent to AAMI, Attn: Standards Department, 4301 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 301, Arlington, VA 22203-1633. ANSI Regis

17、tration Publication of this Technical Report that has been registered with ANSI has been approved by the Accredited Standards Developer (AAMI, 4301 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 301, Arlington, VA 22203-1633). This document is registered as a Technical Report according to the Procedures for the Registrati

18、on of Technical Reports with ANSI. This document is not an American National Standard and the material contained herein is not normative in nature. Comments on this technical information report are invited and should be sent to AAMI, Attn: Standards Department, 4301 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 301, Arli

19、ngton, VA 22203-1633. Contents Page Glossary of equivalent standards v Committee representation . vi Background of AAMI adoption of ISO/TR 19024:2016 vii Foreword viii Introduction . ix 1 Scope and purpose . 1 2 Normative references 1 3 Terms and definitions 1 4 Abbreviated terms . 2 5 Recommendatio

20、ns. 2 Annex A (informative) Rationale for the recommendations of this document . 5 Bibliography . 6 2017 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation ANSI/AAMI/SO TIR19024:2016 v Glossary of equivalent standards International Standards or Technical Reports adopted in the United States

21、may include normative references to other International Standards. AAMI maintains a current list of each International Standard that has been adopted by AAMI (and ANSI). Available on the AAMI website at the address below, this list gives the corresponding U.S. designation and level of equivalency to

22、 the International Standard. www.aami.org/standards/glossary.pdf vi 2017 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation ANSI/AAMI/SO TIR19024:2016 Committee representation Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Blood/Gas Exchange Device Committee The adoption of ISO/T

23、R 19024:2016 as an AAMI Technical Information Report (TIR) was initiated by the AAMI Blood/Gas Exchange Device Committee. The AAMI Blood/Gas Exchange Device Committee also functions as the U.S. Technical Advisory Group to the relevant work in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO).

24、 U.S. representatives from the AAMI Blood/Gas Exchange Device Committee (U.S. Sub-TAG for ISO/TC 150/SC 2/WG 4) played an active part in developing the ISO Technical Report. At the time this document was published, the AAMI Blood/Gas Exchange Device Committee (U.S. Sub-TAG for ISO/TC 150/SC 2/WG 4)

25、had the following members: Cochairs: Trevor Huang, PhD MBA Mark Kurusz, CCP Members: Richard Chan, CCP, Northshore University Hospital Drew Holmes, Baxter Healthcare Tsuyoshi Hosoi, Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Trevor Huang, PhD MBA, Medtronic Perfusion Systems George Silvay, MD PhD, Mount Sinai Me

26、dical Center Catherine Wentz, FDA/CDRH Alternates: David M. Fallen, CCP, Terumo Medical Qijin Lu, FDA/CDRH Rakesh Sethi, Medtronic NOTEParticipation by federal agency representatives in the development of this document does not constitute endorsement by the federal government or any of its agencies.

27、 2017 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation ANSI/AAMI/SO TIR19024:2016 vii Background of AAMI adoption of ISO/TR 19024:2016 As indicated in the foreword to the main body of this document (page viii), the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is a worldwide federat

28、ion of national standards bodies. The United States is one of the ISO members that took an active role in the development of this standard, which was developed by ISO Technical Committee (TC) 150 Subcommittee (SC) 2, Cardiovascular implants and extracorporeal systems, to recommend acceptable methodo

29、logy for conducting gaseous microemboli (GME) testing and discuss limitations of current test methods. Tests described in this document are limited to those conducted using an in vitro circulatory system. U.S. participation in this ISO SC is organized through the U.S. Technical Advisory Group for IS

30、O/TC 150/SC 2, administered by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). AAMI encourages its committees to harmonize their work with international standards as much as possible. The U.S. adoption of ANSI/AAMI/ISO/TR 19024:2016 was registered by the American National Stan

31、dards Institute (ANSI) on 9 October 2016. The AAMI Blood/Gas Exchange Device Committee (U.S. Sub-TAG for ISO/TC 150/SC 2/WG 4, Blood/gas exchangers) initiated the U.S. adoption of ANSI/AAMI/ISO/TR 19024:2016. AAMI and ANSI procedures require that standards be reviewed and, if necessary, revised ever

32、y five years to reflect technological advances that may have occurred since publication. AAMI (and ANSI) have adopted other ISO documents. See the Glossary of Equivalent Standards for a list of ISO standards adopted by AAMI which gives the corresponding U.S. designation and the level of equivalency

33、with the ISO standard. As used within the context of this document, “shall” indicates requirements strictly to be followed to conform to the standard. “Should” indicates that among several possibilities, one is recommended as particularly suitable, without mentioning or excluding others, or that a c

34、ertain course of action is preferred but not necessarily required, or that (in the negative form) a certain possibility or course of action should be avoided but is not prohibited. “May” is used to indicate that a course of action is permissible within the limits of the standard. “Can” is used as a

35、statement of possibility and capability. Finally, “must” is used only to describe “unavoidable” situations, including those mandated by government regulation. The concepts incorporated in this Technical Information Report should not be considered inflexible or static. This TIR, like any other, must

36、be reviewed and updated periodically to assimilate progressive technological developments. To remain relevant, it must be modified as technological advances are made and as new data come to light. Suggestions for improving this standard are invited. Comments and suggested revisions should be sent to

37、 Standards Department, AAMI, 4301 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 301, Arlington, VA 22203-1633. NOTE Beginning with the ISO foreword on page viii, this American National Standard is identical to ISO/TR 19024:2016. viii 2017 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation ANSI/AAMI/SO TIR19024:20

38、16 Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which

39、a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matt

40、ers of electrotechnical standardization. The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types of ISO documents should be noted. This do

41、cument was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives). Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all

42、 such patent rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents). Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and

43、 does not constitute an endorsement. For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISOs adherence to the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL:

44、www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html. The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 150, Implants for surgery, Subcommittee SC 2, Cardiovascular implants and extracorporeal systems. 2017 Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation ANSI/AAMI/SO TIR19024:2016 ix Introduction Present-ge

45、neration extracorporeal circuit devices are not designed to generate gas bubbles, as was the case with bubble oxygenators, as a function of their mechanism to achieve gas transfer. Gaseous microemboli (GME), while significantly reduced in current extracorporeal circuits, are still detectable. The pr

46、esence of GME in blood is not a normal condition and can trigger potentially adverse conditions as both a foreign surface and as a particle or embolus. Adverse systemic sequelae from GME may include activation of blood cells, immune responses, and blockage of blood vessels. While attributing a causa

47、l relationship between GME and significant adverse clinical sequelae is not clear, laboratory equipment and methodology for testing extracorporeal devices on the bench top and are clinically available for use. This document will review the current scientific literature on GME detection methodologies

48、 and their clinical relevance. GME testing is currently being performed by companies and research groups. Both users and manufacturers will benefit from the creation of standardized terminology for use in this work. Development of a consensus position on the clinical implications of GME and the capa

49、bilities and limitations of currently utilized monitoring equipment will also serve both users and manufacturers. The currently available monitoring equipment will have a cost impact on all manufacturers and may burden small enterprises more so than existing larger companies. The equipment cost, however, is less expensive than equipment currently required to evaluate many of the extracorporeal devices such as blood gas analysers, cell counters or spectrometers. Independent investigators with such equipment and expertise are also an option. x 2017 Association for