ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:162 ,大小:2.80MB ,
资源ID:453965      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-453965.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASCE GSP 121-2003 PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION AT THE NATIONAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPERIMENTATION SITES.pdf)为本站会员(bowdiet140)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASCE GSP 121-2003 PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION AT THE NATIONAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPERIMENTATION SITES.pdf

1、GEOTECHNICAL SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 121 PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION AT THE NATIONAL GEOTECHNICAL EXPERIMENTATION SITES SPONSORED BY The Geo-Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers EDITED BY Erik V anmarcke Gordon A. Fenton ASC II/! American Society 5 of Civil Engineers 1801 ALE

2、XANDERBELLDRIVE RESTON, VIRGINIA 20191-4400 Abstract: The papers in this Geotechnical Special Publication explain and demonstrate a broad range of methods of probabilistic site characterization using soil data obtained at one or more National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites (NGES), in particular

3、the NGES locations at Texas A no. 121) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-7844-0669-3 I. Soils-United States-Testing. 2. Engineering geology-United States. I. Vanmarcke, Erik. II. Fenton, Gordon, A. III. American Society of Civil Engineers. IV. Series. TA710.5.P76 2003 624.1 51 02

4、8-dc2 I 2003040326 Any statements expressed in these materials are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ASCE, which takes no responsibility for any statement made herein. No reference made in this publication to any specific method, product, process, or servi

5、ce constitutes or implies an endorsement, recommendation, or warranty thereof by ASCE. The materials are for general information only and do not represent a standard of ASCE, nor are they intended as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, regulations, statutes, or any other legal documen

6、t. ASCE makes no representation or warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or utility of any information, apparatus, product, or process discussed in this publication, and assumes no liability therefore. This information should not be use

7、d without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application. Anyone utilizing this information assumes all liability arising from such use, including but not limited to infringement of any patent or patents. ASCE and American Society of Civil Eng

8、ineers-Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Photocopies: Authorization to photocopy material for internal or personal use under circumstances not falling within the fair use provisions of the Copyright Act is granted by ASCE to libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clear

9、ance Center (CCC) Transactional Reporting Service, provided that the base fee of $18.00 per article is paid directly to CCC, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. The identification for ASCE Books is 0-7844-0669-3/03/ $18.00. Requests for special permission or bulk copying should be addressed to Pe

10、rmissions Akkaya and Vanmarcke), two different fractal representations of spatial variation in soil deposits (Kulatilake and Um; Fenton and Vanmarcke), a neural network model (Juang and Jiang), and a new approach to correlating CPT data with soil type and engineering properties based on the concept

11、of fuzzy subsets (Zhang and Tumay). There are results for both horizontal and vertical variation of measured soil properties - most often CPT data - under various assumptions about trends-in-the-mean and layering by soil type, or about the validity of combining, for statistical analysis purposes, da

12、ta from similar non-contiguous soil deposits (e.g., data on variation-with-depth of CPT tip resistance from different clay layers at one site or from all layers at all five sites). Useful perspectives on the different sources of uncertainty of soil properties is offered, in this volume, by Kulatilak

13、e the sampling interval and the size of the domain sampled or analyzed also affect the parameter estimates. Transformation of the raw data prior to statistical analysis, for example by first calculating the logarithms of the measured CPT tip resistance values (Fenton and Vanmarcke), further v compli

14、cates interpretation of the results. The paper by Akkay and Vanmarcke reports estimated coefficients of variation and scales of fluctuation for many different soil properties at the Texas A&M NOES sand and clay sites. Kulatilake and Um concentrate on statistical analyses of cone tip resistance data

15、from the Texas A&M NOES clay site, while Fenton and Vanmarcke aggregate all the CPT data from the five NOES, disregarding trends and other site-specific information. Only Zhang and Tumays paper deals explicitly with cross correlation between measured values, focusing on how CPT data inform about soi

16、l type and engineering properties. Knowledge about the inherent variability of soil properties is of critical importance in reliability analysis of geotechnical facilities, risk assessment for decision support or regulatory control, and planning and optimization of site-specific exploration and test

17、ing. The dual aim of this publication is to present an overview of traditional and novel statistical methods of soil profile modeling and provide a set baseline statistics, representing the well documented NOES, that can serve as a priori information, in a Bayesian sense, about pattern of spatial va

18、riation of soil properties in probabilistic site characterization worldwide. The papers in this volume, having been accepted for publication by the editors based on a process of peer review in accordance with the standards of ASCE and the Geo-Institute, are eligible for discussion in the Journal of

19、Geotechnical and Geo-Environmental Engineering and for ASCE awards. Early versions of most of the papers were presented, discussed and criticized at a workshop held in conjunction with the Geo-Institute Conference in Seattle, WA (1998) and sponsored by the G-I Committee on Risk Assessment and Manage

20、ment. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) provided funding for the NOES program during the 1990s. Support for the project on probabilistic site characterization at the NOES, conducted by the G-I Committee on Risk Assessment and Management, and for rela

21、ted research by Dr. Akkaya and co-editor Dr. Fenton during extended visits to Princeton University, came from FHWA through the Geo Institute of ASCE. Special thanks are due to Albert F. DiMillio of FHW A for his leadership in the NOES program and to Carol Bowers of the Geo-Institute for critical pro

22、ject management support. Erik Vanmarcke, Princeton University and Gordon Fenton, Dalhousie University vi Contents Spatial Variability of Cone Penetrometer Test (CPT) Parameters at University of Houston National Geotechnical Experimentation Site (NGES) . 1 Michael W. ONeill and Gil Lim Yoon Variation

23、s in Clay Deposits of Chicago 13 TienH. Wu Estimation of Spatial Correlation of Soil Parameters Based on Data from the Texas A&M University National Geotechnical Experimentation Site (NGES) 29 Aysen (Dener) Akkaya and Erik H. Vanmarcke Spatial Variation of Cone Tip Resistance for the Clay Site at Te

24、xas A&M University 41 P.H.S.W. Kulatilake and Jeong-gi Um Random Field Characterization of National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites (NGES) Data 61 Gordon A. Fenton and Erik H. Vanmarcke A New Approach to Site Characterization Using Generalized Regression Neural Networks . 79 C.H. Juang and T. Jia

25、ng Non-Traditional Approaches in Soil Classification Derived from the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) 101 Zhongjie Zhang and Mehmet T. Tumay Subject lndex . 151 Author Index 153 vii Spatial Variability of CPT Parameters at University of Houston NGES Michael W. ONeill 1 and Gil Lim Yoon 2 Abstract Cone p

26、enetrometer test (CPT) records for the University of Houston National Geotechnical Experimentation Site were analyzed for variability using simple statistical methods. The site, which comprised approximately 4000 m 2 in area, consisted of generally insensitive clays interbedded with seams and layers

27、 of fine sand and clayey silt that were overconsolidated in Pleistocene times by desiccation. CPT records were examined by (a) simple direct comparison, (b) computation of depthwise means and coefficients of variation, (c) estimation of the probability distribution model, (d) determination of vertic

28、al and horizontal variograms and correlation distances, and (e) development of Kriging surfaces for the CPT tip and sleeve resistance values across the site. Together, these results constitute an appropriate, practical geostatistical characterization of the CPT test results at the site. Introduction

29、 The University of Houston National Geotechnical Experimentation Site (NGES-UH) was operated from 1979 - 2000 by the senior author. Its primary use was the testing of full-scale shallow and deep foundations - particularly the effects of construction methods and technologies on the geotechnical and s

30、tructural performance of foundations. However, during the course of its operation many in situ soil tests were performed on the site, including a large number of cone penetrometer tests (CPTs). Selected CPT records from two series of tests are considered herein to document the general statistical ch

31、aracteristics of the soil at the site, which is geologically typical of many Pleistocene terrace sites in the southeastern United States. The NGES-UH consisted of soils from two Pleistocene terrace (sedimentary) deposits, as indicated in Fig. 1. The older and deeper deposit, termed locally the 1 Cullen Dist. Prof., Dept. of Civil and Env. Engrg., University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-4791 2 Sr. Researcher, Korea Ocean Res. and Devel. Inst., Ansan, Seoul 425-600 Korea

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1