ASCE GSP 293-2018 Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V Slope Stability and Landslides Laboratory Testing and In Situ Testing.pdf

1、EDITED BYScott J. Brandenberg, Ph.D., P.E. Majid T. Manzari, Ph.D.Slope Stability and Landslides, Laboratory Testing, and In Situ Testing GSP 293Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics VPapers from Sessions of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics VAustin, TexasJune 101

2、3, 2018G E O T E C H N I C A L S P E C I A L P U B L I C A T I O N N O . 2 9 3 GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS V SLOPE STABILITY AND LANDSLIDES, LABORATORY TESTING, AND IN SITU TESTING SELECTED PAPERS FROM SESSIONS OF GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SOIL DYNAMICS V June

3、 1013, 2018 Austin, Texas SPONSORED BY Geo-Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers EDITED BY Scott J. Brandenberg, Ph.D., P.E. Majid T. Manzari, Ph.D. Published by the American Society of Civil Engineers Published by American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive Reston,

4、Virginia, 20191-4382 www.asce.org/publications | ascelibrary.org Any statements expressed in these materials are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the views of ASCE, which takes no responsibility for any statement made herein. No reference made in this publication to a

5、ny specific method, product, process, or service constitutes or implies an endorsement, recommendation, or warranty thereof by ASCE. The materials are for general information only and do not represent a standard of ASCE, nor are they intended as a reference in purchase specifications, contracts, reg

6、ulations, statutes, or any other legal document. ASCE makes no representation or warranty of any kind, whether express or implied, concerning the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or utility of any information, apparatus, product, or process discussed in this publication, and assumes no liability

7、 therefor. The information contained in these materials should not be used without first securing competent advice with respect to its suitability for any general or specific application. Anyone utilizing such information assumes all liability arising from such use, including but not limited to infr

8、ingement of any patent or patents. ASCE and American Society of Civil EngineersRegistered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Photocopies and permissions. Permission to photocopy or reproduce material from ASCE publications can be requested by sending an e-mail to permissionsasce.org or by locating

9、 a title in ASCEs Civil Engineering Database (http:/cedb.asce.org) or ASCE Library (http:/ascelibrary.org) and using the “Permissions” link. Errata: Errata, if any, can be found at https:/doi.org/10.1061/9780784481486 Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Civil Engineers. All Rights Reserved. IS

10、BN 978-0-7844-8148-6 (PDF) Manufactured in the United States of America. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 iii ASCE Preface This volume is one of four Geotechnical Special Publications (GSPs) containing papers from the Fifth Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil

11、Dynamics Conference: (GEESDV) held in Austin, Texas during June 1013, 2018. The GEESDV is the latest event in a series of highly successful conferences held in Sacramento CA (2008), Seattle WA (1998), Park City UT (1988), and Pasadena CA (1978). The conference is organized by the Earthquake Engineer

12、ing and Soil Dynamics Technical Committee of the Geo-Institute (G-I) of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and brings together practicing geo-professionals, researchers, and students from around the world to share the latest advances, engineering applications, and pedagogical approaches

13、in this discipline. This Geotechnical Special Publication is the outcome of two years of concerted efforts by the conference lead organizers and the members of the “technical program” and “proceedings” committees. All submitted papers were reviewed and accepted by at least two independent peer-revie

14、wers. The final accepted technical papers are organized in the following special publications: Volume 1: Liquefaction Triggering, Consequences, and Mitigation Volume 2: Seismic Hazard Analysis, Earthquake Ground Motions, and Regional-Scale Assessment Volume 3: Numerical Modeling and Soil Structure I

15、nteraction Volume 4: Slope Stability and Landslides, Laboratory Testing, and In Situ Testing The Editors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the members of the technical program and proceedings committees as well as the session chairs and reviewers. The Editors, Scott J. Brandenberg,

16、 Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE Majid T. Manzari, Ph.D., M.ASCE Acknowledgments The organizing committee would like to thank the authors, reviewers, session chairs, ASCE staff, and OmniPress staff, without whom this publication would not be possible. GEESDV Conference Program Committee Conference Chair Ellen M

17、. Rathje, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE, University of Texas at Austin Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 iv ASCE Conference Co-Chair Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Ph.D., M.ASCE, Virginia Tech Technical Program Chair Scott J. Brandenberg, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of California Lo

18、s Angeles Proceedings Chair Majid T. Manzari, Ph.D., M.ASCE, George Washington University Technical Program Committee Shideh Dashti, Ph.D, AM.ASCE, University of Colorado at Boulder Ramin Motamed, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of Nevada, Reno Scott M. Olson, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of Illi

19、nois Brady R. Cox, Ph.D., P.E., A.M.ASCE, University of Texas Proceedings Committee Tong Qiu, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, Pennsylvania State University Namasivayam (Sathi) Sathialingam, Ph.D, P.E., G.E., D.GE., F.ASCE, Fugro Consultants, Inc. Mahdi Taiebat, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of British Columb

20、ia Short Course / Student Programs Co-Chairs Dimitrios Zekkos, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of Michigan Christopher E. Hunt, Ph.D., P.E., G.E., M.ASCE, Geosyntec Consultants Student and Younger Member Activities Chair Menzer Pehlivan, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, CH2M Sponsorships and Exhibits Chair Thal

21、eia Travasarou, Ph.D., P.E., G.E., M.ASCE, Consultant GEESDV Topics and Session Chairs Liquefaction Triggering, Consequences, and Mitigation Katerina Ziotopoulou, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, University of California, Davis Shideh Dashti, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, University of Colorado at Boulder Brett Maurer, Ph.D., A

22、.M.ASCE, University of Washington Mourad Zeghal, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Laurie G. Baise, Ph.D., M.ASCE, Tufts University Kevin W. Franke, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, Brigham Young University Arash Khosravifar, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, Portland State University Geotechnical Earthquake

23、 Engineering and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 v ASCE Soil Structure Interaction Anne Lemnitzer, Ph.D., A,M.ASCE, University of California, Irvine Armin W. Stuedlein, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, Oregon State University Ground Motion and Site Response Dong Youp Kwak, Ph.D., RMS James Kaklamanos, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE,

24、Merrimack College Albert R. Kottke, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, Pacific Gas and Electric Ramin Motamed, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of Nevada, Reno Regional Scale Assessment of GeoHazards Qiushi Chen, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, Clemson University Seismic Hazard Assessment Sebastiano Foti, Ph.D., Politecnico di T

25、orino Recent Advances In Situ Site Characterization Thaleia Travasarou, Ph.D., G.E., M.ASCE, Fugro Consultants, Inc. Seismic Slope Stability and Landslides Jennifer Donahue, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, JL Donahue Engineering, Inc. Jack Montgomery, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, Auburn University Recent Advances in Numer

26、ical Modeling Giuseppe Buscarnera, Ph.D., Aff.M.ASCE, Northwestern University Mahdi Taiebat, Ph.D., P.Eng, M.ASCE, University of British Columbia Majid T. Manzari, Ph.D., M.ASCE, The George Washington University Usama S. El Shamy, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, Southern Methodist University Recent Advances in

27、 Laboratory Testing Inthuorn Sasanakul, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of South Carolina Brad P. Wham, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE, University of Colorado Scott M. Olson, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE, University of Illinois, Urbana Mark Stringer, Ph.D., M.ASCE, University of Canterbury Geotechnical Earthquake Engineeri

28、ng and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 vi ASCE Contents Slope Stability and Landslides Acceleration Response of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Bridge Abutment under Dynamic Loading 1 Yewei Zheng, John S. McCartney, Patrick J. Fox, and P. Benson Shing Bridge Foundation Pinning Resistance Implied by Equivalen

29、t Static Analysis Procedure for Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading 10 Christopher R. McGann Cloud-Based Tools for the Probabilistic Assessment of the Seismic Performance of Slopes .19 Gkhan Saygili, Ellen M. Rathje, Yubing Wang, and Mahmoud El-Kishky Development of a Seismic Risk Screening Tool

30、for Earthen Embankments .27 Jennifer L. Donahue, Zahra A. Amini, Christopher E. Hunt, Glenn J. Rix, and David R. Umberg Dynamic Numerical Evaluation of the Effect of the Retained Tailings on the Performance of a Tailings Impoundment .37 Guillaume Lveill and Michael James Effect of Local Site Conditi

31、on on the Seismic Stability of Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.46 Anindya Pain, V. S. Ramakrishna Annapareddy, and Shantanu Sarkar Evaluation of the Seismic Performance of a Class I Landfill 56 Glenn J. Rix, Robert C. Bachus, Chris Conkle, and Mark Schultheis Numerical Simulations of the Fourth Aven

32、ue Landslide Considering Strain-Softening .67 Michael Kiernan and Jack Montgomery Seismic Stability Analysis of Soil Slopes Using Soil Nails 79 Pankaj Rawat and Kaustav Chatterjee SEM-Based Seismic Slope Stability and Mitigation Model for the Jure Landslide after the 7.8Mw 2015 Barpak-Gorkha, Nepal,

33、 Earthquake 88 N. P. Bhandary, R. C. Tiwari, R. Yatabe, and S. Paudel The Takanodai Landslide, Kumamoto, Japan: Insights from Post-Earthquake Field Observations, Laboratory Tests, and Numerical Analyses 98 Gabriele Chiaro, Mohammed Umar, Takashi Kiyota, and Christopher Massey Geotechnical Earthquake

34、 Engineering and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 vii ASCE Laboratory Testing A Critique of b-Values Used for Computing Magnitude Scaling Factors 112 Kristin J. Ulmer, Sneha Upadhyaya, Russell A. Green, Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Peter J. Stafford, Julian J. Bommer, and Jan van Elk Comparing Shear Response of D

35、ense Sands from Centrifuge and Direct Simple Shear Tests with Published Correlations .122 Lopamudra Bhaumik, Alfonso A. Cerna-Diaz, Ozgun A. Numanoglu, Scott M. Olson, Cassandra J. Rutherford, Youssef M. A. Hashash, and Thomas Weaver Comparison of Cyclic Triaxial Test Results on Sand-Rubber Tire Shr

36、ed Mixtures with Dynamic Simple Shear Test Results132 B. R. Madhusudhan, A. Boominathan, and Subhadeep Banerjee Comparison of Measured Cyclic Resistance of Sand in Simple Shear Tests under Constant Volume versus Constant Total Vertical Stress Conditions 141 Chadi El Mohtar, Yuta Nakamura, and Wing S

37、hun Kwan Comparisons in the Cyclic Direct Simple Shear Response of Two Sands from Christchurch, New Zealand 150 Claudio Cappellaro, Misko Cubrinovski, Jonathan D. Bray, Gabriele Chiaro, Michael F. Riemer, and Mark E. Stringer Cyclic Behavior at Small Shear Deformations of Non-Liquefiable Sand Ground

38、 Obtained from Horizontal 1-D and 2-D E-Defense Tests 160 Kentaro Tabata and Masayoshi Sato Cyclic Behavior of Low-Plasticity Fine-Grained Soils with Varying Pore-Fluid Salinity .171 Mohammad M. Eslami, Scott J. Brandenberg, and Jonathan P. Stewart Cyclic Strength of Ottawa F-65 Sand: Laboratory Tes

39、ting and Constitutive Model Calibration 180 Katerina Ziotopoulou, Jack Montgomery, Ana Maria Parra Bastidas, and Brian Morales Dynamic Failure Potential of Partially Saturated Sand under Ultra-Low Confining Pressures .190 Oliver-Denzil S. Taylor, Katherine E. Winters, Woodman W. Berry, and Merissa L

40、. Zuzulock Dynamic Response of Model Footing on Reinforced Sand 199 Raghvendra Sahu, Ramanathan Ayothiraman, and G. V. Ramana Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 viii ASCE Effect of High Initial Effective Confining Stress on the Mechanical Response of Natural Silt 208 Pri

41、yesh Verma and Dharma Wijewickreme Effect of Pore Fluid on Cyclic Behaviour of Reconstituted Marine Clay .219 Swagatika Senapati, Subhadeep Banerjee, and T. Thyagaraj Effects of Ageing on the Shear Modulus Degradation Curve of Loose Fraser River Sand 228 Ilaibibakam W. Omunguye, John A. Howie, and M

42、ark A. Styler Effects of Confining Pressure and Void Ratio on the Maximum Shear Modulus of Natural Pumiceous Soils .238 M. B. Asadi, M. S. Asadi, R. P. Orense, and M. J. Pender Effects of Multi-Directional and Repeated Loading on Cyclic Resistance of Fraser River Sand 247 Stephen Jones and Abouzar S

43、adrekarimi Experimental Study of Strain Dependent Shear Modulus of Ottawa Sand .257 Kaveh H. Zehtab, Seda Gokyer, Artur Apostolov, W. Allen Marr, and Salim K. Werden Experimental Study of the Injectability and Effectiveness of Laponite Mixtures as Liquefaction Mitigation Technique .267 Lucia Mele, A

44、lessandro Flora, Stefania Lirer, Anna dOnofrio, and Emilio Bilotta Hazard-Resilient Pipeline Joint Soil-Structure Interaction under Large Axial Displacement .276 Brad P. Wham, Blake A. Berger, Chalermpat Pariya-Ekkasut, and Thomas D. ORourke Importance of Automatization on Dry Funnel Deposited Speci

45、mens for Liquefaction Testing 286 M. Murat Monkul, enay Yenign, and Ece Eseller-Bayat Initial Observations on Laboratory Shear Loading Response of Sand-Silt Mixtures .296 Achala Soysa and Dharma Wijewickreme Laboratory Study of Sands Reinforced with Polypropylene Fibers .307 H. Li, K. Senetakis, and

46、 A. Khoshghalb Liquefaction Potential of Sand with Non-Plastic Fines with the Same Depositional Energy .319 Yolanda Alberto and Ikuo Towhata Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V GSP 293 ix ASCE Modification of Stokoe-Type Resonant Column and Torsional Shear Testing Device for Meas

47、urements at Higher Strains 326 Inthuorn Sasanakul, Yoon Shin Bae, and James Bay Pore Pressure Generation and Dissipated Energy Ratio in Cohesionless Soils336 Carmine P. Polito and Henry H. M. Moldenhauer Post-Cyclic Behavior of a Gulf of Mexico Clay .345 Vashish Taukoor, Cassandra J. Rutherford, and

48、 Scott M. Olson Processing, Visualization, and Analysis of Direct Simple Shear Test Data Using Jupyter Notebooks in the DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure 357 Mohammad M. Eslami, Ai Zhong, and Scott J. Brandenberg Shear Strength Characteristics of Internal Bentonite Layer of Needle-Punched GCL Used in S

49、mall Earth Dams under Cyclic Loading 365 R. Shigemoto, Y. Sawada, R. Maki, and T. Kawabata The Relation between Static Youngs Modulus and Dynamic Bulk Modulus of Granular Materials and the Role of Stress History .373 Amin Gheibi and Ahmadreza Hedayat Twenty-Four Centrifuge Tests to Quantify Sensitivity of Lateral Spreading to Dr and PGA .383 Bruce L. Kutter, Trevor J. Carey, Bao Li Zheng, Andreas Gavras, Nicholas Stone, Mourad Zeghal, Tarek Abdoun, Evangelia Korre, Majid Manzari, Gopal S. P. Madabhushi, Stuart Haigh, Srikanth S. C. Madabhushi, Mitsu Oka