ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:15 ,大小:1.87MB ,
资源ID:455565      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-455565.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASHRAE NY-08-039-2008 Balcony Spill Plumes Full-Scale Experiments Part 1《阳台喷射羽流 全面试验第1部分RP-1247》.pdf)为本站会员(syndromehi216)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASHRAE NY-08-039-2008 Balcony Spill Plumes Full-Scale Experiments Part 1《阳台喷射羽流 全面试验第1部分RP-1247》.pdf

1、2008 ASHRAE 329ABSTRACT There have been a number of concerns regarding thebalcony spill plume equation provided in North Americanstandards and codes. These include: lack of verification by full-scale experiments and application of the equation for highatria, even though it was developed for low-heig

2、ht atria. As aresult of these concerns, the American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)initiated a project to evaluate the balcony spill plume equationused in North American codes and standards (RP-1247). Theresearch project included computational fluid dynamics

3、(CFD) modeling studies to investigate smoke entrainment inthe balcony area and in high atria. The primary researchconducted as part of RP- 1247 was a series of full-scale exper-iments conducted to investigate smoke flow in balcony spillplumes and the resulting mechanical exhaust requirements foran a

4、trium. The full-scale experiments included measurementsinside the fire compartment and in the opening between the firecompartment and the balcony area. They also includedmeasurements in a simulated atrium space. In Part 1 of thispaper, the results of the measurements in the fire compartmentarea are

5、discussed. The data were also analyzed to estimate themass flow rate through the compartment opening. The esti-mated mass flow rates are compared with algebraic equations,which are used to estimate the mass flow through a compart-ment opening.INTRODUCTIONAtriums have become popular elements in comme

6、rcial,office, and residential buildings because they can provideattractive, environmentally controlled, naturally lit spaces.Such spaces, however, present a challenge for fire protectionengineers because their height (typically greater than 20 m)decreases the effectiveness of automatic sprinkler sys

7、tems andbecause they lack the floor-to-floor separations that can limitthe likelihood of fire and smoke spreading from the floor of fireorigin to other areas of the building. Evacuation routes in atri-ums are of greatest concern because they become vulnerable tospreading smoke unless smoke managemen

8、t measures areused. As a result, specific requirements are included in buildingcodes for atria (ICC 2003, 2006; NFPA 2006; NRCC 2005).In recent years, approaches to smoke management in atriahave been developed and are provided in standards and engi-neering guides (NFPA 2005; Klote and Milke 2002; Mo

9、rganet al. 1999). Smoke management systems can be used toaccomplish one or both of the following (NFPA 2005): Maintain a tenable environment in the means of egressfrom large-volume spaces during the time required forevacuationControl and reduce the migration of smoke between thefire area and adjacen

10、t spacesNFPA 92B (2005) provides algebraic equations for thedesign of smoke management systems for three design firescenarios:The fire is located on the floor of the atrium, and smokeproduction includes the air entrainment into the plumeas it rises to the ceiling (axisymmetric plume).The fire is loc

11、ated in an adjacent space, and the smokeflows through a compartment opening and subsequentlyunder a balcony before entering the atrium space (bal-cony spill plume).A ventilation-limited fire is located in an adjacent space,Balcony Spill Plumes:Full-Scale Experiments, Part 1G.D. Lougheed, PhD C.J. Mc

12、CartneyMember ASHRAEG.D. Lougheed is a senior research officer, and C.J. McCartney is a technical officer in the Fire Research Program, National Research Coun-cil, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.NY-08-039 (RP-1247)2008, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (www.as

13、hrae.org). Published in ASHRAE Transactions, Volume 114, Part 1. For personal use only. Additional reproduction, distribution, or transmission in either print or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAEs prior written permission.330 ASHRAE Transactionsand the smoke enters the atrium through a wi

14、ndow,which is broken by the fire (window plume).Initially in North America, the design of atrium smokemanagement assumed that the fire was located on the floor ofthe atrium and that the smoke production could be estimatedusing the axisymmetric plume equation. It was assumed thatsprinklers would limi

15、t the size and, thus, the smoke producedby fires in adjacent spaces. In recent years, smoke manage-ment requirements for atria in the US building codes specifythat the design of atrium smoke management systems includesdesign fire scenarios in both the atrium and adjacent spaces(UBC 1997; ICC 2003, 2

16、006). Also, research including full-scale fire tests indicates that sprinkler-controlled fires cangenerate significant quantities of buoyant smoke (Morgan etal. 1999; Madrzykowski and Vettori 1992; Lougheed 1997;Lougheed et al. 2000; Lougheed et al. 2001; Ghosh 1997). Asa result, it has become neces

17、sary to consider design firescenarios involving fires in both the atrium space and adjacentspaces in the design of an atrium smoke management system.There have been a number of concerns regarding thebalcony spill plume equation provided in NFPA 92B (2005)and ICC (2003): the lack of verification by f

18、ull-scale experiments andthe application of the equation for high atria eventhough it was developed for low-height atria.As a result of these concerns, the American Society ofHeating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers(ASHRAE) initiated a project to evaluate the balcony spillplume equation

19、 used in North American codes and standards(RP-1247). For this project, three research activities wereundertaken: 1. Full-scale experiments2. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to inves-tigate smoke entrainment below the balcony and at thebalcony edge as the plume spills into an atrium3. CF

20、D modeling of smoke entrainment into a balcony spillplume for high atriaThe CFD modeling studies were undertaken to addresstwo concerns with the experimental program: The distance between the balcony and the ceiling in theexperimental facility was limited (5 to 7 m). This dis-tance exceeds the dista

21、nce required in the initial requestfor proposals. However, in comparison to scenarios inmany North American atria, this distance was a concern.The second concern was the inability to fully investigatethe effect of the parameters that affect air entrainment inthe balcony area using full-scale experim

22、ents. To address these issues, an effort was made to verify aCFD model using the National Institute of Standards andTechnologys (NIST) Fire Dynamic Simulator (FDS) soft-ware (McGrattan et al. 2002a, 2002b) for determining smokeentrainment into a spill plume. Detailed results of the model-ing studies

23、 are provided in master degree theses by Ko (2006)and McCartney (2006) and summarized in Ko et al. (2008) andMcCartney et al. (2008). The primary research conducted as part of RP-1247 wasa series of full-scale experiments that investigated smoke flowin balcony spill plumes and the resulting mechanic

24、al exhaustrequirements for an atrium. An extended set of full-scaleexperiments was conducted for a fire located in a compart-ment. Parameters that were varied included the width of thecompartment opening and the fire size. Tests were conductedwith and without a downstand in the compartment openingan

25、d with and without draft curtains used to channel the flowbelow the balcony.The full-scale experiments included measurements insidethe fire compartment and in the opening between the firecompartment and the balcony area. They also includedmeasurements in a simulated atrium space. In Part 1 of thispa

26、per, the results of the measurements in the fire compartmentarea are discussed. Also, the data were analyzed to estimatethe mass flow rate through the compartment opening. The esti-mated mass flow rates are compared with algebraic equationsthat are used to estimate the mass flow through a compartmen

27、topening. The results for the measurements in the simulatedatrium area are discussed in Part 2 of this paper (Lougheed etal. 2008).EXPERIMENTAL STUDIESThere have been several experimental studies of balconyspill plumes. Most of these were conducted at the BuildingResearch Establishment (BRE) in the

28、UK using 1/10 scalemodels. Experiments were also conducted by the University ofCanterbury, New Zealand, using salt-water modeling (Yii1998) and a 1/10 scale model similar to that used at BRE (Harri-son 2004). Reviews of the experimental studies are provided byHarrison (2004) and Lougheed et al. (200

29、7). A brief summaryof the experimental studies is provided in this section.Morgan and Marshall (1975)Morgan and Marshall (1975) conducted a series of 1/10scale model experiments using the scaling principles providedby Thomas et al. (1963). The physical model simulated thesmoke flow from a single sho

30、p with a width of 0.7 m (3.3 ft)and a double shop with a width of 1.4 m (4.6 ft). The firecompartment was 0.5 m (1.6 ft) deep and 0.5 m (1.6 ft) high.A 0.4 m (1.3 ft) deep balcony extended along the full width ofthe shop and had draft curtains located at both ends. Experi-ments were conducted with t

31、he front of the shop fully open,and a limited number of tests were conducted with a 0.16 m(0.5 ft) deep downstand running the full width of the opening.In addition, experiments were conducted with the doublewidth shop and variable openings. For these tests, the draftcurtains were located at the edge

32、 of the opening, and the down-ASHRAE Transactions 331stand was included. The heated flow from the apparatusflowed into the laboratory.Temperature data were used to develop the BRE spillplume method. Good agreement was obtained between theexperimental results and the theoretical predictions. Law(1986

33、) also used the maximum temperatures measured abovethe balcony for the initial development of a simplified equa-tion for a balcony spill plume.Morgan and Marshall (1979)Morgan and Marshall (1979) conducted a second series of1/10 scale experiments primarily using the 0.7 m (2.3 ft) widemodel shop. Fo

34、r these experiments, the smoke flowed into alarge box with the smoke extracted from the top of the boxusing a mechanical exhaust system at an approximatelyconstant rate. The heat source was a heater with a heat outputbetween 1 and 4 kW (0.95 and 3.78 Btu/s). Most experimentswere conducted with the d

35、raft curtains at 0.7 m (2.3 ft).However, two experiments were conducted with the draftcurtains at 1.4 m (4.6 ft), and another two were conductedwithout draft curtains.Thermocouple trees located outside the plume were usedto measure the temperature distribution in the model atrium.These results were

36、used to determine the thickness of thesmoke layer. There was no clear demarcation between thesmoke layer and the ambient air. An effective layer depth wasdetermined by integrating the temperature-height curve.The BRE spill plume method was used to compare thetheoretical mass flow rates with those pr

37、oduced in the exper-iments. The results of this study gave rise to the developmentof the effective layer depth correction to allow for the temper-ature variation beneath the smoke layer. These experimentsshowed that the channeling by draft curtains was effective inreducing the amount of smoke produc

38、ed by the spill plume.Law (1986) used the spill plume results from these experi-ments to develop a simplified calculation method.Hansell et al. (1993)Hansell et al. (1993) conducted a series of 1/10 scaleexperiments with a model atrium. The model atrium was high(3.06 m) (10.04 ft) compared with the

39、model used by Morganand Marshall (1979). It had a plan area of 3.3 m2(35.5 ft2), anda mechanical system was used to extract air at the top. The experiments were conducted to address specificissues regarding the horizontal flow of smoke toward an open-ing, air entrainment into both free and adhered p

40、lumes, and theeffect of balcony depth. Law (1995) used the results of theseexperiments to modify the earlier correlation (Law 1986) forthe mass flow rate for a balcony spill plume and for the effec-tive width of the spill plume without draft curtains.Marshall and Harrison (1996)Marshall and Harrison

41、 (1996) conducted five series oftests using 1/10 scale physical models. Each series of testsused a different atrium physical model to investigate specificissues, including the effect of atrium size, combustion airflowthrough the compartment opening, and plume end effects onair entrainment into the p

42、lume. These experiments were usedby Poreh et al. (1998) to develop a simplified spill plumeexpression.Yii (1998)Yii (1998) conducted a study on spill plumes using salt-water modeling and a laser induced fluorescence (LIF) flowvisualization technique using a 1/20 scale model. These exper-iments inves

43、tigated the qualitative features of the smoke flowbut did not provide any quantitative information.Harrison (2004)Harrison (2004) conducted 1/10 scale physical modelexperiments. The fire compartment was 1 by 1 by 0.5 m (3.3by 3.3 by 1.6 ft) high with a 0.3 m (1.0 ft) deep balcony. Thecompartment ope

44、ning extended the full height of the compart-ment, and the width of the opening was varied using inserts.Full-height draft curtains were located at the edge of the open-ing.A series of 55 tests were conducted with a 0.6 m (2.0 ft)wide opening. The primary parameters for this series of testswere the

45、heat release rate, the compartment opening width,and the depth of the downstand at the spill edge. Four testswere conducted with the downstand located at the compart-ment opening. A single fire size was used for these tests, andthe opening width and downstand depth were varied.Harrison (2004) compar

46、ed the measured spill plume massflow rates with those determined using the BRE method. Analgebraic equation was also developed for the smoke flow ina balcony spill plume equation for the scenario with a down-stand at the spill edge. Also, an empirical relationship wasdeveloped for air entrainment be

47、neath a balcony.FULL-SCALE EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENTExperimental DesignThe main objective of the experimental program was todetermine balcony spill plume mass flow rates produced bysteady fires in a compartment with an attached balcony. Theatrium smoke layer elevation was the major dependent vari-abl

48、e to be measured. However, in reviewing the literature usedto develop the present correlations for air entrainment intobalcony spill plumes, it was noted that some key parametersthat affect the mass flow rate in the balcony spill plume alsoaffect the conditions within the fire compartment and the ma

49、ssflow rate through the compartment opening. These parametersinclude the fire size (heat release rate), the width of thecompartment opening, and the presence of a downstand in theopening. In Part 1 of this paper, the experimental results areused to investigate the effects of these parameters on the condi-tions inside the fire compartment and on the smoke flowthrough the opening. The air entrainment in the simulatedatrium space is discussed in Part 2 of this paper.332 ASHRAE TransactionsThe parameters that were investigated in the full-scaleexperiments that affected the conditions within t

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1