ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:19 ,大小:784.81KB ,
资源ID:463773      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-463773.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASTM C1211-2018 Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Elevated Temperatures《高温下高级陶瓷抗弯强度的标准试验方法》.pdf)为本站会员(medalangle361)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASTM C1211-2018 Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Elevated Temperatures《高温下高级陶瓷抗弯强度的标准试验方法》.pdf

1、Designation: C1211 13C1211 18Standard Test Method forFlexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at ElevatedTemperatures1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C1211; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year

2、 of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This test method covers determination of the flexural strength of advanced ceramics at elevated temperatures.2 Fou

3、r-point-14point -point and three-point loadings with prescribed spans are the standard as shown in Fig. 1. Rectangular specimens ofprescribed cross-section are used with specified features in prescribed specimen-fixture combinations. Test specimens may be 3 by4 by 45 to 50 mm in size that are tested

4、 on 40 mm 40-mm outer span four-point or three-point fixtures.Alternatively, test specimensand fixture spans half or twice these sizes may be used. The test method permits testing of machined or as-fired test specimens.Several options for machining preparation are included: application matched machi

5、ning, customary procedures, or a specifiedstandard procedure. This test method describes the apparatus, specimen requirements, test procedure, calculations, and reportingrequirements. The test method is applicable to monolithic or particulate- or whisker-reinforced ceramics. It may also be used forg

6、lasses. It is not applicable to continuous fiber-reinforced ceramic composites.1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C28 on Advanced Ceramics and is

7、 the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C28.01 on MechanicalProperties and Performance.Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2013Jan. 1, 2018. Published September 2013January 2018. Originally approved in 1992. Last previous edition approved in 20082013as C1211 02 (2008). 13. DOI: 10.1520/C1211-13.10.1

8、520/C1211-18.2 Elevated temperatures typically denote, but are not restricted to, 200 to 1600C.1600 C.NOTE 1Configuration:A: L = 20 mmB: L = 40 mmC: L = 80 mmFIG. 1 Four-Point-14 Point -Point and Three-Point Fixture ConfigurationsThis document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide

9、the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Becauseit may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current versionof the stan

10、dard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standardCopyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States11.3 This standard does not purport to address all of

11、the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibilityof the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine theapplicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was devel

12、oped in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardizationestablished in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issuedby the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.2. Referenced Documen

13、ts2.1 ASTM Standards:3C1161 Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient TemperatureC1239 Practice for Reporting Uniaxial Strength Data and Estimating Weibull Distribution Parameters for Advanced CeramicsC1322 Practice for Fractography and Characterization of Fracture Origins in

14、 Advanced CeramicsC1341 Test Method for Flexural Properties of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramic CompositesC1368 Test Method for Determination of Slow Crack Growth Parameters of Advanced Ceramics by Constant Stress-RateStrength Testing at Ambient TemperatureC1465 Test Method for Determina

15、tion of Slow Crack Growth Parameters of Advanced Ceramics by Constant Stress-RateFlexural Testing at Elevated TemperaturesE4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing MachinesE220 Test Method for Calibration of Thermocouples By Comparison TechniquesE230 Specification and Temperature-Electromotive

16、Force (EMF) Tables for Standardized Thermocouples3. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 complete gage section, nthe portion of the specimen between the two outer bearings in four-point flexure and three-pointflexure fixtures.NOTE 1In this standard, the complete four-point flexure gage section is twice

17、the size of the inner gage section. Weibull statistical analyses, in thisinstance, only include portions of the specimen volume or surface which experience tensile stresses.3.1.2 flexural strengthstrength, FL2, na measure of the ultimate strength of a specified beam in bending.3.1.3 four-point-1/4fo

18、ur-point-14 point-point flexure, flexurena configuration of flexural strength testing in which aspecimen is symmetrically loaded at two locations that are situated at one-quarter of the overall span, away from the outer twosupport bearings (see Fig. 1).3.1.4 fully-articulating fully articulating fix

19、ture, na flexure fixture designed to be used either with flat and parallel specimensor with uneven or nonparallel specimens. The fixture allows full independent articulation, or pivoting, of all rollers about thespecimen long axis to match the specimen surface. In addition, the upper or lower pairs

20、are free to pivot to distribute force evenlyto the bearing cylinders on either side.NOTE 2See Annex A1 for schematic illustrations of the required pivoting movements.NOTE 3A three-point fixture has the inner pair of bearing cylinders replaced by a single bearing cylinder.3.1.5 inert flexural strengt

21、h, FL2, na measure of the strength of a specified beam specimen in bending as determined in anappropriate inert condition whereby no slow crack growth occurs.3.1.6 inherent flexural strength, FL2, nthe flexural strength of a material in the absence of any effect of surface grindingor other surface f

22、inishing process, or of extraneous damage that may be present. The measured inherent strength is in general afunction of the flexure test method, test conditions, and test specimen size.3.1.7 inner gage section, nthe portion of the specimen between the inner two bearings in a four-point flexure fixt

23、ure.3.1.8 semi-articulating fixture, na flexure fixture designed to be used with flat and parallel specimens. The fixture allows somearticulation, or pivoting, to ensure the top pair (or bottom pair) of bearing cylinders pivot together about an axis parallel to thespecimen long axis, in order to mat

24、ch the specimen surfaces. In addition, the upper or lower pairs are free to pivot to distributeforce evenly to the bearing cylinders on either side.NOTE 4See Annex A1 for schematic illustrations of the required pivoting movements.NOTE 5A three-point fixture has the inner pair of bearing cylinders re

25、placed by a single bearing cylinder.3.1.9 slow crack growth (SCG), nSubcriticalsubcritical crack growth (extension) which may result from, but is not restrictedto, such mechanisms as environmentally-assisted environmentally assisted stress corrosion or diffusive crack growth.3.1.10 three-point flexu

26、reflexure, na configuration of flexural strength testing in which a specimen is loaded at a positionmidway between two support bearings (see Fig. 1).3 For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standa

27、rdsvolume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page on the ASTM website.C1211 1824. Significance and Use4.1 This test method may be used for material development, quality control, characterization, and design data generationpurposes. This test method is intended to be used with ceram

28、ics whose flexural strength is ; 50 MPa (; 7 ;50 MPa (;7 ksi)or greater.4.2 The flexure stress is computed based on simple beam theory, with assumptions that the material is isotropic andhomogeneous, the moduli of elasticity in tension and compression are identical, and the material is linearly elas

29、tic. The averagegrain size should be no greater than 150 of the beam thickness. The homogeneity and isotropy assumptions in the test method ruleout the use of it for continuous fiber-reinforced composites for which Test Method C1341 is more appropriate.4.3 The flexural strength of a group of test sp

30、ecimens is influenced by several parameters associated with the test procedure.Such factors include the testing rate, test environment, specimen size, specimen preparation, and test fixtures. Specimen and fixturesizes were chosen to provide a balance between the practical configurations and resultin

31、g errors as discussed in Test MethodC1161, and Refs (1-3).4 Specific fixture and specimen configurations were designated in order to permit the ready comparison ofdata without the need for Weibull size scaling.4.4 The flexural strength of a ceramic material is dependent on both its inherent resistan

32、ce to fracture and the size and severityof flaws. Variations in these cause a natural scatter in test results for a sample of test specimens. Fractographic analysis of fracturesurfaces, although beyond the scope of this test method, is highly recommended for all purposes, especially if the data will

33、 be usedfor design as discussed in Ref (4) and Practices C1322 and C1239.4.5 This method determines the flexural strength at elevated temperature and ambient environmental conditions at a nominal,moderately fast testing rate. The flexural strength under these conditions may or may not necessarily be

34、 the inert flexural strength.Flexure strength at elevated temperature may be strongly dependent on testing rate, a consequence of creep, stress corrosion, orslow crack growth. If the purpose of the test is to measure the inert flexural strength, then extra precautions are required and fastertesting

35、rates may be necessary.NOTE 6Many ceramics are susceptible to either environmentally-assisted environmentally assisted slow crack growth or thermally activated slowcrack growth. Oxide ceramics, glasses, glass ceramics, and ceramics containing boundary phase glass are particularly susceptible to slow

36、 crack growth.Time dependent Time-dependent effects that are caused by environmental factors (for example, water as humidity in air) may be minimized through theuse of inert testing atmosphere such as dry nitrogen gas or vacuum. Alternatively, testing rates faster than specified in this standard may

37、 be used if thegoal is to measure the inert strength. Thermally activated slow crack growth may occur at elevated temperature even in inert atmospheres. Testing ratesfaster than specified in this standard should be used if the goal is to measure the inert flexural strength. On the other hand, many c

38、eramics such as boroncarbide, silicon carbide, aluminum nitride, and many silicon nitrides have no sensitivity to slow crack growth at room or moderately elevated temperaturesand for such materials, the flexural strength measured under in laboratory ambient conditions at the nominal testing rate is

39、the inert flexural strength.4.6 The three-point test configuration exposes only a very small portion of the specimen to the maximum stress. Therefore,three-point flexural strengths are likely to be much greater than four-point flexural strengths. Three-point flexure has someadvantages. It uses simpl

40、er test fixtures, it is easier to adapt to high temperature, and it is sometimes helpful in Weibull statisticalstudies. However, four-point flexure is preferred and recommended for most characterization purposes.4.7 The three-point test configuration exposes only a very small portion of the specimen

41、 to the maximum stress. Therefore,three-point flexural strengths are likely to be much greater than four-point flexural strengths. Three-point flexure has someadvantages. It uses simpler test fixtures, it is easier to adapt to high temperature, and it is sometimes helpful in Weibull statisticalstudi

42、es. However, four-point flexure is preferred and recommended for most characterization purposes.5. Interferences5.1 Time-dependent phenomena, such as stress corrosion and slow crack growth, can interfere with determination of the flexuralstrength at room and elevated temperatures. Creep phenomena al

43、so become significant at elevated temperatures. Creep deformationcan cause stress relaxation in a flexure specimen during a strength test, thereby causing the elastic formulation that is used tocompute the strength to be in error.5.2 Surface preparation of the test specimens can introduce machining

44、damage such as microcracks that may have a pronouncedeffect on flexural strength. Machining damage imposed during specimen preparation can be either a random interfering factor oran inherent part of the strength characteristic to be measured. With proper care and good machining practice, it is possi

45、ble to obtainfractures from the materials natural flaws. Surface preparation can also lead to residual stresses. Universal or standardized testmethods of surface preparation do not exist. It should be understood that final machining steps may or may not negate machiningdamage introduced during the e

46、arly coarse or intermediate machining.5.3 Slow crack growth can lead to a rate dependency of flexural strength. The testing rate specified in this standard may or maynot produce the inert flexural strength whereby negligible slow crack growth occurs. See Test MethodMethods C1368, and C1465,and Ref (

47、5) for more information about possible rate dependencies of flexural strength and methodologies for quantifying the ratesensitivity4 The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of the text.C1211 1836. Apparatus6.1 LoadingSpecimens may be force in any suitable testi

48、ng machine provided that uniform rates of direct loading can bemaintained. The force measuring system shall be free of initial lag at the loading rates used and shall be equipped with a meansfor retaining readout of the maximum force as well as a force-time or force-deflection record. The accuracy o

49、f the testing machineshall be in accordance with Practices E4.56.2 Four-Point Flexure Four-PoinFour-Point-14-Point Fixtures 14 Point Fixtures (Fig. 1), having support spans as given inTable 1.6.3 Three-Point Flexure Three-Point Fixtures (Fig. 1), having a support span as given in Table 1.6.4 Bearings, three-Three- and four-point flexure.6.4.1 Cylindrical bearings shall be used for support of the test specimen and for load application. The cylinders may be madeof a ceramic with an elastic modulus between 200 and 400 GPa (30 to 60 106 ps

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1