ASTM C285-1988(2005) Standard Test Methods for Sieve Analysis of Wet-Milled and Dry-Milled Porcelain Enamel《湿磨和干磨搪瓷粉的筛选分析试验方法》.pdf

1、Designation: C 285 88 (Reapproved 2005)Standard Test Methods forSieve Analysis of Wet-Milled and Dry-Milled PorcelainEnamel1This standard is issued under the fixed designation C 285; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision,

2、the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 These test methods cover the determination of thefineness of frit in wet- or dry-milled porcelain enamels

3、 andother ceramic coatings for metals by means of the No. 200(75-m) or No. 325 (45-m) sieve.1.2 The two methods appear as follows:SectionsMethod AReferee MethodMethod BRoutine Method4to910 to 141.3 Method A is intended for use where a referee method ofhigher accuracy is required, while Method B is i

4、ntended tomeet the needs of normal enamel plant production controloperations where a rapid, simplified method of sieve testing isrequired. The accuracy of the simplified method has proved tobe entirely adequate for this use. The simplified test, however,is not recommended where high accuracy is requ

5、ired.1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.2. Referen

6、ced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2E11 Specification for Wire Cloth and Sieves for TestingPurposes3. Significance and Use3.1 The fineness of the frit has a direct bearing on many ofits properties, such as fusibility, tearing, gloss, opacity, suspen-sion in the slip, and ease of spraying.METHOD AREFERE

7、E METHOD4. Apparatus4.1 BalanceThe balance or scale shall be of at least 500-gcapacity, and accurate to 0.1 g.4.2 SievesThe sieves shall conform to Specification E11.They shall include the No. 40 (425-m) sieve and also the No.200 (75-m) or the No. 325 (45-m) sieve (Note 1), or both. ANo. 325 sieve s

8、hall be used when the fineness is such that, froma sample containing 100 g of dry solids, less than2gisretained on a No. 200 sieve. An 8-in. (203-mm) full-heightsieve is recommended. This height is preferred because there isless tendency to flood or splash, and also because it fitscommercial automat

9、ic tapping and shaking machines. Allsieves used for testing shall be standardized initially and afterevery 50 tests against a reference sieve tested by the NationalBureau of Standards and bearing its precision seal. Thecorrection for the sieve used in this test shall be determined bysieving tests ma

10、de in conformity with the procedure of this testmethod. Identical samples shall be sieved through the referencesieve and the test sieve. Test materials shall be chosen so that5 to 10 % of the material will be retained on the referencesieve. The difference between the percentage residue on thereferen

11、ce sieve and that on the test sieve is the amount ofcorrection which shall be algebraically added to, or subtractedfrom, the correction for the reference sieve to obtain the finalcorrection (Note 2). The No. 40 sieve need not be calibrated.NOTE 1Tyler Standard Sieves of 35, 200, and 325 mesh corresp

12、ond,respectively, to ASTM sieves No. 40, 200, and 325 (U.S. Standard SieveSeries numbers).NOTE 2For example, when comparing the reference sieve with a testsieve, should 8.5 g be retained on the reference sieve and 7.5 g on the testsieve, the total correction for the test sieve would then be 8.5 7.5,

13、or + 1.0.4.3 DryerA suitable means for drying the sieves and slipsample, without exceeding a temperature of 250F (122C),shall be provided. No dryer is needed for sieve tests ofdry-milled enamel.4.4 Mechanically Operated Sieve Shaker The mechanicalshaking device shall be such as to produce a lateral

14、and verticalmotion of the sieve, accompanied by a jarring action so as to1These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee B08 onMetallic and Inorganic Coatings and are the direct responsibility of SubcommitteeB08.12 on Materials for Porcelain Enamel and Ceramic-Metal Systems.Current

15、edition approved Sept. 15, 2005. Published September 2005. Originallyapproved in 1951. Last previous edition approved in 1999 as C 285 88 (1999).2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards

16、volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.keep the sample moving continuously over the surface of thesieve. If a machine shaker is to be used,

17、the thoroughness ofsieving shall be tested by comparing and calibrating with thehand method of sieving, as described in Section 6.5. Sample5.1 Wet-Milled EnamelSelect a sample of slip represen-tative of the material to be tested. Protect samples fromevaporation. Determine the water content of the sl

18、ip by dryinga representative 100-g sample of slip to constant weight at atemperature not exceeding 250F (122C). Pass the samplethrough a No. 40 sieve before weighing, and discard thematerial retained on the sieve. Sample the slip after stirring byweighing out to the nearest 0.1 g, a quantity calcula

19、ted tocontain 100 g of dry solids.5.2 Dry-Milled EnamelSelect a sample representative ofthe material to be tested and containing 100 g of dry solids,weighed to the nearest 0.1 g.6. Procedure for Wet-Milled Enamel6.1 Wet SievingTransfer the weighed sample to the No.200 or No. 325 sieve. Wash the samp

20、le through the sieve witha gentle flow of water from a rubber hose until the waterpassing through the sieve appears clear and free of cloudiness.This usually requires 2 min. Exercise care to prevent any lossof sample because of splashing or overflowing. Dry the sievewith its residue until the residu

21、e easily moves about as a drypowder when the sieve is shaken. Complete the sieving andweighing operation in accordance with 6.2 or 6.3. Make tests induplicate.6.2 Hand SievingHold the sieve, with pan and coverattached, in one hand at an angle of about 20 from thehorizontal. Move the sieve up and dow

22、n in the plane ofinclination at a rate of about 150 times per minute, and strikeagainst the palm of the other hand at the top of each stroke.After every 25 strokes, turn the sieve about one sixth of arevolution in the same direction. Continue the operation untilnot more than 0.05 g passes through th

23、e sieve in 1 min ofcontinuous sieving. Weigh the portion of the sample retainedon the sieve to the nearest 0.1 g.6.3 Machine SievingIf a mechanically operated sieveshaker is used, vary the time during which the sieve (with panand cover attached) and the sample are shaken, and note thelength of time

24、necessary to operate the sieve shaker in order toget the same result as that obtained with hand sieving.Calibrate the machine-sieving operation in terms of handsieving.7. Procedure for Dry-Milled Enamel7.1 Transfer the sample quantitatively to the No. 200 or 325sieve. Complete the sieving and weighi

25、ng operation in accor-dance with 5.2 or 5.3. Make tests in duplicate.8. Calculation and Report8.1 Using the average of duplicate runs, report the finenessof the frit in percentage by mass (to the nearest 0.1 %) of thedry solids content of the sample retained on the No. 200 or 325sieve. The weight in

26、 grams is equivalent to weight percentage.9. Precision and Bias9.1 PrecisionIt is generally accepted within the porcelainenamel industry that duplicate tests run by the same operator inthe same laboratory should show a precision of 60.5 or less.Failure to duplicate determinations within this limit i

27、ndicatesthe necessity for repetition of the test. The precision ofduplicate tests is negatively influenced by variations in opera-tor technique, sieve binding and wear, and, when it is used, thecondition of mechanical sieving equipment. It is also influ-enced by changing conditions in the test sampl

28、e which occurover time and which result in particle agglomeration due tochemical reactions.9.2 BiasNo justifiable statement on bias can be madesince the true value of sieve analysis cannot be established byan acceptable standard sample.METHOD BROUTINE METHOD10. Apparatus10.1 BalanceThe balance or sc

29、ale shall be at least 200-gcapacity, and accurate to 0.1 g.10.2 SievesThe sieves shall conform to Specification E11and shall include the No. 40 (425-m) and the No. 200 (75-m)sieves. An 8-in. (203-mm) full-height sieve is recommended.This height is preferred because there is less tendency to floodor

30、splash, and also because it fits commercial automatictapping and shaking machines. A sieve properly cared for willhave 500 tests. It should, however, be compared from time totime with a master standard or reference sieve. It is recom-mended that an extra sieve be purchased and preserved as amaster s

31、tandard against which all sieves in use or subsequentlypurchased can be standardized.NOTE 3Tyler Standard Sieves of 35 and 200 mesh correspond,respectively, to ASTM sieves No. 40 and 200 (U.S. Standard Sieve Seriesnumbers).10.3 ContainerA container suitable for weighing a 100-gsample.10.4 DryerSee 4

32、.310.5 Mechanically Operated Sieve ShakerSee 4.4.11. Sample11.1 Select a sample of slip from the mill before unloadingand pass it through a No. 40 sieve before weighing. Discard thematerial retained on the sieve. The sample shall consist of 100g of slip for wet-milled porcelain enamel or 100 g of gr

33、oundfrit for dry-milled porcelain enamel.12. Procedure12.1 Wet-Milled Porcelain EnamelTransfer the 100-gsample of slip to the No. 200 sieve. Wash the sample throughthe sieve with a stream of gently running water, care beingexercised to prevent splashing or overflowing of the sieve.Continue washing u

34、ntil the water passing through the sieveappears clear and free from cloudiness. This usually requires atleast 2 min. Dry the sieve with its residue until the residueeasily moves about as a dry powder when the sieve is shaken(Note 4). Shake the sieve in an automatic shaking and tappingmachine, or by

35、hand, until no further material passes throughC 285 88 (2005)2the meshes. This usually requires from 5 to 7 min. Transfer theresidue remaining on the sieve to the balance and weigh to thenearest 0.1 g.NOTE 4It is recommended that, at this point, the residue be trans-ferred to another sieve for shaki

36、ng. The use of a second sieve minimizesthe error caused by the clogging when both washing and shaking areaccomplished with the same sieve.12.2 Dry-Milled Porcelain EnamelPlace the 100-gsample of frit powder in a No. 200 sieve and shake in anautomatic shaking and tapping machine, or by hand, until no

37、further material passes through the meshes (Note 5). Thisusually requires from 5 to 7 min. Transfer the residue remain-ing on the sieve to the balance and weigh to the nearest 0.1 g.NOTE 5The end point is usually taken as the time at which not morethan 0.1 g of material passes through the sieve with

38、 1 min shaking.Alittleexperience will indicate to the operator when the shaking operation iscomplete.13. Calculation and Report13.1 Report the weight in grams of the residue on thescreen as equivalent to weight percentage of the original slip,or frit powder, specimen.14. Precision and Bias14.1 Preci

39、sionIt is generally accepted within the porce-lain enamel industry that duplicate tests run by the sameoperator in the same laboratory should show a precision of60.5 or less. Failure to duplicate determinations within thislimit indicates the necessity for repetition of the test. Theprecision of dupl

40、icate tests is negatively influenced by varia-tions in operator technique, sieve binding and wear, and, whenit is used, the condition of mechanical sieving equipment. It isalso influenced by changing conditions in the test samplewhich occur over time and which result in particle agglomera-tion due t

41、o chemical reactions.14.2 BiasNo justifiable statement on bias can be madesince the true value of sieve analysis cannot be established byan acceptable standard sample.ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentionedin th

42、is standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the riskof infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must b

43、e reviewed every five years andif not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standardsand should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of theres

44、ponsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you shouldmake your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, W

45、est Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the aboveaddress or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or serviceastm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website(www.astm.org).C 285 88 (2005)3