ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:5 ,大小:111.07KB ,
资源ID:510478      下载积分:10000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-510478.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASTM D1790-2014 Standard Test Method for Brittleness Temperature of Plastic Sheeting by Impact《用冲击法测定塑料薄板的脆化温度的标准试验方法》.pdf)为本站会员(eveningprove235)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASTM D1790-2014 Standard Test Method for Brittleness Temperature of Plastic Sheeting by Impact《用冲击法测定塑料薄板的脆化温度的标准试验方法》.pdf

1、Designation: D1790 08D1790 14Standard Test Method forBrittleness Temperature of Plastic Sheeting by Impact1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D1790; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last

2、revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon () indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.1. Scope*1.1 This test method covers the determin

3、ation of that temperature at which plastic sheeting 1.00 mm (0.040 in.) or less inthickness exhibits a brittle failure under specified impact conditions.1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.NOTE 1This test meth

4、od was developed jointly with the Society of the Plastics Industry, primarily for use with plasticized vinyl sheetings. Itsapplicability to other plastic sheetings must be verified by the user.1.3 This standard does not purport to address the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is t

5、he responsibility of theuser of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitationsprior to use.NOTE 2This test method and ISO 8570 address the same subject matter, but differ in technical content.2. Referenced Documents2.1 AST

6、M Standards:2D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for TestingD883 Terminology Relating to PlasticsD5947 Test Methods for Physical Dimensions of Solid Plastics SpecimensD6988 Guide for Determination of Thickness of Plastic Film Test SpecimensE691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to

7、 Determine the Precision of a Test Method2.2 ISO Standard:ISO 8570 PlasticsFilm and SheetingDetermination of Cold-Crack Temperature33. Terminology3.1 Definitions:3.1.1 brittleness temperature, Tbthat temperature, derived statistically, where 80 % of the specimens would probably pass95 % of the time

8、when a stated minimum number are tested by this test method. The 80 %-passing value is determined by plottingthe data on probability graph paper, as described in 9.1.3.1.2 GeneralDefinitions of terms applying to this test method appear in Terminology D883.4. Significance and Use4.1 Data obtained by

9、this test method have been used to predict the behavior of plastic sheeting at low temperatures only if theconditions of deformation are similar to those specified in this test method. This test method is useful for specification testing andfor comparative purposes, but does not necessarily determin

10、e the lowest use temperature for a particular plastic.4.2 It has been demonstrated that on calendered sheeting the brittleness temperature is sensitive to the direction of fold. It hasalso been demonstrated that the brittleness temperature is sensitive to the direction of sampling. Therefore, it is

11、imperative that theprocedure for taking specimens and folding be followed explicitly.1 This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D20 on Plastics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D20.30 on Thermal Properties.Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2008Oct. 1, 2014. Publish

12、ed October 2008October 2014. Originally approved in 1960. Last previous edition approved in 20022008 asD1790 - 02.D1790 - 08. DOI: 10.1520/D1790-08.10.1520/D1790-14.2 For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at serviceastm.org. For Annual Boo

13、k of ASTM Standardsvolume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page on the ASTM website.3 Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http:/www.ansi.org.This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provi

14、de the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Becauseit may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current versionof the s

15、tandard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standardCopyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States15. Apparatus5.1 Cold Conditioning Chamber, at leas

16、t 450 by 450 by 450 mm (18 by 18 by 18 in.). Means (automatic or manual) shall beprovided for controlling the temperature of the chamber to within 62C of the desired value.5.2 Impact Tester shown in Fig. 1 shall be constructed of cold-rolled steel except for the bolts, screws, and rubber stopper. It

17、is recommended that all structural parts (that is, base, anvil, arm, arm supports, and shaft) be chromium plated to prevent corrosion.The arm, including the rubber stopper and bolt, shall weigh 3.09 kg 6 28 g (6 lb 13 6 1 oz).5.3 Die, 50.8 6 0.4 mm by 146.1 6 0.4 mm (2 6 164 in. by 534 6 164 in.) to

18、 cut the test specimens from the sample.5.4 Stapler, desk-type, with a stop mounted on the base exactly 12.7 mm (12 in.) back of the center of the groover that turnsthe staple.5.5 Index Card Stock, 50 by 127 mm (2 by 5 in.).5.6 Thickness GaugeAdead-weight dial or digital micrometer as described in D

19、5947 or D6988 as appropriate for the materialor specimen geometry being tested.6. Test Specimens6.1 The test specimens shall be cut with the die. The length of the test specimen shall be parallel to the transverse direction ofthe sheeting.6.2 The test specimens shall be selected so that the thicknes

20、s is uniform to within 10% of the thickness over the length of thespecimen in the case of specimens 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) or less in thickness and to within 5 % in the case of specimens greater than0.25 mm (0.010 in.) in thickness but do not exceed 1.00 mm (0.040 in.) in thickness.6.3 The 50-mm (2-in.

21、) ends of each specimen shall be so collected that a gradual, closed loop is formed at room temperatures.The collected ends of the specimen and one end of the 50 by 127-mm (2 by 5-in.) card shall be matched exactly with the bodyof the loop lying on the card. Two staples shall be crimped through the

22、matched ends of the specimen and card. These staples shallbe 13-mm (12 in.) from, and parallel to, the 50-mm (2-in.) end of the stack.6.4 Since it has been demonstrated that this test is sensitive to the direction of fold on calendered sheeting, it is necessary tostipulate that all specimens be fold

23、ed in the same direction. It is recommended that, for materials with no grain, the specimen befolded so that the surface last in contact with the roll shall be inside the loop following the inherent shape of the specimen; grainedmaterials are to be tested with the grained surface on the inside of th

24、e loop.7. Conditioning7.1 ConditioningCondition the test specimens at 23 6 2C (73.4 6 3.6F) and 50 6 5 %10 % relative humidity for not lessthan 40 h prior to test in accordance with Procedure A of Practice D618, for those tests where conditioning is required. In casesof disagreement, the tolerances

25、shall be 61C (61.8F) and 62 %65 % relative humidity.Metric Equivalentsin.mm183.2146.471611.11212.7125.4212643764121141230514356FIG. 1 Brittleness Temperature Impact Testing MachineD1790 1427.2 Test ConditionsConduct tests in the standard laboratory environment of 23 6 2C (73.4 6 3.6F) and 50 6 5 %10

26、 %relative humidity, unless otherwise specified in the test methods or in this test method. In cases of disagreements, the tolerancesshall be 61C (61.8F) and 62 %65 % relative humidity.8. Procedure8.1 Measure the thickness of the specimen at several points along its length to an accuracy of 0.0025 m

27、m (0.0001 in.) or betterfor specimens 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) or less in thickness and to an accuracy of 1 % or better for specimens greater than 0.25 mm(0.010 in) in thickness but do not exceed 1.00 mm (0.040 in.) in thickness.NOTE 3Refer to D6988 for specimens 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) or less in thickness.

28、NOTE 4Refer to D5947 for specimens greater than 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) in thickness.8.2 Place the impact tester, with its base horizontal, in the cold conditioning chamber at the desired testing temperature, for aconditioning period of 1 h. Expose the specimens to the test temperature for 15 6 5 min.8.

29、3 Place each of ten mounted test specimens individually on the anvil with the crimped ends of the staples on the back of thecard fitted into the groove in the anvil. Handle the card, not the sample. Locate the bent loop of the sheeting on the anvil with theloop centered on the anvil and facing away

30、from the pivotal end of the impact arm.8.4 Allow the impact arm to fall free from a position within 5 perpendicular to the base onto the bent loop. Repeat until eachof the ten conditioned specimens has been tested.8.5 Remove the specimens and examine for failure. Partial fracture shall be construed

31、as failure as well as complete divisioninto two or more pieces.8.6 Adjust the temperature of the cold conditioning chamber and condition a second group in order to have a minimum of fourresults, two above and two below the 50 % point. Condition the groups of ten specimens for 15 6 5 min at a suitabl

32、etemperature,the selected temperatures, as indicated by the results of testing the first group of ten specimens. testing. Repeat thetesting procedure and examination.8.7 When using the standard graphic method to determine the 80 %-passing temperature, it is necessary to repeat this procedureof testi

33、ng ten specimens at a series of temperatures differing by uniform increments of 5C. When using the probability graph paperin 9.1, it is not necessary to obtain the lowest no-failure temperatures, at which no failure is obtained, or the highest failuretemperature.8.7 When testing for conformance to a

34、 specification, it shall be satisfactory to accept materials on the basis of testing a minimumof ten test specimens at the specified temperature. Not more than 20 % of the specified number of test specimens shall fail at thespecified temperature.9. Calculation9.1 Graphic MethodPlot the data on proba

35、bility graph paper with the temperature on the linear scale and the percentagefailure on the probability scale. Select the temperature scale so that it represents a minimum of two divisions per degree Celsius.Draw a straight line through a minimum of four points, two above and two below the 50 % poi

36、nt. The temperature indicated atthe intersection of the data line with the 20 % failure line shall be reported as Tb, the 80 % passing temperature (20 % failuretemperature).10. Report10.1 Report the following information:10.1.1 Complete identification of the material tested, including type, source,

37、manufacturers code designation, form, andprevious history,10.1.2 Eighty percent passing temperature, to the nearest degree Celsius,10.1.3 Thickness of test specimen,10.1.4 Direction of fold,10.1.5 Conditioning procedure, and10.1.6 Date of test.10.2 For routine acceptance testing, report the followin

38、g instead of 10.1.1, and 10.1.2:10.2.1 Number of specimens tested,10.2.2 Temperature of test, and10.2.3 Number of failures.11. Precision and Bias11.1 Table 1 is based on a round robin conducted in 1991 in accordance with Practice E691, involving three materials testedby seven laboratories. For each

39、material, all of the samples were prepared at one source, but the individual specimens wereD1790 143prepared at the laboratories that tested them. The test result for each material was based on a minimum of four trials, performedunder varying conditions, involving ten specimens in each trial. Each l

40、aboratory obtained two test results for eachmaterial.(WarningThe following explanations of r and R (11.2 through 11.2.3) are only intended to present a meaningful wayof considering the approximate precision of this method. It is not appropriate to apply the data in Table 1 rigorously to acceptanceor

41、 rejection of material, as those data are specific to the round robin and are unlikely to be representative of other lots, conditions,materials, or laboratories. It is recommended that users of this test method should apply the principles outlined in Practice E691to generate data specific to their l

42、aboratory and materials, or between specific laboratories. The principles of 11.2 through 11.2.3would then be valid for such data.)NOTE 5Material Number 3 (SP-61737 Lot 30) was tested successfully by only three of the seven participating labs due to equipment limitations.11.2 Concept of r and RIf Sr

43、 and St have been calculated from a large enough body of data, and for test results that wereaverages from testing 40 specimens (four trials involving ten specimens in each trial):11.2.1 Repeatability Limit, r(Comparing two test results for the same material, obtained by the same operator using the

44、sameequipment on the same day.) The two test results shall be judged not equivalent if they differ by more than the “r” value for thatmaterial.11.2.2 Reproducibility Limit, R(Comparing two test results for the same material, obtained by two different operators usingdifferent equipment in different l

45、aboratories.) The two test results shall be judged not equivalent if they differ by more than the“R” value for that material.11.2.3 Any judgment in accordance with 11.2.1 or 11.2.2 would have an approximate 95 % probably of being correct.11.3 There are no recognized standards by which to estimate th

46、e bias of this test method.12. Keywords12.1 brittleness temperature; cold-crack temperature; impact; plastic sheetingSUMMARY OF CHANGESCommittee D20 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue(D1790 - 02D1790 - 08) that may impact the use of this standard. (

47、October 1, 2008)2014)(1) Removed permissive language.Changed relative humidity requirement to 610 % from 65 % in 7.1 and 7.2.(2) Added referencesChanged 8.6 to D6988 andreflect using D5947 to Section 2.probability graph paper(3) Added reference to a thickness gauge in Section 5.Removed old 8.7: Refe

48、rence to standard graph method.(4) Revised Section 6.Renumbered 8.8 to 8.7(5) Added new Section 8.1 andRemoved “Graphic Method” title from 9.1Notes 3 and 4 to Section 8. Remaining notesrenumbered(6) Removed supplier info since the supplier that had been listed is no long manufacturing the fixture(7)

49、 Incorporated Note 4 into Section 11.1TABLE 1 Statistical Assessment of Brittleness TemperatureRound-Robin ResultsValues Expressed in CNumber Material Description Average Sr A SR B rC RD1 HN-81414 Lot 3Squirrel Grey0.013 in.(0.33 mm)16.2 0.62 2.36 1.74 6.612 HC-41310 Lot 2Special Tan0.014 in.(0.36 mm)18.3 0.80 2.88 2.24 8.103 SP-61737 Lot 30Blue0.020 in.(0.51 mm)39.2 0.73 3.71 2.04 10.4A Sr = within-laboratory standard deviation.B SR = between-laboratory standard deviation.C r = within-laboratory repeatability limit = 2.8*Sr .D R = betw

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1