ImageVerifierCode 换一换
格式:PDF , 页数:16 ,大小:202.67KB ,
资源ID:523000      下载积分:5000 积分
快捷下载
登录下载
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
如需开发票,请勿充值!快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
特别说明:
请自助下载,系统不会自动发送文件的哦; 如果您已付费,想二次下载,请登录后访问:我的下载记录
支付方式: 支付宝扫码支付 微信扫码支付   
注意:如需开发票,请勿充值!
验证码:   换一换

加入VIP,免费下载
 

温馨提示:由于个人手机设置不同,如果发现不能下载,请复制以下地址【http://www.mydoc123.com/d-523000.html】到电脑端继续下载(重复下载不扣费)。

已注册用户请登录:
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
三方登录: 微信登录  

下载须知

1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。
2: 试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。
3: 文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 本站仅提供交流平台,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

版权提示 | 免责声明

本文(ASTM D6600-2000(2004) Standard Practice for Evaluating Test Sensitivity for Rubber Test Methods《评价橡胶试验方法的试验敏感性的标准操作规程》.pdf)为本站会员(吴艺期)主动上传,麦多课文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知麦多课文库(发送邮件至master@mydoc123.com或直接QQ联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

ASTM D6600-2000(2004) Standard Practice for Evaluating Test Sensitivity for Rubber Test Methods《评价橡胶试验方法的试验敏感性的标准操作规程》.pdf

1、Designation: D 6600 00 (Reapproved 2004)Standard Practice forEvaluating Test Sensitivity for Rubber Test Methods1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 6600; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year oforiginal adoption or, in the case of revision, the year o

2、f last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. Asuperscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1. Scope1.1 This practice covers testing to evaluate chemical con-stituents, chemical and physical properties of compoundingmat

3、erials, and compounded and cured rubbers, which mayfrequently be conducted by one or more test methods. Whenmore than one test method is available, two questions arise:Which test method has the better (or best) response to ordiscrimination for the underlying fundamental property beingevaluated? and

4、Which test method has the least error? Thesetwo characteristics collectively determine one type of technicalmerit of test methods that may be designated as test sensitivity.1.2 Although a comprehensive and detailed treatment, asgiven by this practice, is required for a full appreciation of testsensi

5、tivity, a simplified conceptual definition may be givenhere. Test sensitivity is the ratio of discrimination power for thefundamental property evaluated to the measurement error oruncertainty, expressed as a standard deviation. The greater thediscriminating power and the lower the test error, the be

6、tter isthe test sensitivity. Borrowing from the terminology in elec-tronics, this ratio has frequently been called the signal-to-noiseratio; the signal corresponding to the discrimination power andthe noise corresponding to the test measurement error. There-fore, this practice describes how test sen

7、sitivity, genericallydefined as the signal-to-noise ratio, may be evaluated for testmethods used in the rubber manufacturing industry, whichmeasure typical physical and chemical properties, with excep-tions as noted in 1.3.1.3 This practice does not address the topic of sensitivity forthreshold limi

8、ts or minimum detection limits (MDL) in suchapplications as (1) the effect of intentional variations ofcompounding materials on measured compound properties or(2) the evaluation of low or trace constituent levels. Minimumdetection limits are the subject of separate standards.1.4 This standard does n

9、ot purport to address all of thesafety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.5 The content of this practice is as

10、follows:SectionScope 1Referenced Documents 2Terminology 3Summary of Practice 4Significance and Use 5Measurement Process 6Development of Test Sensitivity Concepts(Absolute and Relative Test Sensitivity, Limited and ExtendedRange Test Sensitivity, Uniform and Nonuniform Test Sensitivity)7Steps in Cond

11、ucting a Test Sensitivity Evaluation Program 8Report for Test Sensitivity Evaluation 9Keywords 10Annex A1Background on: Use of Linear Regression Analysis andPrecision of Test Sensitivity EvaluationAppendix X1Two Examples of Relative Test Sensitivity Evaluation:Relative Test Sensitivity: Limited Rang

12、eThree ProcessabilityTestsRelative Test Sensitivity: Extended RangeCompliance versusModulusAppendix X2Background on: Transformation of Scale and Deriva-tion of Absolute Sensitivity for a Simple Analytical Test2. Referenced Documents2.1 ASTM Standards:2D 4483 Practice for Evaluating Precision for Tes

13、t MethodStandards in the Rubber and Carbon Black ManufacturingIndustries3. Terminology3.1 A number of specialized terms or definitions are re-quired for this practice. They are defined in a systematic orsequential order from simple terms to complex terms; thesimple terms may be used in the definitio

14、n of the more complexterms. This approach generates the most succinct and unam-biguous definitions. Therefore, the definitions do not appear inthe usual alphabetical sequence.3.2 Definitions:3.2.1 calibration material, CM, na material (or otherobject) selected to serve as a standard or benchmark ref

15、erencematerial, with a fully documented FP reference value for a testmethod; the calibration material, along with several othersimilar materials with documented or FPreference values, may1This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D11 on Rubber andis the direct responsibility of Subcom

16、mittee D11.16 on Application of StatisticalMethods.Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2004. Published December 2004. Originallyapproved in 2000. Last previous edition approved in 2000 as D 6600 - 00e2.2For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, orcontact ASTM Customer Service

17、 at serviceastm.org. For Annual Book of ASTMStandards volume information, refer to the standards Document Summary page onthe ASTM website.1Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.be used to calibrate a particular test method o

18、r may be used toevaluate test sensitivity.3.2.1.1 DiscussionAfully documented FP or FP referencevalue implies that an equally documented measured propertyvalue may be obtained from a MP = f (FP) relationship.However, unless f = 1, the numerical values for the MP and theFP are not equal for any CM.3.

19、2.2 fundamental property, FP, nthe inherent or basicproperty (or constituent) that a test method is intended toevaluate.3.2.3 measured property, MP, nthe property that themeasuring instrument responds to; it is related to the FP by afunctional relationship, MP = f (FP), that is known or that maybe r

20、eadily evaluated by experiment.3.2.4 reference material, RM, na material (or other ob-ject) selected to serve as a common standard or benchmark forMP measurements for two or more test methods; the expectedmeasurement value for each of the test methods, designated asthe reference value, may be known

21、(from other sources) or itmay be unknown.3.2.5 testing domain, nthe operational conditions underwhich a test is conducted; it includes description of the testsample or specimen preparation, the instrument(s) used (cali-bration, adjustments, settings), the selected test technicians,and the surroundin

22、g environment.3.2.5.1 local testing, na testing domain comprised of onelocation or laboratory as typically used for quality control andinternal development or evaluation programs.3.2.5.2 global testing, na testing domain that encom-passes two or more locations or laboratories, domestic orinternation

23、al, typically used for producer-user testing, productacceptance, and interlaboratory test programs.3.2.6 Although a simplified conceptual definition of testsensitivity was given in the Scope, a more detailed but stillgeneral definition using quantitative terms is helpful forpreliminary discussion.3.

24、2.6.1 test sensitivity (generic), na derived quantity thatindicates the level of technical merit of a test method; it is theratio of the test discrimination power or signal, that is themagnitude of the change in the MP for some unit change in therelated FP of interest, to the noise or standard devia

25、tion of theMP.3.2.6.2 DiscussionThis definition strictly applies to anabsolute sensitivity, see 7.2. The change in the FP may be anactual measurement unit or a selected FP difference. Therelation between the MP and the FP is of the form MP = f (FP).4. Summary of Practice4.1 This practice develops th

26、e necessary terminology andthe required concepts for defining and evaluating test sensitiv-ity for test methods. Sufficient background information ispresented to place the standard on a firm conceptual andmathematical foundation. This allows for its broad applicationacross both chemical and physical

27、 testing domains. The devel-opment of this practice draws heavily on the approach andtechniques as given in the referenced literature.3,44.2 After the introduction of some general definitions, abrief review of the measurement process is presented, suc-ceeded by a development of the basic test sensit

28、ivity concepts.This is followed by defining two test sensitivity classifications,absolute and relative test sensitivity and two categories, (1) fora limited measured property range and (2) for an extendedproperty range evaluation. For an extended property range foreither classification, two types of

29、 test sensitivity may exist, (1)uniform or equal sensitivity across a range of properties or (2)nonuniform sensitivity which depends on the value of themeasured properties across the selected range.4.3 Annex A1 is an important part of this practice. Itpresents recommendations for using linear regres

30、sion analysisfor test sensitivity evaluation and recommendations for evalu-ating the precision of test sensitivity.4.4 Appendix X1 is also an important adjunct to thispractice. It gives two examples of relative test sensitivitycalculations: (1) for a limited range or spot check program and(2) for an

31、 extended range test sensitivity program with adependent (nonuniform) test sensitivity. Appendix X2 givesbackground on transformation of scale often needed for ex-tended range sensitivity and for improved understanding, italso gives the derivation of the absolute test sensitivity for asimple analyti

32、cal chemical test.5. Significance and Use5.1 Testing is conducted to make technical decisions onmaterials, processes, and products. With the continued growthin the available test methods for evaluating scientific andtechnical properties, a quantitative approach is needed to selecttest methods that h

33、ave high (or highest) quality or technicalmerit. The procedures as defined in this practice may be usedfor this purpose to make testing as cost effective as possible.5.2 One index of test method technical merit and impliedsensitivity frequently used in the past has been test methodprecision. The pre

34、cision is usually expressed as some multipleof the test measurement standard deviation for a defined testingdomain. Although precision is a required quantity for testsensitivity, it is an incomplete characteristic (only one half ofthe necessary information) since it does not consider thediscriminati

35、on power for the FP (or constituent) being evalu-ated.5.3 Any attempt to evaluate relative test sensitivity for twodifferent test methods on the basis of test measurementstandard deviation ratios or variance ratios, which lack anydiscrimination power information content, constitutes an in-valid quan

36、titative basis for sensitivity, or technical meritevaluation. Coefficient of variation ratios (which are normal-ized to the mean) may constitute a valid test sensitivity3Mandel, J., and Stiehler, R.D., Journal of Research of National Bureau ofStandards, Vol 53, No. 3, September 1954. See also “Preci

37、sion Measurement andCalibrationStatistical Concepts and Procedures,” Special Publication 300, Vol 1,National Bureau of Standards, 1969, pp. 179155). (The National Bureau ofStandards is now the National Institute for Standards and Technology.)4“The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data,” Chapters

38、 13 and 14, J.Mandel, Interscience Publishers (John Wiley for every value of MP there must be aunique single value for FP. The relationship must be specificfor any particular measuring process or test, and, if there aretwo different processes or tests for evaluating the FP, therelationship is genera

39、lly different for each test.7. Development of Test Sensitivity Concepts7.1 Test DomainThe scope of any potential test sensitivityevaluation program should be established. Is the evaluation fora limited local testing situation, that is, one laboratory or testlocation? Or are the results to be applied

40、 on a global basisacross numerous domestic or worldwide laboratories or loca-tions? If local testing is the issue, the test measurements areconducted in one laboratory or location. For global testing, aninterlaboratory test program (ITP) must be conducted. Two ormore replicate test sensitivity evalu

41、ations are conducted ineach participating laboratory and an overall or average testsensitivity is obtained across all laboratories. In the context ofan ITP for global evaluation, each replicate sensitivity evalu-ation is defined as the entire set of operations that is requiredto calculate one estima

42、ted value for the test sensitivity. Foradditional background on the assessment of precision for thetest sensitivity values attained, see A1.2 and also PracticeD 4483.7.2 Test Sensitivity ClassificationThere are two classifi-cations for test sensitivity.7.2.1 Class 1 is absolute test sensitivity, or

43、ATS, where theword absolute is used in the sense that the measured propertycan be related to the FP by a relationship that gives absolute ordirect values for FP from a knowledge of the MP. In evaluatingtest sensitivity for this class, two or more CMs are used eachhaving documented values for the FP.

44、7.2.2 Class 2 is relative test sensitivity, or RTS, where thetest sensitivity of Test Method 1 is compared to Test Method 2,on the basis of a ratio, using two or more RMs with differentMP values. This class is used for physical test methods whereno FPs can be evaluated.7.3 Absolute Test SensitivityI

45、n this section absolute ordirect test sensitivity is defined in a simplified manner by theuse of Fig. 1.7.3.1 Development of Absolute Test SensitivityFig. 1 isconcerned with two types of properties: (1) an FP (or singlecriterion or constituent), the value of which is established bythe use of a CM an

46、d (2) an MP obtained by applying the testmethod to the CM. A relationship or functionality existsbetween the MP and FP that may be nonlinear. In theapplication of a particular test, FP1corresponds to MP1andFP2corresponds to MP2. Over a selected region of therelationship, designed by points a and b,

47、the slope, K, of theillustrated curve is approximated by the relationship K =D(MP)/D(FP). If the test measurement standard deviation forMP denoted as SMP, is constant over this a to b range, theabsolute test sensitivity designated as cAis defined by Eq 1.cA5 | K |/SMP(1)The equation indicates that f

48、or the selected region of interest,test sensitivity will increase with the increase of the numerical(absolute) value of the slope,|K|andsensitivity will increasethe more precise the MP measurement. Thus, cAmay be usedas a criterion of technical merit to select one of a number of testmethods to measu

49、re the FP provided that a functional relation-ship, MP = f (FP), can be established for each test method.7.3.2 Absolute test sensitivity may not be uniform orconstant across a broad range of MPor FPvalues. It is constantacross a specified range, only if the direct (not transformed)MP versus FP relationship is linear and the test error SMPisconstant. With an assumed monotonic relationship between FPand MP, absolute test sensitivity, cA, may be evaluated on thebasis of (1) two or more CMs, (or objects) with differentknown FP values or (2) a theoretical relationship bet

copyright@ 2008-2019 麦多课文库(www.mydoc123.com)网站版权所有
备案/许可证编号:苏ICP备17064731号-1