ATIS 0300102-2011 Scanner Testing Results per ATIS-0300085 BCSC Test Specification for Product Label Scanning.pdf

1、 ATIS-0300102 ATIS Standard on - SCANNER TESTING RESULTS PER ATIS-0300085, TEST SPECIFICATION FOR PRODUCT LABEL SCANNING As a leading technology and solutions development organization, ATIS brings together the top global ICT companies to advance the industrys most-pressing business priorities. Throu

2、gh ATIS committees and forums, nearly 200 companies address cloud services, device solutions, emergency services, M2M communications, cyber security, ehealth, network evolution, quality of service, billing support, operations, and more. These priorities follow a fast-track development lifecycle from

3、 design and innovation through solutions that include standards, specifications, requirements, business use cases, software toolkits, and interoperability testing. ATIS is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ATIS is the North American Organizational Partner for the 3rd Ge

4、neration Partnership Project (3GPP), a founding Partner of oneM2M, a member and major U.S. contributor to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Radio and Telecommunications sectors, and a member of the Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL). For more information, visit. Notice

5、 of Disclaimer Codabar, Code 93, Code 128, Interleave 2 of 5, Matrix 2 of 5, NEC 2 of 5, Telepen, UPC/EAN/JAN off; Micro PDF 417 on; Targeting zone 50% of code; Near field decode window width 480 Office with fluorescent lighting No. 2: Imager Test (Scan all Symbols) 1:33:00 1:37:18 11 Imager X=4.2mi

6、l_to 20.8 mil USB DOT Adjustable UNIX based OS on reader with USB interface to Windows XP hos Test #2: Imager Test #1 11:34:00 11:37:37 12 Imager X=4.2mil_to 20.8 mil USB DOT Adjustable UNIX based OS on reader with USB interface to Windows XP hos Test #3: Imager Test #1 11:50:00 11:52:22 5 Part 2: N

7、otes and Comments Number Scanner Type Mfr specified resolution (X) Any difficulties that the person scanning symbols is having capturing content? Notes on data discrepancies General comments 1 Imager 640 x 480 Sweet spot on focal distance is 2.5 inches from front of scanner for PDF417. Max 4.5” and

8、Min is 1.75” Labels 60 through 52 and 14 through 8 difficult to scan. When scanning any 2D or data imaging label, canner must be held perfectly still to capture data. It is much more sensitive to motion than the linear labels. Focus mode set to Near Focus 2 Imager 640 x 480 Sweet spot on focal dista

9、nce is 2.5 inches from front of scanner for MicroPDF417. Max 4.5” and Min is 1.75” Labels 60 through 52 and 14 through 8 more difficult to scan. When scanning any 2D or data imaging label, canner must be held perfectly still to capture data. It is much more sensitive to motion than scanning the line

10、ar labels. Labels 14 through 8 were the most difficult to scan successfully. label 13 took up to 20 times to successfully capture data. The smaller labels , (60 through 52 were more difficult to achieve a successful data capture. This is also true of the data matrix labels. In both cases the scanner

11、 had to be held perfectly still and the trigger gently squeezed. The scanner takes approximately 1.0 seconds before it is ready for the next scan when scanning data matrix or PDF417 format labels. _Scanning the linear labels were faster and no appreciable delay was apparent between scans 6 3 Imager

12、640 x 480 Sweet spot on focal distance is 2.5 inches from front of scanner for MicroPDF417. Max 4.5” and Min is 1.75” Labels 60 through 52 more difficult to scan. When scanning any 2D or data imaging label, scanner must be held perfectly still to capture data. It is much more sensitive to motion tha

13、n scanning the linear labels. The smaller labels , (60 through 52 were more difficult to achieve a successful data capture. This is also true of the data matrix labels. In both cases the scanner had to be held perfectly still and the trigger gently squeezed. The scanner takes approximately 1.0 secon

14、ds before it is ready for the next scan when scanning Data Matrix or MicroPDF417 format labels. Scanning the linear labels were faster and no appreciable delay was apparent between scans 4 Imager 640 x 480 None I scanned all non imaging labels including the TLC39. TLC39 was not programmed for this s

15、canner. 40 labels were scanned in 60 seconds which is the fastest rate of scan. 5 Imager 10 mil Scanner scanned all codes except 5 MIL Scanner was very aggressive 6 Imager 5 mil Scanner was very aggressive 7 Imager 5 mil There is some multiple scans Scanner was very aggressive 8 Laser 5 mil Multiple

16、 double scans I liked the feel of the scanner the aggressiveness of the scanner 9 Laser 5 mil This scanner was very slow in responding, seemed to have an issue going from one style label to another 7 10 Imager 5 mil Scanner held 4 inches from board and oriented same direction as code. 11 Imager X=4.

17、2mil_to 20.8 mil None. The TLC-39 symbol was not recognized by the reader. Not a recognized symbol type. There were no errors when the reader was scanning non TLC-39 symbols. 12 Imager X=4.2mil_to 20.8 mil None. The TLC-39 symbol was not recognized by the reader. Not a recognized symbol type. There were no errors when the reader was scanning non TLC-39 symbols.