BS PD CLC TR 50489-2006 Smart tracker chips — Feasibility study on the inclusion of RFID in nElectrical and Electronic Equipment for WEEE management《智能追踪芯片 在WEEE管理用电气和电子设备中包括RFID的可.pdf

1、PUBLISHED DOCUMENTPD CLC/TR 50489:2006Smart tracker chips Feasibility study on the inclusion of RFID in Electrical and Electronic Equipment for WEEE managementICS 13.030.50; 29.020; 31.020g49g50g3g38g50g51g60g44g49g42g3g58g44g55g43g50g56g55g3g37g54g44g3g51g40g53g48g44g54g54g44g50g49g3g40g59g38g40g51

2、g55g3g36g54g3g51g40g53g48g44g55g55g40g39g3g37g60g3g38g50g51g60g53g44g42g43g55g3g47g36g58Licensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSIPD CLC/TR 50489:2006This Published Document was published under the authority of the Standards Policy and Strategy Commit

3、tee on 31 January 2007 BSI 2007ISBN 978 0 580 50037 4National forewordThis Published Document was published by BSI. It is the UK implementation of CLC/TR 50489:2006.The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted by Technical Committee L/7, British Electrotechnical Committee, to Subcommittee L

4、/7/1, Waste from electrical and electronic equipment.A list of organizations represented on L/7/1 can be obtained on request to its secretary.This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application.Amendments issued s

5、ince publicationAmd. No. Date CommentsLicensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSITECHNICAL REPORT CLC/TR 50489 RAPPORT TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHER BERICHT November 2006 CENELEC European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization Comit Europen de Normalis

6、ation Electrotechnique Europisches Komitee fr Elektrotechnische Normung Central Secretariat: rue de Stassart 35, B - 1050 Brussels 2006 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members. Ref. No. CLC/TR 50489:2006 E English version Smart tracker

7、 chips - Feasibility study on the inclusion of RFID in Electrical and Electronic Equipment for WEEE management This Technical Report was approved by CENELEC on 2006-06-17. CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,

8、Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Licensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncont

9、rolled Copy, (c) BSI- 2 - Foreword This Technical Report was prepared by CENELEC BTTF 116-3, Waste from electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). The text of the draft was submitted to the formal vote and was approved by CENELEC as CLC/TR 50489 on 2006-06-17. _ CLC/TR 50489:2006Licensed Copy: Wang

10、 Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI- 3 - Contents Introduction.4 1 Scope 5 2 Abbreviations.5 3 SWOT Analysis of RFID use in waste management .5 4 Technical requirements6 5 Economic requirements .6 6 Social considerations.6 7 Legal considerations6 8 Environmental

11、considerations 6 9 Conclusion.7 Bibliography8 Annex A (informative) CECED report - ELECTRONIC PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION A Study into the feasibility of technologies that enable the identification of producer and product characteristics 9 CLC/TR 50489:2006Licensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43

12、 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI- 4 - Introduction An RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) system consists of a transmitter, a receiver (mostly combined and called a transceiver, interrogator or reader), an antenna and a tag or transponder. The transmitter sends out a radio signal on a c

13、ertain frequency by means of an antenna. This signal is recognised by the tag if within the transmitters reading range. The tag then responds with a signal that is recognised by the receiver. Data within a tag may provide identification for an item in manufacture, goods in transit, a location, the i

14、dentity of a vehicle, an animal, an individual, etc. By including additional data, it is possible to support applications by item specific information or instructions immediately available on reading the tag. A certain protocol takes care of the communication between reader and the host computer. Th

15、ree frequency ranges has generally been distinguished for RFID systems: low, medium and high. Table 1 summarises these three frequency ranges, along with the typical system characteristics and examples of major areas of application. Table 1 Frequency bands and typical characteristics Frequency range

16、 Typical characteristics Low 1 Hz - 300 kHz Short to medium read range Low reading speed Medium 300 3 000 kHz Short to medium read range Potentially, medium reading speed High 3 MHz 30 GHz Long read range High reading speed Line of sight required The choice of operating frequency is of primary impor

17、tance in determining data transfer rates. Generally speaking the higher the frequency the higher the data transfer or throughput rates that can be achieved. The CECED report “ELECTRONIC PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION, A Study into the feasibility of technologies that enable the identification of producer an

18、d product characteristics”, (see Annex A) was considered the most relevant report available and used as main reference for this Technical Report. CLC/TR 50489:2006Licensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI- 5 - 1 Scope This Technical Report investigat

19、es in the light of the implementation of the WEEE Directive (2002/96/EC) the feasibility of deploying machine readable product identification technologies (e.g. smart tracker chips) to fulfil the marking requirement for the purpose of implementing producer responsibility. The product recognition sha

20、ll provide information for waste stream management (sorting, reporting and cost allocation). Machine readable product identification technologies can be utilized during every phase of the product life cycle of an EEE. The WEEE management is the last phase. This Technical Report focuses on this phase

21、 only. 2 Abbreviations In the body of this Technical Report the following abbreviations have been used: CECED: Comit Europen des Constructeurs dEquipements Domestiques EEE: Electrical and Electronic Equipment RFID: Radio Frequency IDentification SWOT: Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat WEEE: Waste

22、 Electrical and Electronic Equipment 3 SWOT Analysis of RFID use in waste management Strength No line of sight Bulk tag reading Not affected by dirt or scratches Information link Non-contact identification Weakness Shielding of metals Initially only pallets individual producerswill be able to decide

23、 whether they wish to address their commitment individuallyor whether they wish to join a collective scheme. Clearly, however, producers willneed to conform to those schemes available. It is unlikely that individualcompanies or even collectives such as CECED will be able to totally determinehow the

24、directive is implemented, all the other parties involved in the product life-cycle will have to agree to any system either voluntarily or by compulsion. SG hasspoken with a number of other stakeholders to gather opinion as to how they areplanning to comply with the directives and whether product tag

25、ging could be partof those plans.6.2 National GovernmentIn order to obtain a view as to the UK central Government approach to WEEE SGcontacted the UK Department of Trade and Industry (DTI).The DTI has just completed a survey of third party reactions to the WEEEdirective via its web site. The survey

26、consisted of an interpretation of thedirectives followed by a series of questions on each article. The survey resultsare currently being collated, however it is clear that a sampling or market shareapproach has been assumed to identify producer cost and this will be comparedto a point of sale tax or

27、 fee.The leader of the initiative at the DTI is Dr Mark Downs who was contacted bytelephone. Dr Downs stated that although he was aware that in some quartersthe tagging of goods to enable producer identification at disposal might beconsidered as a possibility, it was not an option being investigated

28、 as a wayforward by the DTI. No explanation was given as to why this option was notconsidered a viable route.A major risk to producers is that different countries will adopt different standardsor practices that put different requirements on producers, for example onecountry may adopt tagging and put

29、 the necessary legislation in place to ensure itsuse whilst another meets its obligations by sampling. Having to apply differentpractices to products being introduced into different markets in the EU would beexpensive for producers and offer a very unattractive option going against anytrends for sta

30、ndardisation.Enquiries have been sent to other European Governments regarding their plansas to how apportion costs to manufacturers as required by WEEE and alsoLicensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSIEPI Final Report Page 15whether they are consider

31、ing electronic tagging as an option. At time of writing noreplies have been received.6.3 Local GovernmentIn the UK collection of waste is the responsibility of the local District Council,disposal is the responsibility of the County Council. This situation potentiallycomplicates the situation with re

32、spect to WEEE and tagging as both parties needto accept and adopt the same system.SG has spoken to representatives from both councils and received a commonview that both are willing to adopt a tagging system as long as they do not bearany costs. The councils would look to the producers to provide fi

33、nance forequipment and databases to operate such a system. Exactly how that paymentwould be implemented was not specified and both councils felt that in truth sucha system was not practical. Both councils favoured an up-front disposal tax paidat point of sale and passed on to the local authority to

34、pay for disposal. Theirargument was that such a system is fair to all and avoids the problem of “free-riders” or “orphan” goods.6.4 RetailersThe main concern of retailers with respect to WEEE is being forced to operate a“take back” system, i.e. when selling an item retailers would be obliged to take

35、back an equivalent equipment. Such a system would result in storage andcollection problems for the obsolete items at the retailers premises.Regarding a tagging system, the biggest issue is the number and diverse natureof retailers and the high cost of equipping all outlets with reading equipment. Th

36、euse of the equipment would be mainly in “other applications”. Retailers are notseen as a primary stakeholder in the WEEE directive unless they are called uponto complete the paperwork for “up-front “ tax payment or forced to operate a “takeback” system.6.5 Disposal and Recycling and Processing comp

37、aniesClearly one of the prime stakeholders on whose business WEEE and RoHS willhave a major impact is the disposal and recycling and processing companies. Togather an understanding of how this industry operates and gain a view on itspreparation for WEEE SG visited sites in UK, Holland and Germany. A

38、 full reportof these visits and their findings is given in Appendix I.The overriding finding from these studies is that the industry is at a very earlystage of development in terms of being able to sort and separate out differenttypes of product and materials. The stage of development of the industry is veryvariable from country to country, ranging from very rudimentary disposal facilitiesLicensed Copy: Wang Bin, na, Thu Apr 12 07:45:43 GMT+00:00 2007, Uncontrolled Copy, (c) BSI