BS PD CLC TS 50131-12-2016 Alarm systems Intrusion and hold-up systems Methods and requirements for setting and unsetting of Intruder Alarm Systems (IAS)《警报系统 入侵和滞留报警系统 侵入警报系统(IAS).pdf

1、PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016Alarm systems Intrusion andhold-up systemsPart 12: Methods and requirements forsetting and unsetting of Intruder AlarmSystems (IAS)BSI Standards PublicationWB11885_BSI_StandardCovs_2013_AW.indd 1 15/05/2013 15:06PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016 PUBLISHED DOCUMENTNational forewordThis P

2、ublished Document is the UK implementation of CLC/TS 50131-12:2016.The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical Committee GW/1/2, Installed Alarm Systems.A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained on request to its secretary.This publication does not

3、purport to include all the necessary provisions of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application. The British Standards Institution 2016. Published by BSI Standards Limited 2016ISBN 978 0 580 92973 1 ICS 13.320 Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from legal obli

4、gations.This British Standard was published under the authority of the Standards Policy and Strategy Committee on 30 November 2016.Amendments/corrigenda issued since publicationDate Text affectedPD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SPCIFICATION TECHNIQUE TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION CLC/TS 501

5、31-12 November 2016 ICS 13.320 English Version Alarm systems - Intrusion and hold-up systems - Part 12: Methods and requirements for setting and unsetting of Intruder Alarm Systems (IAS) To be completed Alarmanlagen - Einbruch- und berfallmeldeanlagen - Teil 12: Methoden und Anforderungen zur Scharf

6、- und Unscharfschaltung von Einbruchmeldeanlagen (EMA) This Technical Specification was approved by CENELEC on 2016-07-25. CENELEC members are required to announce the existence of this TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the TS available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It

7、 is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force. CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Icelan

8、d, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization Comit Europen de Normalisation Electrotechnique Europisc

9、hes Komitee fr Elektrotechnische Normung CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2016 CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC Members. Ref. No. CLC/TS 50131-12:2016 E PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016Contents Page European forewor

10、d . 3 Introduction 4 1 Scope . 5 2 Normative references . 5 3 Terms and definitions 5 4 Methods of setting and unsetting . 6 4.1 General . 6 4.2 Methods of setting 6 4.3 Methods of unsetting . 7 5 Documentation 8 Annex A (normative) Equipment specifications 9 Annex B (informative) Schematic example

11、for entry door 10 Annex C (normative) Equipment test procedures . 11 CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016European foreword This document (CLC/TS 50131-12:2016) has been prepared by CLC/TC 79 “Alarm systems“. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may

12、be the subject of patent rights. CENELEC and/or CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016Introduction Unwanted alarms have been a significant problem for response authorities throughout Europe. A significant proportio

13、n of these are attributed to “operator error” during the entry and exit procedures. Recommendations are therefore made for the selection of methods of setting and unsetting an Intrusion Alarm System (IAS) that will minimize such errors. CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:20161 Scope This Technic

14、al Specification provides recommendations for those methods of setting and unsetting an Intrusion Alarm System (IAS) complying with EN 50131-1 that will reduce unwanted alarms arising from “operator error” in setting and unsetting the IAS and provide confidence that the conditions in which the syste

15、m is installed are conducive to system reliability during the “set” period. This document details optional methods by which these goals may be achieved, either in isolation, or in conjunction with verification methods. These recommendations should be incorporated into the respective standards in the

16、 EN 50131 series. This Technical Specification also provides (in Annex A) recommendations for equipment and (in Annex C) associated test requirements, in order to permit the manufacture of standardized equipment to provide the functionality needed by an IAS to meet these recommendations. NOTE This s

17、tandard includes requirements that are additional to those in EN 50131-1 which are relevant when the respective method of setting and unsetting is implemented. 2 Normative references The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are indispensable for i

18、ts application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. EN 50131-1:2006, Alarm systems Intrusion and hold-up systems Part 1: System requirements CLC/TS 50131-2-10:2014, Alarm syste

19、ms Intrusion and hold-up systems Part 2-10: Intrusion detectors Lock state contacts (magnetic) EN 50131-3:2009, Alarm systems Intrusion and hold-up systems Part 3: Control and indicating equipment FprEN 50131-5-3:2016, Alarm systems Intrusion systems Part 5-3: Requirements for interconnections equip

20、ment using radio frequency techniques CLC/TS 50131-9:2014, Alarm systems Intrusion and hold-up systems Part 9: Alarm verification Methods and principles 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. 3.1 unverified alarm intruder or hold-up alar

21、m that has not yet been sequentially, visually or audibly verified SOURCE: CLC/TS 50131-9: 2014, 3.1.14 3.2 verified alarm alarm considered genuine as a result of the use of alarm verification SOURCE: CLC/TS 50131-9: 2014, 3.1.16 3.3 lock state monitoring device apparatus which monitors the bolt pos

22、ition of a locking device, e.g. a bolt contact or a lock state contact as described in CLC/TS 50131-2-10 CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:20163.4 blocking function logical function which prevents entry to the protected premises during the set state of the IAS. Note 1 to entry: This function ca

23、n be integrated in any device, e.g. lock, CIE (see Annex B). 3.5 blocking element physical device which secures the entry door and is used in conjunction with blocking function Note 1 to entry: See Annex B. 4 Methods of setting and unsetting 4.1 General The methods of setting and unsetting described

24、 may be used as complementary to alarm verification technology (CLC/TS 50131-9) or as stand-alone methods of minimizing unwanted alarms arising from errors during setting and unsetting of an IAS. In general, methods of setting and unsetting may be selected in any combination to suit the requirements

25、 of the specific alarm system installation. However, the “coerciveness” principle (4.2.3 and 4.3.4) should be considered as a single coherent set of recommendations covering both setting and unsetting. If setting or unsetting is carried out by a combination of methods of authorization, the requireme

26、nts of EN 50131-3:2009, 8.3.2.3 apply. NOTE IAS should provide means to implement at least one of the methods of setting described in 4.2 and at least one of the methods of unsetting described in 4.3. 4.2 Methods of setting 4.2.1 General Consideration should be given to the provision of an indicatio

27、n to the user and/or notification to the ARC if an attempt to set the IAS is not completed within the pre-determined time. Completion of setting procedures should not rely solely on actions within the supervised premises (for example, simple timed exit procedure), but should require a specific actio

28、n external to the supervised premises). Suitable methods include those given in 4.2.2 to 4.2.5. 4.2.2 The setting procedure is carried out from outside the supervised premises The setting procedure shall comply with EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.5. This may be achieved by mechanical or electronic means, or b

29、y provision of an indication such that the user is aware that the system is prevented from setting. An indication of completion of setting required by EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.7 which can be perceived outside the supervised premises shall be provided 4.2.3 The setting procedure is carried out from outsi

30、de the supervised premises incorporating additional measures to ensure the integrity of the IAS. NOTE This describes the “coerciveness” principle, known in Germany as “Zwangslufigkeit.”. The setting procedure shall follow the recommendations of 4.2.2 with the following additional requirements: a) al

31、l applicable requirements of EN 50131-1:2006, Table 4 shall apply in all grades of system; b) for IAS with non-specific (e.g. wire-free) interconnections, no interference may be present in any shared interconnection for longer than 30 s; CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016c) for IAS with non

32、-specific or wire-free interconnections, setting shall be permitted only if signals or messages have been received from all system components within 100 s; d) the lock state monitoring devices are in a locked condition; e) blocking shall be achieved by using blocking function and element as specifie

33、d in A.2; f) no configuration is in progress which could influence the operation of the IAS; g) no remote diagnostic process is in progress which could influence the operation of the IAS. On completion of setting and before the set indication is enabled, a mechanism shall be activated by the IAS, pr

34、eventing unlocking of the designated entry door before the IAS is unset. The last unset operation shall be completed and the IAS clear before a new setting operation can be commenced. Where the opening of a window is detected the lock state shall also be monitored. Setting is permitted only when the

35、 window is closed and locked. 4.2.4 Setting is carried out by a 2-stage process The setting procedure shall be started by a user action and be completed by a positive action outside of the supervised premises. Suitable methods of completion include: a) the action of closing the final exit door; EXAM

36、PLE Response to closing of switch mounted on the door. The CIE shall include a function to prevent spurious activation from any exit route detector from affecting the setting procedure (e.g. whilst a detector is stabilizing). b) the action of locking the door (e.g. response to contacted lock); c) a

37、separate user action at the supervised premises to confirm successful closure of final exit door (e.g. operation of push button or other device). There shall be an indication that the setting procedure has commenced. (see EN 50131-3:2009, 8.3.3.2). An indication of completion of setting as required

38、by EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.7, which can be perceived outside the supervised premises, shall be provided. 4.2.5 Setting is carried out in conjunction with the ARC Setting shall be carried out in accordance with an agreed secure procedure. As a minimum, this should include: a) appropriate measures to pre

39、vent setting the system with persons inside the supervised premises; b) exchange of authorization information at least equivalent to EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.2. The indication of completion of setting required by EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.7 shall be communicated to the system user. 4.3 Methods of unsetting 4

40、.3.1 General The entry procedure should be designed to avoid the possibility of a user error resulting in an unwanted alarm condition. Suitable methods include those given in 4.3.2 to 4.3.9. CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:20164.3.2 Forced unsetting by unlocking The action of unlocking the de

41、signated entry door shall automatically unset the IAS. 4.3.3 Access to the supervised premises is prevented whilst the IAS is set It shall not be possible to open the designated entry door until the IAS has been unset. 4.3.4 Access to the supervised premises is prevented whilst the IAS is set (using

42、 the coerciveness principle) It shall not be possible to open the designated entry door until the IAS has been unset and means shall be provided additional to the door locking function to prevent entry into the supervised premises. This method shall be used if setting is carried out as per 4.2.3. 4.

43、3.5 Access to the supervised premises is prevented unless any verification facility (as defined in CLC/TS 50131-9) has been disabled a) The verification facility shall be disabled by the action of unlocking the designated entry door. OR b) The verification facility shall be disabled by the action of

44、 opening the designated entry door. Option b) should be used only for very low risks and with the express consent of the client in view of the absence of any response in the event that the door is forced. 4.3.6 Unsetting by means of a timed entry procedure The requirements of EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.7

45、b) and 8.3.8.2 shall apply. 4.3.7 Unsetting by means of a timed entry procedure with verification facility (as defined in CLC/TS 50131-9) The requirements of 4.3.6 and CLC/TS 50131-9 apply. The requirements of EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.8.2 apply also to the notification of verification. 4.3.8 Unsetting b

46、y means of a timed entry procedure with verification facility (as defined in CLC/TS 50131-9) and use of digital key The requirements of 4.3.7 apply. Unsetting shall only be achieved with a single action of a digital key. NOTE In the event of an alarm being notified (locally or remotely) alternative

47、means of unsetting can be used (e.g. PIN-code). 4.3.9 Unsetting is carried out in conjunction with the ARC Unsetting shall be carried out in accordance with an agreed secure procedure. As a minimum, this should include the exchange of authorization information at least equivalent to EN 50131-1:2006,

48、 8.3.2. An indication of completion of unsetting equivalent to that described by EN 50131-1:2006, 8.3.8.2 shall be communicated to the system user. 5 Documentation The system design proposal (see CLC/TS 50131-7, 7.3) and the system “asfitted” document (see CLC/TS 50131-7, 10.7) shall include a descr

49、iption of the Set and Unset methods used. CLC/TS 50131-12:2016PD CLC/TS 50131-12:2016Annex A (normative) Equipment specifications A.1 Control and indicating equipment CIE intended for use in systems designed to comply with this Technical Specification, and for which compliance with this specification is claimed shall provide the functionality for at least one method of setting and at least one method of unsetting, as described in Clause 4. If method 4.2.3 is supported for setting, the method of unsetting in line with 4.3.4 shall be provided. In c