DIN CWA 16597-2013 FishBizz Business Case - For monitoring of quality and sales of fish products English version CWA 16597 2013《FishBizz商业案例 鱼产品销售和质量监控 英文版本CWA 16597-2013》.pdf

1、August 2013 Bereich InnovationPreisgruppe 37DIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung e. V. Jede Art der Vervielfltigung, auch auszugsweise, nur mit Genehmigung des DIN Deutsches Institut fr Normung e. V., Berlin, gestattet.ICS 35.240.60; 65.150Zur Erstellung einer DIN SPEC knnen verschiedene Verfahrensweis

2、en herangezogen werden: Das vorliegende Dokument wurde nach den Verfahrensregeln eines CWAs erstellt.!%NL“2024341www.din.deDDIN CWA 16597FishBizz Business Case Fr die berwachung der Qualitt und des Verkaufs vonFischprodukten;Englische Fassung CWA 16597:2013FishBizz Business Case For monitoring of qu

3、ality and sales of fish products;English version CWA 16597:2013FishBizz Business Case Pour la suivi de la qualit et la mise en vente de produits de la pche;Version anglaise CWA 16597:2013Alleinverkauf der Spezifikationen durch Beuth Verlag GmbH, 10772 Berlin www.beuth.deGesamtumfang 177 SeitenDIN SP

4、EC 91313DIN CWA 16597 (DIN SPEC 91313):2013-08 2 Nationales Vorwort Dieses europische CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA 16597:2013) wurde vom CEN Workshop CEN/WS FishBizz Integration of standards for Traceability and Sale of Seafood Products“ bei CEN erarbeitet, dessen Sekretariat vom NEN (Niederlande) ge

5、halten wurde. Es handelt sich um eine unvernderte bernahme der CWA 16597 FishBizz Business Case For monitoring of quality and sales of fish products“ als DIN CWA 16597 (DIN SPEC 91313) FishBizz Business Case Fr die berwachung der Qualitt und des Verkaufs von Fischprodukten“. Eine DIN SPEC nach dem C

6、WA-Verfahren ist die nationale bernahme einer CEN/CENELEC-Vereinbarung, die innerhalb offener CEN/CENELEC Workshops entwickelt wird und den Konsens zwischen den registrierten Personen und Organisationen widerspiegelt, die fr den Inhalt verantwortlich sind. Arbeiten eines CEN Workshop werden nicht du

7、rch ein nationales Gremium gespiegelt. Bei dem zu Grunde liegenden CWA wurde ein Entwurf durch CEN verffentlicht. Es wird auf die Mglichkeit hingewiesen, dass einige Elemente dieses Dokuments Patentrechte berhren knnen. DIN ist nicht dafr verantwortlich, einige oder alle diesbezglichen Patentrechte

8、zu identifizieren. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMIT EUROPEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPISCHES KOMITEE FR NORMUNG Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels 2013 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No.:CWA 1659

9、7:2013 E CEN WORKSHOP AGREEMENT CWA 16597 March 2013 ICS 35.240.60; 65.150 English version FishBizz Business Case For monitoring of quality and sales of fish products This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested parties, the constitution of

10、 which is indicated in the foreword of this Workshop Agreement. The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of this Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre can be held account

11、able for the technical content of this CEN Workshop Agreement or possible conflicts with standards or legislation. This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its Members. This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference docume

12、nt from the CEN Members National Standard Bodies. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuan

13、ia, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom. CWA 16597:2013 (E) 2 Contents Page Foreword 5 Executive Summary 6 1 References 9 2 Terms, definitions and abbreviations . 17 2.1 Terms and definitions 17

14、2.2 Abbreviations 17 3 FishBizz Business Case . 20 3.1 Introduction . 20 3.1.1 ebXML Common Business Processes(CBP): 21 3.1.2 How does ebXML meet the eBusiness requirements? . 23 3.2 Key Elements of the Advanced Business Case 26 3.2.1 E-business Infrastructure 26 3.2.2 Actors Food Business Operators

15、 29 3.2.3 Benefit Factors 35 3.2.4 Expected Dis-benefits 43 3.2.5 Timescales . 44 3.2.6 Costs 44 3.2.7 Investment appraisal 44 3.2.8 Major Risks 45 4 GS1 Traceability Standards including EPC . 47 4.1 Background . 47 4.2 GS1 Standards for FishBizz Traceability . 49 4.2.1 GS1 Global Traceability Stand

16、ard (GTS) 51 4.2.2 Technical Standard Sets for Traceability Solutions 52 4.3 GS1 EPC Standards for Traceability . 64 4.3.1 EPC Architectural Foundations . 64 4.3.2 EPCIS for Traceability 70 4.3.3 EPCIS Pilot Learnings 71 4.3.4 Other Traceability Systems in Place . 75 4.3.5 EPCIS Implementation steps

17、 for SMEs 75 5 FishBizz and ebXML . 77 5.1 Background and Context . 77 5.2 ebXML Standards 78 5.2.1 Business Process . 78 5.2.2 Message Service Specification . 78 5.2.3 Collaboration Protocol Profiles and Agreements . 80 5.2.4 Core Components Technical Specification . 81 5.2.5 Registry and Repositor

18、y 83 5.3 ebXML Related Standards . 83 5.3.1 UN/CEFACT Modelling Methodology 83 5.3.2 UN/CEFACT Core Components Library . 84 5.3.3 Naming and Design Rules for XML . 84 5.3.4 UN/CEFACT XML. 84 5.3.5 ebCore Party Identification 85 5.4 Related e-Business Standards 85 5.4.1 UBL . 85 5.4.2 GS1 eCom 85 5.4

19、.3 OAGIS 86 5.4.4 CEN BII and BDX . 86 5.5 Deploying ebXML 86 DIN CWA 16597 (DIN SPEC 91313):2013-08 CWA 16597:2013 (E) 3 5.5.1 ebXML discovery and retrieval 86 5.5.2 Other deployment scenarios 87 6 Traceability Information in e-Business XML Document Standards . 88 6.1 Early Work on ebXML for Tracea

20、bility Information Exchange 88 6.1.1 Data Modelling and ebXML for Supply Chain Traceability 88 6.1.2 TraceCore XML 89 6.1.3 UN/CEFACT Agriculture PDA . 91 6.2 UBL 2.0 . 92 6.3 UN/CEFACT XML . 94 6.4 GS1 eCom XML 98 6.5 Section Summary 100 7 Seafood Industry B2B Traceability Requirements . 101 7.1 Fo

21、od Business Operator Information 101 7.1.1 Business and Establishment Identifier . 101 7.1.2 GMP Certification 102 7.2 Traceable Unit Information . 102 7.2.1 Unit Identity 103 7.2.2 Source. 105 7.2.3 Destination . 106 7.2.4 Control Checks on Received Items . 107 7.2.5 Transformation Relations . 108

22、7.2.6 Description . 108 7.2.7 Production History 112 7.2.8 Section Summary 115 8 Regulatory Requirements . 117 8.1 Global level . 117 8.2 Regional level . 118 8.2.1 Europe . 118 8.2.2 USA 126 9 Key Traceability Data requirements for the Business Actors 129 9.1 Fish Supply Chain Process 129 9.2 Criti

23、cal Tracking Events 129 9.3 Distributed EPCIS Architecture: 131 9.4 Cumulative Data Elements required per Business Actor 132 9.4.1 Fishing Vessel . 133 9.4.2 Vessel landing Business and Auction 134 9.4.3 Fish feed production . 135 9.4.4 Breeders . 136 9.4.5 Hatcheries 136 9.4.6 Fish Farms . 137 9.4.

24、7 Live Fish transporters . 138 9.4.8 Processors . 139 9.4.9 Transporters and Storers . 140 9.4.10 Trader or Wholesaler . 141 9.4.11 Retailer or Caterer . 142 9.4.12 Supplies from outside Domain 142 10 UN/CEFACT XML Profiling and Extensions for Traceability . 144 10.1 Introduction 144 10.2 Extensions

25、 and Profiling for the XML Schema Library . 144 10.2.1 Trade Products 144 10.2.2 Supply Chain Events . 147 10.3 EPCIS Interoperability . 149 10.3.1 UN/CEFACT XML and EPCIS 149 10.3.2 Extensibility . 150 10.4 Traceability Business Transactions 150 10.4.1 Advise Despatch 150 10.4.2 Advise Receipt . 15

26、1 DIN CWA 16597 (DIN SPEC 91313):2013-08 CWA 16597:2013 (E) 4 10.4.3 Request Trace . 151 10.4.4 Notify Trace . 152 10.5 Traceability Business Documents 153 10.5.1 Despatch Advice . 153 10.5.2 Trace Request . 153 10.5.3 Trace Document 154 11 Exchanging FishBizz Business Documents 156 11.1 Introductio

27、n . 156 11.2 Using AS4 to Exchange UN/CEFACT Messages . 156 11.3 Sample AS4 Message . 157 12 Usage of ebXML and EPCIS in Business Case 163 12.1 Measuring costs 163 12.2 The Cost-Benefit Assessment . 163 13 Training 165 13.1 eBusiness infrastructure . 165 13.2 Training Needs Analysis 166 13.2.1 Organ

28、izational Level . 166 13.2.2 Team/Department Level . 166 13.2.3 Individual Level . 167 13.3 Methods of Meeting Learning Needs 167 13.4 Audiences 167 13.4.1 Non-technical audience . 167 13.4.2 Technical audience . 168 13.4.3 Solution provider and IT integration audience 168 Annex A Document History 1

29、69 Annex B List of Figures. 171 Annex C List of Tables 174 Annex D Cumulative Data Elements required per Business Actor 175 DIN CWA 16597 (DIN SPEC 91313):2013-08 CWA 16597:2013 (E) 5 Foreword This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested pa

30、rties on 2012-12-07, the constitution of which was supported by CEN following the public call for participation made on 2011-02-07. This CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA) has been prepared by the CEN Workshop Integration of standards for Traceability and Sale of Seafood Products (FishBizz). More informat

31、ion on the workshop is available from: http:/www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/Sectors/ISSS/Workshops/Pages/FishBizz.aspx The individuals and organizations which supported the technical consensus represented by the CEN Workshop Agreement are: Z. Patkai (Zoltan Patkai Consultant) P. van der Eijk (Sonnenglanz Co

32、nsulting) M. Mitic (European Traceability Institute) H. Qian (Shandong Institute of Standardization) C. Udomwongsa (FXA Company Limited) Per Ole Johansen (Client Computing Germany GmbH) Svein Tore Johnsen (Collbiz International AS Contributors include: Svein-Tore Johnsen Miodrag Mitic Zoltan Patkai

33、Pim van der Eijk The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of the CEN Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre can be held accountable for the technical content of the CEN Wo

34、rkshop Agreement or possible conflict with standards or legislation. This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its members. The final review/endorsement round for this CWA was started on 2012-10-06 and was successfully closed on 2012-12-07.T

35、he final text of this CWA was submitted to CEN for publication on 2013-02-19. This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference document from the National Members of The following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former

36、 Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Comments or suggestions from the users of t

37、he CEN Workshop Agreement are welcome and should be addressed to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre. DIN CWA 16597 (DIN SPEC 91313):2013-08 CWA 16597:2013 (E) 6 Executive Summary The reform of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) aims to provide a stable, secure and healthy food supply. Sustainability i

38、s at the heart of the proposed reform. Fishing sustainably means fishing at levels that do not endanger the reproduction of stocks and that provide high long-term yields. This requires managing the volume of fish taken out of the sea through fishing. At the same time, an improved framework for aquac

39、ulture is expected to increase production and supply of seafood. To enforce the CFP rules, a control system is designed to ensure that fish products can be traced back and checked throughout the supply chain. Checks are carried out at every point in the chain from the boat to the retailer: in ports

40、where fish is landed or trans-shipped, during transport, in factories that process fish and at markets where fish is sold. At every point along the chain, for every consignment of fish, information shall be provided that proves that it was caught legally. The CFP rules require that all fish products

41、 are traceable to their source. To achieve traceability throughout the fish product supply chain, various tracking and tracing methodologies and technologies shall be integrated in the operational business processes carried out by the different actors along the chain. As a result, different traceabi

42、lity systems shall have the ability to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged. Traceability systems by the different actors along the chain shall be interoperable to guarantee fast, accurate and cost-effective exchange of information. Standardization is a common appr

43、oach towards achieving interoperability. There is also a wide range of technologies, ranging from simple to advanced IT systems, and from open source to closed source commercial systems, which can support a standard. The challenge lies in the fact that there is often more than one standard available

44、 and used by the actors along the supply chain. Some standards have a narrow point-to-point profile aimed at achieving, so called, “one-up/one-down“ traceability with immediate trade partner systems. Other standards are either focused on establishing a “chain-of-custody“ system via a central reposit

45、ory maintained by a third party, or focused on “traceability networks“ that are based on registries that enable traceability data search along the fish product supply chain. The FishBizz project team reviewed various CEN, ISO, UN/CEFACT, OASIS and GS1/EPC standards used for electronic commerce in th

46、e seafood sector. These range from standards at data component level and standards aimed at general principles for designing a traceability system, trough standards that specify how electronic transactions should be executed and standards for business collaboration, including end-to-end supply chain

47、 visibility. The aim is to leverage multiple complementary standards rather than picking one isolated standard that may be strong in some areas, but weak in others. This will enable broader, more integrated traceability functionalities and enable lower cost implementations. The outcome of the work c

48、onducted so far is a Draft of a CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA). It specifies the data elements drawn from the work conducted under ISO TC 234, current regulatory and industry requirements, and the profiling and extensions to the UN/CEFACT reusable aggregate XML schema module to support traceability an

49、d e-business requirements. The interoperable solution outlined in the Draft CWA supports the critical traceability and e-business business processes, which are: 1. Advising the dispatch and receipt of products in accordance with the UN/CEFACT Business Requirement Specification for the Cross Industry Despatch and Receipt process (UN/CEFACT XML Despatch Advice). (The UN/CEFACT XML Receipt Advice yet has to be defined by UN/CEFACT) 2. Initiating and responding to a traceability request in accordance with the GS1 Global Traceability Stand