EN 61298-4-2008 en Process measurement and control devices - General methods and procedures for evaluating performance - Part 4 Evaluation report content《过程测量和控制装置 性能评定用一般方法和程序 第4部.pdf

1、raising standards worldwideNO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAWBSI British StandardsWB9423_BSI_StandardColCov_noK_AW:BSI FRONT COVERS 5/9/08 12:55 Page 1Process measurement andcontrol devices Generalmethods and procedures forevaluating performance Part 4: Evaluation

2、 report contentBS EN 61298-4:2008National forewordThis British Standard is the UK implementation of EN 61298-4:2008. It isidentical to IEC 61298-4:2008. It supersedes BS EN 61298-4:1996 which iswithdrawn.The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted by Technical CommitteeGEL/65, Measurement

3、and control, to Subcommittee GEL/65/2, Elements ofsystems.A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained onrequest to its secretary.This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions of acontract. Users are responsible for its correct application. BSI 20

4、09ISBN 978 0 580 55956 3ICS 25.040.40Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity fromlegal obligations.This British Standard was published under the authority of the StandardsPolicy and Strategy Committee on 31 October 2009Amendments issued since publicationAmd. No. Date Text affectedB

5、RITISH STANDARDBS EN 61298-4:2008EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 61298-4 NORME EUROPENNE EUROPISCHE NORM November 2008 CENELEC European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization Comit Europen de Normalisation Electrotechnique Europisches Komitee fr Elektrotechnische Normung Central Secretariat: rue de Sta

6、ssart 35, B - 1050 Brussels 2008 CENELEC - All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CENELEC members. Ref. No. EN 61298-4:2008 E ICS 25.040.40 Supersedes EN 61298-4:1995English version Process measurement and control devices - General methods and procedures for e

7、valuating performance - Part 4: Evaluation report content (IEC 61298-4:2008) Dispositifs de mesure et de commande de processus - Mthodes et procdures gnrales dvaluation des performances - Partie 4: Contenu du rapport dvaluation (CEI 61298-4:2008) Prozessmess-, -steuer- und -regelgerte - Allgemeine M

8、ethoden und Verfahren fr die Bewertung des Betriebsverhaltens - Teil 4: Inhalt des Bewertungsberichtes (IEC 61298-4:2008) This European Standard was approved by CENELEC on 2008-11-01. CENELEC members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giv

9、ing this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the Central Secretariat or to any CENELEC member. This European Standard exists in three official

10、versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CENELEC member into its own language and notified to the Central Secretariat has the same status as the official versions. CENELEC members are the national electrotechnical committee

11、s of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United K

12、ingdom. BS EN 61298-4:2008EN 61298-4:2008 - 2 - Foreword The text of document 65B/688/FDIS, future edition 2 of IEC 61298-4, prepared by SC 65B, Devices any particular method or procedure, not covered by this standard, should be developed and specified in the new standard in accordance with the crit

13、eria, as far as they are applicable, stated in this standard; any conceptual or significant deviation from the content of this standard, should be clearly identified and justified if introduced in a new standard. BS EN 61298-4:2008 6 61298-4 IEC:2008 PROCESS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL DEVICES GENERAL M

14、ETHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING PERFORMANCE Part 4: Evaluation report content 1 Scope This part of IEC 61298 specifies general methods and procedures for conducting tests, and reporting on the functional and performance characteristics of process measurement and control devices. The tests are a

15、pplicable to any such devices characterized by their own specific input and output variables, and by the specific relationship (transfer function) between the inputs and outputs, and include analogue and digital devices. For devices that require special tests, this standard should be used, together

16、with any product specific standard specifying special tests. This standard specifies the content of the written report on the evaluation or tests on a process measurement or control device, and the results obtained. It specifies the major items which should be included in the evaluation report, but

17、it does not specify the exact format in which the contents should be presented. (This is left to the discretion of the test laboratory which prepares and issues the report.) 2 Normative references The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated re

18、ferences, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. IEC 60050 (all parts), International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) IEC 60050-300, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) Electrical and ele

19、ctronic measurements and measuring instruments (composed of Part 311, 312, 313 and 314) IEC 60050-351, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) Part 351 : Control technology 3 General considerations 3.1 Report coverage One report shall refer to one evaluation on a subject device. If a second

20、evaluation is made on the same device, then a separately numbered report shall be issued. 3.2 Report binding Each copy of the report shall be bound with covers, so that the pages cannot become separated. No particular method of binding together the pages of the report is specified. This is left to t

21、he discretion of the test laboratory issuing the report. BS EN 61298-4:200861298-4 IEC:2008 7 3.3 Page numbering Each page of the report shall be identified with a unique, sequential page number. It is a convention to regard the first page of text in the report as page 1, with subsequent pages numbe

22、red sequentially. Page numbers shall be shown in the format “Page x of y“ , where x is the specific page number and y is the number of the last page of the report. The report number should be given also. If a separate title page is placed at the front of the report, this is not usually included in t

23、he page numbering sequence. 3.4 Draft and final reports It is sometimes desirable and advantageous to issue a preliminary, draft version of an evaluation report for comment prior to the issue of a formal, final version of the report. Each page of draft reports shall be clearly identified as such, bu

24、t need not be presented or bound exactly as the subsequent final report. 3.5 Abridged reports At the discretion of the issuing authority, or the test laboratory, an abridged version of the report may be issued, complementary to the full report. If an abridged report is issued, it shall always includ

25、e at least the introduction, major findings, and manufacturers comments, exactly as presented in the full report. 3.6 Units SI units should be used throughout the report. When other units need to be used, the SI equivalent should be given in brackets alongside. 4 Report title Each report title shall

26、 give all the following information: report number; date of issue; manufacturers name, and country of manufacture; instrument type; model name or number. The report number shall be a unique number, one of a series, which refers only to one report of one evaluation, or possibly a series of evaluation

27、s. The manufacturers name shall be the full name of the manufacturer company at the time when the instrument was supplied for evaluation. Any changes in name during the period of evaluation should be indicated in the introduction of the report. The country of manufacture shall be where the device wa

28、s finally assembled into a complete instrument. This may not be the same as the country from which the instrument was supplied for evaluation. The correct status may need to be confirmed by the author of the report. The instrument type shall be a brief, general description of function, application d

29、etails and size or range. BS EN 61298-4:2008 8 61298-4 IEC:2008 Any further details about the equipment itself, or the range of tests applied, should be described in the introduction of the report. 5 Preliminary pages 5.1 Title page This page shall include the full report title, as specified in Clau

30、se 4, plus the name of the test laboratory and the names(s) of the author(s). The report shall identify the sponsor of the evaluation and any information regarding the use of any proprietary information contained. Additional information about the laboratory compiling the report may be provided on th

31、is page at the discretion of the laboratory. This page is not usually numbered. 5.2 Contents page This page is not included in the sequence of page numbers for the text of the report. 5.3 Photograph of the equipment tested This shall always be shown in Figure 1. It should preferably appear facing pa

32、ge 1 of the report. It should be a photograph of the equipment actually tested with the covers on, three-quarter front view, if this is possible. If a photograph of the same type of equipment, provided by the manufacturer, is used, this should be stated. A scale, or some other means to indicate the

33、size of the equipment, shall be included in Figure 1. 6 First page of report This page shall always contain the heading to the report and the introduction. It may also contain the first part of the “Major findings and comments“ clause. The heading to the report shall always contain at least the foll

34、owing information: title of the report (including manufacturers name, type of device and model); author(s) names(s) and professional qualifications; name of evaluation laboratory; project number; sponsor(s) of the project; report number; date (month and year) of issue of the final report. 7 Report i

35、ntroduction The introduction should not cover more than one page. The paragraphs indicated below should be included in this clause, using the standard wording shown in italic print, wherever relevant. BS EN 61298-4:200861298-4 IEC:2008 9 Paragraph 1 “This report describes the evaluation of a. (instr

36、ument and model) manufactured by. (manufacturers name). The instrument was a. (standard production/prototype/etc. model) manufactured in. (country of manufacture)“. Paragraph 2 “The instrument was evaluated to a test programme drawn up by. (laboratory or sponsor) based on. (quote briefly the main re

37、levant standards do not give full references here these will be given in subclause 14.1)“. Paragraph 3 Functional purpose of instrument tested. Give also, as appropriate, input span, output span, range, and whether adjustable or not. Paragraph 4 The manufacturers quoted indication of general perform

38、ance. Paragraph 5 A brief description of the principle of operation. Paragraph 6 Primary application, intended environment, ancillary equipment, options available, special features, etc., power supply required, safety status (whether approved or not for use in flammable atmospheres). Paragraph 7 “Th

39、e equipment was delivered on. and was evaluated over a period of. weeks/months from. (commencement date) until. (date of completion of tests).“ If this period is unduly protracted the reason(s) for the delays should be briefly stated. 8 Major findings and comments Two sentences similar to the follow

40、ing examples shall appear immediately under the title. “These findings are summarized here for ready reference, and to give an overview of the evaluation. For a complete assessment of the instrument, the report shall be read and considered as a whole.“ “All errors and changes are expressed as a perc

41、entage of output span unless otherwise stated.“ This clause should summarize and comment on the most significant findings from the evaluation. The comments should be brief and concise, and, for example, may be grouped under the following headings. Manufacturers performance specifications Briefly com

42、ment if the manufacturers specifications are not comprehensive. Satisfactory performance features State all the tests in which the results were satisfactory and within the manufacturers relevant specification. If required, a summary of the results may be given. Performance outside specification Stat

43、e all the tests in which the results were not satisfactory, or outside the manufacturers specification. A summary of the results should be given. BS EN 61298-4:2008 10 61298-4 IEC:2008 Aspects of unspecified performance Summarize the results of tests for which there was no manufacturers specificatio

44、n. Unexpected events Unexpected events observed during the evaluation, such as a fault, and the action taken, should be reported here. More detailed reference to this should be given in Clause 10. Give brief details of any repairs carried out, by whom, and how quickly. If essential, a detailed descr

45、iption can be included as an annex to the report. Construction and maintenance Give brief comments on the quality of materials, construction, workmanship, finishes, etc. State any production faults found during initial visual inspection, and during testing. If possible, state whether components were

46、 of assessed quality, and whether finishes stood up to humidity testing, corrosion testing, drop or shock testing, and ordinary handling. If appropriate, comment on any potential difficulties for maintenance. Installation State the method of installation and give any comments on the likely ease or d

47、ifficulties and state the time likely to be taken. Commissioning Report whether or not any commissioning was necessary and, if so, the time taken, who did it and how easy it was, or whether any difficulties were experienced. Safety State the operator safety aspects (covers over live terminals, inter

48、locks on doors, etc.). This paragraph should only be included when there is an unsafe feature to report. Packaging Comment on the adequacy, or otherwise, of the packaging for shipment. This paragraph should be included only when there is some deficiency to report. Comments on documentation Comment o

49、n the quality, adequacy and ease of use of the handbooks, manuals, spare parts list and other printed data and literature supplied automatically by the manufacturer, or on the request of the test laboratory. State the language in which the manuals are written and whether they are available in any other language. 9 Manufacturers comments When an evaluation report is to be distributed to organizations other than the manufacturer, the manufacturer should