ETSI TS 103 463-2017 Access Terminals Transmission and Multiplexing (ATTM) Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Digital Multiservice Cities (V1 1 1).pdf

1、 ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07) Access, Terminals, Transmission and Multiplexing (ATTM); Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Digital Multiservice Cities TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07)2 Reference DTS/ATTMSDMC-1 Keywords KPI, smart grid, smart meter, sustainabil

2、ity ETSI 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16 Siret N 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C Association but non lucratif enregistre la Sous-Prfecture de Grasse (06) N 7803/88 Important notice The present document can be downloaded from

3、: http:/www.etsi.org/standards-search The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electronic and/or print versions of the present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any existing or perce

4、ived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the only prevailing document is the print of the Portable Document Format (PDF) version kept on a specific network drive within ETSI Secretariat. Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revis

5、ion or change of status. Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at https:/portal.etsi.org/TB/ETSIDeliverableStatus.aspx If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services: https:/portal.etsi.org/People/Commit

6、eeSupportStaff.aspx Copyright Notification No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm except as authorized by written permission of ETSI. The content of the PDF version shall not be modified without the written au

7、thorization of ETSI. The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media. ETSI 2017. All rights reserved. DECTTM, PLUGTESTSTM, UMTSTMand the ETSI logo are trademarks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members. 3GPPTM and LTE are trademarks of ETSI registered for th

8、e benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners. oneM2M logo is protected for the benefit of its Members. GSM and the GSM logo are trademarks registered and owned by the GSM Association. ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07)3 Contents Intellectual Property Rights 5g3Foreword . 5g3Mo

9、dal verbs terminology 5g3Executive summary 5g3Introduction 6g31 Scope 7g32 References 7g32.1 Normative references . 7g32.2 Informative references 7g33 Definitions and abbreviations . 8g33.1 Definitions 8g33.2 Abbreviations . 8g34 Indicators for smart cities . 9g34.1 Generalities. 9g34.2 People . 10g

10、34.2.1 Health 10g34.2.2 Safety 10g34.2.3 Access to (other) services . 10g34.2.4 Education 11g34.2.5 Diversity and social cohesion . 11g34.2.6 Quality of housing and the built environment. 11g34.3 Planet 11g34.3.1 Energy and mitigation . 11g34.3.2 Materials, water, land 12g34.3.3 Climate resilience .

11、 12g34.3.4 Pollution and waste . 12g34.3.5 Ecosystem . 12g34.4 Prosperity . 13g34.4.1 Employment 13g34.4.2 Equity 13g34.4.3 Green economy . 13g34.4.4 Economic performance . 13g34.4.5 Innovation . 13g34.4.6 Attractiveness and competitiveness 14g34.5 Governance. 14g34.5.1 Organization . 14g34.5.2 Comm

12、unity involvement 14g34.5.3 Multilevel governance 14g34.6 Conclusions 15g3Annex A (informative): Description of the city indicators 16g3A.1 People . 16g3A.1.1 Health . 16g3A.1.2 Safety 17g3A.1.3 Access to (other) services . 18g3A.1.4 Education 19g3A.1.5 Diversity and social cohesion . 19g3A.2 Planet

13、 20g3A.2.1 Energy and mitigation 20g3A.2.2 Materials, water, land . 21g3A.2.3 Climate resilience . 26g3A.2.4 Pollution and waste 28g3ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07)4 A.2.5 Ecosystem. 34g3A.3 Prosperity . 36g3A.3.1 Employment . 36g3A.3.2 Equity . 38g3A.3.3 Green economy 40g3A.3.4 Economic perfo

14、rmance . 43g3A.3.5 Innovation. 45g3A.3.6 Attractiveness and competitiveness 49g3A.4 Governance . 53g3A.4.1 Organization . 53g3A.4.2 Community involvement 57g3A.4.3 Multi-level governance . 60g3History 62g3ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07)5 Intellectual Property Rights Essential patents IPRs esse

15、ntial or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available for ETSI members and non-members, and can be found in ETSI SR 000 314: “Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentia

16、lly Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in respect of ETSI standards“, which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web server (https:/ipr.etsi.org/). Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No gu

17、arantee can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web server) which are, or may be, or may become, essential to the present document. Trademarks The present document may include trademarks and/or tradenames which are asserted and/or

18、registered by their owners. ETSI claims no ownership of these except for any which are indicated as being the property of ETSI, and conveys no right to use or reproduce any trademark and/or tradename. Mention of those trademarks in the present document does not constitute an endorsement by ETSI of p

19、roducts, services or organizations associated with those trademarks. Foreword This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI Technical Committee Access, Terminals, Transmission and Multiplexing (ATTM). Modal verbs terminology In the present document “shall“, “shall not“, “should“, “shou

20、ld not“, “may“, “need not“, “will“, “will not“, “can“ and “cannot“ are to be interpreted as described in clause 3.2 of the ETSI Drafting Rules (Verbal forms for the expression of provisions). “must“ and “must not“ are NOT allowed in ETSI deliverables except when used in direct citation. Executive su

21、mmary The present document describes the selection of indicators for assessing indicators on city level. Starting from the definition of a smart city, indicators have been selected that can function as Key Performance Indicators for tracking the progress towards city objectives. The indicators for s

22、mart cities focus on monitoring the evolution of a city towards an even smarter city. The time component -“development over the years“- is an important feature. The city indicators may be used to show to what extent overall policy goals have been reached, or are within reach. With a starting point i

23、n the smart city definition, and taking into account the wishes of cities and citizens with regard to smart city indicators, the indicators are arranged in an extended triple bottom line sustainability framework, including the themes people, planet, prosperity, governance and propagation, and comple

24、ted with specific smart city indicators. Under the main themes subthemes conforming to major policy ambitions have been identified. Under these subthemes in total 73 city indicators have been selected. The selection has been based on an inventory of 43 existing indicator frameworks for cities indica

25、tors. The majority of the indicators in the ICT users selection have been derived from existing indicator frameworks. New indicators have been suggested to fill gaps in existing frameworks. Annex A of the present document presents the selection of indicators for ICT users. ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.

26、1 (2017-07)6 Introduction ICT users aim to speed up the transition to low carbon, resource-efficient cities by facilitating and enabling stakeholders in smart cities to learn from each other, create trust in solutions, and monitor progress, by means of a common performance measurement framework. The

27、 ultimate goal is to support the wide-scale deployment of smart city solutions and services in order to create impact on major societal challenges related to the cities fast growth and the Unions 20/20/20 energy and climate targets. The expected benefits for different stakeholders can be summarized

28、as follows: Cities will benefit from the ICT users results as they support their strategic planning and allow measuring their progress towards smart city goals. In addition, benefits are created from the enhanced collaboration within and between cities, providing the possibility to compare solutions

29、 and to find best practices. Policy makers will benefit from the indicators that help to set policy targets and monitor their achievement. ICT users KPI frameworks sub-themes are formulated as policy goals and thereby the use of the indicators and therefore the indicators are especially useful to fo

30、llow progress towards policy goals. Solution providers will benefit from better insight into business opportunities for their products and services, and into the possibilities for replication in a different city or context. Industrial stakeholders will benefit from the recommendations for new busine

31、ss, e.g. based on open data. Citizens will benefit from the indicators as they may help to get a better understanding of complex projects and their impacts. All these opportunities should bring environmental benefits such as reduction of CO2 emissions, increased energy efficiency, increased share of

32、 renewables, as well as improve the quality of life through better mobility, better communication between local authorities and their citizens, empowerment of citizens (i.e. smart citizens). For the development of the performance measurement framework, ICT users are building on existing smart city a

33、nd sustainable city indicator systems. The bases of the ICT users indicator framework (Based on CITYkeys deliverable 1.4 i.1) are the traditional sustainability impact categories People, Prosperity and Planet, but the performance measurement framework includes specific smart city KPIs that go beyond

34、 the traditional categories in showing not only the impact but also indices of the success factors for smart city endeavours and the suitability for dissemination to other cities and circumstances. The transparent and flexible ICT Users performance measurement framework will be able to handle differ

35、ent sizes of cities in different smart city development stages and thereby support different development strategies of smart cities and -initiatives over a wide range of characteristics. ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07)7 1 Scope The present document defines indicators (KPIs) for Smart Cities ex

36、pressing city level in terms of People, Planet, Prosperity, Governance and Propagation. 2 References 2.1 Normative references References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or non-specific. For specific references, only the cited version ap

37、plies. For non-specific references, the latest version of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. Referenced documents which are not found to be publicly available in the expected location might be found at https:/docbox.etsi.org/Reference/. NOTE: While any hyperlinks included in

38、 this clause were valid at the time of publication, ETSI cannot guarantee their long term validity. The following referenced documents are necessary for the application of the present document. 1 Recommendation ITU-T L.1440: “Methodology for environmental impact assessment of information and communi

39、cation technologies at city level“. 2 Recommendation ITU-T L.1430: “Methodology for assessment of the environmental impact of information and communication technology greenhouse gas and energy projects“. 3 ISO 1996-2:1987: “Describes methods for measuring and describing noise of the environment rele

40、vant to a specified area, existing or planned. Does not give guidance on the estimation of the overall uncertainty of the results. Noes not specify noise limits“. 4 ISO 37120:2014: “Sustainable development of communities - Indicators for city services and quality of life“. 2.2 Informative references

41、 References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or non-specific. For specific references, only the cited version applies. For non-specific references, the latest version of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. NOTE: W

42、hile any hyperlinks included in this clause were valid at the time of publication, ETSI cannot guarantee their long term validity. The following referenced documents are not necessary for the application of the present document but they assist the user with regard to a particular subject area. i.1 E

43、uropean project CITYkeys deliverable D1.4: “D1.4-CITYkeys-D14-Smart-City-KPIs-Final-20160201“. NOTE: Available at http:/citykeys-project.eu/citykeys/resources/general/download/CITYkeys-D1-4-Smart-City-smart-project-KPIs-and-related-methodology-final-WSWE-A7LN3E. i.2 ETSI GS OEU 019: “Operational ene

44、rgy Efficiency for Users (OEU); KPIs for Smart Cities“. i.3 ITU, 2014: “Key performance indicators (KPIs) definitions for smart sustainable cities“. ITU focus group on smart sustainable cities. i.4 ISO 14000 series: “Environmental management“. ETSI ETSI TS 103 463 V1.1.1 (2017-07)8 i.5 OECD Frascati

45、 Manual 2002. NOTE: Available at http:/www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/frascati-manual-2002_9789264199040-en. i.6 Eurostat Urban audit (urb) Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS). NOTE: Available at http:/ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/urb_esms.htm. i.7 Euro

46、pean Environment Agency Urban Atlas. NOTE: Available at http:/www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/urban-atlas. i.8 Department of Energy train, tram, subway, bus, etc. Definition Share of population with access to a public transport stop within 500 m. Calculation (Number of inhabitants with a transp

47、ortation stop 500 m / total population) 100 %. See note. Strengths and weaknesses Strengths: The indicator provides an absolute measure for the ease of access of public transportation. Weaknesses: Considering purely the geographical catchment areas as absolute measure, may exclude other important in

48、formation with regards to (the quality of) mobility (e.g. attractive frequencies, comfort, reliability of services, and intermodal integration are the main characteristics of service quality). Access to sustainable modes of transport does not necessarily guarantee use. Transport mode choices have be

49、en linked to other factors besides accessibility, including perceptions of convenience, practicality, safety, comfort, individuality and cost (1). By looking singularly at the residential location of inhabitants as the source for % calculation, only the source location of movement is being taken into account, but not the main destinations. Thus the outcome may contain distortions in regards to the true situation concerning the accessibility of public transport. Data requirements Expected data source It might be possible to use city