GOST R ISO 7029-2011 Acoustics Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age《声学 听阈和年龄函数关系的统计分布》.pdf

1、 70292011 ISO 7029:2000Acoustics Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age(IDT) 27 2002 . 184- , 1.02004 . 1 - ( ) , 42 358 3 16 2011 . 552-4 7029:2000 . - (ISO 7029:2000Acoustics Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age)5 , - . () . - , , 2012 ,

2、- - II 70292011, , . , . 18 , , , , . , - , , , - . , . , - . , , , , , .III 70292011 Acoustics.Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age 201212011 . 125 8000 18 70 :a) - 18 ;b) . , . , - , . , - 1999. , - . - , , , , . , , - , ( 389-1, 8253-1, 8253-2, 60645-1), - :a) 18 ;b

3、) , 389. 18 , .2 :2.1 (otologically normal person): - , , - , .1 70292011 , , . - ( , ).2.2 c68 (hearing threshold deviation): - 18 .3 3.1 Y (. 3.2) - (. 3.3).3.2 c68Hmd, Y, , c68Hmd, Y= c97 (Y 18)2. (1) c97 1. (1) Y 1870. 1 c97, c97, /2 125 0,0030 0,0030250 0,0030 0,0030500 0,0035 0,00351000 0,0040

4、 0,00401500 0,0055 0,00502000 0,0070 0,00603000 0,0115 0,00754000 0,0160 0,00906000 0,0180 0,01208000 0,0220 0,01503.3 - , su sl - :su= bu+ 0,445 c68Hmd, Y, (2)sl= bl+ 0,3566 c68Hmd, Y, (3) bu bl 2.2 70292011 2 bu bl, bu, bl, 125 7,23 6,67 5,78 5,34250 6,67 6,12 5,34 4,89500 6,12 6,12 4,89 4,891000

5、6,12 6,12 4,89 4,891500 6,67 6,67 5,34 5,342000 7,23 6,67 5,78 5,343000 7,78 7,23 6,23 5,784000 8,34 7,78 6,67 6,236000 9,45 8,90 7,56 7,128000 10,56 10,56 8,45 8,453.4 c68HQ, Y, Q - Y , :c68HQ, Y= c68Hmd, Y+ ksu, (4)c68HQ, Y= c68Hmd, Y ksl. (5) (4) , 0,05c163 Q c163 0,50, (5) 0,50 80986229530511200

6、26122132681422344812142131456280002030405060701195110226321124400311233960711213658801419304975801110734116406142502715274171017274260141725385577) . 25 .7 70292011 , *, , 3. - 22.1 ISO 389-1:1998, Acoustics Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment Part 1: Referenceequivalent thre

7、shold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones2 ISO 389-2:1994, Acoustics Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment Part 2: Referenceequivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and insert earphones3 ISO 389-3:1994, Acoustics Reference zero for th

8、e calibration of audiometric equipment Part 3: Referenceequivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators4 ISO 389-7:1996, Acoustics Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment Part 7: Referencethreshold of hearing under free-field listening conditions5 ISO 1999:199

9、0, Acoustics Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-inducedhearing impairment6 ISO 8253-1:1989, Acoustics Audiometric test methods Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conductionthreshold audiometry7 ISO 8253-2:1992, Acoustics Audiometric test methods Part 2: Sound fiel

10、d audiometry with pure tone andnarrow-band test signals8 IEC 60645-1:1992, Audiometers Part 1: Pure-tone audiometers9 BEASLEY, W.C. The national health survey, 19351936. US Public Health Service, 193810 BERGER, E.H., ROYSTER, L.H. and THOMAS, W.G. Hearing levels of non-industrial exposed subjects. J

11、.Occup. Med., 19, 1977, pp. 66467011* CORSO, J.F. Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. Arch. Otolaryngol., 77, 1963, pp. 38540512* GLORIG, A. and NIXON, J. Hearing loss as a function of age. Laryngoscope, 72, 1962, pp. 1596161013 GLORIG, A. and ROBERTS, J. Hearing levels of adults by age

12、 and sex, United States 19601962. NationalCenter for Health Statistics, Series 11, Number 11, 1965. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC14 GLORIG, A., WHEELER, D., QUIGGLE, R., GRINGS, W. and SUMMERFIELD, A. 1954 Wisconsin State Fairhearing survey: Statistical treatment of clinical and audio

13、metric data, 1957. American Academy ofOphthalmology and Otolaryngology, Los Angeles15* HINCHCLIFFE, R. The threshold of hearing as a function of age. Acustica, 9, 1959, pp. 30330816* HINCHCLIFFE, R. and JONES, W.I. Hearing levels of a suburban Jamaican population. Int. Audiol., 7, 1968,pp. 23925817*

14、 JATHO, K. and HECK, K.H. Schwellenaudiometrische Untersuchungen c104ber die Progredienz und Charakteristikder Altersschwerhc96rigkeit in den verschiedenen Lebensabschnitten (zugleich ein Betrag zur Pathogenese derPresbyakusis). Zeitschr. Laryng.-Rhinol.-Otol., 38, 1959, pp. 728818 JOHNSON, D.L. Der

15、ivation of presbycusis and permanent noise induced threshold shift (NIPTS) to be used forthe basis of a standard on the effects of noise on hearing. AMRL-TR-78-128, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base,Ohio, USA, 197819* KELL, R.L., PEARSON, J.C.G. and TAYLOR, W. Hearing thresholds of an island populatio

16、n in North Scotland.Int. Audiol., 9, 1970, pp. 33434920 MARTIN, R.H., GIBSON, E.S. and LOCKINGTON, J.N. Occupational hearing loss between 85 and 90 dBA. J.Occup. Med., 17, 1975, pp. 131821 PALVA, A. and JOKINEN, K. Presbyacusis: V Filtered speech test. Acta Otolaryng., 70, 1970, pp. 23224122 ROBINSO

17、N, D.W. and DADSON, R.S. A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones. Br. J.Appl. Phys., 7, 1956, pp. 16618123 ROBINSON, D.W, and SUTTON, G.J. Age effect in hearing a comparative analysis of published thresholddata. Audiology, 18, 1979, pp. 32033424* ROCHE, A.F., SIERVOGEL, R.M

18、., HIMES, J.H. and JOHNSON, D.L. Longitudinal study of human hearing: Itsrelationship to noise and other factors. AMRL-TR-76-110, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, USA, 197625 ROSEN, S., BERGMAN, M., PLESTER, D., EL-MOFTY, A. and SATTI, M.H. Presbycusis study of a relativelynoise-free populatio

19、n in the Sudan. Ann. Otol. Rhin. Laryngoscope, 71, 1962, pp. 72774326 SHIPTON, M.S. Tables relating pure-tone audiometric threshold to age. Acoustics Rpt. Ac, 94, 1979, NationalPhysical Laboratory, Teddington, UK27 SPOOR, A. Presbycusis values in relation to noise induced hearing loss. Int. Audiol.,

20、 6, 1967, pp. 485728 SPOOR, A. and PASSCHIER-VERMEER, W. Spread in hearing-levels on non-noise exposed people at variousages. Int. Audiol., 8, 1969, pp. 32833629 STEINBERG, J.C., MONTGOMERY, H.C. and GARDNER, M.B. Results of the Worlds Fair hearing tests. J.Acoust. Soc. Amer., 12, 1940, pp. 29130130

21、 SUTHERLAND, H.C. and GASAWAY, D.C. Current hearing threshold levels for noise-exposed US Air Forcepersonnel one years reportings. SAM-TR-78-39, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, USA,19788 7029201131* TAYLOR, W., PEARSON, J. and NAIR, A. Hearing thresholds of a non-noise-exposed population in Dundee. Br

22、.J. Indust. Med., 24, 1967, pp. 11412232 THIERY, L., PIETRY-VERDY, M.F., DAMONGEOT, A., DERZKO G. and GROSDEMANGE, J.P. c73tude delaudition dune population urbaine non soumise c66 des bruits dorigine professionnelle. Rev. dAcoust., 49, 1979,pp. 10711633 WEBSTER, J.C., HIMES, H.W. and LICHTENSTEIN, M

23、. San Diego County Fair hearing survey. J. Acoust. Soc.Amer., 22, 1950, pp. 47348334 DRISCOLL, D.P. and ROYSTER, L.H. Comparisons between the median haring threshold level for anunscreened black nonindustrial noise exposed population (NINEP) and four presbycusis data bases. AmericanIndustrial Hygien

24、e Association Journal, 45, 1984, pp. 57759935 HINCHCLIFFE, R. A socio-economic factor for hearing? Journal of Audiological Medicine, 3, 1994, pp. 10711236 PARVING, A., BIERING-SORENSON, M., BECH, B., CHRISTENSEN, B. and SORENSON, M.S. Hearing in theelderly 80 years of age: Prevalence of problems and sensitivity. Scandinavian Audiology, 26, 1997, pp. 991089 70292011 534.322.3.08:006.354 13.140 34 :