ISA 95 00 04-2012 Enterprise-Control System Integration Part 4 Objects and attributes for manufacturing operations management integration.pdf

1、 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 Enterprise-Control System Integration Part 4: Objects and attributes for manufacturing operations management integration Approved 27 August 2012 ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 Enterprise-Control System Integration Part 4: Objects and attributes for manufact

2、uring operations management integration ISBN: 978-1-937560-62-1 Copyright 2012 by ISA. All rights reserved. Not for resale. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, m

3、echanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the Publisher. ISA 67 Alexander Drive P. O. Box 12277 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 USA- 3 - ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 Preface This preface, as well as all annexes, is included for information purp

4、oses and is not part of ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012. This document has been prepared as part of the service of ISA toward a goal of uniformity in the field of instrumentation. To be of real value, this document should not be static but should be subject to periodic review. Toward this end, the Society we

5、lcomes all comments and criticisms and asks that they be addressed to the Secretary, Standards and Practices Board; ISA; 67 Alexander Drive; P. O. Box 12277; Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Telephone (919) 549-8411; Fax (919) 549-8288; E-mail: standardsisa.org. The ISA Standards and Practices Depa

6、rtment is aware of the growing need for attention to the metric system of units in general, and the International System of Units (SI) in particular, in the preparation of instrumentation standards. The Department is further aware of the benefits to USA users of ISA standards of incorporating suitab

7、le references to the SI (and the metric system) in their business and professional dealings with other countries. Toward this end, this Department will endeavor to introduce SI-acceptable metric units in all new and revised standards, recommended practices, and technical reports to the greatest exte

8、nt possible. IEEE/ASTM SI 10, American National Standard for Metric Practice, and future revisions, will be the reference guide for definitions, symbols, abbreviations, and conversion factors. It is the policy of ISA to encourage and welcome the participation of all concerned individuals and interes

9、ts in the development of ISA standards, recommended practices, and technical reports. Participation in the ISA standards-making process by an individual in no way constitutes endorsement by the employer of that individual, of ISA, or of any of the standards, recommended practices, and technical repo

10、rts that ISA develops. CAUTION ISA DOES NOT TAKE ANY POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE EXISTENCE OR VALIDITY OF ANY PATENT RIGHTS ASSERTED IN CONNECTION WITH THIS DOCUMENT, AND ISA DISCLAIMS LIABILITY FOR THE INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT RESULTING FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT. USERS ARE ADVISED THAT DETER

11、MINATION OF THE VALIDITY OF ANY PATENT RIGHTS, AND THE RISK OF INFRINGEMENT OF SUCH RIGHTS, IS ENTIRELY THEIR OWN RESPONSIBILITY. PURSUANT TO ISAS PATENT POLICY, ONE OR MORE PATENT HOLDERS OR PATENT APPLICANTS MAY HAVE DISCLOSED PATENTS THAT COULD BE INFRINGED BY USE OF THIS DOCUMENT AND EXECUTED A

12、LETTER OF ASSURANCE COMMITTING TO THE GRANTING OF A LICENSE ON A WORLDWIDE, NON-DISCRIMINATORY BASIS, WITH A FAIR AND REASONABLE ROYALTY RATE AND FAIR AND REASONABLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON SUCH DISCLOSURES AND LETTERS OF ASSURANCE, CONTACT ISA OR VISIT WWW.ISA.ORG/STANDARDSPAT

13、ENTS. OTHER PATENTS OR PATENT CLAIMS MAY EXIST FOR WHICH A DISCLOSURE OR LETTER OF ASSURANCE HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED. ISA IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR IDENTIFYING PATENTS OR PATENT APPLICATIONS FOR WHICH A LICENSE MAY BE REQUIRED, FOR CONDUCTING INQUIRIES INTO THE LEGAL VALIDITY OR SCOPE OF PATENTS, OR DETE

14、RMINING WHETHER ANY LICENSING TERMS OR CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH SUBMISSION OF A LETTER OF ASSURANCE, IF ANY, OR IN ANY LICENSING AGREEMENTS ARE REASONABLE OR NON-DISCRIMINATORY. ISA REQUESTS THAT ANYONE REVIEWING THIS DOCUMENT WHO IS AWARE OF ANY PATENTS THAT MAY IMPACT IMPLEMENTATION

15、OF THE DOCUMENT NOTIFY THE ISA STANDARDS AND PRACTICES DEPARTMENT OF THE PATENT AND ITS OWNER. ADDITIONALLY, THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY INVOLVE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, OPERATIONS OR EQUIPMENT. THE DOCUMENT CANNOT ANTICIPATE ALL POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS OR ADDRESS ALL POSSIBLE SAFETY ISSUES ASSOCIATED WI

16、TH USE IN HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS. THE USER OF THIS DOCUMENT MUST EXERCISE SOUND PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT CONCERNING ITS USE AND APPLICABILITY UNDER THE ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 - 4 - USERS PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. THE USER MUST ALSO CONSIDER THE APPLICABILITY OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL REGULATORY LIMITATIONS AND

17、 ESTABLISHED SAFETY AND HEALTH PRACTICES BEFORE IMPLEMENTING THIS DOCUMENT. THE USER OF THIS DOCUMENT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE IMPACTED BY ELECTRONIC SECURITY ISSUES. THE COMMITTEE HAS NOT YET ADDRESSED THE POTENTIAL ISSUES IN THIS VERSION. - 5 - ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 CONTENTS INTR

18、ODUCTION 13 1 Scope 15 2 Normative references . 15 3 Terms and definitions . 16 3.1 Definitions . 16 3.2 Abbreviations 17 4 Information exchange between manufacturing operations 17 4.1 Activity information exchange network 17 4.2 Information exchange models . 18 5 Object model attributes 19 5.1 Intr

19、oduction . 19 5.2 Attribute extensibility . 20 5.3 Object model structure 20 5.4 Conventions used in tables . 21 6 Resource relationship network model . 22 6.1 Resource relationship network 22 6.2 Resource relationship network attributes . 23 6.3 Resource network connection . 25 6.4 Resource network

20、 connection property . 26 6.5 From resource reference . 26 6.6 From resource reference property . 26 6.7 To resource reference . 27 6.8 To resource reference property . 27 6.9 Resource network connection type 28 6.10 Resource network connection type property 28 7 Work definition model . 30 7.1 Work

21、definition 30 7.2 Work master . 31 7.3 Work directive . 31 7.4 Work definition attributes 32 7.5 Parameter specification . 34 7.6 Personnel specification . 34 7.7 Personnel specification property . 34 7.8 Equipment specification 34 7.9 Equipment specification property 34 7.10 Physical asset specific

22、ation 34 7.11 Physical asset specification property . 35 7.12 Material specification 35 7.13 Material specification property 35 7.14 Workflow specification 35 8 Work schedule and job list models . 43 8.1 Work schedule and job list 43 ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 - 6 - 8.2 Work schedule attributes . 46 8.3

23、 Work request 47 8.4 Job list model 48 8.5 Job list attributes 49 8.6 Job order 49 8.7 Job order parameter 51 8.8 Personnel requirement 51 8.9 Personnel requirement property 51 8.10 Equipment requirement . 51 8.11 Equipment requirement property . 51 8.12 Physical asset requirement . 51 8.13 Physical

24、 asset requirement property . 51 8.14 Material requirement . 51 8.15 Material requirement property . 51 9 Work performance model . 51 9.1 Work performance . 51 9.2 Work performance attributes . 52 9.3 Work response 54 9.4 Job response 56 9.5 Job response data 58 9.6 Personnel actual . 58 9.7 Personn

25、el actual property . 58 9.8 Equipment actual 58 9.9 Equipment actual property 58 9.10 Physical asset actual 58 9.11 Physical asset actual property . 58 9.12 Material actual 59 9.13 Material actual property 59 10 Work capability model 59 10.1 Work capability . 59 10.2 Work capability attributes 59 10

26、.3 Personnel capability 61 10.4 Personnel capability property 61 10.5 Equipment capability . 61 10.6 Equipment capability property . 62 10.7 Physical asset capability . 62 10.8 Physical asset capability property . 62 10.9 Material capability . 62 10.10 Material capability property . 62 11 Work maste

27、r capability model 62 11.1 Work master capability 62 11.2 Work master capability attributes 63 11.3 Personnel capability 65 11.4 Personnel capability property 65 - 7 - ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 11.5 Equipment capability . 65 11.6 Equipment capability property . 65 11.7 Physical asset capability . 65 11

28、.8 Physical asset capability property . 66 11.9 Material capability . 66 11.10 Material capability property . 66 12 KPI model 66 12.1 KPI . 66 13 Work alerts model 66 13.1 Work alert . 66 13.2 Work alert definition 67 13.3 Work alert definition property 67 13.4 Work alert attributes 69 13.5 Work ale

29、rt property . 71 14 Object lists and relationships . 71 15 Compliance 74 Annex A (Informative) Bibliography . 75 Annex B (Informative) Questions and answers about object use 77 Annex C (Informative) Related Standards 81 Annex D (Informative) Representing a Workflow Specification in BPMN 83 Annex E (

30、Informative) Representing a Workflow Specification in flowchart notation . 87 Tables Table 1 UML notation used 20 Table 2 Example table 21 Table 3 Resource relationship network attributes . 25 Table 4 Resource network connection attributes 25 Table 5 Resource network connection property attributes 2

31、6 Table 6 From resource reference attributes 26 Table 7 From resource reference property attributes 27 Table 8 To resource reference attributes 27 Table 9 To resource reference property attributes 28 Table 10 Resource network connection type attributes . 28 Table 11 Resource network connection type

32、property attributes . 30 Table 12 Work definition attributes . 34 Table 13 Workflow specification attributes 39 Table 14 Workflow specification node attributes . 39 Table 15 Workflow specification node property attributes . 39 Table 16 Workflow specification connection attributes 40 Table 17 Workflo

33、w specification connection property attributes 40 Table 18 Workflow specification node type attributes . 42 ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 - 8 - Table 19 Workflow specification node type property attributes . 42 Table 20 Workflow specification connection type attributes 42 Table 21 Workflow specification co

34、nnection property attributes 43 Table 22 Work schedule attributes . 47 Table 23 Work request attributes . 48 Table 24 Job list attributes . 49 Table 25 Job order attributes . 50 Table 26 Work performance attributes 54 Table 27 Work response attributes . 56 Table 28 Job response attributes . 58 Table

35、 29 Work capability attributes 61 Table 30 Work master capability attributes . 65 Table 31 Work alert definition attributes . 67 Table 32 Work alert definition property attributes . 69 Table 33 Work alert attributes 71 Table 34 Work alert property attributes 71 Table 35 Objects and models . 73 Figur

36、es Figure 1 Information exchange models for manufacturing operations management 18 Figure 2 Resource relationship network model . 23 Figure 3 Work definition model . 31 Figure 4 Relationship of work master to work directive . 32 Figure 5 Workflow specification model . 35 Figure 6 Example of a workfl

37、ow specification in BPMN format 36 Figure 7 Example of a workflow specification in flowchart format 37 Figure 8 Work schedule model . 44 Figure 9 Operations schedule for a site 45 Figure 10 Work schedule for an area 45 Figure 11 Work request, job order, job list 46 Figure 12 Work request example for

38、 continuous processing . 46 Figure 13 Work performance model 52 Figure 14 Work capability model 59 Figure 15 Work master capability object model 63 Figure 16 Work alert model 67 Figure 17 Relationship between models . 72 Figure 18 Equipment resources 77 Figure 19 Routing relationship network 78 Figu

39、re 20 Gas main relationship network 78 - 9 - ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 Figure 21 “Usable in” relationship network . 79 Figure 22 Relationship to Part 2 and ISA-88 standards 82 Figure 23 Example of a workflow specification in BPMN notation . 86 Figure 24 Example workflow process in the workflow specific

40、ation model. 86 Figure 25 Example of a workflow specification in flowchart notation . 87 Figure 26 Example workflow process in the workflow specification model. 88 This page intentionally left blank. - 11 - ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 ENTERPRISE-CONTROL SYSTEM INTEGRATION Part 4: Object model attributes

41、for manufacturing operations management integration FOREWORD This is Part 4 of a series of standards that defines the interfaces between enterprise activities and control activities. The scope of this Part 4 standard is limited to defining the details of the interface content within manufacturing op

42、erations management. The scope of this Part 4 standard is limited to the definition of object models and attributes for the information defined in Part 3. The goal is to reduce the effort, cost, and errors associated with implementing these interfaces. The standard may be used to reduce the effort a

43、ssociated with implementing new product offerings. The goal is to have enterprise systems and control systems that interoperate and easily integrate. This publication has been drafted in accordance with the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. Therefore, the first three clauses present the scope of the stand

44、ard, normative references, and definitions, in that order. This page intentionally left blank. - 13 - ANSI/ISA-95.00.04-2012 INTRODUCTION This Part 4 standard further defines the object models and attributes involved in data exchange between the categories and activities defined in ANSI/ISA-95.00.03

45、-2005, Enterprise-Control System Integration - Part 3: Activity Models of Manufacturing Operations Management (hereafter referred to as Part 3). The models and terminology defined in Part 3 and Part 4 a) emphasize good manufacturing operations management integration practices during the entire life

46、cycle of the systems; b) can be used to improve existing integration capability of manufacturing operations management systems; and c) can be applied regardless of the degree of automation. Specifically, the Part 3 and Part 4 standards provide a standard terminology and a consistent set of concepts

47、and models for integrating manufacturing operations management systems that will improve communications between all parties involved. Benefits produced will a) reduce the users time to reach full production levels for new products; b) enable vendors to supply appropriate tools for implementing integ

48、ration of manufacturing operations management systems; c) enable users to better identify their needs; d) reduce the cost of automating manufacturing processes; e) optimize supply chains; and f) reduce life-cycle engineering efforts. The Part 3 and Part 4 standards may be used to reduce the effort a

49、ssociated with implementing new product offerings. The goal is to have manufacturing operations management systems that interoperate and easily integrate. It is not the intent of the standards to a) suggest that there is only one way of implementing integration of manufacturing operations management systems; b) force users to abandon their current way of handling integration; or c) restrict development in the area of integration of manufacturing operations man