ITU-T J 800 1-2008 Cable DHCP Registry (Study Group 9)《有线电视动态主机配置协议(DHCP)注册 研究组9》.pdf

1、 International Telecommunication Union ITU-T J.800.1TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (08/2008) SERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND PROGRAMME AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA SIGNALS Multimedia over IP in cable Cable DHCP Registry Recommendation ITU-T J.800.1 Rec. ITU-T

2、J.800.1 (08/2008) i Recommendation ITU-T J.800.1 Cable DHCP Registry Summary Recommendation ITU-T J.800.1 defines the Cable-specific DHCP option codes for DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 including the DHCPv6 Vendor-specific Information Options. Source Recommendation ITU-T J.800.1 was approved on 22 August 2008 by

3、 ITU-T Study Group 9 (2005-2008) under Recommendation ITU-T A.8 procedure. ii Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) FOREWORD The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in the field of telecommunications, information and communication technologies (ICTs). The ITU

4、Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) is a permanent organ of ITU. ITU-T is responsible for studying technical, operating and tariff questions and issuing Recommendations on them with a view to standardizing telecommunications on a worldwide basis. The World Telecommunication Standardizat

5、ion Assembly (WTSA), which meets every four years, establishes the topics for study by the ITU-T study groups which, in turn, produce Recommendations on these topics. The approval of ITU-T Recommendations is covered by the procedure laid down in WTSA Resolution 1. In some areas of information techno

6、logy which fall within ITU-Ts purview, the necessary standards are prepared on a collaborative basis with ISO and IEC. NOTE In this Recommendation, the expression “Administration“ is used for conciseness to indicate both a telecommunication administration and a recognized operating agency. Complianc

7、e with this Recommendation is voluntary. However, the Recommendation may contain certain mandatory provisions (to ensure e.g. interoperability or applicability) and compliance with the Recommendation is achieved when all of these mandatory provisions are met. The words “shall“ or some other obligato

8、ry language such as “must“ and the negative equivalents are used to express requirements. The use of such words does not suggest that compliance with the Recommendation is required of any party. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ITU draws attention to the possibility that the practice or implementation o

9、f this Recommendation may involve the use of a claimed Intellectual Property Right. ITU takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of claimed Intellectual Property Rights, whether asserted by ITU members or others outside of the Recommendation development process. As of the

10、 date of approval of this Recommendation, ITU had not received notice of intellectual property, protected by patents, which may be required to implement this Recommendation. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information and are therefore strongly urged to con

11、sult the TSB patent database at http:/www.itu.int/ITU-T/ipr/. ITU 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, by any means whatsoever, without the prior written permission of ITU. Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) iii CONTENTS Page 1 Scope 1 2 References. 1 2.1 Normative Refe

12、rences 1 2.2 Informative References 1 2.3 Reference Acquisition 3 3 Abbreviations and acronyms 3 4 DHCPv4 Protocol field values 3 4.1 Cable Values for DHCPv4 Option 43 3 4.2 Cable Values for DHCPv4 Option 60 Vendor Client Identifier. 7 4.3 DHCPv4 Vendor Identifying Vendor Specific Options for DOCSIS

13、 3.0 8 4.4 Cable Specific DHCPv4 Options for Cable Modems with embedded IPCablecom devices . 11 5 DHCPv6 Protocol Field Values 12 5.1 Values for the Cable Project codes. 12 5.2 DHCPv6 CableLabs Vendor Specific Information Option Common Sub-Options 13 5.3 DHCPv6 Cable Vendor-specific Information Opti

14、on: DOCSIS Sub-options. 21 5.4 DHCPv6 Cable Vendor-specific Information Option: IPCablecom Sub-options. 24 5.5 DHCPv6 Cable Vendor Class Option Values 27 Appendix I Standard DHCP Options Used by Cable DHCPv4 Clients (Informative). 28 Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) 1 Recommendation ITU-T J.800.1 Cable

15、DHCP Registry 1 Scope This Recommendation defines the Cable-specific DHCP option codes for DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 including the DHCPv6 Vendor-specific Information Options. The scope of this version of this Recommendation includes: DHCPv4 protocol fields authoritatively assigned by CableLabs that are mand

16、ated for product implementation in eDOCSIS, DOCSIS, IPCable2Home, IPCablecom, and OpenCable specifications. DHCPv6 protocol fields authoritatively assigned by CableLabs that are mandated for product implementation in DOCSIS specifications and in other specifications under development for IPCablecom.

17、 The Cable DHCPv6 options are carried in the DHCPv6 Vendor-specific Information option (option code OPTION_VENDOR_OPTS, Section 22.17 of RFC 3315). The enterprise number for Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. to be used in the DHCPv6 Vendor-specific option, is 4491. The actual product requirements

18、related to the implementation of these DHCP options can be found in relevant ITU-T Recommendations and CableLabs Project specifications. NOTE The structure and content of this Recommendation have been organized for ease of use by those familiar with the original source material; as such, the usual s

19、tyle of ITU-T recommendations has not been applied. 2 References 2.1 Normative References RFC 1035 IETF RFC 1035, Domain Names Implementation and Specification, November 1987. RFC 3315 IETF RFC 3315, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6), July 2003. RFC 3495 IETF RFC 3495, Dynamic Ho

20、st Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option for CableLabs Client Configuration, March 2003. RFC 3594 IETF RFC 3594, PacketCable Security Ticket Control Sub-Option for the DHCP CableLabs Client Configuration (CCC) Option, September 2003. 2.2 Informative References This Recommendation uses the following i

21、nformative references. ANSI/SCTE 22-1 ANSI/SCTE 22-1, Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specification, DOCSIS 1.0 Part 1: Radio Frequency Interface (RFI), 2002. ANSI/SCTE 23-1 ANSI/SCTE 23-1, Data-Over-Cable Systems, Radio Frequency Interface Specification 1.1. CANN Recommendation ITU-T J.800.0, Cab

22、le Assigned Names and Numbers. CH 1.0 Recommendation ITU-T J.191, IP feature package to enhance cable modems. 2 Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) CH 1.1 Recommendation ITU-T J.192, A residential gateway to support the delivery of cable data services. eDOCSIS Recommendation ITU-T J.126, Embedded Cable Mod

23、em device specification. eRouter Recommendation ITU-T J.218, Cable modem IPv4 and IPv6 eRouter specification. EUE-PROV Recommendation ITU-T J.369, E-UE Provisioning Framework. MIB-CLABDEF Recommendation ITU-T J.800.2, Cable Definition MIB Specification. MULPIv3.0 Recommendation ITU-T J.222.2, Third-

24、generation transmission systems for interactive cable television services IP cable modems: MAC and Upper Layer protocols. OC-HOST 2.0 OpenCable Host Device 2.0 Core Functional Requirements, OC-SP-HOST2.0-CFR-C01-071113, November 13, 2007, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. PROV PacketCable MTA Devi

25、ce Provisioning Specification, PKT-SP-PROV-C01-071129, November 29, 2007, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. PROV 1.5 Recommendation ITU-T J.167, Media terminal adapter (MTA) device provisioning requirements for the delivery of real-time services over cable television networks using cable modems. R

26、FC 868 IETF RFC 868/STD0026, Time Protocol, May 1983. RFC 2131 IETF RFC 2131, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol, March 1997. RFC 2132 IETF RFC 2132, DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions, March 1997. RFC 3046 IETF RFC 3046, DHCP Relay Agent Information Option, January 2001. RFC 3256 IETF RFC 32

27、56, The DOCSIS (Data-Over-Cable Service Interface Specifications) Device Class DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) Relay Agent Information Sub-option, April 2002. RFC 3634 IETF RFC 3634, Key Distribution Center (KDC) Server Address Sub-option for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)

28、 CableLabs Client Configuration (CCC) Option, December 2003. RFC 3925 IETF RFC 3925, Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4), October 2004. RFC 3993 IETF RFC 3993, Subscriber-ID Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Ag

29、ent Option, March 2005. RFC 4014 IETF RFC 4014, Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) Attributes Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Information Option, February 2005. RFC 4243 IETF RFC 4243, Vendor-Specific Information Suboption for the Dynamic Hos

30、t Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option, December 2005. RFC 4361 IETF RFC 4361, Node-specific Client Identifiers for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Version Four (DHCPv4), February 2006. RFC 4580 IETF RFC 4580, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscrib

31、er-ID Option, June 2006. Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) 3 RFIv2.0 Recommendation ITU-T J.122, Second-generation transmission systems for interactive cable television services IP cable modems. 2.3 Reference Acquisition Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., 858 Coal Creek Circle, Louisville, CO 80027, Ph

32、one +1-303-661-9100; Fax +1-303-661-9199; http:/. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Secretariat, 46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166, Phone +1-571-434-3500, Fax +1-571-434-3535, http:/www.ietf.org. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), http:/www.iana.org. 3 Abbreviations and acrony

33、ms This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms. DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol eCM Embedded Cable Modem eSAFE Embedded Service/Application Functional Entity OUI Organizationally Unique Identifier TSP Telephony Service Provider 4 DHCPv4 Protocol field values 4.1 Cable

34、Values for DHCPv4 Option 43 Several Cable industry Recommendations and specifications mandate implementation of DHCPv4 option 43 by the DHCP client function of consumer premises equipment devices, to convey to the cable operators provisioning system information about the product that can be used to

35、make device and service configuration decisions during the provisioning process. The DHCPv4 Option 43 sub-options code values for all Cable projects for DHCPv4 are listed in Table 1. Also see DHCPv4 Option 43 Syntax Requirements in eDOCSIS. The “used in“ column includes the specifications where thes

36、e values are used and they contain the normative requirements. This table is intended to define the values but the normative use of these values is not part of this Recommendation. 4 Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) Table 1 CableLabs DHCPv4 Option 43 Sub-options DHCP Option 43 Value Description Used in

37、Sub-option 1 The request sub-option vector is a list of sub-options (within option 43) to be returned to client by the server upon reply to the request. None defined. Sub-option 2 Device type of the component making the DHCP request. For a DOCSIS cable modem: “ECM“= embedded Cable Modem (as specifie

38、d by DOCSIS 1.0, 1.1, or 2.0 Base Specifications) For an IPCablecom E-MTA: “EMTA“ = embedded Multimedia Telephone Adapter (as specified in IPCablecom 1.0 and 1.5 MTA Device Provisioning Specifications) For IPCable2home PS: “EPS“ = Embedded Portal Services or “SPS“ = Stand-alone Portal Services For a

39、n OpenCable Host: “ESTB“ For an OpenCable CableCARD: “CARD“ For an eRouter: “EROUTER“ DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 eRouter Sub-option 3 “ECM: “ Colon-separated list of eCM and eSAFE(s) contained in the complete eDOCSIS device. First on t

40、he list shall be “ECM“ for eCM. can be “EMTA“, “EPS“, “ESTB“ or “EROUTER“ corresponding to embedded MTA, embedded Portal Service Element, and embedded STB, respectively. For example: “ECM:EMTA“ = An IPCablecom Embedded MTA “ECM:EPS“ = An IPCable2home Embedded Portal Services Element “ECM:ESTB“ = An

41、Embedded STB “ECM:EMTA:EPS“ = An Embedded MTA and Embedded Portal Services Element “ECM:ESTB:CARD“ Indicates that a Cable Card is making a request via the eCMs DOCSIS return channel “ECM:EROUTER“ = An embedded Router for DOCSIS DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Hos

42、t 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 eRouter Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) 5 Table 1 CableLabs DHCPv4 Option 43 Sub-options DHCP Option 43 Value Description Used in Sub-option 4 “ Device serial number as in the MIB object docsDevSerialNumber, e.g., “123456“ For OpenCable CableCARD, the serial number of the card. If S

43、erial Number is not available, then other unique identifier (other than MAC Address) may be utilized. DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 Sub-option 5 “ Hardware version number. Identical to value as reported in the field in the MIB object sysD

44、escr. e.g., “v.3.2.1“ DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 Sub-option 6 “ Software version number. Identical to value as reported in the field in the MIB object sysDescr. e.g., “v.1.0.2“ DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.

45、1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 Sub-option 7 “ Boot ROM version. Identical to value as reported in the field in the MIB object sysDescr. e.g., “Bv4.5.6“ DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 Sub-option 8 “ A 6-octet, hexadecimal-encoded, vendor

46、-specific Organizationally Unique Identifier (OUI) DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 Sub-option 9 “ Device model number. Identical to value as reported in the field in the MIB object sysDescr. e.g., “T3000“ DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/

47、1.5 IPCable2home 1.0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 CableCARD 2.0 Sub-option 10 “ Vendor name or ID. Identical to value as reported in the field in the MIB object sysDescr. e.g., “XYZ Corp“ Not used for OpenCable CableCARD. Sub-option 51 is used instead. DOCSIS 1.1/2.0/3.0* IPCablecom 1.0/1.5 IPCable2home 1.

48、0/1.1OpenCable Host 2.0 6 Rec. ITU-T J.800.1 (08/2008) Table 1 CableLabs DHCPv4 Option 43 Sub-options DHCP Option 43 Value Description Used in Sub-options 11 to 127 Reserved for CableLabs Sub-options 1114 IPCable2home Sub-option 11 PS WAN-Man (0x01) PS WAN-Data (0x02) Identifies that an address is b

49、eing requested in the IPCable2home Portal Services WAN Management realm. Identifies that an address is being requested in the IPCable2home Portal Services WAN-Data realm IPCable2home 1.0/1.1Sub-option 12 “ CM/PS System Description from sysDescr IPCable2home 1.0/1.1Sub-option 13 “ CM/PS Firmware Revision from docsDevSwCurrentVers IPCable2home 1.0/1.1Sub-option 14 “ Firewall Policy File Version from cabhSec2FirewallPolicyCurrentVersion IPCable2